European Radiology

, Volume 14, Issue 7, pp 1209–1216 | Cite as

Preoperative breast MRI in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer

  • K. SchelfoutEmail author
  • M. Van Goethem
  • E. Kersschot
  • I. Verslegers
  • I. Biltjes
  • P. Leyman
  • C. Colpaert
  • L. Thienpont
  • J. Van den Haute
  • J. P. Gillardin
  • W. Tjalma
  • Ph. Buytaert
  • A. De Schepper


To investigate the use of MRI in preoperative characterization of invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) and in detection of multifocal/multicentric disease. We retrospectively reviewed T1-weighted FLASH 3D precontrast and postcontrast MR images together with subtraction images of 26 women with histopathologically proven invasive lobular cancer. Two experienced radiologists described tumor patterns of ILC independently. MR findings of unifocal, multifocal, single quadrant and multiquadrant disease were correlated with results of other imaging techniques and compared with histopathological findings as gold standard. Most ILC presented on MRI as a single spiculated/irregular, inhomogeneous mass (pattern 1, n=12) or as a dominant lesion surrounded by multiple small enhancing foci (pattern 2, n=8). Multiple small enhancing foci with interconnecting enhancing strands (pattern 3) and an architectural distortion (pattern 4) were both described in three cases. There was one case of a focal area of inhomogeneous enhancement (pattern 5) and one normal MR examination (pattern 6). Unifocal and multifocal lesions were identified on MRI in four patients with normal conventional imaging. In nine women, multiple additional lesions or more extensive multiquadrant disease were correctly identified only on MRI. MRI may play an important role in the evaluation of patients with ILC, which is often difficult to diagnose on clinical examination and conventional imaging and more likely occur in multiple sites and in both breasts. However, false-negative MR findings do occur in a small percentage of ILC.


Breast neoplasm, diagnosis Breast neoplasm, MR Breast neoplasm, radiography Breast neoplasm, US Invasive lobular, carcinoma 


  1. 1.
    Weinstein SP, Orel SG, Heller R, Reynolds C, Czerniecki B, Solin LJ, Schnall M (2001) MR Imaging of the breast in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 176:399–406Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mendelson EB, Harris KM, Doshu N, Tobon H (1989) Infiltrating lobular carcinoma: mammographic patterns with pathologic correlation. Am J Roentgenol 153:265–271Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yeh C, Titus JM, Kalisher L (1997) Breast imaging case of the day. Infiltrating lobular carcinoma. Radiographics 17:1328–1332Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fechner RE (1975) Histologic variants of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast. Hum Pathol 6:373–378PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Framarino Dei Malatesta M, Fiorelli C, Bandiera AF, Veneziano M, Galati GM, Porfiri L (1995) Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast (ILC). Eur J Gynaec Oncol 1:36–39Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Skaane P, Skjorten F (1999) Ultrasonographic evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma. ACTA Radiol 40:369–375PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Evans N, Lyons K (2000) The use of ultrasound in the diagnosis of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast less than 10 mm in size. Clin Radiol 55:261–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Butler RS, Venta LA, Wiley EL, Ellis RL, Dempsey PJ, Rubin E (1999) Sonographic evaluation of infiltrating lobular carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 172:325–330Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Foote FW Jr, Stewart FW (1941) Lobular carcinoma in situ: a rare form of mammary cancer. Am J Pathol 17:491–496Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Quayyum A, Birdwell RL, Daniel BL, Nowels KW, Jeffrey SS, Agoston TA, Herfkens RJ (2002) MR Imaging features of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: histopatholgic correlation. Am J Roentgenol 178:1227–1232Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hilleren DJ, Andersson IT, Lindholm K, Linell FS (1991) Invasive lobular carcinoma: mammographic findings in a 10-year experience. Radiology 178:149–154PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sickles EA (1991) The subtle and atypical mammographic features of invasive lobular carcinoma. Radiology 178:25–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Watson L (2001) Breast cancer: diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Radiol Technol 73:45–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Le Gal M, Ollivier L, Asselain B et al (1992) Mammographic features of 455 invasive carcinomas. Radiology 185:705–708PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rodenko GN, Harms SE, Pruneda JM, Farell RS, Evans WP, Copit DS, Krakos PA, Flamig DP (1996) MR Imaging in the management before surgery of lobular carcinoma of the breast: correlation with pathology. Am J Roentgenol 167:1415–1419Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sadler GP, McGee S, Dallimore NS, Monypenny IJ, Douglas-Jones AG, Lyons K, Horgan K (1994) Role of fine-needle aspiration cytology and needle-core biopsy in the diagnosis of lobular carcinoma of the breast. Br J Surg 81:1315–1317PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lesser ML, Rosen PP, Kinne DW (1982) Multicentricity and bilaterality in invasive carcinoma. Surgery 91:234–240PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dixon JM, Anderson TJ, Page DL, Lee D, Duffy SW, Stewart HJ (1983) Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: an evaluation of the incidence and consequence of bilateral disease. Br J Surg 70:513–516Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boetes C, Mus RDM, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Strijk SP, Wobbes T, Hendriks JHCL, Ruys SHJ (1995) Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology 197:743–747PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mumtaz H, Hall-Craggs MA, Davidson T et al (1997) Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 169:417–424Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Orel SG, Schnall MD (2001) MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 220:13–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Boetes C, Strijk SP, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Van Der Sluis RE, Ruijs JHJ (1997) False-negative MR imaging of malignant breast tumors. Eur Radiol 7:1231–1234PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL et al (1993) MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 187:493–501 (abstract)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, Troupon RH (1994) Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic–patholgic correlation. Radiology 190:485–493 (abstract)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim SJ, Morris EA, Liberman L, Ballon DJ, La Trenta LR, Hadar O, Abramson A, Dershaw DD (2001) Observer variability and application of BI-RADS terminology for breast MR Imaging. Am J Roentgenol 177:551–557Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    American College of Radiology (ACR) (1998) Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 3rd edn. American college of Radiology, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for normal scales. Educ Psych Meas 20:37–46Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cornford EJ, Wilson ARM, Athanassiou E et al (1995) Mammographic features of invasive lobular and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: a comparative analysis. Br J Radiol 68:450–453PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Holland R, Hendriks JH, Mravunac M (1983) Mammographically occult breast cancer. Cancer 52:1810–1819Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dronkers DS (1985) Mammografisch occult mammacarcinoom. Ned Tijdschr Geneesk 129:1632–1635Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Martin JE, Moskowitz M, Milbrath JR (1979) Breast cancer missed by mammography. Am J Roentgenol 132:737–739Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Beute BJ, Kalisher L, Hutter RV (1991) Lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: clinical, pathologic, and mammographic features. Am J Roentgenol 157:257–265Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chintana PP, Helvie MA, Adler DD (1995) Invasive lobular carcinoma: sonographic appearance and role of sonography in improving diagnostic sensitivity. Radiology 195:231–234PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nokes SR, Pierce W, Abraham DC, Harms SE (1999) Radiology, infiltrating lobular carcinoma. J Ark Med Soc 96:176–177PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Harms SE (1998) Integration of breast magnetic resonance imaging with breast cancer treatment. Top Magn Reson Imaging 9:79–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM et al (1995) Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 196:115–122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cooney BS, Orel SG, Schnall MD, Troupin RH (1994) Invasive lobular carcinoma in a patient with synchronous ductal carcinoma in situ: detection with MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 162:1318–1320Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Esserman L, Hylton N, Yassa L et al (1999) Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging. J Clin Oncol 17:110–119PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E (1999) Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 213:881–888PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Davis PL, McCarty KS Jr (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 9:60–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Orel SG, Weinstein SP, Schnall MD (1999) Breast MR imaging in patients with axillary node metastases and unknown primary malignancy. Radiology 212:543–549PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wilhem K, Grebe P, Teifke A, Halbsguth A, Mitze Thelen M (1992) Das lobuläre Mammakarzinom in der Kerspintomographie. Akt Radiol 2:373Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Schelfout
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Van Goethem
    • 2
  • E. Kersschot
    • 3
  • I. Verslegers
    • 2
  • I. Biltjes
    • 2
  • P. Leyman
    • 3
  • C. Colpaert
    • 1
  • L. Thienpont
    • 4
  • J. Van den Haute
    • 5
  • J. P. Gillardin
    • 6
  • W. Tjalma
    • 7
  • Ph. Buytaert
    • 7
  • A. De Schepper
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PathologyUniversity Hospital AntwerpEdegemBelgium
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyUniversity Hospital AntwerpEdegemBelgium
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyO.L.V. Hospital AalstAalstBelgium
  4. 4.Department of PathologyO.L.V. Hospital AalstAalstBelgium
  5. 5.Department of GynecologyO.L.V. Hospital AalstAalstBelgium
  6. 6.Department of SurgeryO.L.V. Hospital AalstAalstBelgium
  7. 7.Department of GynecologyUniversity Hospital AntwerpEdegemBelgium

Personalised recommendations