European Radiology

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 298–309

European obesity and the radiology department. What can we do to help?

  • O. Buckley
  • E. Ward
  • A. Ryan
  • Walsh Colin
  • A. Snow
  • W. C. Torreggiani
Radiological Education

Abstract

Obesity is a chronic disease that is now a global epidemic. The numbers of obese people are exponentially rising in Europe, and it is projected that in Europe by 2010 there will be 150 million obese people. The obesity-related health crisis does not only affect adults, with one in four European children now overweight. Radiologists, both adult and paediatric, need to be aware of the magnitude of the problem, and obese patients cannot be denied radiologic evaluation due to their size. Missed diagnosis, appointment cancellation and embarrassing situations for patients when they are referred for a radiological examination for which they are not suitable are all issues that can be avoided if careful provision is made to accommodate the needs of the obese patient requiring radiologic evaluation. This paper will discuss the epidemiology of obesity and the role of radiology in the assessment of obesity and disorders of fat metabolism. The limitations obesity poses to current radiological equipment and how the radiologist can optimise imaging in the obese patient will be described. Dose reference levels and dose control are discussed. Examples of how obesity both hinders and helps the radiologist will be illustrated. Techniques and pre-procedural preparation to help the obese patient in the interventional suite are discussed.

Keywords

Obesity Artefact Dose 

References

  1. 1.
    WHO Global InfoBase online [online database]. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2007 (noncommunicable diseases, comparable estimates; http://www.who.int/ncd_surveillance/infobase/web/InfoBaseCommon, 7accessed 8 April 2007)
  2. 2.
    WHO, European Charter on Counteracting Obesity. EUR/06/5062700/8 http://www.euro.who.int/Document/E89567.pdf date of access 8th June 2008
  3. 3.
    Obesity in Europe, The Case For Action (2002) International Taskforce on Obesity and European Association for the Study of Obesity, London. http://www.iotf.org/media/euobesity.pdf date of access 8th June 2008
  4. 4.
    Ludwig DS (2007) Childhood obesity the shape of things to come. NEJM 357(23):2325–2327, Dec. 6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dietz WH (1998) Health consequences of obesity in youth: Childhood predictors of adult disease. Pediatrics 101:518–525PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lobstein T, Frelut M-L (2003) Prevalence of overweight among children in Europe. Obesity Reviews 4(4):195–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Olshansky SJ, Passaro DJ, Hershow RC et al (2005) A potential decline in life expectancy in the United States in the 21st Century. NEJM 352:1138–1145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    National Institutes of Health and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (1998) Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults—the evidence report. Obes Res 6(suppl 2):1S–209SGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Snijder MB, Van Dam RM, Visser M, Seidell JC (2006) What aspects of body fat are particularly hazardous and how do we measure them. Int J Epidemiol 35(1):83–92, Feb, Epub 2005 Dec 8. ReviewPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rattarsan C, Leelawattana R, Soonthompun S, Setasuban W, Thamprasit A (2004) Gender differences of regional abdominal fat and their relationships with insulin sensitivity in healthy and glucose intolerant Thais. J Endocinol Metab 89:6266–6270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shaw NJ, Crabtree NJ, Kibirige M, Fordham JN (2007) Ethnic and gender differences in body fat in British school children as measured by DXA. Arch Dis Child 92(10):872–875, Oct, Epub 2007 May 23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gurrici S, Hartriyanti Y, Hautvast JG, Deurenberg P (2001) Relationship between body fat and body mass index: differences between Indonesians and Dutch Caucasians. Br J Nutr 85:239–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bjorntorp P (1988) The associations between obesity, adipose tissue distribution and disease. Acta Med Scand Suppl 1404–1411Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Prineas RJ, Folsom AR, Kaye SA (1993) Central adiposity and increased risk of coronary disease mortality in older women. Ann Epidemiol 3:35041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tokunaga K, Matsuzawa Y, Ishikawa K, Tarui S (1983) A novel technique for the determination of body fat by computed tomography. Int J Obes 7:437–445PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kobayashi J, Tadokoro N, Watanabe M, Shinomiya M (2002) A novel method of measuring intra-abdominal fat volume using helical computed tomography. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord Mar 26(3):398–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maruyama Y, Mizuguchi M, Yaginuma T, Kusaka M, Yoshida H, Yokoyama K, Kasahara Y, Hosoya T (2008) Serum leptin, abdominal obesity and the metabolic syndrome in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. [Epub ahead of print] Jan 2, doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3102171
  18. 18.
    Brennan DD, Whelan PF, Robinson K, Ghita O, O’Brien J, Sadleir R, Eustace S (2005) Rapid automated measurement of body fat distribution from whole-body MRI. AJR 185:418–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gerard EL, Snow RC, Kennedy DN, Frisch RE, Guimaraes AR, Barbieri RL, Sorensen AG, Egglin TK, Rosen R (1991) Overall body fat and regional fat distribution in young women: Quantification with MR imaging. AJR 157:99–104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mantatzis M, Prassopoulos P (2007) Total body fat visceral fat subcutaneous fat bone marrow fat. What is important to measure. AJR 189:W386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Uppot RN (2007) Impact of obesity on radiology. Radiol Clin North Am 45(2):231–246, Mar, ReviewPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chalndler RC, Srinivas G, Chintapalli KN, Schweisinger WH, Prasad SR (2008) Imaging in bariatric surgery: A guide to postsurgical anatomy and common complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(1):122–135, Jan, ReviewCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Blachar A, blank A, Gavert N, Metzer U, Fluser G, Abu-Abeid S (2007) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding surgery for morbid obesity: imaging of normal anatomic features and post operative complications. AJR 188:472–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chandler RC, Srinivas G, Chintapalli KN, Schwesinger WH, Prasad SR (2008) Imaging in bariatric surgery: A guide to postsurgical anatomy and common complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(1):122–135, JanPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Handolin LE, Hiltunin OJ (2006) Peroperative difficulties in fluoroscopy of the femoral head in massive obese patient: enhanced visualization by intra-articular contrast agent. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126(7):498–499, Sep, Epub 2006 Jun 21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bryk S, Censullo M, Wagner L, Rossman L, Cohen A (2006) Endovascular and interventional procedures in obese patients: A review of procedural technique modifications and radiation management. J Vascular Interventional Radiol 1(17):27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Uppot RN, Sahani DV, Hahn PF, Kalra MK, Saini SS, Mueller PR (2006) Effect of obesity on image quality: 15-year longitudinal study for evaluation of dictated radiology reports. Radiology 240(2):435–439, Aug, Epub 2006 Jun 26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hong HS, Han JK, Kim TK, Kim YH, Kim JS, Cha JH, Choi BI (2001) Ultrasonographic evaluation of the gallbladder: Comparison of fundamental tissue harmonic and pulse inversion harmonic imaging. Ultrasound Med 20(1):35–41, JanGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rosenthal SJ, Jones PH, Wetzel LH (2001) Phase inversion tissue harmonic sonographic imaging: A clinical utility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176(6):1393–1398, JunPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Goldsmith P, Patel A, Farmer R, Wright G, Brown J (2008) A novel technique for CT imaging the brain of the obese patient. Clin Rad 62:575–576, MayGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Coulden RA, Dixon AK (1987) Avoidance of ring artifacts in lumbar spine computed tomography in obese patients. [Letter] British Journal of Radiology 60(713):518PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vannier MW, Johnson PJ, Dachman A et al (2005) Multi detector CT of massively obese patients. Presented at RSNA, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bae KT, Seeck BA, Hildebolt CF, Tao C, Zhu F, Kanematsu M, Woodard PK (2008) Contrast enhancement in cardiovascular MDCT: effect of body weight, height, body surface area body mass index and obesity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(3):777–784, MarPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bae KT, Tao C, Gürel S, Hong C, Zhu F, Gebke TA, Milite M, Hildebolt CF (2007) Effect of patient weight and scanning duration on contrast enhancement during pulmonary multidetector CT angiography. Radiology 242(2):582–589, FebPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Achenbach S, Anders K, Kalender WA (2008) Dual-source cardiac computed tomography: image quality and dose considerations. Eur Radiol 18(6):1188–1198, Jun, Feb 26 [Epub ahead of print]PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Klein HM, Meyners W, Neeb B, Labenz J, Truümmler KH (2007) Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using an open 0.35 T system. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31(3):430–434, May-JunPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Uppot RN, Sheehan A, Seethamraju R (2005) Obesity and MR imaging. MRI Hot Topics, Siemens Medical www.usa.siemens/medical date of access 8th June 2008
  38. 38.
    European Commission. Criteria for Acceptability of Radiological (including Radiotherapy) and Nuclear Medicine Installation. Radiation Protection No 91, 1997Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    IPEM Report 88, Guidance on the establishment and use of Diagnostic Reference Levels for medical X-ray examinations, 2004Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Uppot RN, Sahani DV, Hahn PF, Gervais D, Mueller PR (2007) Impact of obesity on medical imaging and image-guided intervention. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(2):433–440, Feb ReviewPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Silverman DH, Ratib O, Czernin J (2005) Optimizing imaging protocols for overweight and obese patients: a lutetium orthosilicate PET/CT study. [Clinical Trial. Journal Article] J Nuclear Med 46(4):603–607Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Halpern BS, Dahlbom M, Auerbach MA, Schiepers C, Fueger BJ, Weber WA, Silverman DH, Ratib O, Czernin J (2005) Optimizing imaging protocols for overweight and obese patients: a lutetium orthosilicate PET/CT study. J Nucl Med 46(4):603–607, AprPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Botkin CD, Osman MM (2007) Prevalence, challenges, and solutions for 18F-FDG PET studies of obese patients: a technologist’s perspective. J Nuclear Med Technol 2(35):80–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gofrit ON, Shapiro A, Donchin Y, Bloom AI, Shenfeld OZ, Landau EH, Pode D (2007) Lateral decubitus position for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in the morbidly obese or kyphotic patient. J Endourology 16(6):383–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Shindo S, Kato K, Motohashi S, Kaga S, Inoue H, Matsumoto M (2007) Delayed femoral pseudoaneurysm formation after percutaneous coronary intervention. Clin Imag 31(3):162–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Chan V, Persaud T, Buckley O, Colville J, Torreggiani WC (2006) Are buttock injections truly intra muscular? Eur J Radiol 2158(3):480–484, Feb, Epub 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Halder S, Wimbush S (2006) Radiologically assisted cerebrospinal fluid sampling in a morbidly obese patient. Crit Care Resusc 8(4):394PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Buckley
    • 1
  • E. Ward
    • 1
  • A. Ryan
    • 2
  • Walsh Colin
    • 1
  • A. Snow
    • 1
  • W. C. Torreggiani
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyAdelaide and Meath HospitalDublinIreland
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyWaterford Regional Hospital CoWaterfordIreland
  3. 3.AMNCHDublin 24Ireland

Personalised recommendations