Evidence-based radiology: why and how?
- 702 Downloads
To provide an overview of evidence-based medicine (EBM) in relation to radiology and to define a policy for adoption of this principle in the European radiological community.
Starting from Sackett’s definition of EBM we illustrate the top-down and bottom-up approaches to EBM as well as EBM’s limitations. Delayed diffusion and peculiar features of evidence-based radiology (EBR) are defined with emphasis on the need to shift from the demonstration of the increasing ability to see more and better, to the demonstration of a significant change in treatment planning or, at best, of a significant gain in patient outcome. The “as low as reasonably achievable” (ALARA) principle is thought as a dimension of EBR while EBR is proposed as part of the core curriculum of radiology residency. Moreover, we describe the process of health technology assessment in radiology with reference to the six-level scale of hierarchy of studies on diagnostic tests, the main sources of bias in studies on diagnostic performance, and levels of evidence and degrees of recommendations according to the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (Oxford, UK) as well as the approach proposed by the GRADE working group. Problems and opportunities offered by evidence-based guidelines in radiology are considered. Finally, we suggest nine points to be actioned by the ESR in order to promote EBR.
Radiology will benefit greatly from the improvement in practice that will result from adopting this more rigorous approach to all aspects of our work.
KeywordsEvidence-based medicine Evidence-based radiology ALARA Health technology assessment Degrees of recommendations
We sincerely thank Professor Yves Menu (Department of Radiology, Saint Antoine Hospital, Paris) for his suggestions regarding the subsection “EBR at the ECR”.
- 3.Greenhalgh T (2006) How to read a paper. The basics of evidence-based medicine, 3rd edn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp ix–xiiGoogle Scholar
- 4.Greenhalgh T (2006) How to read a paper. The basics of evidence-based medicine, 3rd edn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 1–3Google Scholar
- 5.Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (2008) http://cebm.net. Accessed 24 Feb 2008
- 7.Hunink MGM, Glasziou PP, Siegel JE, Weeks JC, Pliskin JS, Elstein AS, Weinstein MC (2001) Decision making in health and medicine: integrating evidence and values. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
- 12.Trinder L (2000) A critical appraisal of evidence-based practice. In: Trinder L, Reynolds S (eds) Evidence-based practice: a critical appraisal. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 212–214Google Scholar
- 17.No authors listed (1997) Routine ultrasound imaging in pregnancy: how evidence-based are the guidelines? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 13:475–477Google Scholar
- 18.No authors listed (1997) Reports from the British Columbia Office of Health Technology Assessment (BCOHTA). Routine ultrasound imaging in pregnancy: how evidence-based are the guidelines? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 13:633–637Google Scholar
- 38.Medina LS, Blackmore CC (2006) Evidence-based imaging, 1st edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 40.Royal College of Radiologists Working Party (1998) Making the best use of a department of clinical radiology: guidelines for doctors, 4th edn. The Royal College of Radiologists, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 41.No authors listed (2004) Proceedings of the second ALARA conference. February 28, 2004. Houston, Texas, USA. Pediatr Radiol 34(Suppl 3):S162–S246Google Scholar
- 44.Council of the European Union (1997) Council Directive 97/43/Euratom of 30 June 1997 on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionizing radiation in relation with medical exposure, and repealing Directive 84/466/Euratom. J Eur Commun L 180:22–27 (http://europa.eu.int/eurlex/en/dat/1997/en_397L0043.htlm)Google Scholar
- 46.FDA Radiological Health Program (2008) Available via: http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/radhealth/index.html. Accessed 24 Feb 2008
- 47.White SJ, Ashby D, Brown PJ (2000) An introduction to statistical methods for health technology assessment. Health Technol Assess 4(i–iv):1–59Google Scholar
- 57.Ouwendijk R, de Vries M, Stijnen T, from the Program for the Assessment of Radiological Technology et al (2008) Multicenter randomized controlled trial of the costs and effects of noninvasive diagnostic imaging in patients with peripheral arterial disease: the DIPAD trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1349–1357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 59.Jordan HS, Bert RB, Chew P, Kupelnick B, Lau J (2003) Magnetic resonance spectroscopy for brain tumors. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, p 109Google Scholar
- 68.Sardanelli F, Di Leo G (2008) Biostatistics for radiologists. Springer, Milan, pp 165–179Google Scholar
- 80.Field MJ, Lohr KN, eds (1992) Guidelines for clinical practice: from development to use. National Academy, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- 85.Royal College of Radiologists (2007) Making the best use of clinical radiology services (MBUR), 6th edn. http://www.rcr.ac.uk/content.aspx?PageID=995. Accessed 21 June 2009
- 86.American College of Radiologists (2009) Guidelines available at: http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/guidelines.aspx. Accessed 21 June 2009
- 87.Canadian Association of Radiologists (2009) Guidelines available at: http://www.car.ca/content.aspx?pg=Guidelines&spg=home&lang=E&lID=. Accessed 21 June 2009
- 88.European Society of Radiology (2009) Guidelines available at: http://www.myesr.org/cms/website.php?id=%2Fen%2Fsearchresults.htm&cx=014135113606645554273%3Aigwz0kdufju&cof=FORID%3A11&sa=Search&q=guidelines#1545. Accessed 21 June 2009
- 91.The European Network for the Assessment of Imaging in Medicine (EuroAIM) (2009) http://www.eibir.org/cms/website.php?id=/de/index/newfilename/newfilename.htm. Accessed 21 June 2009
- 92.Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) http://www.agreecollaboration.org/instrument/. Accessed 21 June 2009