Time course of infarct healing and left ventricular remodelling in patients with reperfused ST segment elevation myocardial infarction using comprehensive magnetic resonance imaging
- 352 Downloads
To describe the time course of myocardial infarct (MI) healing and left ventricular (LV) remodelling and to assess factors predicting LV remodelling using cardiac MRI.
In 58 successfully reperfused MI patients, MRI was performed at baseline, 4 months (4M), and 1 year (1Y) post MI
Infarct size decreased between baseline and 4M (p < 0.001), but not at 1Y; i.e. 18 ± 11%, 12 ± 8%, 11 ± 6% of LV mass respectively; this was associated with LV mass reduction. Infarct and adjacent wall thinning was found at 4M, whereas significant remote wall thinning was measured at 1Y. LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes significantly increased at 1Y, p < 0.05 at 1Y vs. baseline and vs. 4M; this was associated with increased LV sphericity index. No regional or global LV functional improvement was found at follow-up. Baseline infarct size was the strongest predictor of adverse LV remodelling.
Infarct healing, with shrinkage of infarcted myocardium and wall thinning, occurs early post-MI as reflected by loss in LV mass and adjacent myocardial remodelling. Longer follow-up demonstrates ongoing remote myocardial and ventricular remodelling. Infarct size at baseline predicts long-term LV remodelling and represents an important parameter for tailoring future post-MI pharmacological therapies designed to prevent heart failure.
KeywordsMyocardial infarction Magnetic resonance Imaging Left ventricular function Remodelling Myocardium
This study was partially funded by FWO grant G.06113.09
- 2.St John Sutton M, Pfeffer MA, Plappert T, Rouleau JL, Moyé LA, Dagenais GR, Lamas GA, Klein M, Sussex B, Goldman S (1994) Quantitative two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements are major predictors of adverse cardiovascular events after acute myocardial infarction. The protective effects of captopril. Circulation 89:68–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Bonaduce D, Petretta M, Morgano G, Villari B, Bianchi V, Conforti G, Salemme L, Themistoclakis S, Pulcino A (1994) Left ventricular remodeling in the year after myocardial infarction: an echocardiographic, haemodynamic, and radionuclide angiographic study. Coron Artery Dis 5:155–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Pfeffer MA, McMurray JJ, Velazquez EJ, Rouleau JL, Køber L, Maggioni AP, Solomon SD, Swedberg K, Van de Werf F, White H, Leimberger JD, Henis M, Edwards S, Zelenkofske S, Sellers MA, Califf RM (2003) Valsartan, captopril, or both in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both. N Engl J Med 349:1893–1906PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Baks T, van Geuns RJ, Biagini E, Wielopolski P, Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van der Giessen WJ, Krestin GP, Serruys PW, Duncker DJ, de Feyter PJ (2006) Effects of primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction on early and late infarct size and left ventricular wall characteristics. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:40–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Ripa RS, Nilsson JC, Wang Y, Søndergaard L, Jørgensen E, Kastrup J (2007) Short- and long-term changes in myocardial function, morphology, edema, and infarct mass after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction evaluated by serial magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J 154:929–936PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Wu E, Ortiz JT, Wu E, Ortiz JT, Tejedor P, Lee DC, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Kansal P, Carr JC, Holly TA, Lloyd-Jones D, Klocke FJ, Bonow RO (2008) Infarct size by contrast enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance is a stronger predictor of outcomes than left ventricular ejection fraction or end-systolic volume index: prospective cohort study. Heart 94:730–736PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Engblom H, Hedström E, Heiberg E, Wagner GS, Pahlm O, Arheden H (2009) Rapid initial reduction of hyperenhanced myocardium after reperfused first myocardial infarction suggests recovery of the peri-infarction zone: one-year follow-up by MRI. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2:47–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Petersen SE, Selvanayagam JB, Francis JM, Myerson SG, Wiesmann F, Robson MD, Östman-Smith I, Casadei B, Watkins H, Neubauer S (2005) Differentiation of athlete’s heart from pathological forms of cardiac hypertrophy by means of geometric indices derived from cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 7:551–558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Fieno DS, Hillenbrand HB, Rehwald WG, Harris KR, Decker RS, Parker MA, Klocke FJ, Kim RJ, Judd RM (2004) Infarct resorption, compensatory hypertrophy, and differing patterns of ventricular remodeling following myocardial infarctions of varying size. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:2124–2131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Bogaert J, Bosmans H, Maes A, Suetens P, Marchal G, Rademakers FE (2000) Remote myocardial dysfunction after acute anterior myocardial infarction: impact of left ventricular shape on regional function: a magnetic resonance myocardial tagging study. J Am Coll Cardiol 35:1525–1534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Baks T, van Geuns RJ, Biagini E, Wielopolski P, Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Boersma E, van der Giessen WJ, Krestin GP, Duncker DJ, Serruys PW, de Feyter PJ (2005) Recovery of left ventricular function after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 26:1070–1077PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar