Advertisement

European Radiology

, Volume 13, Issue 8, pp 1820–1835 | Cite as

Benign bone tumors and tumor-like lesions: value of cross-sectional imaging

  • Klaus WoertlerEmail author
Musculoskeletal

Abstract

This article reviews the role of CT and MR imaging in the diagnosis of benign bone tumors and tumor-like lesions of bone with with regard to differential diagnosis, the assessment of tumor-related complications, and the detection of postoperative recurrence. Indications for cross-sectional imaging of specific lesions, including osteoid osteoma, osteoblastoma, enchondroma, osteochondroma, intraosseous lipoma, hemangioma, giant cell tumor, aneurysmal bone cyst, simple bone cyst, and eosinophilic granuloma, are discussed, and advantages and disadvantages of the different imaging modalities are illustrated on the basis of pathologically confirmed cases.

Keywords

Bone neoplasms Diagnosis Computed tomography Magnetic resonance imaging 

References

  1. 1.
    Forest M, Coindre JM, Diebold J (1997) Pathology of tumors. In: Forest M, Tomeno B, Vanel D (eds) Orthopedic surgical pathology: diagnosis of tumors and pseudotumoral lesions of bone and joints. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 71–516Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Forest M, Amouroux J (1997) Pathology of pseudotumoral lesions. In: Forest M, Tomeno B, Vanel D (eds) Orthopedic surgical pathology: diagnosis of tumors and pseudotumoral lesions of bone and joints. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 519–670Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Resnick D (1995) Tumors and tumor-like lesions of bone: radiographic principles. In: Resnick D (ed) Diagnosis of bone and joint disorders. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 3613–3627Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Resnick D, Kyriakos M, Greenway GD (1995) Tumors and tumor-like lesions of bone: imaging and pathology of specific lesions. In: Resnick D (ed) Diagnosis of bone and joint disorders. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 3628–3938Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Magid D (1993) Two-dimensional and three-dimensional computed tomographic imaging in musculoskeletal tumors. Radiol Clin North Am 31:425–447PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bloem JL, Kroon HM (1993) Imaging of bone and soft tissue tumors: osseous lesions. Radiol Clin North Am 31:261–278PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berquist TH (1993) Magnetic resonance imaging of primary skeletal neoplasms. Radiol Clin North Am 31:411–424PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kransdorf MJ, Stull MA, Gilkey FW, Moser RP (1991) Osteoid osteoma. Radiographics 11:671–669PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Assoun J, Richardi G, Railhac JJ et al. (1994) Osteoid osteoma: MR imaging versus CT. Radiology 191:217–223PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Woertler K, Vestring T, Boettner F, Winkelmann W, Heindel W, Lindner N (2001) Osteoid osteoma: CT-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and follow-up in 47 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:717–722PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davies M, Cassar-Pullicino VN, Davies AM, McCall IW, Tyrrell PNM (2002) The diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging in osteoid osteoma. Skeletal Radiol 31:559–569CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Murphey MD, Andrews CL, Flemming DJ, Temple HT, Smith WS, Smirniotopoulos JG (1996) Primary tumors of the spine: radiologic–pathologic correlation. Radiographics 16:1131–1158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McGrath BE, Bush CH, Nelson TE, Scarborough MT (1996) Evaluation of suspected osteoid osteoma. Clin Orthop 327:247–252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Levine E, Neff JR (1983) Dynamic computed tomography scanning of benign bone lesions: preliminary results. Skeletal Radiol 9:238–245PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kroon HM, Schurmans J (1990) Osteoblastoma: clinical and radiologic findings in 98 new cases. Radiology 175:783–790PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shaikh MI, Saifuddin A, Pringle J, Natali C, Sherazi Z (1999) Spinal osteoblastoma: CT and MR imaging with pathological correlation. Skeletal Radiol 28:33–40CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brien EW, Mirra JM, Kerr R (1997) Benign and malignant cartilage tumors of bone and joint: their anatomic and theoretical basis with an emphasis on radiology, pathology and clinical biology. I. The intramedullary cartilage tumors. Skeletal Radiol 26:325–353CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Murphey MD, Flemming DJ, Boyea SR, Bojescul JA, Sweet DE, Temple HT (1998) Enchondroma versus chondrosarcoma in the appendicular skeleton: differentiating features. Radiographics 18:1213–1237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Geirnaerdt MJA, Hermans J, Bloem JL, Kroon HM, Pope TL, Taminiau AHM, Hogendoorn PC (1997) Usefulness of radiography in differentiating enchondroma from central grade 1 chondrosarcoma. Am J Roentgenol 169:1097–2004Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aoki J, Sone S, Fujioka F et al. (1991) MR of enchondroma and chondrosarcoma: rings and arcs of Gd-DTPA enhancement. J Comput Assist Tomogr 15:1011–1016Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Geirnaerdt MJA, Hogendoorn PCW, Bloem JL, Taminiau AHM, van der Woude HJ (2000) Cartilaginous tumors: fast contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 214:539–546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    De Beuckeleer LHL, De Schepper AMA, Ramon F (1996) Magnetic resonance imaging of cartilaginous tumors: Is it useful or necessary? Skeletal Radiol 25:137–141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    De Beuckeleer LHL, De Schepper AMA, Ramon F, Somville J (1995) Magnetic resonance imaging of cartilaginous tumors: a retrospective study of 79 patients. Eur J Radiol 21:34–40CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Woertler K, Lindner N, Gosheger G, Brinkschmidt C, Heindel W (2000) Osteochondroma: MR imaging of tumor-related complications. Eur Radiol 10:823–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Geirnaerdt MJA, Bloem JL, Eulderink F, Hogendoorn PCW, Taminiau AHM (1993) Cartilaginous tumours: correlation of gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and histopathologic findings. Radiology 186:813–817PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brien EW, Mirra JM, Luck JV (1999) Benign and malignant cartilage tumors of bone and joint: their anatomic and theoretical basis with an emphasis on radiology, pathology and clinical biology. II. Juxtacortical cartilage tumors. Skeletal Radiol 28:1–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lee JK, Yao L, Wirth CR (1987) MR imaging of solitary osteochondroma: report of eight cases. Am J Roentgenol 149:557–560Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Malghem J, Vande Berg B, Noel H, Maldague B (1992) Benign osteochondromas and exostotic chondrosarcoma: evaluation of cartilage cap thickness by ultrasound. Skeletal Radiol 21:33–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hudson TM, Springfield DS, Spanier SS, Enneking WF, Hamlin DJ (1984) Benign exostoses and exostotic chondrosarcomas: evaluation of cartilage thickness by CT. Radiology 152:595–599PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Propeck T, Bullard MA, Lin J, Doi K, Martel W (2000) Radiologic–pathologic correlation of intraosseous lipomas. AJR 175:673–678PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Laredo JD, Assouline E, Gelbert F, Wybier M, Merland JJ, Tubiana JM (1990) Vertebral hemangiomas: fat content as a sign of aggressiveness. Radiology 177:467–472PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Murphey MD, Nomikos GC, Flemming DJ, Gannon FH, Temple HT, Kransdorf MJ (2001) Imaging of giant cell tumor and giant cell reparative granuloma of bone: radiologic–pathologic correlation. Radiographics 21:1283–1309PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Aoki J, Tanikawa H, Ishii K, Seo GS, Karakida O, Sone S, Ichikawa T, Kachi K (1996) MR findings indicative of hemosiderin in giant-cell tumor of bone: frequency, cause, and diagnostic significance. Am J Roentgenol 166:145–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Woertler K, Blasius S, Hillmann A, Brinkschmidt C, Heindel W (2000) MR morphology of primary aneurysmal bone cyst: a retrospective analysis of 38 cases. Rofo Fortschr Rontgenstr 172:591–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vergel de Dios AM, Bond JR, Shives TC, McLeod RA, Unni KK (1992) Aneurysmal bone cyst: a clinicopathologic study of 238 cases. Cancer 69:2921–2931PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kransdorf MJ, Sweet DE (1995) Aneurysmal bone cyst: concept, controversy, clinical presentation, and imaging. Am J Roentgenol 164:573–580Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Woertler K, Brinkschmidt C (2002) Imaging features of subperiosteal aneurysmal bone cyst. Acta Radiol 43:336–339CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Murphey MD, Flemming DJ, Torop AH, Smith SE, Sonin AH, Temple HT (1998) Imaging differentiation of primary and secondary aneurysmal bone cyst with pathologic correlation. Radiology 209:311Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hudson TM (1984) Fluid levels in aneurysmal bone cyst: a CT feature. Am J Roentgenol 142:1001–1004Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sullivan RJ, Meyer JS, Dormans JP, Davidson RS (1999) Diagnosing aneurysmal and unicameral bone cysts with magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop 366:186–190Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Davies AM, Pikoulas C, Griffith J (1994) MRI of eosinophilic granuloma. Eur J Radiol 18:205–209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Beltran J, Aparisi F, Bonmati LM, Rosenberg ZS, Present D, Steiner GC (1993) Eosinophilic granuloma: MRI manifestations. Skeletal Radiol 22:157–161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Monroc M, Ducou le Pointe H, Haddad S, Josset P, Montagne JP (1994) Soft tissue signal abnormality associated with eosinophilic granuloma. Correlation of MR imaging with pathologic findings. Pediatr Radiol 24:328–332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Remedios D, Saifuddin A, Pringle J (1997) Radiological and clinical recurrence of giant cell tumor of bone after the use of cement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:26–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pinto CH, Taminiau AHM, Vanderschueren GM, Hogendoorn PCW, Bloem JL, Obermann WR (2002) Technical considerations in CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma: tricks of the trade. Am J Roentgenol 179:1633–1642Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyTechnische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der IsarMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations