European Radiology

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 648–660 | Cite as

CT enteroclysis: technique and clinical applications

  • Sabine Schmidt
  • Christian Felley
  • Jean-Yves Meuwly
  • Pierre Schnyder
  • Alban Denys


CT enteroclysis (CTE) has been gradually evolving with technical developments of spiral and multidetector row CT technology. It has nowadays become a well-defined imaging modality for the evaluation of various small bowel disorders. Volume challenge of 2L of enteral contrast agent administrated to the small bowel via a nasojejunal catheter ensures luminal distension, the prerequisite for the detection of mural abnormalities, also facilitating the accurate visualization of intraluminal lesions. CT acquisition is centered on small bowel loops, reconstructed in thin axial slices and completed by multiplanar views. Image analysis is essentially done in cine-mode on work-stations. CTE is of particular diagnostic value in intermediate or advanced stages of Cohn's disease, including the depiction of extraintestinal complications. It has become the imaging modality of choice for the localization and characterization of small bowel tumors. The cause and degree of low-grade small bowel obstruction is more readily analyzed with the technique of CTE than conventional CT. Limitations of CTE concern the assessment of pure intestinal motility disorders, superficial mucosal lesions and arteriovenous malformations of the small bowel, which are not consistently visualized. CTE should be selectively used to answer specific questions of the small bowel. It essentially contributes to the diagnostic quality of modern small bowel imaging, and therefore deserves an established, well-defined place among the other available techniques.


Intestines, CT Enteroclysis Crohn's disease Intestinal neoplasms Intestines, stenosis or obstruction 


