Advertisement

European Radiology

, 16:998 | Cite as

Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the therapy of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a critical review

  • K. Hochmuth
  • D. Proschek
  • W. Schwarz
  • M. Mack
  • A. A. Kurth
  • T. J. VoglEmail author
Musculoskeletal

Abstract

Percutaneous vertebroplasty has become an efficient technique for the treatment of painful vertebral fractures. Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures are characterized by severe back pain and immobilization causing other complications like thrombosis or pneumonia. Vertebral cement augmentation provides increased strength of the vertebral body and an obvious pain relief. Between 1989 and 2004, 30 studies and a total of 2,086 treated patients have been published in literature. A review of these studies has been performed. The number and age of the patients, number of treated vertebrae, pre- and postoperative outcome of pain and complications of the different studies were assessed and analyzed. Percutaneous vertebroplasty is an efficient technique with low complication rates and a significant reduction in pain. It rapidly improves the mobility and quality of life of patients with vertebral compression fractures. With an increasing number of treated patients, experience with this interventional technique has become excellent. But still there are no randomized controlled trials available, showing that percutaneous vertebroplasty has a significantly better outcome than other treatment options, especially after a long-term follow-up.

Keywords

Vertebroplasty Spine Osteoporosis Percutaneous vertebroplasty Bone cement 

References

  1. 1.
    European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS) (2002) J Bone Miner Res, 17:716–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Melton LJ, Frye MA, Wahner HW, Riggs BL (1989) Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women. Am J Epidemiol, 129:1000–1011PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kanis JA. Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Bone 1992; 13 (Suppl. 1):7–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ettinger MP. Aging bone and osteoporosis: strategies for preventing fractures in the elderly; Arch Intern Med. 2003 Oct 13; 163(18)2237–2246CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McGraw JK, Barr JD, Mathis JM, Sacks D. Society of Interventional Radiology Quality Improvement Guidelines for Percutaneous Vertebroplasty. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14:827–831PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zoarski GH, Olan WJ, Stallmeyer MJ, Dick BW, Deyne M. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic compression fractures: quantitative prospective evaluation of long-term outcomes. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002; 13:139–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Galibert P, Rosat P, Le Gars D. Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty. Neurochirurgie 1987; 33:166–168PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Helmberger T, Hierholzer J, Vorwerk D. Leitlinien der Deutschen Röntgengesellschaft zur Vertebroplastie. Radiologe 2003; 43:703–708CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heini PF. Vertebroplastik bei hochgradiger Osteoporose. Orthopäde 2004; 33:22–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gangi A, Dietemann JL. Percutaneous vertebroplasty guided by a combination of CT and fluoroscopy. AJNR 1994; 15:83–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alvarez L, Quinones D, Calvo E, Rossi RE. Vertebroplasty in the treatment of vertebral tumors: postprocedural outcome and quality of life. Eur Spine J 2003; 12:356–360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gangi A, Imbert JP, Marin H, Dietemann JL. Percutaneous vertebroplasty: indications, technique and results. Radiographics 2003; 23:15–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pitton MB, Brecher B, Herber S, Mohr W, Thelen M. Evaluation of percutaneous vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral fractures using a combination of CT fluoroscopy and conventional lateral fluoroscopy. RoFo 2004; 176:1005–1012PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gangi A, Dietemann JL. Percutaneous vertebroplasty: a developing standard of care for vertebral compression fractures. AJNR 2001; 22:373–381PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hodler J, Gilula LA. Midterm outcome after vertebroplasty: predicitve value of technical and patient-related factors. Radiology 2003; 227:662–668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Evans AJ, Kip KE, Dunnagan SA. Vertebral compression fractures: pain reduction and improvement in functional mobility after percutaneous vertebroplasty. Radiology 2003; 226:366–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deschamps M, Coldman AJ. Assessment of adult cancer pain: shortcomings of current methods. Pain 1988; 32:133–139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Legroux-Gerot I, Boutry N, Cortet B. Long-term follow-up of vertebral osteoporotic fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty. Clin Rheumatol 2004; 23:310–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Winking M, Ortel M, Schnettler R, Böker DK. Treatment of pain from osteoporotic vertebral collapse by percutaneous PMMA vertebroplasty. Acta Neurochir 2004; 146:469–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Martin JP, Seium Y, Dietrich PY, Ruefenacht DA. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in metastatic disease: transpedicular access and treatment of lysed pedicles-initial experience. Radiology 2003; 229Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Martin JB, Sugiu D, Piotin K, Murphy B, Rüfenacht DA. Vertebroplasty: clinical experience and follow-up results. Bone 1999; 25:11S–15SCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Winking M, Ortel M, Schnettler R, Böker DK. Polymethylmethacrylat-Vertebroplastie. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2003; 128:2525–2530CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Perez-Higueras A, Rossi RE, Quinones D, Al-Assir I. Percutaneous vertebroplasty: long-term clinical and. Neurorad 2002; 44:950–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McGraw JK, Minkus KD, Rami PM, Davis TM. Prospective evaluation of pain relief in 100 patients undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty: results and follow-up. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002; 13:883–886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gaughen JR, Schweickert PA, Kaufmann TJ, Kallmes DF. Relevance of antecedent venography in percutaneous vertebroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures. AJNR 2001; 23:594–600Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kallmes DF, Marx WF, Jensen ME. Vertebroplasty in the mid- and upper thoracic spine. AJNR 2002; 23:1117–1120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Peh WCG, Peck DD. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Radiology 2002; 223:121–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kaufmann TJ, Schweickert PA, Marx FW, Kallmes DF. Age of fracture and clinical outcome of percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJNR 2001; 22:1860–1863PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Heini PF, Berlemann U. Percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty with PMMA. Eur Spine J 2000; 9:445–450CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Grados F, Cayrolle G, Hardy N, Deramond H. Long-term observation of vertebral osteoporotic fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty. Rheumatol 2000; 39:1410–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cyteval C, Roux JO, Thomas E, Taourel P. Acute osteoporotic vertebral collapse. AJR 1999; 173:1685–1690PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cortet B, Voutry N, Flipo RM, Delcambre B. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. J Rheumatol 1999; 26:2222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    KY Yoo. Acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with pulmonary cement embolism following percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate. Spine 2004; 29:294–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pleser M, O Worsdorfer, C Manke. [Pulmonary embolism caused by PMMA in percutaneous vertebroplasty Case report and review of the literature.]. Unfallchirurg 2004; 107:807–811CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Laredo JD, Hamze B. Complications of percutaneous vertebroplasty and their prevention. Skelet Radiol; 33:493–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Aaron J. Bone turnover and microdamage. Adv Osteopor Fract Manag 2:102–110Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jensen ME, Mathis JM, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ, Dion JE. Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects. AJNR, 18:1897–1904PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kalteis T, Gugler G, Zysk S, Grifka J (2004) Acute tissue toxicity of PMMA bone cements. Z Orthop ;142:666–672CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ciapetti G, Cenni E, Savarino L, Cavedagna D, Pizzoferrato A (2000) Cytotoxic effect of bone cements in HL–60 cells: distinction between apoptosis and necrosis. Biomed Mater Res, 52:338–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Goodman SB, Song Y, Lee K, Doshi A, Rushdieh B, Woolson S, Maloney W, Schurman D, Sibley R (1997) Loosening and osteolysis of cemented joint arthroplasties. A biologic spectrum. Clin Orthop Relat Res, ; Apr.:149–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kallmes DF (2003) Percutaneous vertebroplasty. Radiology, 229:27–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kobayashi K, Nakamura K, Murata K (2005) Percutaneous vertebroplasty immediately relieves pain of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Eur Radiol, 15:360–367CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Amar AP, Esnaashari N, Lavine SD, Teitelbaum GP (2001) Percutaneous transpedicular PMMA vertebroplasty for the treatment of spinal compression fractures. Neurosurgery, 49:1105–1114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Hochmuth
    • 1
    • 2
  • D. Proschek
    • 1
  • W. Schwarz
    • 1
  • M. Mack
    • 1
  • A. A. Kurth
    • 2
  • T. J. Vogl
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyUniversity of FrankfurtFrankfurt am MainGermany
  2. 2.Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, FriedrichsheimUniversity of FrankfurtFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations