Advertisement

European Radiology

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 1015–1021 | Cite as

Kyphosis reduction and the rate of cement leaks after vertebroplasty of intravertebral clefts

  • Martin KraussEmail author
  • Horst Hirschfelder
  • Bernd Tomandl
  • Gabriele Lichti
  • Ingrid Bär
Musculoskeletal

Abstract

To assess the results of vertebroplasty in patients with intravertebral clefts compared to patients with normal osteoporotic fractures, we evaluated the pre- and postoperative images and pain scores (VAS) of 114 patients with 192 vertebroplasty procedures treated between March 2002 and February 2005. Intravertebral clefts were identified on conventional radiographs, MR or CT images as gas- or fluid-filled spaces adjacent to an endplate of a fractured vertebra. Forty-four vertebrae showed intravertebral clefts. All clefts were filled with PMMA showing a typical filling pattern. Due to the prone positioning of the patient during vertebroplasty, a significant reduction of the kyphosis angle was achieved in the cleft group. Cement leakage occurred in 18.2% of clefts and 46% of regular osteoporotic fractures. In all patients, good filling of the cleft was achieved no matter where the needle tip was placed in the vertebra. The VAS score was 9.1 preoperatively, 3.6 before discharge and 3.9 6 months postoperatively, showing no significant difference between both groups. Patients with intravertebral clefts show a significant reduction of the kyphosis angle compared to non-cleft patients and have a significantly lower risk of experiencing cement leakage during vertebroplasty. Pain reduction is the same in both groups.

Keywords

Osteoporosis Interventional procedures Spine Fractures Vertebroplasty 

References

  1. 1.
    Cotten A, Boutry N, Cortet B, Assaker R, Demondion X, Leblond D, Chastanet P, Duquesnoy B, Deramond H (1998) Percutaneous vertebroplasty: state of the art. Radiographics 18:311–320PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Denardo A (2002) Percutaneous vertebroplasty. Sem Intervent Radiol 19:271–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gangi A, Wong LLS, Guth S, Dietemann JL (2002) Percutaneous vertebroplasty: indications, technique and results. Sem Intervent Radiol 19:265–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hide IG, Gangi A (2004) Percutaneous vertebroplasty: history, technique and current perspectives. Clin Radiol 59:461–467CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kallmes DF, Jensen ME (2003) Percutaneous vertebroplasty. Radiology 229:27–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kobayashi K, Shimoyama K, Nakamura K, Murata K (2005) Percutaneous vertebroplasty immediately relieves pain of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and prevents prolonged immobilization of patients. Euro Radiol 15:360–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Garfin SR, Yuan HA, Reiley MA (2001) New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine 26:1511–1515CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heini P, Orler R (2004) Kyphoplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Eur Spine J 13:184–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Theodorou DJ (2001) The intravertebral cleft sign. Radiology 221:787–788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lane JI, Maus TP, Wald JT, Thielen KR, Bobra S, Luetmer P (2002) Intravertebral clefts opacified during vertebroplasty: pathogenesis, technical implications, and prognostic significance. Am J Neuroradiol 23:1642–1646PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peh WC, Gelbart MS, Gilula LA, Peck DD (2004) Percutaneous vertebroplasty: treatment of painful vertebral compression fractures with intraosseous vacuum phenomena. Am J Roentgenol 182:818–819Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jang JS, Kim DY, Lee SH (2003) Efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of intravertebral pseudarthrosis associated with noninfected avascular necrosis of the vertebral body. Spine 28:1588–1592CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bhalla S, Reinus WR (1998) The linear intravertebral vacuum: a sign of benign vertebral collapse. Am J Roentgenol 170:1563–1569Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hiwatashi A, Moritani T, Numaguchi Y, Westesson PL (2003) Increase in vertebral body height after vertebroplasty. Am J Neuroradiol 23:185–189Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carlier RY, Gordji H, Mompoint DM, Vernhet N, Feydy A, Vallée C (2004) Osteoporotic vertebral collapse: percutaneous vertebroplasty and local kyphosis correction. Radiology 233:891–898PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Teng MMH, Wei CJ, Wei LC, Luo BC, Lirng JF, Chang FC, Liu CL, Chang CY (2003) Kyphosis correction and height restoration effects of percutaneous vertebroplasty. Am J Neuroradiol 24:1893–1900PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baroud G, Bohner M, Heini P, Steffen T (2004) Injection biomechanics of bone cements used in vertebroplasty. Biomed Mater Eng 14:487–504PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Berlemann U, Franz T, Orler R, Heini PF (2004) Kyphoplasty for treatment osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a prospective non-randomized study. Eur Spine J 13:496–501CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Theodorou DJ, Theodorou SJ, Duncan TD, Garfin SR, Wong WH (2992) Percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for the correction of spinal deformity in painful vertebral body compression fractures. Clin Imaging 26:1–5Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weisskopf M, Herlein S, Birnbaum K, Siebert C, Stanzel S, Wirtz DC (2003) Kyphoplasty – a new minimally invasive treatment for repositioning and stabilising vertebral bodies. Z Orthop 141:406–411CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hillmeier J, Grafe I, Da Fonseca K, Meeder PJ, Nöldge G, Libicher M, Kock HJ, Haag M, Kasperk C (2004) The evaluation of balloonkyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. An interdisciplinary concept. Orthopäde 33:893–904PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McGraw JK, Cardella J, Barr JD, Mathis JM, Sahcez O, Schwartzberg MS, Swan TL, Sacks D (2003) Society of Interventional Radiology Quality Improvement Guidelines for Percutaneous Vertebroplasty. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:S311–S315PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Evans AJ, Jensen ME, Kip KE, DeNardo AJ, Lawler GJ, Negin GA, Remley KB, Boutin SM, Dunnagan SA (2003) Vertebral compression fractures: pain reduction and impreovement in functional mobility after percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty – retrospective report of 245 cases. Radiology 226:366–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McGraw JK, Lippert JA, Minkus KD, Rami PM, Davis TM, Budzik RF (2002) Prospective evaluation of pain relief in 100 patients undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty: results and follow-up. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13:883–886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    McKiernan F Faciszewski T, Jensen R (2004) Quality of life following vertebroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 86:2600–2606PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Malghem J, Maldague B, Labaisse MA, Dooms G, Duprez T, Devogelaer JP, Vande Berg B (1993) Intravertebral vacuum cleft: changes in content after supine positioning. Radiology 187:483–487PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Acosta FL Jr, Aryan HE, Taylor WR, Ames CP (2005) Kyphoplasty-augmented short-segment pedicle screw fixation of traumatic lumbar burst fractures: initial clinical experience and literature review. Neurosurg Focus 18:e9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Libicher M, Vetter M, Wolf I, Noeldge G, Kasperk C, Grafe I, Da Fonseca K, Hillmeier J, Meeder PJ, Meinzer HP, Kauffmann GW (2005) CT volumetry of intravertebral cement after kyphoplasty. Comparison of polymethylmethacrylate and calcium phosphate in a 12-month follow-up. Eur Radiol 15:1544–1549CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Krauss
    • 1
    Email author
  • Horst Hirschfelder
    • 2
  • Bernd Tomandl
    • 1
  • Gabriele Lichti
    • 2
  • Ingrid Bär
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyKlinikum SuedNuernbergGermany
  2. 2.Department of Physical and Rehabilitative MedicineKlinikum SuedNürnbergGermany

Personalised recommendations