European Radiology

, Volume 16, Issue 12, pp 2866–2874

Impact of the introduction of 16-row MDCT on image quality and patient dose: phantom study and multi-centre survey

  • Francis R. Verdun
  • Nicolas Theumann
  • Pierre-Alexandre Poletti
  • Daniel Gutierrez
  • Abbas Aroua
  • Pierre Schnyder
  • Jean-François Valley
  • Salah D. Qanadli
Computer Tomography

Abstract

The purpose was to compare the image quality and patient dose between 4- and 16-row MDCT units and to evaluate the dispersion of the dose delivered for common clinical examinations. Four 4- and 16-row MDCT units were used in the study. Image noise levels from images of a CatPhan phantom were compared for all units using a given CTDIvol of 15.0±1.0 mGy. Standard acquisition protocols from ten centres, shifted from 4- to 16-row MDCT (plus one additional centre for 16-row MDCT), were compared for cerebral angiography and standard chest and abdomen examinations. In addition, the protocols used with 16-row MDCT units for diagnosis of the unstable shoulder and for cardiac examinations were also compared. The introduction of 16-MSCT units did not reduce the performance of the detectors. Concerning the acquisition protocols, a wide range in practice was observed for standard examinations; DLP varied from 800 to 5,120 mGy.cm, 130 to 860 mGy.cm, 410 to 1,790 mGy.cm and 850 to 2,500 mGy.cm for cerebral angiography, standard chest, standard abdomen and heart examinations, respectively.The introduction of 16-row MDCT did not, on average, increase the patient dose for standard chest and abdominal examinations. However, a significant dose increase has been observed for cerebral angiography. There is a wide dispersion in the doses delivered, especially for cardiac imaging.

Keywords

Multi-slice spiral CT CT dose survey Dose reference levels (DRL) 

References

  1. 1.
    Kalender WA, Seissler W, Klotz E, Vock P (1990) Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique, continuous transport, and scanner rotation. Radiology 176:181–183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Klingenbeck-Regn K, Schaller S, Flohr T, Ohnesorge B, Kopp AF, Baum U (1999) Subsecond multi-slice computed tomography: basics and applications. Eur J Radiol 31:110–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fuchs T, Kachelriess M, Kalender WA (2000) Technical advances in multi-slice spiral CT. Eur J Radiol 36:69–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dawson P, Lees WR (2001) Multi-slice technology in computed tomography. Clin Radiol 56:302–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rydberg J, Buckalter KA, Caldemeyer KS, Phillips MD, Conces DJ, Aisen AM, Persohn SA, Kopecky KK (2000) Multisection CT: scanning techniques and clinical applications. Radiographics 20:1787–1806PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berland LL, Smith JK (1998) Multidetector-array CT: once again, technology creates new opportunities. Radiology 209:327–329PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kopecky KK, Buckwalter KA, Sokiranski R (1999) Multi-slice CT: spirals past single-slice CT in diagnostic efficacy. Diagn Imaging 21:36–42Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knez A, Becker CR, Leber A, Ohnesorge B, Becker A, White C, Haberl R, Reiser MF, Steinbeck G (2001) Usefulness of multislice spiral computed tomography angiography for determination of coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol 88:1191–1194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nieman K, Rensing BJ, van Geuns RJ, Munne A, Ligthart JM, Pattynama PM, Krestin GP, Serruys PW, de Feyter PJ (2002) Usefulness of multislice computed tomography for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 89:913–918PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hong C, Becker CR, Schoepf UJ, Ohnesorge B, Bruening R, Reiser MF (2002) Coronary artery calcium: absolute quantification in nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT studies. Radiology 223:474–480PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rubin GD, Schmidt AJ, Logan LJ, Sofilos MC (2001) Multi-detector row CT angiography of lower extremity arterial inflow and runoff: initial experience. Radiology 221:146–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Flohr T, Stierstorfer K, Bruder H, Simon J, Schaller S (2002) New technical developments in multislice CT. I. Approaching isotropic resolution with sub-mm 16-slice scanning. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 174:839–845PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Flohr TG, Schaller S, Stierstorfer K, Bruder H, Ohnesorge BM, Schoepf UJ (2005) Multi-detector row CT systems and image-reconstruction techniques. Radiology 235:756–773PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brix G, Nagel HD, Stamm G, Veit R, Lechel U, Griebel J, Galanski M (2003) Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey. Eur Radiol 13:1979–1991PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yates SJ, Pike LC, Goldstone KE (2004) Effect of multislice scanners on patient dose from routine CT examinations in East Anglia. Br J Radiol 77:472–478PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hart D, Wall BF (2004) UK population dose from medical X-ray examinations. Eur J Radiol 50:285–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M (2005) Dose from computed tomography examinations in the UK-2003 Review NRPB Report W67 Chilton: National Radiological Protection BoardGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aroua A, Vader JP, Valley JF and Verdun FR Exposure of the Swiss population by radiodiagnostics: 2003 Review Health Physics (submitted 2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    International Electrotechnical Committee 1994. Medical diagnostic X-ray equipment-Radiation conditions for use in the determination of characteristics. Standard IEC # 61267, Geneva SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Verdun FR, Noel A, Meuli R, Pachoud M, Monnin P, Valley JF, Schnyder P, Denys A (2004) Influence of detector collimation on SNR in four different MDCT scanners using a reconstructed slice thickness of 5 mm. Eur Radiol 14:1866–1872PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography 1999: report EUR 16262. Available at: http://www.drs.dk/guidelines/ct/quality/mainindex.htm
  23. 23.
    Federle MP (2005) CT of the acute (emergency) adbdomen. Eur Radiol 15(Suppl 4):D100–D1004PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Marincek B (2005) Multi-detector computed tomography of acute abdomen. Eur Radiol 15:2435–2447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Farber JM, Buckwalter KA (2002) Sports-related injuries of the shoulder: instability. Radiol Clin North Am 40:235–249 MarPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bitzer M, Nasko M, Krackhardt T, Schick F, Schober W, Wiskirchen J, Morgalla M, Weise K, Claussen C (2004) Direct CT-arthrography versus direct MR-arthrography in chronic shoulder instability: comparison of modalities after the introduction of multidetector-CT technology. Rofo 176(12):1770–1775PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hesse B, Murphy R, Greenberg N, Gring C, Sauri D, Garcia M (2005) Tissue Doppler imaging-guided prospective tube current modulation in cardiac multidetector computed tomography. Abstract SSK08–04, 91st annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, Chicago 2005Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gurung J, Khan MF, Maataoui A, Herzog C, Bux R, Bratzke H, Ackermann H, Vogl TJ (2005) Multislice CT of the pelvis: dose reduction with regard to image quality using 16-row CT. Eur Radiol 15:1898–1905PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Greess H, Lutze J, Nomayr A, Wolf H, Hothorn T, Kalender WA, Bautz W (2004) Dose reduction in subsecond multislice spiral CT examination of children by online tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 14:995–999PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francis R. Verdun
    • 1
  • Nicolas Theumann
    • 2
  • Pierre-Alexandre Poletti
    • 3
  • Daniel Gutierrez
    • 1
  • Abbas Aroua
    • 1
  • Pierre Schnyder
    • 2
  • Jean-François Valley
    • 1
  • Salah D. Qanadli
    • 2
  1. 1.University Institute for Radiation Physics (IRA-DUMSC)LausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyUniversity Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases CentreLausanneSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyUniversity Hospital of Geneva (HUG)Genève-14Switzerland

Personalised recommendations