  1. 1.
    Klöppel R, Thiele J, Bosse J (1992) The sellink CT method. RöFo 156:291–292PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thiele J, Klöppel R, Schulz HG (1993) CT-Sellink-eine neue Methode der Darmwandbeurteilung. RöFo 159(3):213–2217PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bender GN, Timmons JH, Williard WC, Carter J (1996) Computed tomographic enteroclysis—one methodology. Invest Radiol 31(1):39–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schober E, Turetschek K, Schima W, Mostbeck GH (1997) Methylcellulose spiral CT in the preoperative assessment of Crohn's disease: radiologic and pathologic correlation (abstract). Radiology 205(P):717Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rollandi GA, Curone PF, Biscalde E, Nardi F, Bonifacio E, Conzi R, Derchi LE (1999) Spiral CT of the abdomen after distention of small bowel loops with transparent enema in patients with Crohn's disease. Abdom Imaging 24:544–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gaffke G, Stroszczynski C, Schlecht I, Jost D, Ludwig WD, Schlag P, Felix R (2001) Diagnostik von Dünndarmtumoren mit Hilfe der CT-Sellink Methode. Röntgenpraxis 54(6):214–219Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Antes G, Eggeman F (1986) Dünndarmradiologie-Einführung und Atlas. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cirillo LC, Camera L, Della Noce M, Castiglione F, Mazzacca G, Salvatore M (2000) Accuracy of enteroclysis in Crohn's disease of the small bowel: a retrospective study. Eur Radiol 10(12):1894–1898PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gourtsoyiannis NC, Bays D, Papaioannou N, Theotokas J, Barouxis G, Karabelas T (1993) Bengin tumors of the small intestine: preoperative evaluation with a barium infusion technique. Eur J Radiol 16:115–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gourtsoyiannis N, Mako E (1997) Imaging of primary small intestinal tumours by enteroclysis and CT with pathological correlation. Eur Radiol 7:625–642PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miller RE, Sellink JL (1979) Enteroclysis: the small bowel enema. How to succeed and how to fail. Gastrointest Radiol 4:269–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maglinte DDT, Herlinger H (1989) Single contrast and biphasic enteroclysis. In: Herlinger H, Maglinte D (eds) Clincial radiology of the small intestine. Philadelphia: Saunders, pp 107–118Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maglinte DDT, Chernish SM, Kelvin FM, O'Connor KW, Hage JP (1992) Crohn's disease of the small intestine: accuracy and relevance of enteroclysis. Radiology 184:541–545PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nolan DJ (1997a) The true yield of the small-intestinal barium study. Endoscopy 29:447–453PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nolan DJ, Traill ZC (1997b) The current role of the barium examination of the small intestine. Clin Radiol 52:809–820PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Silverman PM, Kalender WA, Hazle JD (2001) Common terminology for single and multislice helical CT. Am J Roentgenol 165(5):1135–1136Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Raptopoulos V, Schwartz RK, McNicholas MMJ, Movson J, Pearlma J, Joffe N (1997) Multiplanar helical CT enterography in patients with Crohn's disease. AJR 169:1545–1550PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Horton KM, Fishman EK (2001) Multi-detector row CT of mesenteric ischemia: can it be done? Radiographics 21:1463–1473PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Horton KM, Fishman EK (2003) The current status of multidetector row CT and three-dimensional imaging of the small bowel. Radiol Clin North Am 41(2):199–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rust GF, Holzknecht N, Olbrich D, Schöpf U, Brüning R, Reiser M (1999) Mehrschicht-Computertomographie des Dünndarms—vorläufige Ergebnisse. Radiologe 39:965–970CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rust GF, Spiekermann A, Daum F, Schoepf UJ, Holzknecht N, Matz C, Staebler A, Reiser MF (2001) New developments in imaging the small bowel with multislice computed tomography and negtive contrast medium, In: Reiser MF (ed) Multislice CT. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 49–60Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schmidt S, Lepori D, Meuwly JY, Duvoisin B, Meuli R, Michetti P et al (2002) Prospective Comparison of MR-Enteroclysis (MRE) with Multidetector-Spiral-CT-Enteroclysis (MSCTE). Eur Radiol 13:1303–1311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Boudiaf M, Jaff A, Soyer P, Bouhnik Y, Hamzi L, Rymer R (2004) Small-bowel disease: prospective evaluation of multi-detector row helical CT enteroclysis in 107 consecutive patients. Radiology 233:338–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gupta S (1982) Primary tumors of the small bowel: a clinico-pathological study of 58 cases. J Surg Oncol 20:161–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Orjollet-Lecoanet C, Menard Y, Martins A, Crombé-Ternamian A, Cotton F, Valette PJ (2000) L'Enteroscanner: Une nouvelle méthode d'exploration du grêle. J Radiol 81:618–627PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Voderholzer WA, Ortner M, Rogalla P, Beinhölzl J, Lochs H (2003) Diagnostic yield of wireless capsule enteroscopy in comparison with computed tomography enteroclysis. Endoscopy 35(12):1009–1014PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rollandi GA, Biscalde E (2002) CT Enteroclysis. In: Terrier F, Grossholz M, Becker CD (eds) Spiral CT of the abdomen. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg New York, pp 369–384Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Maglinte DDT, Lappas JC, Kelvin FM et al (1987) Small bowel radiography: how, when and why? Radiology 163:297–304PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Maglinte DDT, Lappa JC, Heitkamp DE, Bender GN, Kelvin FM (2003) Technical refinements in enteroclysis. Radiol Clin North Am 41:213–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Maglinte DDT, Lappa JC, Chernish SM (1988) Improved tolerance of enteroclysis by use of sedation. Am J Roentgenol 151:951–952Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pochaczevsky R (2000) Carbondioxide as a low-attenuation oral contrast agent. Radiology 214:918PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Maglinte DD, Bender Gn, Heitkamp De, Lappas JC, Kelvin FM (2003) Multidetector-row helical CT enteroclysis. Radiol Clin North Am 41(2):249–262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Horton KM, Fishman EK (2004) Multidetector-row computed tomography and 3-dimensional computed tomography imaging of small bowel neoplasms. Current concept in diagnosis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:106–116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Turetschek K, Schober E, Wunderbaldinger P, Bernhard C, Schima W, Puespoek A, Vogelsang H, Moeschl P , Mostbeck G (2002) Findings at helical CT-enteroclysis in symptomatic patients with Crohn's disease: correlation with endoscopic and surgical findings. J Comput Ass Tomogr: 26(4):488–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Prassopoulos (2002) MR enteroclysis: technical considerations and clinical applications. Eur Radiol 12:2651–2658PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gore RM, Balthazar EJ, Ghahremani GG, Miller FH (1996) CT features of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. AJR 