European Radiology

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 188–196 | Cite as

Ultra-high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the detection of prostate cancer: evaluation in 201 cases with histopathological correlation

  • Kazuhiro Katahira
  • Taro Takahara
  • Thomas C. Kwee
  • Seitaro Oda
  • Yasuko Suzuki
  • Shoji Morishita
  • Kosuke Kitani
  • Yasuyuki Hamada
  • Mitsuhiko Kitaoka
  • Yasuyuki Yamashita
Urogenital

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (DWI) for prostate cancer detection, using different b-values.

Methods

A total of 201 patients who underwent MR imaging before total prostatectomy were evaluated. MR images were independently assessed by three radiologists. Three combinations of sequences were separately evaluated, as follows: group 1 [T2-weighted images (T2WI) alone], group 2 (T2WI and DWI with a b-value of 1,000 s/mm2), group 3 (T2WI and DWI with a b-value of 2,000 s/mm2). Whole-mount-section histopathological examination was the reference standard. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) and diagnostic performance parameters were determined.

Results

The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for the detection of prostate cancer were as follows: 52.2%, 80.7%, and 0.694 in group 1; 61.2%, 82.6%, and 0.755 in group 2; 73.2%, 89.7%, and 0.842 in group 3. Group 3 achieved the highest diagnostic performance, followed by group 2 (P < 0.05). In the transition zone, the specificity was lower (P < 0.001) for group 2 (82.2%) than for group 1 (86.2%).

Conclusion

The addition of diffusion-weighted images with a b-value of 2,000 s/mm2 to T2WI can improve the diagnostic performance of MR imaging in prostate cancer detection.

Keywords

Prostate cancer Diffusion-weighted imaging Ultra-high b-value MRI Histopathological correlation 

References

  1. 1.
    Buckley DL, Roberts C, Parker GJM, Logue JP, Hutchnson CE (2004) Prostate cancer: evaluation of vascular characteristics with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging-initial experience. Radiology 233:709–715CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Engelbrecht MR, Huisman HF, Laheiji RJF et al (2003) Discrimination of prostate cancer from normal peripheral zone and central gland tissue by using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 229:248–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Turnbull LW, Buckley DL, Turnbull LS, Liney GP, Knowles AJ (1999) Differentiation of prostatic carcinoma and benign prostatic hyperplasia:correlation between dynamic Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging and histopathology. J Magn Reson Imaging 9:311–316CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim JK, Hong SS, Choi YJ et al (2005) Wash-in rate on the basis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: usefulness for prostate cancer detection and localization. J Magn Reson Imaging 22:639–646CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li H, Sugimura K, Kaji Y et al (2006) Conventional MRI capabilities in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in the transition zone. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:729–742CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lim HK, Kim JK, Kim KA, Cho KS (2009) Prostate cancer: apparent diffusion coefficient map with T2-weighted images for detection—a multireader study. Radiology 250:145–151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tanimoto A, Nakashima J, Kohno H et al (2007) Prostate cancer screening: the clinical value of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:146–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shimofusa R, Fujimoto H, Akamata H et al (2005) Diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:149–153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hosseinzadah K, Schwarz S (2004) Endorectal diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer to differentiate malignant and benign peripheral zone tissue. J Magn Reson Imaging 20:654–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim CK, Par BK, Lee HM, Kwon GY (2007) Value of diffusion-weighted imaging for the prediction of prostate cancer location at 3 T using a phased-array coil. Invest Radiol 42:842–847CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim JH, Kim JK, Par BW, Kim N, Cho KS (2008) Apparent diffusion coefficient: prostate cancer versus noncancerous tissue according to anatomical region. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:1173–1179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim CK, Par BK, Han JJ, Kang TW, Lee HM (2007) Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate at 3 T for differentiation of malignant and benign tissue in transition and peripheral zones: preliminary results. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:449–454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lichy MP, Aschoff P, Plathow C et al (2007) Tumor detection by diffusion-weighted MRI and ADC-mapping- initial clinical experiences in comparison to PET-CT. Invest Radiol 42:605–613CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Takahara T, Imai Y, Yamashita T, Yasuda S, Nasu S, Van Cauteren M (2004) Diffusion weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS): technical improvement using free breathing, STIR and high resolution 3D display. Radiat Med 22:275–282PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ichikawa T, Erturk SM, Motosugi U et al (2006) High-b-value diffusion-weighted MRI in colorectal cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:181–184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ichikawa T, Erturk SM, Motosugi U et al (2007) High-b-value diffusion-weighted MRI for detecting pancreatic adenocarcinoma: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:409–414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hricak H, Choyke PL, Eberhardt SC, Leibel S, Scardino PT (2007) Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective. Radiology 243:28–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yu KK, Scheidler J, Hricak H et al (1999) Prostate cancer: prediction of extracapusular extension with endorectal MR imaging and three-dimentional proton MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 213:481–488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bloch BN, Furman-Haran E, Helbich TH (2007) Prostate cancer: accurate determination of extracapsular extension with high-spatial-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR imaging—initial results. Radiology 245:176–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang L, Mullerad M, Chen H et al (2004) Prostate cancer: incremental value of endorectal MR imaging findings for prediction of extracapsular extension. Radiology 232:133–139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sala E, Akin O, Moskowitz C et al (2006) Endorectal MR imaging in the evaluation of seminar vesicle invastion: diagnostic accuracy and multivariate feature analysis. Radiology 238:929–937CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang L, Hricak H, Kattan M et al (2007) Prediction of seminar vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: incremental value of adding endorectal MR imaging to the Kattan nomogram. Radiology 242:182–188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schiebler ML, Tomaszewski JE, Bezzi M et al (1989) Prostatic carcinoma and benign prostatic hyperplasia: correlation of high-resolution MR and histopathologic findings. Radiology 172:131–137PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Turnbull LW, Buckley DL, Turnbull LS, Liney GP, Knowles AJ (1999) Differentiation of prostatic carcinoma and benign prostatic hyperplasia: correlation between dynamic Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging and histopathology. J Magn Reson Imaging 9:311–316CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim CK, Park BK, Kim B (2010) High-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 T to detect prostate cancer: comparisons between b values of 1,000 and 2,000 s/mm2. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:W33–W37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roehl KA, Anterior JAV, Catalona WJ (2002) Serial biopsy results in prostate cancer screening study. J Urol 167:2435–2439CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wefer AE, Hricak H, Vigneron DB et al (2000) Sextant localization of prostate cancer: comparison of sextant biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectoroscopic imaging with step section histology. J Urol 164:400–404CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Haider MA, van der Kwast TH, Tanguay J et al (2007) Combined T2-Weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for Localization of prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:323–328CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kazuhiro Katahira
    • 1
  • Taro Takahara
    • 2
  • Thomas C. Kwee
    • 2
  • Seitaro Oda
    • 1
  • Yasuko Suzuki
    • 1
  • Shoji Morishita
    • 1
  • Kosuke Kitani
    • 3
  • Yasuyuki Hamada
    • 3
  • Mitsuhiko Kitaoka
    • 4
  • Yasuyuki Yamashita
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyKumamoto Chuo HospitalKumamotoJapan
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of UrologyKumamoto Chuo HospitalKumamotoJapan
  4. 4.Department of PathologyKumamoto Chuo HospitalKumamotoJapan
  5. 5.Department of RadiologyUniversity of KumamotoKumamotoJapan

Personalised recommendations