Advertisement

European Radiology

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 308–317 | Cite as

ECG-gated chest CT angiography with 64-MDCT and tri-phasic IV contrast administration regimen in patients with acute non-specific chest pain

  • Diana Litmanovitch
  • Giulia A. Zamboni
  • Thomas H. Hauser
  • Pei-Jan P. Lin
  • Melvin E. Clouse
  • Vassilios Raptopoulos
Chest

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate chest CTA protocol using retrospective ECG-gating and triphasic IV contrast regimen for comprehensive evaluation of patients with acute non-specific chest pain. ECG-triggered dose modulation was used with a 64-MDCT scanner in 56 non-critically ill patients with acute nonspecific chest pain using triphasic IV regimen: 50 ml contrast followed by 50 ml 60% contrast/saline and 30 ml normal saline. Lungs, aorta, pulmonary and coronary arteries were graded on a 5-point scale (5, best). Aorta and pulmonary artery attenuation was measured and three coronary artery groups were evaluated. Comparison with invasive coronary angiography was obtained in nine patients on a per segment (16 total) basis. Dosimetry values were obtained. Studies were satisfactory in all patients (score >3). Aorta and pulmonary artery attenuation was >200 HU in 90.5%. Lung or pleura, non-cardiac vascular and coronary arteries disease were detected in 20, 11 and 16 patients, respectively. Median coronary angiography (grade 5) was significantly higher than acceptable for diagnosis grade 4 (p < 0.001). Per segment, weighted kappa statistic was 0.79 indicating substantial agreement with catheter angiography (p<0.001). Average DLP was 1,490 ± 412 mGy-cm. Gated 64-MDCT angiography with triphasic IV contrast is a robust multipurpose technique for patients with acute non-specific chest pain.

Keywords

Computed tomography Coronary arteries ECG-gated chest CT Acute chest pain Emergency department 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to (Donna Wolfe) for editorial assistance and to (Clotell Forde) for secretarial, data formatting and literature search assistance and (Iryna Rastorhuyeva) for assistance with data collection.

References

  1. 1.
    Raptopoulos VD, Boiselle PB, Michailidis N (2006) MDCT angiography of acute chest pain: evaluation of ECG-gated and nongated techniques. AJR 186:S346–S356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roos JE, Willmann JK, Weishaupt D, Lachat M, Marincek B, Hilfiker PR (2002) Thoracic aorta: motion artifact reduction with retrospective and prospective electrocardiography-assisted multi-detector row CT. Radiology 222:271–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marten K, Engelke C, Funke M, Obenauer S, Baum F, Grabbe E (2003) ECG-gated multislice spiral CT for diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. Clin Radiol 58:862–868PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schoepf UJ, Becker CR, Bruening RD (1999) Electrocardiographically gated thin-section CT of the lung. Radiology 212:649–654PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boehm T, Willmann JK, Hilfiker PR (2003) Thin-section CT of the lung: does electrocardiographic triggering influence diagnosis? Radiology 229:483–491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morin RL, Gerber TC, McCollough CH (2003) Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart. Circulation 18(107):917–922, FebCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bae KT, Hong C, Whiting BR (2004) Radiation dose in multidetector row computed tomography cardiac imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 19:859–863, JunPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Suess C, Schoepf UJ, Reiser MF (2002) Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction ofradiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 12:1081–1086PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sigal-Cinqualbre AB, Hennequin R, Abada HT, Chen X, Paul JF (2004) Low-kilovoltage multi-detector row chest CT in adults: feasibility and effect on image quality and iodine dose. Radiology 231:169–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abada HT, Larchez C, Daoud B, Sigal-Cinqualbre A, Paul JF (2006) MDCT of the coronary arteries: feasibility of low-dose CT with ECG-pulsed tubecurrent modulation to reduce radiation dose. AJR 186:S387–S390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    d’Agostino AG, Remy-Jardin M, Khalil C, Delannoy-Deken V, Flohr T, Duhamel A, Remy J (2006) Low-dose ECG-gated 64-slices helical CT angiography of the chest: evaluation of image quality in 105 patients.Eur Radiol 16(10):2137–2146, OctPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vrachliotis TG, Bis KG, Haidary A, Kosuri R, Balasubramaniam M, Gallagher M, Raff G, Ross M, O’neil B, O’neill W (2007) Atypical chest pain: coronary, aortic, and pulmonary vasculature enhancement atbiphasic single-injection 64-section CT angiography. Radiology 243(2):368–376, MayPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ghersin E, Litmanovich D, Dragu R (2006) 16-MDCT coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography in acute chest pain syndrome: a blinded prospective study. AJR 186:177–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Austen W, Edwards J, Frye R et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association 51(4 Suppl):5–40, AprGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Computed Tomography. Available at: http://www.drs.dk/guidelines/ct/quality/index.htm. Accessed June 26, 2002
  16. 16.
    White CS, Kuo D, Kelemen M. Chest pain evaluation in the emergency department: can MDCT provide a comprehensive evaluation? AJR 185:533–540Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, Becker A, Nikolaou K, Paul S, Wintersperger B, Reiser M, Becker CR, Steinbeck G, Boekstegers P (2005) Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(1):147–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ, Knez A, Boekstegers P, Reiser MF, Becker CR (2007) ECG-gated 64-MDCT angiography in the differential diagnosis of acute chest pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(1):76–82, JanPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, Petersilka M, Gruber K, Suss C, Grasruck M, Stierstorfer K, Krauss B, Raupach R, Primak AN, Kuttner A, Achenbach S, Becker C, Kopp A, Ohnesorge BM (2006) First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 16(2):256–68, Feb, Epub 2005 Dec 10. Erratum in: Eur Radiol 16(6):1405, JunPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Vachenauer R, Desbiolles L, Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Frauenfelder T, Schertler T, Husmann L, Grunenfelder J, Genoni M, Kaufmann PA, Marincek B, Leschka S (2006) Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 16(12):2739–2747, DecPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ, Leber AW, von Ziegler F, Rist C, Buhmann S, Knez A, Reiser MF, Becker CR (2006) Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience. Eur Radiol 16(7):1409–1415, JulPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Fink C, Becker A, Knez A, Rist C, Reiser MF, Becker CR (2007) Dual-source CT in chest pain diagnosis. Radiologe 47(4):301–309, AprPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sica GT (2006) Bias in research studies. Radiology 239:780–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diana Litmanovitch
    • 1
    • 2
  • Giulia A. Zamboni
    • 1
    • 2
  • Thomas H. Hauser
    • 2
    • 3
  • Pei-Jan P. Lin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Melvin E. Clouse
    • 1
    • 2
  • Vassilios Raptopoulos
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  3. 3.Department of CardiologyBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations