Advertisement

European Radiology

, Volume 15, Issue 8, pp 1544–1549 | Cite as

CT volumetry of intravertebral cement after kyphoplasty. Comparison of polymethylmethacrylate and calcium phosphate in a 12-month follow-up

  • M. Libicher
  • M. Vetter
  • I. Wolf
  • G. Noeldge
  • C. Kasperk
  • I. Grafe
  • K. Da Fonseca
  • J. Hillmeier
  • P. J. Meeder
  • H. P. Meinzer
  • G. W. Kauffmann
Musculoskeletal

Abstract

This study was intended to measure the volume of intravertebral cement after balloon kyphoplasty with high resolution computed tomography (CT) and dedicated software. Volume changes of biocompatible calcium phosphate cement (CPC) were detected during a follow-up of 12 months. Measurements were compared with a control group of patients treated with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Twenty-three vertebrae (14 CPC, 9 PMMA) of 12 patients were examined with CT using an identical imaging protocol. Dedicated software was used to quantify intravertebral cement volume in subvoxel resolution by analyzing each cement implant with a density-weighted algorithm. The mean volume reduction of CPC was 0.08 ml after 12 months, which corresponds to an absorption rate of 2 vol%. However, the difference did not reach significance level (P>0.05). The mean error estimate was 0.005 ml, indicating excellent precision of the method. CT volumetry appears a precise tool for measurement of intravertebral cement volume. CT volumetry offers the possibility of in vivo measurement of CPC resorption.

Keywords

Polymethylmethacrylate cement Vertebroplasty Kyphoplasty Compression fracture Calcium phosphate cement 

References

  1. 1.
    Cotten A, Dewatre F, Cortet B et al. (1996) Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteolytic metastases and myeloma: effects of the percentage of lesion filling and the leakage of methyl methacrylate at clinical follow-up. Radiology 200:525–530PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Garfin SR, Yuan HA, Reiley MA (2001) New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine 26:1511–1515CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nussbaum DA, Gailloud P, Murphy K (2004) The chemistry of acrylic bone cements and implications for clinical use in image-guided therapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:121–126Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Verlaan JJ, Oner FC, Slootweg PJ, Verbout AJ, Dhert WJ (2004) Histologic changes after vertebroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 86-A:1230–1238Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bai B, Jazrawi LM, Kummer FJ, Spivak JM (1999) The use of an injectable, biodegradable calcium phosphate bone substitute for the prophylactic augmentation of osteoporotic vertebrae and the management of vertebral compression fractures. Spine 24:1521–1526CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    LeGeros RZ (2002) Properties of osteoconductive biomaterials: calcium phosphates. Clin Orthop 395:81–98Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weiss DD, Sachs MA, Woodard CR (2003) Calcium phosphate bone cements: a comprehensive review. J Long-Term Eff Med Implants 13:41–47Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lim TH, Brebach GT, Renner SM et al. (2002) Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable calcium phosphate cement for vertebroplasty. Spine 27:1297–1302Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ooms EM, Wolke JG, van der Waerden JP, Jansen JA (2002) Trabecular bone response to injectable calcium phosphate (Ca-P) cement. J Biomed Mater Res 61:9–18Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lu J, Descamps M, Dejou J et al. (2002) The biodegradation mechanism of calcium phosphate biomaterials in bone. J Biomed Mater Res 63:408–412Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yankelevitz DF, Reeves AP, Kostis WJ, Zhao B, Henschke CI (2000) Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation. Radiology 217:251–256PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wu Z, Chung HW, Wehrli FW (1994) A Bayesian approach to subvoxel tissue classification in NMR microscopic images of trabecular bone. Magn Reson Med 31:302–308Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vokurka EA, Herwadkar A, Thacker NA, Ramsden RT, Jackson A (2002) Using Bayesian tissue classification to improve the accuracy of vestibular schwannoma volume and growth measurement. Am J Neuroradiol 23:459–467Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Laidlaw DH, Fleischer KW, Barr AH (1998) Partial-volume Bayesian classification of material mixtures in MR volume data using voxel histograms. IEEE Trans Med Imag 17(1):74–86Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lieberman IH, Dudeney S, Reinhardt MK, Bell G (2001) Initial outcome and efficacy of “kyphoplasty” in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine 26:1631–1638CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wolf I, Vetter M, Wegner I et al. (2004) The medical imaging interaction toolkit (MITK). In: Galloway RL (ed) SPIE medical imaging 2004. Visualization, image-guided procedures, and display. Bellingham, Washington, pp 16–27Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pokric M, Thacker N, Scott MLJ, Jackson A (2001) The importance of partial voluming in multi-dimensional medical image segmentation. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-MICCAI:1293Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schmidt C, Priemel M, Kohler T et al. (2003) Precision and accuracy of peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) in the mouse skeleton compared with histology and microcomputed tomography (microCT). J Bone Miner Res 18:1486–1496Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tomita S, Molloy S, Jasper LE, Abe M, Belkoff SM (2004) Biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty with different bone cements. Spine 29:1203–1207Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tomita S, Kin A, Yazu M, Abe M (2003) Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty with calcium phosphate cement in a simulated osteoporotic compression fracture. J Orthop Sci 8:192–197Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hillmeier J, Meeder PJ, Nöldge G, Kock HJ, Da Fonseca K, Kasperk HC (2004) Balloon kyphoplasty of vertebral compression fractures with a new calcium phosphate cement. Orthopäde 33:31–39 (German)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cunin G, Boissonnet H, Petite H, Blanchat C, Guillemin G (2000) Experimental vertebroplasty using osteoconductive granular material. Spine 25:1070–1076Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Molloy S, Mathis JM, Belkoff SM (2003) The effect of vertebral body percentage fill on mechanical behavior during percutaneous vertebroplasty. Spine 28:1549–1554Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Jasper LE, Deramond H (2001) The biomechanics of vertebroplasty. The effect of cement volume on mechanical behavior. Spine 26:1537–1541PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liebschner MA, Rosenberg WS, Keaveny TM (2001) Effects of bone cement volume and distribution on vertebral stiffness after vertebroplasty. Spine 26:1547–1554Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mousavi P, Roth S, Finkelstein J, Cheung G, Whyne C (2003) Volumetric quantification of cement leakage following percutaneous vertebroplasty in metastatic and osteoporotic vertebrae. J Neurosurg 99:56–59Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wormanns D, Kohl G, Klotz E et al. (2004) Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility. Eur Radiol 14:86–92CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wasser K, Sinn HP, Fink C et al. (2003) Accuracy of tumor size measurement in breast cancer using MRI is influenced by histological regression induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur Radiol 13:1213–1223Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fischbach F, Knollmann F, Griesshaber V, Freund T, Akkol E, Felix R (2003) Detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice computed tomography: improved detection rate with reduced slice thickness. Eur Radiol 13:2378–2383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Muller SD, Green SM, McCaskie AW (2002) The dynamic volume changes of polymerising polymethyl methacrylate bone cement. Acta Orthop Scand 73:684–687Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gilbert JL, Hasenwinkel JM, Wixson RL, Lautenschlager EP (2000) A theoretical and experimental analysis of polymerization shrinkage of bone cement: a potential major source of porosity. J Biomed Mater Res 52:210–218Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Libicher
    • 1
  • M. Vetter
    • 2
  • I. Wolf
    • 2
  • G. Noeldge
    • 1
  • C. Kasperk
    • 3
  • I. Grafe
    • 3
  • K. Da Fonseca
    • 4
  • J. Hillmeier
    • 5
  • P. J. Meeder
    • 4
  • H. P. Meinzer
    • 2
  • G. W. Kauffmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Diagnostic RadiologyUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.Departments of Medical and Biological InformaticsDeutsches KrebsforschungszentrumHeidelbergGermany
  3. 3.Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  4. 4.Department of Trauma SurgeryUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  5. 5.Department of Trauma SurgerySt Vincenz HospitalLimburgGermany

Personalised recommendations