European Radiology

, Volume 17, Issue 11, pp 2941–2947 | Cite as

Comparison of sensitivity and reading time for the use of computer-aided detection (CAD) of pulmonary nodules at MDCT as concurrent or second reader

  • F. BeyerEmail author
  • L. Zierott
  • E. M. Fallenberg
  • K. U. Juergens
  • J. Stoeckel
  • W. Heindel
  • D. Wormanns


The purpose of this study was to compare sensitivity for detection of pulmonary nodules in MDCT scans and reading time of radiologists when using CAD as the second reader (SR) respectively concurrent reader (CR). Four radiologists analyzed 50 chest MDCT scans chosen from clinical routine two times and marked all detected pulmonary nodules: first with CAD as CR (display of CAD results immediately in the reading session) and later (median 14 weeks) with CAD as SR (display of CAD markers after completion of first reading without CAD). A Siemens LungCAD prototype was used. Sensitivities for detection of nodules and reading times were recorded. Sensitivity of reading with CAD as SR was significantly higher than reading without CAD (p < 0.001) and CAD as CR (p < 0.001). For nodule size of 1.75 mm or above no significant sensitivity difference between CAD as CR and reading without CAD was observed; e.g., for nodules above 4 mm sensitivity was 68% without CAD, 68% with CAD as CR (p = 0.45) and 75% with CAD as SR (p < 0.001). Reading time was significantly shorter for CR (274 s) compared to reading without CAD (294 s; p = 0.04) and SR (337 s; p < 0.001). In our study CAD could either speed up reading of chest CT cases for pulmonary nodules without relevant loss of sensitivity when used as CR, or it increased sensitivity at the cost of longer reading times when used as SR.


Computed tomography (CT) Lung Nodule Computer Diagnostic aid 


  1. 1.
    Takashima S, Sone S, Li F, Maruyama Y, Hasegawa M, Kadoya M (2003) Indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodules revealed at population-based CT screening of the lung: using first follow-up diagnostic CT to differentiate benign and malignant lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:1255–1263PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Sloan JA, Midthun DE, Hartman TE, Sykes AM, Aughenbaugh GL, Zink FE, Hillman SL, Noetzel GR, Marks RS, Clayton AC, Pairolero PC (2002) Screening for lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165:508–513PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wormanns D, Ludwig K, Beyer F, Heindel W, Diederich S (2005) Detection of pulmonary nodules at multirow-detector CT: effectiveness of double reading to improve sensitivity at standard-dose and low-dose chest CT. Eur Radiol 15:14–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Armato SG 3rd, Li F, Giger ML, MacMahon H, Sone S, Doi K (2002) Lung cancer: performance of automated lung nodule detection applied to cancers missed in a CT screening program. Radiology 225:685–692PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wormanns D, Fiebich M, Saidi M, Diederich S, Heindel W (2002) Automatic detection of pulmonary nodules at spiral CT: clinical application of a computer-aided diagnosis system. Eur Radiol 12:1052–1057PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Awai K, Murao K, Ozawa A, Komi M, Hayakawa H, Hori S, Nishimura Y (2004) Pulmonary nodules at chest CT: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologists’ detection performance. Radiology 230:347–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wormanns D, Beyer F, Diederich S, Ludwig K, Heindel W (2004) Diagnostic performance of a commercially available computer-aided diagnosis system for automatic detection of pulmonary nodules: comparison with single and double reading. Fortschr Roentgenstr 176:953–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rubin GD, Lyo JK, Paik DS, Sherbondy AJ, Chow LC, Leung AN, Mindelzun R, Schraedley-Desmond PK, Zinck SE, Naidich DP, Napel S (2005) Pulmonary nodules on multi-detector row CT scans: performance comparison of radiologists and computer-aided detection. Radiology 234:274–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee JW, Goo JM, Lee HJ, Kim JH, Kim S, Kim YT (2004) The potential contribution of a computer-aided detection system for lung nodule detection in multidetector row computed tomography. Invest Radiol 39:649–655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marten K, Seyfarth T, Auer F, Wiener E, Grillhosl A, Obenauer S, Rummeny EJ, Engelke C (2004) Computer-assisted detection of pulmonary nodules: performance evaluation of an expert knowledge-based detection system in consensus reading with experienced and inexperienced chest radiologists. Eur Radiol 14:1930–1938PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marten K, Engelke C (2007) Computer-aided detection and automated CT volumetry of pulmonary nodules. Eur Radiol 17(4):888–901PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brown MS, Goldin JG, Suh RD, McNitt-Gray MF, Sayre JW, Aberle DR (2003) Lung micronodules: automated method for detection at thin-section CT-initial experience. Radiology 226:256–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brown MS, McNitt-Gray MF, Goldin JG, Suh RD, Sayre JW, Aberle DR (2001) Patient-specific models for lung nodule detection and surveillance in CT images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:1242–1250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peldschus K, Boston MA, Martensen JM, Cheema JI, Miao M, Wood SA, Schoepf U (2003) Computer-aided diagnosis of focal lung disease with dedicated visualization tools and automated lesion detection: influence on reader effectiveness. RSNA 2003. 89th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program: 293Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marten K, Rummeny EJ, Engelke C (2005) Computer-aided diagnosis and volumetry of pulmonary nodules: current concepts and future perspectives. Fortschr Roentgenstr 177:188–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Freedman M, Osicka T, Lo SC, Lure F, Xu XW, Lin J, Zhang R, Zhao H (2005) The effect of database content on machine performance and radiologist performance improvement with chest CAD. CARS 2005 Proc. of the 19th congress and exhibition: 1087–92Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Beyer
    • 1
    Email author
  • L. Zierott
    • 1
  • E. M. Fallenberg
    • 1
    • 2
  • K. U. Juergens
    • 1
  • J. Stoeckel
    • 3
  • W. Heindel
    • 1
  • D. Wormanns
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Clinical RadiologyUniversity Hospital MuensterMuensterGermany
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyClemenshospital Muenster GmbHMuensterGermany
  3. 3.CAD GroupSiemens Medical Solutions USA Inc.MalvernUSA
  4. 4.Depatment of RadiologyELK Berlin Chest HospitalBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations