European Radiology

, Volume 18, Issue 8, pp 1556–1568 | Cite as

Optional inferior vena caval filters: where are we now?

Vascular-Interventional

Abstract

With the advent of newer optional/retrievable inferior vena caval filters, there has been a rise in the number of filters inserted globally. This review article examines the currently available approved optional filter models, outlines the clinical indications for filter insertion and examines the expanding indications. Additionally, the available evidence behind the use of optional filters is reviewed, the issue of anticoagulation is discussed and possible future filter developments are considered.

Keywords

Inferior vena caval filter Optional filter Retrievable filter Permanent filter Pulmonary embolus Deep venous thrombosis Venous thromboembolism 

References

  1. 1.
    Hyers TM, Hull RD, Weg JG (1995) Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease. Chest 108(Suppl):335S–351SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Becker DM, Philbrick JT, Selby JB (1992) Inferior vena cava filters: indication, sefety, effectiveness. Arch Intern Med 152:1985–1994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Trousseau A (1868) Phlegmatia alba dolens. In: Clinique médicale de l’Hôtel-Dieu de Paris, 3rd edn, vol 3. J.B. Baillière, Paris, pp 652–695Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mobin-Uddin K, Smith PE, Martinez LO, Lombardo CR, Jude JR (1967) A vena caval filter for the prevention of pulmonary embolus. Surg Forum 18:209–211Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Greenfield LJ, McCurdy JR, Brown PP, Elkins RC (1973) A new vena caval filter permitting continued flow and resolution of emboli. Surgery 73:599–606PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tadavarthy SM, Castaneda-Zuniga W, Salomonowitz E et al (1984) Kimray-Greenfield vena cava filter: percutaneous introduction. Radiology 151:525–526PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    PREPIC Study Group (1985) Eight year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism. Circulation 112:416–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F et al (1998) A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 338:409–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stein PD, Kayali F, Olson RE (2004) Twenty-one-year trends in the use of inferior vena cava filters. Arch Intern Med 164:1541–1545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Magnant JG, Walsh DB, Juravsky LI, Cronenwett JL (1992) Current use of inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Surg 16:701–706PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peterson L (2003) Inferior vena cava filters. Trends Med Oct 2003Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Walsh DB, Birkmeyer JD, Barrett JA, Kniffin WB, Cronenwett JL, Baron JA (1995) Use of inferior vena cava filters in the Medicare population. Ann Vasc Surg 9:483–487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Greenfield LJ, Proctor MC (1996) Current indications for caval interruption: should they be liberalized in view of improving technology? Semin Vasc Surg 9:50–58PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    De Gregorio M, Gimeno M, Tobio R et al (2001) Animal experience in the Günther tulip retrievable inferior vena caval filter. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 24:413–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Darcy MD, Smith TP, Hunter DW, Castaneda-Zuniga W, Lung G, Amplatz K (1996) Short-term prophylaxis of pulmonary embolism by using a retrievable vena cava filter. AJR Am J Roentgenol 147:836–838Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McCowan TC, Ferris EJ, Carver DK, Baker ML (1990) Amplatz vena cava filter: clinical experience in 30 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 155:177–181PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Binkert CA, Bansal A, Gates JD (2005) Inferior vana cava filter removal after 317-day implantation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16:1156–1158Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Terhaar OA, Lyon SM, Given MF, Foster AE, McGrath FP, Lee MJ (2004) Extended interval for retrieval of Günther Tulip filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:1257–1262PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Looby S, Given MF, Geoghegan T, McErlean A, Lee MJ (2007) Günther Tulip retrievable inferior vena caval filters: indications, efficacy, retrieval and complications. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 30:59–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Van Ha T et al (2006) Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 29:S81–S291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    De Gregorio MA, Gamboa P, Gimeno MJ et al (2003) The Günther Tulip retrievable filter: prolonged temporary filtration by repositioning within the inferior vena cava. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:1259–1265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fotiadis NI, Sabharwal T, Dourado R, Fikrat S, Adam A (2007) Technical error during deployment leads to vena cava filter migration and massive pulmonary embolism. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Aug 29 [Epub ahead of print], DOI  10.1007/s00270-007-9159-6
  23. 23.
    Yamagami T, Kato T, Iida S, Hirota T, Nishimura T (2005) Günther Tulip inferior vena cava filter placement during treatment for deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 28:442–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Saeed I, Garcia M, McNicholas K (2006) Right ventricular migration of a recovery IVC filter’s fractured wire with subsequent pericardial tamponade. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 29:685–686PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ganguli S, Tham JC, Komlos F, Rabkin DJ (2006) Fracture and migration of a suprarenal inferior vena cava filter in a pregnant patient. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:1707–1711PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Millward S (1998) Temporary and retrievable vena caval filters: current status. J Vasc Interv Radiol 9:381–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Günther RW, Neuerburg J, Mossdorf A et al (2005) New optional IVC filter for percutaneous retrieval—in vitro evaluation of embolus capturing efficiency. Rofo 177:632–636PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bucker et al (2006) Long-term retrieval of modified Günther Tulip vena cava filters-an animal study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 29:S81–S291 [abstract]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Oliva VL, Szatmari F, Giroux MF, Flemming BK, Cohen SA, Soulez G (2005) The Jonas study: evaluation of the retrievability of the Cordis OptEase inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16:1439–1445PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rosenthal D, Swischuk JL, Cohen SA, Wellons ED (2005) OptEase retrievable inferior vena cava filter: initial multicenter experience. Vascular 13:286–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Karmy-Jones R, Jurkovich GJ, Velmahos GC et al (2007) Practice patterns and outcomes of retrievable vena cava filters in trauma patients: an AAST multicenter study. J Trauma 62:17–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Keller IS, Meier C, Pfiffner R, Keller E, Pfammatter T (2007) Clinical comparison of two optional vena cava filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18:505–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Asch MR (2002) Initial experience in humans with a new retrievable inferior vena cava filter. Radiology 225:835–844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Grande WJ, Trerotola SO, Reilly PM et al (2005) Experience with the Recovery filter as a retrievable inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16:1189–1193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ray CE, Mitchell E, Zipser S, Kao EY, Brown CF, Moneta GL (2006) Outcomes with retrievable inferior vena cava filters: a multicenter study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:1595–1604PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Brountzos EN, Kaufman JA, Venbrux AC et al (2003) A new optional vena cava filter: retrieval at 12 weeks in an animal model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:763–772PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Binkert CA, Sasadeusz K, Stavropoulos SW (2006) Retrievability of the recovery vena caval filter after dwell times longer than 180 days. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:299–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kuo WT, Loh CT, Sze DY (2007) Emergency retrieval of a G2 filter after complete migration into the right ventricle. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18:1177–1182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cantwell CP, Lynch FC (2007) Caudal migration of a G2 filter during carbon dioxide cavography. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18:814–815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pieri S, Agresti M, Morucci M, De Medici L (2003) Optional vena cava filters: preliminary experience with a new vena cava filter. Radiol Med 105:56–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Imberti D, Bianchi M, Farina A, Siragusa S, Silingardi M, Ageno W (2005) Clinical experience with retrievable vena cava filters: results of a prospective observational multicenter study. J Thromb Haemost 3:1370–1375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bruckheimer E, Judelman AG, Bruckheimer SD, Tavori I, Naor G, Katzen BT (2003) In vitro evaluation of a retrievable low-profile nitinol vana cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:469–474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Grassi CJ, Swan TL, Cardella JF et al (2003) Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous permanent inferior vena cava filter placement for the prevention of pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:S271–S275PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Streiff MB (2000) Vena caval filters: a comprehensive review. Blood 95:3669–3677PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kaufman JA, Kinney TB, Streiff MB et al (2006) Guidelines for the use of retrievable and convertible vena cava filters: report from the Society of Interventional Radiology Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:449–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kirilcuk NN, Herget EJ, Dicker RA, Spain DA, Hellinger JC, Brundage SI (2005) Are temporary inferior vena cava filters really temporary? Am J Surg 190:858–863PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Antevil JL, Sise MJ, Sack DI et al (2006) Retrievable vena cava filters for preventing pulmonary embolism in trauma patients: a cautionary tale. J Trauma 60:35–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Quirke TE, Ritota PC, Swan KG (1997) Inferior vena caval filter use in U.S. trauma centers: a practioner survey. J Trauma 43:333–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Allen TL, Carter JL, Morris BJ, Harker CP, Stevens MH (2005) Retrievable vena cava filters in trauma patients for high-risk prophylaxis and prevention of pulmonary embolism. Am J Surg 189:656–661PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Anaya DA, Nathens AB (2005) Thrombosis and coagulation: deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism prophylaxis. Surg Clin North Am 85:1163–1177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Geerts WH, Code KI, Jay RM, Chen E, Szalai JP (1994) A prospective study of venous thromboembolism after major trauma. N Engl J Med 331:1601–1606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Velmahos GC, Kern J, Chan LS et al (2000) Prevention of venous thromboembolism after injury: an evidenced based report; Part II. Analysis of risk factors and evaluation of the role of vena caval filters. J Trauma 49:140–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Velmahos GC, Kern J, Chan LS et al (2000) Prevention of venous thromboembolism after injury: an evidence-based report; Part I. Analysis of risk factors and evaluation of the role of vena caval filters. J Trauma 49:132–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    McMurtry AL, Owings JT, Anderson JT, Battistella FD, Gosselin R (1999) Increased use of prophylactic vena cava filters in trauma patients failed to decrease overall incidence of pulmonary embolism. Am J Coll Surg 189:314–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Piano G, Ketteler ER, Prachand V et al (2007) Safety, feasibility, and outcome of retrievable vena cava filters in high-risk surgical patients. J Vasc Surg 45:784–788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Frezza EE, Wachtel MS (2006) A simple venous thromboembolism prophylaxis protocol for patients undergoing Bariatric surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring) 14:1961–1965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hann CL, Streiff MB (2005) The role of vena caval filters in the management of venous thromboembolism. Blood Rev 19:179–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Schunn C, Schunn GB, Hobbs G, Vona-Davis LC, Waheed U (2006) Inferior vena cava filter placement in late-stage cancer. Vasc Endovascular Surg 40:287–294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    O’Sullivan GJ, Lohan DG, Gough N, Cronin CG, Kee ST (2007) Pharmacomechanical thrombectomy of acute deep vein thrombosis with the Trellis-8 isolated thrombolysis catheter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18:715–724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    El Sayed HF, Kougias P, Zhou W, Lin PH (2006) Utility of retrievable vena cava filters and mechanical thrombectomy in the endovascular management of acute deep venous thrombosis. Vascular 14:305–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Lee KH, Han H, Lee KJ et al (2006) Mechanical thrombectomy of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis with use of an Arrow-Trerotola percutaneous thrombectomy device. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:487–495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Grassi CJ (1991) Inferior vena caval filters: analysis of five currently available devices. Am J Roentgenol 156:813–821Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Roehm JOJ, Johnsrude IS, Barth MH, Gianturco C (1988) The bird’s nest inferior vena cava filter: progress report. Radiology 168:745–749PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Kinney TB (2003) Update on inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:425–440PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Greenfield LJ, Rutherford RB (1999) Recommended reporting standards for vena caval filter placement and patient follow-up. Vena Caval Filter Consensus Conference. J Vasc Interv Radiol 10:1013–1019PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Girard P, Stern JB, Parent F (2002) Medical literature and vena cava filters: so far so weak. Chest 122:963–967PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Recommended reporting standards for vena caval filter placement and patient follow-up: Vena Caval Filter Consensus Conference (1999) J Vasc Surg 30:573–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    The participants in the vena caval filter consensus conference (2003) Recommended reporting standards for vena caval filter placement and patient follow-up J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:S427–S432Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Millward SF, Grassi CJ, Kinney TB et al (2005) Reporting standards for inferior vena caval filter placement and patient follow-up: supplement for temporary and retrievable/optional filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16:441–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Snow V, Qaseem A, Barry P et al (2007) Management of venous thromboembolism: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Academy of Family Physicians. Ann Intern Med 146:204–210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Segal JB, Streiff MB, Hofmann LV, Thornton K, Bass EB (2007) Management of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review for a practice guideline. Ann Intern Med 146:211–222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Stein PD, Alnas M, Skaf E et al (2004) Outcome and complications of retrievable inferior vena cava filters. Am J Cardiol 94:1090–1093PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Geets WH, Pineo GF, Heit JA et al (2004) Prevention of venous thrombosis. The seventh ACCP conference on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. Chest 126:338–400SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Ballew KA, Philbrick JT, Becker DM (1995) Vena cava filter devices. Clin Chest Med 16:295–305PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Kanter B, Moser KM (1988) The Greenfield vena cava filter. Chest 93:170–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Greenfield LJ, Proctor MS (2001) Recurrent thromboembolism in patients with vena caval filters. J Vasc Surg 33:510–514PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Dovrish Z, Hadary R, Blickstein D, Shilo L, Ellis MH (2006) Retrospective analysis of the use of inferior vena cava filters in routine hospital practice. Postgrad Med J 82:150–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Yale SH, Mazza JJ, Glurich I, Peters T, Mukesh BN (2006) Recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with and without anticoagulation after inferior vena caval filter placement. Int Angiol 25:60–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Sakuma M, Nakamura M, Nakanishi N et al (2004) Inferior vena cava filter is a new additional therapeutic option to reduce mortality from acute pulmonary embolism. Circ J 68:816–821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Schulman S, Granqvist S, Holmstrom M et al (1997) The duration of oral anticoagulant therapy after a second episode of venous thromboembolism: The Duration of Anticoagulation Trial Study Group. N Engl J Med 336:393–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Levine M, Gent M, Hirsh J et al (1996) A comparison of low-molecular weight heparin administered primarily at home with unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital for proximal deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 334:677–681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    White RH, Beyth RJ, Zhou H, Romano PS (1999) Major bleeding after hospitalization for deep venous thrombosis. Am J Med 107:414–424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Brandjes DP, Buller HR, Heijboer H et al (1997) Randomised trial of effect of compression stockings in patients with symptomatic proximal-vein thrombosis. Lancet 349:759–762PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Prandoni P, Lensing AWA, Prins MH et al (2004) Below-knee elastic compression stockings to prevent the post-thrombotic syndrome. Ann Intern Med 141:249–256PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Neuerburg J, Günther R, Rassmussen E et al (1993) New retrievable percutaneous vena filter: experimental in vitro and vivo evolution. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 16:224–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    De Gregorio MA, Gimeno MJ, Lostale F et al (2004) Retrievability of uncoated versus paclitaxel - coated Günther - Tulip IVC filters in an animal model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:719–726PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Proctor MC, Cho KJ, Greenfield LJ (2000) In vivo evaluation of vena caval filters: can function be linked to design characteristics? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 23:460–465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Erbel R, Di Mario C, Bartunek J et al (2007) PROGRESS-AMS (Clinical Performance and Angiographic Results of Coronary Stenting with Absorable Metal Stents) Investigators. Temporary scaffolding of coronary arteries with bioabsorbable magnesium stents:a prospective, non-randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 369:1869–1875PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Millward SF, Oliva VL, Bell SD et al (2001) Günther Tulip retrievable vena cava filter: results from the Registry of the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:1053–1058PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Offner PJ, Hawkes A, Madayag R, Seale F, Maines C (2003) The role of temporary inferior vena cava filters in critically ill surgical patients. Arch Surg 138:591–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Mismetti P, Rivron-Guillot K, Quenet S et al (2007) A prospective long-term study of 220 patients with a retrievable vena cava filter fro secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism. Chest 131:223–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Academic RadiologyBeaumont HospitalDublin 9Ireland
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyUniversity of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations