European Radiology

, Volume 20, Issue 10, pp 2341–2347 | Cite as

Single breath-hold magnetic resonance cine imaging for fast assessment of global and regional left ventricular function in clinical routine

  • Kai Nassenstein
  • Holger Eberle
  • Stefan Maderwald
  • Christoph J. Jensen
  • Christina Heilmaier
  • Thomas Schlosser
  • Oliver Bruder
Cardiac

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate a TGRAPPA (temporal parallel acquisition technique)-accelerated, single breath-hold multi-slice cine imaging approach for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) function.

Methods:

One hundred eleven patients were examined at 1.5 T. Cine imaging was performed with single-slice breath-hold acquisitions in short-axis orientation using a SSFP (TR 2.63 ms, TE 1.12 ms, FA 72°) sequence and a TGRAPPA SSFP (TR 2.66 ms, TE 1.11 ms, FA 72°, AF 3) sequence, which covered the entire LV in multiple short-axis slices during a single breath-hold. End-diastolic (EDV), end-systolic (ESV), stroke volumes (SV), ejection fraction (EF), muscle mass (MM) and regional wall motion were assessed for both data sets.

Results:

Single breath-hold imaging was feasible in 108 patients. Excellent correlations were observed for all volumetric parameters derived from both data sets (all r > 0.97). While EDV and ESV showed marginally lower values for single breath-hold imaging (EDV: −1.6 ± 7.9 ml; ESV: −1.8 ± 6.0 ml, p < 0.05), no differences were observed for SV, EF, MM and regional wall motion assessment. Single breath-hold imaging required significant shorter acquisition times (28 ± 6 s vs. 335 ± 87 s).

Conclusion:

TGRAPPA-accelerated multi-slice SSPF imaging allows for fast and accurate assessment of regional and global LV function within a single breath-hold.

Keywords

Cine magnetic resonace imaging Parallel imaging TGRAPPA Cardiac volume Left ventricular function 

References

  1. 1.
    Higgins CB (1992) Which standard has the gold? J Am Coll Cardiol 19:1608–1609CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bellenger NG, Marcus NJ, Rajappan K, Yacoub M, Banner NR, Pennell DJ (2002) Comparison of techniques for the measurement of left ventricular function following cardiac transplantation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 4:255–263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Niendorf T, Sodickson DK (2008) Highly accelerated cardiovascular MR imaging using many channel technology: concepts and clinical applications. Eur Radiol 18:87–102. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0692-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P (1999) SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 42:952–962CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wintersperger BJ, Reeder SB, Nikolaou K, Dietrich O, Huber A, Greiser A, Lanz T, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO (2006) Cardiac CINE MR imaging with a 32-channel cardiac coil and parallel imaging: impact of acceleration factors on image quality and volumetric accuracy. J Magn Reson Imaging 23:222–227. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20484 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wintersperger BJ, Sincleair S, Runge VM, Dietrich O, Huber A, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO (2007) Dual breath-hold magnetic resonance cine evaluation of global and regional cardiac function. Eur Radiol 17:73–80. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0259-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Breuer FA, Kellman P, Griswold MA, Jakob PM (2005) Dynamic autocalibrated parallel imaging using temporal GRAPPA (TGRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 53:981–985. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20430 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, Pennell DJ, Rumberger JA, Ryan T, Verani MS (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105:539–542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Passing H, Bablok (1983) A new biometrical procedure for testing the equality of measurements from two different analytical methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry, Part I. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 21:709–720Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hogan MC, Petersen SE, Hudsmith LE, Francis JM, Neubauer S, Robson MD (2007) Effects of steady state free precession parameters on cardiac mass, function, and volumes. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 23:583–589. doi: 10.1007/s10554-006-9191-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barkhausen J, Goyen M, Ruhm SG, Eggebrecht H, Debatin JF, Ladd ME (2002) Assessment of ventricular function with single breath-hold real-time steady-state free precession cine MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:731–735PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davis CP, McKinnon GC, Debatin JF, Wetter D, Eichenberger AC, Duewell S, von Schulthess GK (1994) Normal heart: evaluation with echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 191:691–696PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bornstedt A, Nagel E, Schalla S, Schnackenburg B, Klein C, Fleck E (2001) Multi-slice dynamic imaging: complete functional cardiac MR examination within 15 seconds. J Magn Reson Imaging 14:300–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maredia N, Kozerke S, Larghat A, Abidin N, Greenwood JP, Boesiger P, Plein S (2008) Measurement of left ventricular dimensions with contrast-enhanced three-dimensional cine imaging facilitated by k-t SENSE. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 10:27. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-10-27 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Heilmaier C, Nassenstein K, Nielles-Vallespin S, Zuehlsdorff S, Hunold P, Barkhausen J (2009) Assessment of left ventricular function with single breath-hold highly accelerated cine MRI combined with guide-point modeling. Eur J Radiol. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.03.028 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eberle HC, Nassenstein K, Jensen CJ, Schlosser T, Sabin GV, Naber CK, Bruder O (2010) Rapid MR assessment of left ventricular systolic function after acute myocardial infarction using single breath-hold cine imaging with the temporal parallel acquisition technique (TPAT) and 4D guide-point modelling analysis of left ventricular function. Eur Radiol 20:73–80. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1522-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Young AA, Cowan BR, Schoenberg SO, Wintersperger BJ (2008) Feasibility of single breath-hold left ventricular function with 3 Tesla TSENSE acquisition and 3D modeling analysis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 10:24. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-10-24 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chandler AG, Pinder RJ, Netsch T, Schnabel JA, Hawkes DJ, Hill DL, Razavi R (2008) Correction of misaligned slices in multi-slice cardiovascular magnetic resonance using slice-to-volume registration. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 10:13. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-10-13 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Semelka RC, Tomei E, Wagner S, Mayo J, Caputo G, O'Sullivan M, Parmley WW, Chatterjee K, Wolfe C, Higgins CB (1990) Interstudy reproducibility of dimensional and functional measurements between cine magnetic resonance studies in the morphologically abnormal left ventricle. Am Heart J 119:1367–1373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moon JC, Lorenz CH, Francis JM, Smith GC, Pennell DJ (2002) Breath-hold FLASH and FISP cardiovascular MR imaging: left ventricular volume differences and reproducibility. Radiology 223:789–797CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kellman P, McVeigh ER (2005) Image reconstruction in SNR units: a general method for SNR measurement. Magn Reson Med 54:1439–1447. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20713 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hunold P, Maderwald S, Ladd ME, Jellus V, Barkhausen J (2004) Parallel acquisition techniques in cardiac cine magnetic resonance imaging using TrueFISP sequences: comparison of image quality and artifacts. J Magn Reson Imaging 20:506–511. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20125 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kai Nassenstein
    • 1
  • Holger Eberle
    • 2
  • Stefan Maderwald
    • 1
    • 3
  • Christoph J. Jensen
    • 2
  • Christina Heilmaier
    • 1
  • Thomas Schlosser
    • 1
  • Oliver Bruder
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and NeuroradiologyUniversity Hospital EssenEssenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Cardiology and AngiologyElisabeth Hospital EssenEssenGermany
  3. 3.Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance ImagingUniversity Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany

Personalised recommendations