167:3–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bitterling H, Rock C, Reiser M (2003) Die Computertomographie in der Diagnostik entzündlicher Darmerkrankungen: Methodik der MSCT und klinische Ergebnisse. Radiologe 43:17–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Schmidt S, Chevallier C, Chalaron M, Bessoud B, Verdun FR, Frascarolo P, Schnyder P, Denys A (2005) Multidetector CT enteroclysis: comparison of the reading performance for axial and coronal views. Eur Radiol 15(2):238–246CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Reittner P, Goritschnig T, Petritsch W, Doerfler O, Preidler KW, Hinterleitner T, Szolar DH (2002) Multiplanar spiral CT enterography in patients with Crohn's disease using a negative oral contrast material: initial result noninvasive imaging approach. Eur Radiol 12(9):2253–2257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wold PB, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Sandborn WJ (2003) Assessment of small bowel Crohn's disease: noninvasive peroral CT enterography compared with other imaging methods and endoscopy-feasibility study. Radiology 229:275–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hart D, Haggett PJ, Boardman P, Nolan DJ, Wall BF (1994) Patient radiation doses from enteroclysis examinations. Br J Radiol 67:997–1000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ruiz-Cruces R, Ruiz F, Perez-Martinez M, Lopez J, Tot Ausina I, de los Rios AD (2000) Patient dose from barium procedures. Br J Radiol 73:752–761PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Flohr TG, Schaller S, Stierstorfer K, Bruder H, Ohnesorge BM, Schoepf UJ (2005) Multi-detector row CT systems and image-reconstruction techniques. Radiology 203:756–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Macari M, Balthazar EJ (2001) CT of bowel wall thickening: significance and pitfalls of interpretation. AJR 176:1105–1116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Horton KM, Eng J, Fishman EK (2000) Normal enhancement of the small bowel: evaluation with spiral CT. J Comp Ass Tomogr 24(1):67–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bender GN, Maglinte DD, Klöppel R, Timmons JH (1999) CT-enteroclysis: a superfluous diagnostic procedure or valuable when investigation small-bowel disease? AJR 172:373–378PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Makanjuola D (1998) Computed tomography compared with small bowel enema in clinically equivocal intestinal obstruction. Clin Radiol 53:203–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Choi D, Lee SJ, Cho YA, Lim HK, Kim SH, Lee WJ et al (2003) Bowel wall thickening in patients with Crohn's disease: CT patterns and correlation with inflammatory activity. Clin Radiol 58:68–74CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Maglinte DDT, Gourtsoyiannis N, Rex D, Howard TH, Kelvin FM (2003) Classification of small bowel Crohn's subtypes based on multimodality imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 41:285–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Dudiak KM, Johnson CD, Stephens DH (1989) Primary tumors of the small intestine: CT evaluation. AJR 152:995–998PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Laurent F, Raynaud M, Biset JM, Boisserie-Latroix M, Grelet P, Droullard J (1991) Diagnosis and categorization of small bowel neoplasms: role of computed tomography. Gastrointest Radiol 16:115–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Antes G, Neher M, Hiemeyer V, Burger A (1996) Gastrointestinal bleeding of obscure origin: role of enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 6:851–854CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Moch A, Herlinger H, Kochman ML, Levine MS, Rubesin SE, Laufer I (1994) Enteroclysis in the evaluation of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. AJR 163:1381–1384PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mindelzun RE, Beaulieu CF (1997) Using biphasic CT to reveal gastrointestinal arteriovenous malformations. AJR 168:437–438PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Grassi R, di Mizio R, Romano S, Cappabianca S, del Vecchio W, Severini S (2000) Multiple jejunal angiodysplasia detected by enema-helical CT. J Clin Imaging 24:61–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mathon G, Frampas E, D'Alincourt A, Lerat F, Letessier E, Masliah C, Madoz A, Dupas B (2003) Meckel's diverticulum diagnosed by CT-Enteroclysis. J Radiol 84(6):712–714PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Shrake PD, Rex DK, Lappas JC, Maglinte DDT (1991) Radiographic evaluation of suspected small bowel obstruction. Am J Gastroenterol 86:175–178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Balthazar EJ (1994) CT of small-bowel obstruction. AJR 162:255–261PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Maglinte DDT, Balthazar EJ, Kelvin FM, Megibow AJ (1997) The role of radiology in the diagnosis of small-bowel obstruction. AJR 168:1171–1180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Megibow AJ, Balthazar EJ, Cho KC, Medwid SW, Birnbaum BA, Noz ME (1991) Bowel obstruction: evaluation with CT. Radiology 180:313–318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Maglinte DT, Scott NG, Harmon BH, Kelvin FM, Hage JP, Chua GT, Ng AC, Graffis RF, Chernish SM (1993) Obstruction of the small intestine: accuracy and role of CT in diagnosis. Radiology 188:61–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Walsh DW, Bender GN, Timmons JH (1998) Comparison of computed tomography-enteroclysis and traditional computed tomography in the setting of suspected partial small bowel obstruction. Emerg Radiol 5:29–37Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Hara AK, Leighton JA, Sharma VK, Fleischer DE (2004) Small bowel: preliminary comparison of capsule endoscopy with barium study and CT. Radiolgy 230:260–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Mako EK, Mester AR, Tarjan Zs, Kalringer K, Toth G (2000) Enteroclysis and spiral CT examination in diagnosis and evaluation of small bowel Crohn's disease. Eur J Radiol 35:168–175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Umschaden HW, Szolar D, Gaser J, Umschaden M, Haselbach H (2000) Small bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. Radiology 215:717–725PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Rieber A, Aschoff A, Nüssle K et al (2000) MRI in the diagnosis of small bowel disease: use of positive and negative oral contrast media in combination with enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 10:1377–1382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Costamagna G, Shah SK, Riccioni ME et al (2002) A prospective trial comparing small bowel radiographs and video capsule endoscopy for suspected small bowel disease. Gastroenterology 123:999–1005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Scapa E, Jacob H, Lewkowocz S et al (2002) Initial experience of wireless-capsule endoscopy for evaluating occult gastrointestinal bleeding and suspected small bowel pathology. Am J Gastroenterol 97:2776–2779CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sabine Schmidt
    • 1
  • Christian Felley
    • 2
  • Jean-Yves Meuwly
    • 1
  • Pierre Schnyder
    • 1
  • Alban Denys
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyCHUVLausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of GastroenterologyCHUVLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations