Advertisement

European Radiology

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 665–671 | Cite as

Multidetector CT angiography in the assessment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: accuracy in detecting the severity, number, and length of stenoses

  • R. SchernthanerEmail author
  • A. Stadler
  • F. Lomoschitz
  • M. Weber
  • D. Fleischmann
  • J. Lammer
  • Ch. Loewe
Vascular-Interventional

Abstract

The purpose was to evaluate the accuracy of multidetector CT angiography (MD-CTA) in the morphologic assessment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) compared to digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Fifty consecutive patients referred for DSA of the peripheral arteries due to PAOD were prospectively included in this study and underwent 16-row MD-CTA prior to DSA. Maximum intensity projections and multipath curved planar reformations were created with a semi-automated toolbox. Twenty-one vascular segments were defined in each leg and compared to DSA findings with regard to gradation, length, and number of lesions. Mean sensitivity and specificity in the detection of significant stenoses (over 70%) were 100% and 99.5% in the iliac arteries, 97.4% and 99.0% in the femoro-popliteal arteries, and 98.3% and 99.8% in the infrapopliteal arteries, respectively. High kappa values for exact stenoses gradation (0.74–1), lesion length (0.74–1), and number of lesions (0.71–1) were reached by MD-CTA, indicating high agreement with DSA. Non-invasive MD-CTA is an accurate tool for the assessment of all treatment-relevant morphologic information of PAOD (gradation, length, and number of stenoses) compared to DSA.

Keywords

CT angiography Vascular imaging Peripheral vascular diseases Computer-generated 3D imaging 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Fonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung (FWF, Austria) under the contract no. L291–N04.

References

  1. 1.
    Waugh JR, Sacharias N (1992) Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. Radiology 182:243–246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lawrence JA, Kim D, Kent KC, Stehling MK, Rosen MP, Raptopoulos V (1995) Lower extremity spiral CT angiography versus catheter angiography. Radiology 194:903–908PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rieker O, Duber C, Schmiedt W, von Zitzewitz H, Schweden F, Thelen M (1996) Prospective comparison of CT angiography of the legs with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. Ajr 166:269–276PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rubin GD, Schmidt AJ, Logan LJ, Olcott C, Zarins CK, Napel S et al (1999) Multidetector-row CT angiography of lower extremity occlusive disease: a new application for CT scanning. Radiology 210:588Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rubin GD, Schmidt AJ, Logan LJ, Sofilos MC (2001) Multi-detector row CT angiography of lower extremity arterial inflow and runoff: initial experience. Radiology 221:146–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Catalano C, Fraioli F, Laghi A, Napoli A, Bezzi M, Pediconi F et al (2004) Infrarenal aortic and lower-extremity arterial disease: diagnostic performance of multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology 231:555–563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martin ML, Tay KH, Flak B, Fry PD, Doyle DL, Taylor DC et al (2003) Multidetector CT angiography of the aortoiliac system and lower extremities: a prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Ajr 180:1085–1091PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Portugaller HR, Schoellnast H, Hausegger KA, Tiesenhausen K, Amann W, Berghold A (2004) Multislice spiral CT angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease: a valuable tool in detecting significant arterial lumen narrowing? Eur Radiol 14:1681–1687PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Willmann JK, Baumert B, Schertler T, Wildermuth S, Pfammatter T, Verdun FR et al (2005) Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries assessed with 16-detector row CT angiography: Prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 236:1083–1093PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Harris KA, Fowkes FG (2007) Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg 45:S5–S67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fleischmann D, Kanitsar A, Lomoschitz E, Koechl A (2002) Multi-path curved planar reformation of the peripheral arterial tree. Radiology 225:363Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fleischmann D, Rubin GD, Bankier AA, Hittmair K (2000) Improved uniformity of aortic enhancement with customized contrast medium injection protocols at CT angiography. Radiology 214:363–371PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kanitsar A (2001) Advanced visualzation techniques for vessel investigation [Master Thesis]. Vienna, University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kanitsar A, Fleischmann D, Wegenkittl R, Felkel P, Groeller E (2002) CPR-curved planar reformation. IEEE Visualization; 2002. IEEE Computer Society, Boston, pp 37–44Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kanitsar A, Wegenkittl R, Felkel P, Fleischmann D, Sandner D, Groeller E (2001) Computed tomography angiography: a case study of peripheral vessel investigation. IEEE visualization 2001. San Diego, pp 477–80Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kanitsar A, Wegenkittl R, Felkel P, Sandner D, Groeller E, Fleischmann D (2001) Automated vessel detection at lower extremity multislice CTA. Eur Radiol 11(S1):236Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Schernthaner
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. Stadler
    • 1
  • F. Lomoschitz
    • 1
  • M. Weber
    • 1
  • D. Fleischmann
    • 2
  • J. Lammer
    • 1
  • Ch. Loewe
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of RadiologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyStanford University Medical CenterStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations