European Radiology

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 500–509

When to perform CTA in patients suspected of PE?

Chest
  • 186 Downloads

Abstract

Venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) is a common disorder which may be associated with high morbidity or mortality when left untreated. Specific VTE diagnosis is mandatory, as treatment is associated with significant side effects. Therefore, timely diagnostic tests are necessary to establish the presence or absence of VTE. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) has reached a high accuracy in the evaluation of pulmonary embolism (PE). Unfortunately, the continuous decrease of the prevalence of PE in the most recent studies can lead to cost-efficacy imbalance and overuse of ionizing radiation when CTPA is used as a single test. Therefore, no single non-invasive test is suitable for all patients and diagnostic strategies based on sequential non-invasive tests are likely to identify patients in whom anticoagulation can be withheld safely and limit the number of patients requiring more invasive or more expensive tests. The cost effectiveness of clinical stratification and D-dimer test has been demonstrated as it reduces the requirement for invasive tests. In this paper, the current role of CTPA in the diagnosis of PE will be reviewed.

Keywords

Embolism Pulmonary CT angiography Predictive rule 

References

  1. 1.
    British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee Pulmonary Embolism Guideline Development Group (2003) British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Thorax 58:470–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Task Force on Pulmonary Embolism, European Society of Cardiology (2000) Guidelines on diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J 21:1301–1336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fedullo PF, Tapson VF (2003) Clinical practice. The evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 349:1247–1256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pistolesi M, Miniati M (2002) Imaging techniques in treatment algorithms of pulmonary embolism. Eur Respir J 35:28s–39sCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Prologo JD, Gilkeson RC, Diaz M, Asaad J (2004) CT pulmonary angiography: a comparative analysis of the utilization patterns in emergency department and hospitalized patients between 1998 and 2003. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1093–1096PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kruip MJ, Leclercq MG, van der Heul C, Prins MH, Buller HR (2003) Diagnostic strategies for excluding pulmonary embolism in clinical outcome studies. A systematic review. Ann Intern Med 138:941–951PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ghaye B, Remy J, Remy-Jardin M (2002) Non-traumatic thoracic emergencies: CT diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: the first 10 years. Eur Radiol 12:1886–1905PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    van Strijen MJ, de Monye W, Schiereck J et al (2003) Single-detector helical computed tomography as the primary diagnostic test in suspected pulmonary embolism: a multicenter clinical management study of 510 patients. Ann Intern Med 138:307–314PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schoepf UJ, Costello P (2004) CT angiography for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: state of the art. Radiology 230:329–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Deschildre F et al (1996) Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with spiral CT: comparison with pulmonary angiography and scintigraphy. Radiology 200:699–706PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Coche E, Verschuren F, Keyeux A et al (2003) Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in outpatients: comparison of thin-collimation multi-detector row spiral CT and planar ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology 229:757–765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    van Belle A, Büller HR et al, Christopher Study Investigators (2006) Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. JAMA 295:172–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ghaye B, Ghuysen A, Bruyere PJ, D’Orio V, Dondelinger RF (2006) Can CT pulmonary angiography allow assessment of severity and prognosis in patients presenting with pulmonary embolism? What the radiologist needs to know. Radiographics 26:23–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ghaye B, Ghuysen A, Willems V et al (2006) Pulmonary embolism CT severity scores and CT cardiovascular parameters as predictor of mortality in patients with severe pulmonary embolism. Radiology 239:884–891PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wildberger JE, Klotz E, Ditt H, Spuntrup E, Mahnken AH, Gunther RW (2005) Multislice computed tomography perfusion imaging for visualization of acute pulmonary embolism: animal experience. Eur Radiol 15:1378–1386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miniati M, Pistolesi M, Marini C et al (1996) Value of perfusion lung scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: results of the Prospective Investigative Study of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PISA-PED). Am J Respir Crit Care Med 154:1387–1393PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miniati M, Prediletto R, Formichi B et al (1999) Accuracy of clinical assessment in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159:864–871PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rodger MA, Carrier M, Jones GN et al (2000) Diagnostic value of arterial blood gas measurement in suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162:2105–2108PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    PIOPED Investigators (1990) Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA 263:2753–2759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kucher N, Goldhaber SZ (2003) Cardiac biomarkers for risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 108:2191–2194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Perrier A, Bounameaux H, Morabia A et al (1996) Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by a decision analysis-based strategy including clinical probability, D-dimer levels, and ultrasonography: a management study. Arch Intern Med 156:531–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Perrier A, Desmarais S, Miron MJ et al (1999) Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients. Lancet 353:190–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Perrier A, Miron MJ, Desmarais S et al (2000) Using clinical evaluation and lung scan to rule out suspected pulmonary embolism: Is it a valid option in patients with normal results of lower-limb venous compression ultrasonography? Arch Intern Med 160:512–516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Musset D, Parent F, Meyer G et al (2002) Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study. Lancet 360:1914–1920PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M et al (2000) Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost 83:416–420PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wicki J, Perneger TV, Junod AF, Bounameaux H, Perrier A (2001) Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency ward: a simple score. Arch Intern Med 161:92–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chagnon I, Bounameaux H, Aujesky D et al (2002) Comparison of two clinical prediction rules and implicit assessment among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 113:269–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy PM et al (2006) Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score. Ann Intern Med 144:165–171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M et al (2001) Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer. Ann Intern Med 135:98–107PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kline JA, Nelson RD, Jackson RE et al (2002) Criteria for the safe use of D-dimer testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a multicenter US study. Ann Emerg Med 39:144–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hyers TM (1999) Venous thromboembolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159:1–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Perrier A, Roy PM, Aujesky D et al (2004) Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in outpatients with clinical assessment, D-dimer measurement, venous ultrasound, and helical computed tomography: a multicenter management study. Am J Med 116:291–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stein PD, Hull RD, Patel KC et al (2004) D-dimer for the exclusion of acute venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 140:589–602PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ten Wolde M, Hagen PJ, Macgillavry MR, Advances in New Technologies Evaluating the Localization of Pulmonary Embolism Study Group et al (2004) Non-invasive diagnostic work-up of patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism; results of a management study. J Thromb Haemost 2:1110–1117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Perrier A, Roy PM, Sanchez O et al (2005) Multidetector-row computed tomography in suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 352:1760–1768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Righini M, Le Gal G, De Lucia S et al (2006) Clinical usefulness of D-dimer testing in cancer patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost 95:715–719PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Moores LK (2006) Diagnosis and management of pulmonary embolism: are we moving toward an outcome standard? Arch Intern Med 166:147–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy PM et al (2006) Value of D-dimer testing for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in patients with previous venous thromboembolism. Arch Intern Med 166:176–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rodger MA, Bredeson CN, Jones G et al (2006) The bedside investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis study: a double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing combinations of 3 bedside tests vs ventilation-perfusion scan for the initial investigation of suspected pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 166:181–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Goldhaber SZ (1998) Pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 339:93–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Miniati M, Monti S, Pratali L et al (2001) Value of transthoracic echocardiography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: results of a prospective study in unselected patients. Am J Med 110:528–535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Goldhaber SZ (2002) Echocardiography in the management of pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 136:691–700PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Collomb D, Paramelle PJ, Calaque O et al (2003) Severity assessment of acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation using helical CT. Eur Radiol 13:1508–1514PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Schoepf UJ, Kucher N, Kipfmueller F, Quiroz R, Costello P, Goldhaber SZ (2004) Right ventricular enlargement on chest computed tomography: a predictor of early death in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 110:3276–3280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rathbun SW, Raskob GE, Whitsett TL (2000) Sensitivity and specificity of helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 132:227–232PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mullins MD, Becker DM, Hagspiel KD, Philbrick JT (2000) The role of spiral volumetric computed tomography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 160:293–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Winer-Muram HT, Rydberg J, Johnson MS et al (2004) Suspected acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation with multi-detector row CT versus digital subtraction pulmonary arteriography. Radiology 233:806–815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Stein PD, Fowler SE, Goodman LR et al (2006) Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 354:2317–2327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Tillie-Leblond I, Mastora I, Radenne F et al (2002) Risk of pulmonary embolism after a negative spiral CT angiogram in patients with pulmonary disease: 1-year clinical follow-up study. Radiology 223:461–467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Perrier A, Bounameaux H (2006) Accuracy or outcome in suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 354:2383–2385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ghaye B (2007) Peripheral pulmonary embolism on multidetector CT pulmonary angiography. JBR-BTR 90:100–108PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Bourriot K, Couffinhal T, Bernard V, Montaudon M, Bonnet J, Laurent F (2003) Clinical outcome after a negative spiral CT pulmonary angiographic finding in an inpatient population from cardiology and pneumology wards. Chest 123:359–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Quiroz R, Kucher N, Zou KH et al (2005) Clinical validity of a negative computed tomography scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. JAMA 293:2012–2017PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ferretti GR, Bosson JL, Buffaz PD et al (1997) Acute pulmonary embolism: role of helical CT in 164 patients with intermediate-probability at ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy and normal results at duplex US of the legs. Radiology 205:453–458PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Perrier A, Howarth N, Didier D et al (2001) Performance of helical computed tomography in unselected outpatients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 135:88–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ghanima W, Almaas V, Aballi S et al (2005) Management of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) by D-dimer and multi-slice computed tomography in outpatients: an outcome study. J Thromb Haemost 3:1926–1932PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Wilson HT, Meagher TM, Williams SJ (2002) Combined helical computed tomographic pulmonary angiography and lung perfusion scintigraphy for investigating acute pulmonary embolism. Clin Radiol 57:33–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Remy-Jardin M, Bahepar J, Lafitte JJ et al (2006) Multi-detector row CT angiography of pulmonary circulation with gadolinium-based contrast agents: prospective evaluation in 60 patients. Radiology 238:1022–1035PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Thomsen HS, Almen T, Morcos SK (2002) Contrast Media Safety Committee Of The European Society Of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR). Gadolinium-containing contrast media for radiographic examinations: a position paper. Eur Radiol 12:2600–2605PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Thomsen HS (2006) Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a serious late adverse reaction to gadodiamide. Eur Radiol 16:2619–2621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Meaney JFM, Weg JG, Chenevert TL, Stafford-Johnson D, Hamilton BH, Prince MR (1997) Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with magnetic resonance angiography. N Engl J Med 336:1422–1427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Gupta A, Frazer CK, Ferguson JM et al (1999) Acute pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with MR angiography. Radiology 210:353–359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Oudkerk M, van Beek EJ, Wielopolski P et al (2002) Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and conventional pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a prospective study. Lancet 359:1643–1647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Fink C, Ley S, Schoenberg SO, Reiser MF, Kauczor HU (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Radiol DOI 10.1007/s00330-007-0664-4
  65. 65.
    Kluge A, Luboldt W, Bachmann G (2006) Acute pulmonary embolism to the subsegmental level: diagnostic accuracy of three MRI techniques compared with 16-MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:W7–W14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Stein PD, Athanasoulis C, Alavi A et al (1992) Complications and validity of pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 85:462–468PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Diffin DC, Leyendecker JR, Johnson SP, Zucker RJ, Grebe PJ (1998) Effect of anatomic distribution of pulmonary emboli on interobserver agreement in the interpretation of pulmonary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:1085–1089PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    van Beek EJ, Brouwerst EM, Song B, Stein PD, Oudkerk M (2001) Clinical validity of a normal pulmonary angiogram in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism—a critical review. Clin Radiol 56:838–842PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Hull RD, Hirsh J, Carter CJ et al (1983) Pulmonary angiography, ventilation lung scanning, and venography for clinically suspected pulmonary embolism with abnormal perfusion lung scan. Ann Intern Med 98:891–899PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Girard P, Musset D, Parent F, Maitre S, Phlippoteau C, Simonneau G (1999) High prevalence of detectable deep venous thrombosis in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Chest 116:903–908PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Ghaye B, Dondelinger RF (2002) Non-traumatic thoracic emergencies: CT venography in an integrated diagnostic strategy of acute pulmonary embolism and venous thrombosis. Eur Radiol 12:1906–1921PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Lensing AW, Kraaijenhagen R, Van Beek EJR, Buller HR (1999) Diagnosis of venous thrombosis. In: Oudkerk, van Beek, ten Cate (eds) Pulmonary embolism. Blackwell, Berlin, pp 44–70Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ghaye B, Nchimi A, Noukoua CT, Dondelinger RF (2006) Does multi-detector row CT pulmonary angiography reduce the incremental value of indirect CT venography compared with single-detector row CT pulmonary angiography? Radiology 240:256–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Das M, Mühlenbruch G, Mahnken AH et al (2006) Optimized image reconstruction for detection of deep venous thrombosis at multidetector-row CT venography. Eur Radiol 16:269–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Goodman LR, Stein PD, Beemath A et al (2007) CT venography for deep venous thrombosis: continuous images versus reformatted discontinuous images using PIOPED II data. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:409–412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Perrier A, Nendaz Mr, Sarasin Fp, Howarth N, Bounameaux H (2003) Cost-effectiveness analysis of diagnostic strategies for suspected pulmonary embolism including helical computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 167:39–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    van Erkel AR, van Rossum AB, Bloem JL, Kievit J, Pattynama PM (1996) Spiral CT angiography for suspected pulmonary embolism: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Radiology 201:29–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Matthews S (2006) Short communication: imaging pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: what is the most appropriate imaging protocol? Br J Radiol 79:441–444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Francalanci I, Comeglio P, Liotta AA et al (1995) D-dimer concentrations during normal pregnancy, as measured by ELISA. Thromb Res 78:399–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Winer-Muram HT, Boone JM, Brown HL, Jennings SG, Mabie WC, Lombardo GT (2002) Pulmonary embolism in pregnant patients: fetal radiation dose with helical CT. Radiology 224:487–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Chan WS, Ginsberg JS (2002) Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Thromb Res 107:85–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Scarsbrook AF, Bradley KM, Gleeson FV (2007) Perfusion scintigraphy: diagnostic utility in pregnant women with suspected pulmonary embolic disease. Eur Radiol DOI 10.1007/s00330-007-0607-0
  83. 83.
    Roy PM, Meyer G, Vielle B, EMDEPU Study Group et al (2006) Appropriateness of diagnostic management and outcomes of suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 144:157–164PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medical ImagingUniversity Hospital of Liege, B 35LiegeBelgium

Personalised recommendations