European Radiology

, Volume 17, Issue 7, pp 1865–1874 | Cite as

Early mammographic and sonographic findings after intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as a boost in patients with breast cancer

  • K. Wasser
  • C. Schoeber
  • U. Kraus-Tiefenbacher
  • L. Bauer
  • J. Brade
  • J. Teubner
  • F. Wenz
  • W. Neff
Breast

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate mammographic and sonographic changes at the surgical site within the first 2 years after IORT as a boost followed by whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT), compared with a control group treated with WBRT alone. All patients had breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer. Group A: n = 27, IORT (20 Gy) followed by WBRT (46 Gy). Group B (control group): n = 27, WBRT alone (56–66 Gy). Mammography: fat necrosis in 14 group A versus four group B patients (P < 0.001); parenchymal scarring classified as unorganized at the last follow-up in 16 vs seven cases, respectively (P = 0.03). Ultrasound: overall number of patients with circumscribed findings 27 vs 18 (P < 0.001); particular hematomas/seromas in 26 vs 13 patients (P < 0.001). Synopsis of mammography and ultrasound: overall postoperative changes were significantly higher classified in group A (P = 0.01), but not judged to have a significantly higher impact on interpretation. Additional diagnostic procedures, due to unclear findings at the surgical site, were performed on four patients of both groups. Within the first 2 years after IORT as a boost, therapy-induced changes at the original tumor site are significantly more pronounced compared with a control group. There is no evidence that the interpretation of findings is complicated after IORT.

Keywords

Mammography Ultrasound Breast cancer Intraoperative radiotherapy 

References

  1. 1.
    Reitsamer R, Peintinger F, Sedlmayer F, Kopp M, Menzel C, Cimpoca W, Glueck S, Rahim H, Kopp P, Deutschmann H, Merz F, Brandis M, Kogelnik H (2002) Intraoperative radiotherapy given as a boost after breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 38:1607–1610PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Veronesi U, Orecchia R, Luini A, Gatti G, Intra M, Zurrida S, Ivaldi G, Tosi G, Ciocca M, Tosoni A, De Lucia F (2001) A preliminary report of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in limited-stage breast cancers that are conservatively treated. Eur J Cancer 37:2178–2183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vaidya JS, Tobias JS, Baum M, Wenz F, Kraus-Tiefenbacher U, D’souza D, Keshtgar M, Massarut S, Hilaris B, Saunders C, Joseph D (2005) TARGeted Intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT): an innovative approach to partial-breast irradiation. Semin Radiat Oncol 15:84–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kraus-Tiefenbacher U, Scheda A, Steil V, Hermann B, Kehrer T, Bauer L, Melchert F, Wenz F (2005) Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for breast cancer using the Intrabeam system. Tumori 9:339–345Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gatzemeier W, Orecchia R, Gatti G, Intra M, Veronesi U (2001) Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in treatment of breast carcinoma—a new therapeutic alternative within the scope of breast-saving therapy? Current status and future prospects. Report of experiences from the European Institute of Oncology (EIO). Mailand Strahlenther Onkol 177:330–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Intra M, Gatti G, Luini A, Galimberti V, Veronesi P, Zurrida S, Frasson A, Ciocca M, Orecchia R, Veronesi U (2002) Surgical technique of intraoperative radiotherapy in conservative treatment of limited-stage breast cancer. Arch Surg 137:737–740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Della Sala SW, Pellegrini M, Bernardi D, Franzoso F, Valentini M, Di Michele S, Centonze M, Mussari S (2006) Mammographic and ultrasonographic comparison between intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and conventional external radiotherapy (RT) in limited-stage breast cancer, conservatively treated. Eur J Radiol 59:220–230Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Teubner J (1997) Echomammography: technique and results. In: Friedrich M, Sickles EA (eds) Medical radiology: radiological diagnosis of breast diseases. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 181–220Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Breast Imaging Reporting and Data system BI-RADS, 3rd edn (1998) American College of Radiology, RestonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dershaw DD (1995) Mammography in patients with breast cancer treated by breast conservation (lumpectomy with or without radiation). AJR Am J Roentgenol 164:309–316PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harris KM, Costa-Greco MA, Baratz AB, Britton CA, Ilkhanipour ZS, Ganott MA (1989) The mammographic features of the postlumpectomy, postirradiation breast. Radiographics 9:253–268PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dershaw DD, Shank B, Reisinger S (1987) Mammographic findings after breast cancer treatment with local excision and definitive irradiation. Radiology 164:455–461PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hogge JP, Robinson RE, Magnant CM, Zuurbier RA (1995) The mammographic spectrum of fat necrosis of the breast. Radiographics 15:1347–1356PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cox CE, Greenberg H, Fleisher D, Clark R, Berman C, Nicosia S, Ku NN, Fiorica J, Reintgen D (1993) Natural history and clinical evaluation of the lumpectomy scar. Am Surg 59:55–59PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krishnamurthy R, Whitman GJ, Stelling CB, Kushwaha AC (1999) Mammographic findings after breast conservation therapy. Radiographics 19:53–62Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baillie M, Mok PM (2004) Fat necrosis in the breast: review of the mammographic and ultrasound features, and a strategy for management. Australas Radiol 48:288–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mundinger A, Martini C, Madjar H, Laubenberger J, Gufler H, Langer M (1996) Ultrasound and mammography follow-up of findings after breast saving operation and adjuvant irradiation. Ultraschall Med 17:7–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Schreer I (2003) Postttraumatische, postoperative und posttherapeutische Veränderungen. In: Mödder U (ed) Bildgebende Mammadiagnostik. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 401–441Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kindinger R, Teubner J, Diezler P, Georgi M (1994) Long-term follow-up using sono- and mammography to evaluate posttherapeutic alterations in breast cancer tissue traeted conservatively. In: Madjar H, Teubner J, Hackelöer BB (eds) Breast ultrasound update. Karger, Freiburg, pp 240–252Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Balu-Maestro C, Bruneton JN, Geoffray A, Chauvel C, Rogopoulos A, Bittman O (1991) Ultrasonographic posttreatment follow-up of breast cancer patients. J Ultrasound Med 10:1–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Soo MS, Kornguth PJ, Hertzberg BS (1998) Fat necrosis in the breast: sonographic features. Radiology 206:261–269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kraus-Tiefenbacher U, Bauer L, Kehrer T, Hermann B, Melchert F, Wenz F (2006) Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as a boost in patients with early-stage breast cancer—acute toxicity. Onkologie 29:77–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Herskind C, Steil V, Kraus-Tiefenbacher U, Wenz F (2005) Radiobiological aspects of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with isotropic low-energy X-rays for early-stage breast cancer. Radiat Res 163:208–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Wasser
    • 1
  • C. Schoeber
    • 1
  • U. Kraus-Tiefenbacher
    • 2
  • L. Bauer
    • 3
  • J. Brade
    • 4
  • J. Teubner
    • 1
    • 5
  • F. Wenz
    • 2
  • W. Neff
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity Hospital Mannheim, University of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.Department of Radiation Oncology, Mannheim Medical CenterUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  3. 3.Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversity Hospital Mannheim, University of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  4. 4.Department of StatisticsUniversity Hospital Mannheim, University of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  5. 5.Diagnostic Breastcenter St. Elisabethklinik HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations