European Radiology

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 1131–1137

Tumor staging using whole-body high-resolution 16-channel PET-CT: does additional low-dose chest CT in inspiration improve the detection of solitary pulmonary nodules?

  • K. U. Juergens
  • M. Weckesser
  • L. Stegger
  • C. Franzius
  • M. Beetz
  • O. Schober
  • W. Heindel
  • D. Wormanns


For optimal image fusion between CT and F-18-FDG-PET, the acquisition of CT images is performed in mild expiratory suspension, which might compromise the detection of lung metastases. This study aimed at evaluating the influence of expiration on the detection of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) and at assessing if additional inspiratory low-dose CT (I-LDCT) of the chest can improve the detection of potential lung metastases performing whole-body 16-channel PET-CT. Sixty-six patients with malignant tumors underwent PET-CT: contrast-enhanced CT was acquired during mild expiration and was used for fusion with PET images; additionally, chest I-LDCT was performed at deep inspiration. Two radiologists reported all SPN detected at I-LDCT and the expiratory CT scan independently. Overall, 53% of 128 SPN (mean: 3.8±0.2 mm) were detected at both respiratory states: 51 SPN only at I-LDCT, and 9 nodules only at expiratory CT. Of the SPN, 117/128 were classified as certain; 45 of those were additionally detected at I-LDCT, and 6 nodules at expiratory CT. A 100% detection rate was reached in SPN >4 mm at I-LDCT versus >8 mm at expiratory CT (all P<0.001). Additional I-LDCT of the chest significantly improves the detection of SPN at whole-body F-18-FDG-PET-CT and thus is recommended as part of the standard protocol for oncological patients.


Computed tomography (CT) Positron-emission tomography computed tomography (PET-CT) Whole-body PET-CT Tumor staging Low-dose chest CT Solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) 


  1. 1.
    Antoch G, Saoudi N, Kuehl H, et al (2004) Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality Fluorine-18-2-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-Glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: comparison with CT and PET. J Clin Oncol 22:4357–4368CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lardinois D, Weder W, Hany TF, et al (2003) Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography. N Engl J Med 348:2500–2507CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Antoch G, Vogt FM, Freudenberg LS, et al (2003) Whole-body dual-modality PET-CT and whole-body MRI for tumor staging in oncology. JAMA 290:3199–3206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rusinek H, Naidich DP, McGuinness G, et al (1998) Pulmonary nodule detection: low-dose versus conventional CT. Radiology 209:243–249PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diederich S, Semik M, Lentschig MG, et al (1999) Helical CT of pulmonary nodules in patients with extrathoracic malignancy: CT-surgical correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:353–360PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Seemann MD, Seemann O, Luboldt W, et al (2000) Differentiation of malignant from benign solitary pulmonary lesions using chest radiography, spiral CT and HRCT. Lung Cancer 29:105–124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kozuka T, Johkoh T, Hamada S, et al (2003) Detection of pulmonary metastases with multi-detector row CT scans of 5-mm nominal section thickness: autopsy lung study. Radiology 226:231–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wormanns D, Kohl G, Klotz E, et al (2004) Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility. Eur Radiol 14:86–92CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marten K, Grillhösl A, Seyfarth T, Obenauer S, Rummeny EJ, Engelke C (2005) Computer-assisted detection of pulmonary nodules: evaluation of diagnostic performance using an expert knowledge-based detection system with variable reconstruction slice thickness settings. Eur Radiol 15:203–212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Diederich S, Hansen J, Wormanns D (2005) Resolving small pulmonary nodules: CT features. Eur Radiol 15:2064–2069CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Valencia R, Denecke T, Lehmkuhl L, Fischbach F, Felix R, Knollmann F. Value of axial and coronal maximum intensity projection (MIP) images in the detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice spiral CT: comparison with axial 1-mm and 5-mm slices. Eur Radiol 2005; DOI 10.1007/s00330-005-2871-1Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beyer T, Antoch G, Blodgett T, Freudenberg LF, Akhurst T, Mueller S (2003) Dual-modality PET/CT imaging: the effect of respiratory motion on combined image quality in clinical oncology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30:588–596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Diederich S, Wormanns D, Semik M, et al (2002) Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers. Radiology 222:773–781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Townsend DW, Beyer T, Blodgett TM (2003) PET/CT scanner: a hardware approach to image fusion. Semin Nucl Med 33:193–204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beyer T, Townsend D (2001) Dual-modality PET/CT imaging: CT based attenuation correction in the presence of CT contrast agent. J Nucl Med 42:56PGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Keidar Z, Haim N, Guralnik L, et al (2004) PET/CT using 18F-FDG in suspected lung cancer recurrence: diagnostic value and impact on patient management. J Nucl Med 45:1640–1646PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gutzeit A, Antoch G, Kühl H, et al (2005) Unknown primary tumors: detection with dual-modality PET/CT - initial experience. Radiology 234:227–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Snyder BJ, Pugatch RD (1998) Imaging characteristics of metastatic disease to the chest. Chest Surg Clin N Am 8:29–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Davis SD (1991) CT evaluation for pulmonary metastases in patients with extrathoracic malignancy. Radiology 180:1–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    American College of Radiology. ACR appropriateness criteria: screening for pulmonary metastases:
  21. 21.
    Yankelevitz DF, Henschke CI (1997) Does 2-year stability imply that pulmonary nodules are benign? Am J Roentgenol 168:325–328Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aoki T, Nakata H, Watanabe H, et al (2000) Evolution of peripheral lung adenocarcinomas: CT findings correlated with histology and tumor doubling time. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:763–768PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yankelevitz DF, Reeves AP, Kostis WJ, Zhao B, Henschke CI (2000) Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation. Radiology 217:251–256PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wormanns D, Ludwig K, Beyer F, Heindel W, Diederich S (2005) Detection of pulmonary nodules at multirow-detector CT: effectiveness of double reading to improve sensitivity at standard-dose and low-dose chest CT. Eur Radiol 15:14–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gould MK, Maclean CC, Kuschner WG, Rydzak CE, Owens DK (2001) Accuracy of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and mass lesions: a meta-analysis. JAMA 285:914–924CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Antoch G, Stattaus J, Nemat AT, et al (2003) Non-small cell lung cancer: dual-modality PET/CT in preoperative staging. Radiology 229:526–533PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lindell RM, Hartman TE, Swensen SJ, et al (2005) Lung cancer screening experience: A retrospective review of PET in 22 non-small cell lung carcinomas detected on screening chest CT in a high-risk population. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:126–131PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. U. Juergens
    • 1
  • M. Weckesser
    • 2
  • L. Stegger
    • 2
  • C. Franzius
    • 2
  • M. Beetz
    • 1
  • O. Schober
    • 2
  • W. Heindel
    • 1
  • D. Wormanns
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Clinical RadiologyUniversity of MuensterMuensterGermany
  2. 2.Department of Nuclear MedicineUniversity of MuensterMuensterGermany

Personalised recommendations