Estimation of tissue perfusion by dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging: simulation-based evaluation of the steepest slope method
Tissue perfusion is frequently determined from dynamic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI image series by means of the steepest slope method. It was thus the aim of this study to systematically evaluate the reliability of this analysis method on the basis of simulated tissue curves.
9600 tissue curves were simulated for four noise levels, three sampling intervals and a wide range of physiological parameters using an axially distributed reference model and subsequently analysed by the steepest slope method.
Perfusion is systematically underestimated with errors becoming larger with increasing perfusion and decreasing intravascular volume. For curves sampled after rapid contrast injection with a temporal resolution of 0.72 s, the bias was less than 23% when the mean residence time of tracer molecules in the intravascular distribution space was greater than 6 s. Increasing the sampling interval and the noise level substantially reduces the accuracy and precision of estimates, respectively.
The steepest slope method allows absolute quantification of tissue perfusion in a computationally simple and numerically robust manner. The achievable degree of accuracy and precision is considered to be adequate for most clinical applications.
KeywordsDynamic-contrast-enhanced imaging Steepest slope method Tissue perfusion Microcirculation Tracer kinetic modelling CT MRI
This work as supported in part by the German ‘Competence Alliance on Radiation Research’ (BMBF 03NUK008F)
- 3.Brix G, Griebel J, Kiessling F, Wenz F (2010) Tracer-kinetic modeling of tumor angiogenesis based on dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MRI measurements. Eur J Nucl Mol Imaging. doi: 10.1007/s00259-010-1448-7
- 13.Kiessling F, Boese J, Corvinus C, Ederle JR, Zuna I, Schoenberg SO, Brix G, Schmähl A, Tuengerthal S, Herth F, Kauczor HU, Essig M (2004) Perfusion CT in patients with advanced bronchial carcinomas: a novel chance for characterization and treatment monitoring? Eur Radiol 14:1226–1233PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.De Vries AF, Griebel J, Kremser C, Judmaier W, Gneiting T, Kreczy A, Ofner D, Pfeiffer KP, Brix G, Lukas P (2001) Tumor microcirculation evaluated by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging predicts therapy outcome for primary rectal carcinoma. Cancer Res 61:2513–2516Google Scholar
- 16.Palmowski M, Schifferdecker I, Zwick S, Macher-Goeppinger S, Laue H, Haferkamp A, Kauczor HU, Kiessling F, Hallscheidt P (2009) Tumor perfusion assessed by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI correlates to the grading of renal cell carcinoma: Initial results. Eur J Radiol; in press. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.042
- 17.Bassingthwaighte JB, Goresky CA (1984) Modeling in the analysis of solute and water exchange in the microvasculature. In: Renkin EM, Michel CC, Geiger SR (eds) Handbook of physiology. section 2. The cardiovascular system. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, pp 549–626Google Scholar
- 20.Witzleb E (1997) Funktionen des Gefäßsystems. In: Schmidt RF, Thews G (eds) Physiologie des Menschen, 23rd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelbeg, New York, pp 505–572Google Scholar
- 22.Zwick S, Brix G, Tofts P, Strecker R, Kopp-Schneider A, Laue H, Semmler W, Kiessling F (2009) Simulation-based comparison of two approaches frequently used for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur Radiol, in press 10.1007/s00330-009-1556-6
- 30.Imanishi Y, Fukui A, Niimi H, Itoh D, Nozaki K, Nakaji S, Ishizuka K, Tabata H, Furuya Y, Uzura M, Takahama H, Hashizume S, Arima S, Nakajima Y (2005) Radiation-induced temporary hair loss as a radiation damage only occurring in patients who had the combination of MDCT and DSA. Eur Radiol 15:41–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar