European Radiology

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 383–393 | Cite as

Stereotactic and ultrasound-guided breast biopsy



Percutaneous imaging-guided needle biopsy has increasingly become an alternative to surgical biopsy for the histologic assessment of breast lesions. Percutaneous biopsy is faster, less invasive, and less expensive than surgical biopsy. Tissue acquisition is performed with automated core needles or directional vacuum-assisted biopsy probes. Guidance for percutaneous biopsy is usually provided by stereotaxis, ultrasound, and, more recently, under the guidance of MR imaging. Imaging guidance depends on lesion type and the results of diagnostic imaging studies. This article reviews indications, advantages, limitations, and controversial issues in percutaneous imaging-guided biopsy of breast lesions under stereotactic and ultrasound guidance. The potential for new research opportunities and directions is also discussed.


Breast Breast biopsy Ultrasound Stereotaxis 



This article was supported in part by a seeding grant from Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Johnson and Johnson, Vienna, Austria.


  1. 1.
    Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Schreer I (eds) (2003) Bildgebende Mammadiagnostik. Untersuchungstechnik, Befundmuster und Differentialdiagnostik in Mammaographie, Sonographie und Kernspintomographie, 2nd edn. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Helbich TH (2000) Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast. Eur J Radiol 34:208–219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Perry NM (2001) Quality assurance in the diagnosis of breast disease. EUSOMA Working Party. Eur J Cancer 37:159–172Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, Burke BJ, Hopper KD, Yakes WF (1991) Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated large-core biopsies. Radiology 180:403–407PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA et al. (1993) US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 187:507–511PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ et al. (1994) Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 193:359–364PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, Abramson AF, Deutch BM, Hann LE (1994) Stereotaxic 14-gauge breast biopsy: How many core biopsy specimens are needed? Radiology 192:793–795PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liberman L, Fahs MC, Dershaw DD, Bonaccio E, Abramson AF, Cohen MA, Hann LE (1995) Impact of stereotaxic core breast biopsy on cost of diagnosis. Radiology 195:633–637PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wunderbaldinger P, Wolf G, Turetschek K, Helbich TH (2002) Comparison of sitting versus prone position for stereotactic large-core breast biopsy in surgically proven lesions. Am J Roentgenol 178:1221–1225Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Welle GJ, Clark M, Loos S, Pauls D, Warden D, Sheffield M, Parsells C (2000) Stereotactic breast biopsy: recumbent biopsy using add-on upright equipment. Am J Roentgenol 175:59–63Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liberman L, Evans WP III, Dershaw DD, Hann LE, Deutch BM, Abramson AF, Rosen PP (1994) Radiography of microcalcifications in stereotaxic mammary core biopsy specimens. Radiology 190:223–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Helbich TH, Mayr W, Schick S et al. (1997) Coaxial technique: approach to breast core biopsies. Radiology 203:684–690PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzoni FA, Finkelstein SI, Shepard MJ (1999) Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 210:799–805PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liberman L, Cohen MA, Dershaw DD et al. (1995) Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions: an indication for surgical biopsy. Am J Roentgenol 164:1111–1113Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Helbich TH, Rudas M, Haitel A, Kohlberger PD, Thurnher M, Gnant M, Wunderbaldinger P, Wolf G, Mostbeck GH (1998) Evaluation of needle size for breast biopsy: comparison of 14-, 16-, and 18-gauge biopsy needles. Am J Roentgenol 171:59–63Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Melotti MK, Berg WA (2000) Core needle breast biopsy in patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy: preliminary results. Am J Roentgenol 174:245–249Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee CH, Carter D, Philpotts LE, Couce ME, Horvath LJ, Lange RC, Tocino I (2000) Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed with stereotactic core needle biopsy: Can invasion be predicted? Radiology 217:466–470PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Darling MLR, Smith DN, Lester SC, Kaelin C, Selland DL, Denison CM et al. (2000) Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision. Am J Roentgenol 175:1341–1346Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liberman L, Drotman M, Morris EA, LaTrenta LR, Abramson AF, Zakowski MF, Dershaw DD (2000) Imaging–histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy. Cancer 89:2538–2546CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee CH, Philpotts LE, Horvath LJ, Tocino I (1999) Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate. Radiology 212:189–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Helbich TH, Rudas M, Bohm G, Huber S, Wagner T, Taucher S, Wolf G, Mostbeck GH (1999) Randomized in vitro and in vivo evaluation of different biopsy needles and devices for breast biopsy. Clin Radiol 54:56–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Buchberger W, Niehoff A, Obrist P, Rettl G, Dunser M (2002) Ultraschallgezielte Stanzbiopsie der Mamma: Technik, Ergebnisse, Indikationen. Radiologe 42:25–32Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Memarsadeghi M, Pfarl G, Riedl C, Wagner T, Rudas M, Helbich TH (2003) Value of 14-gauge ultrasound-guided large-core needle biopsy of breast lesions: own results in comparison with the literature. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 175:374–380CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Smith DN, Rosenfield Darling ML, Meyer JE, Denison CM, Rose DI, Lester S, Richardson A, Kaelin CM, Rhei E, Christian RL (2001) The utility of ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy: results from 500 consecutive breast biopsies. J Ultrasound Med 20:43–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schulz-Wendtland R, Krämer S, Lang N, Bautz W (1998) Ultrasonic guided microbiopsy in mammary diagnosis: indications, technique and results. Anticancer Res 18:2145–2146PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schoonjans JM, Brem RF (2001) Fourteen-gauge ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy of breast masses. Ultrasound Med 20:967–972Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Simon JR, Kalbhen CL, Cooper RA, Flisak ME (2000) Accuracy and complication rates of US-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy: initial results. Radiology 215:694–697PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Burbank F, Parker SH, Fogarty TJ (1996) Stereotactic breast biopsy: improved tissue harvesting with the Mammotome. Am Surg 62:738–744PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liberman L, Hann LE, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Rosen PP (1997) Mammographic findings after stereotactic 14-gauge vacuum biopsy. Radiology 203:343–347PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liberman L, Smolkin JH, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Rosen PP (1998) Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology 208:251–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Schaumlöffel U, Viehweg P, Höfer H, Buchmann J, Lampe D (1998) Minimally invasive stereotaxic vacuum core breast biopsy. Eur Radiol 8:377–385CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Philpotts LE, Shaheen NA, Carter D, Lange RC, Lee CH (1999) Comparison of rebiopsy rates after stereotactic core needle biopsy of the breast with 11-gauge vacuum suction probe versus 14-gauge needle and automatic gun. Am J Roentgenol 172:683–687Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Thornton CM, Rosen PP (1997) Clip placement after stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology 205:417–422PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Reynolds HE, Poon CM, Goulet RJ, Lazaridis CL (1998). Biopsy of breast microcalcifications using an 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted device. Am J Roentgenol 171:611–613Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Borgen PI (1998) Percutaneous removal of malignant mammographic lesions at stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 206:711–715PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Liberman L, Vuolo M, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF, LaTrenta LR, Polini NM, Rosen PP (1999) Epithelia displacement after stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Am J Roentgenol 172:677–681Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Brem RF, Behrndt VS, Sanow L, Gatewood OMB (1999) Atypical ductal hyperplasia: histologic underestimation of carcinoma in tissue harvested from impalpable breast lesions using 11-gauge stereotactically guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. Am J Roentgenol 172:1405–1407Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, Evans WP III, Lechner MC, Richardson TR, Smid AA, Borofsky HB, Lee CH, Goldstein HM, Schilling KJ, Wray AB, Brem RF, Helbich TH, Lehrer DE, Adler SJ (2001) Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology 218:497–502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Brem RF, Schoonjans JM, Goodman SN, Nolten A, Askin FB, Gatewood OM (2001) Nonpalpable breast cancer: percutaneous diagnosis with 11- and 8-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy devices. Radiology 219:793–796PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Apesteguia L, Mellado M, Saenz J, Cordero JL, Reparaz B, De Miguel C (2002) Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy on digital stereotaxic table of nonpalpable lesions non-recognizable by ultrasonography. Eur Radiol 12:638–645PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jackman RJ, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM (2002) Atypical ductal hyperplasia: Can some lesions be defined as probably benign after stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, eliminating the recommendation for surgical excision? Radiology 224:548–554PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Liberman L, Kaplan JB, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Menell JH, Dershaw DD (2002) To excise or to sample the mammographic target: What is the goal of stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy? Am J Roentgenol 179:679–683Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Helbich TH, Buchberger W, Rudas M (2002) Österreichisches Konsensuspapier: Stereotaktisch und Ultraschallgezielte Vakuumbiopsie von Brustläsionen. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 174:517–521PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Philpotts LE, Lee CH, Horvath LJ, Lange RC, Carter D, Tocino I (2000) Underestimation of breast cancer with 11-gauge vacuum suction biopsy. Am J Roentgenol 175:1047–1050Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pfarl G, Helbich TH, Riedl CC, Guth-Wagner T, Gnant M, Rudas M, Liberman L (2002) Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a validation study. Am J Roentgenol 179:1503–1507Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    American College of Radiology (1998) Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADSTM), 3rd edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vizcaino I, Gadea L, Andreo L et al. (2001) Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography. Radiology 219:475–483PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Helbich TH, Pfarl G, Lomosschitz F, Stadler A, Rudas M, Wolf G (2000) Role of core needle breast biopsy in probably benign lesions. Radiology 217:527PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Liberman L (2000) Clinical management issues in percutaneous core breast biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am 38:791–807PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lomoschitz FM, Helbich TH, Rudas M, Pfarl G, Linnau KF, Stadler A, Jackman RJ (2004) Stereotactic, prone, II-gauge, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: influence of number of specimens on diagnostic accuracy. Radiology (in press)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Pfarl G, Riedl CC, Fuchsjäger MH, Bloch BN, Kaindl E, Helbich TH (2002) Impact of decompression and dislocation of clips and hookwires after stereotactic placement: a prospective analysis. Radiology 225:512Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Diaz LK, Wiley EL, Venta LA (1999) Are malignant cells displaced by large-core needle biopsy of the breast? Am J Roentgenol 173:1303–1313Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Vienna (AKH)ViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations