The diagnostic accuracy of acetabular labral tears using magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrography: a meta-analysis
- 1.3k Downloads
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) have been advocated for the diagnosis of acetabular labral tears. The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of MRI and MRA in diagnosing acetabular labral tears using meta-analysis.
Pertinent published and unpublished literature databases were reviewed. A two-by-two table was constructed to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of MRI or MRA investigations against surgical outcomes. Pooled sensitivity and specificity and Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (ROC) evaluations were performed. Methodological quality of each study was assessed using the QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) tool.
Nineteen papers assessing 881 hips were reviewed. Conventional MRI was assessed in 13 studies and MRA was assessed in 16 studies. Whilst both MRI (0.5–3T) and MRA (0.5–3T) presented with a moderate sensitivity and specificity (sensitivity 66%, 87%; specificity 79%, 64%), diagnostic accuracy of MRA appeared to be superior to MRI in detecting acetabular labral tears on ROC curve interpretation. The literature poorly described population characteristics, assessor blinding, with limited sample sizes.
MRI and MRA may be useful adjuncts in the diagnosis of acetabular labral tears in adults. MRA appears to be superior to conventional MRI.
KeywordsAcetabular labral tear Magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic resonance arthrography Hip arthroscopy Systematic review Meta-analysis
We thank the Sir Thomas Browne Library at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital for their assistance in obtaining the texts that formed the basis of this review.
Conflict of Interests
- 1.Drake RL, Vogl AW, Mitchell AWM (2010) Gray’s anatomy for students, 2nd edn. Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 3.Petersen W, Petersen F, Tillmann B (2003) Structure and vascularization of the acetabular labrum with regard to the pathogenesis and healing of labral lesions. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 11:403–408Google Scholar
- 7.Petersilge CA, Haque MA, Petersilge WJ, Lewin JS, Lieberman JM, Buly R (1996) Acetabular labral tears: evaluation with MR arthrography. Radiology 2000:231–235Google Scholar
- 16.Philippon MJ, Martin RR, Kelly BT (1995) A classification system for labral tears of the hip. Arthroscopy 21(Suppl):e36Google Scholar
- 17.Ikeda T, Awaya G, Suzuki S, Okada Y, Tada H (1988) Torn acetabular labrum in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg 70-B:13–16Google Scholar
- 27.Klaue K, Durnin CW, Ganz R (1991) The acetabular rim syndrome. A clinical presentation of dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 73-B:423–429Google Scholar
- 36.Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Dinnes J, Reitsma J, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J (2004) Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies. Health Technol Assess 8:1–234Google Scholar
- 39.Deeks JJ (2001) Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. In: Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG (eds) Systematic reviews in healthcare: meta-analysis in context. BMJ Publishing Groups, London, pp 248–284Google Scholar
- 40.Edwards DJ, Lomas D, Villar RN (1995) Diagnosis of the painful hip by magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg 77-B:374–376Google Scholar