Critical Reviews in Neurosurgery

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 24–28 | Cite as

The current role of CT myelography and myelography in neurosurgical practice

Article

Keywords

Spinal Canal Disc Herniation Spinal Stenosis Magnetic Reso Compute Tomogra 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Papers reviewed

  1. 1.
    Bartlett RJV, Rowland Hill CA, Devlin R, Gardiner ED (1996) Two-dimensional MRI at 1.5 and 0.5 T versus CT myelography in the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. Neuroradiology 38:142–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reul J, Gievers B, Weis J, Thron A (1995) Assessment of the narrow cervical spinal canal: a prospective comparison of MRI, myelography and CT-myelography. Neuroradiology 37:187–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Perneczky G, Böck FW, Neuhold A, Stiskal M (1992) Diagnosis of cervical disc disease. MRI versus cervical myelography. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 116: 44–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bischoff RJ, Rodriguez RP, Gupta K, Righi A, Dalton JE, Whitecloud TS (1993) A comparison of computed tomography-myelography, magnetic resonance imaging, and myelography in the diagnosis of herniated nucleus pulposus and spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 6: 289–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Verlag 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryMarmara University HospitalAltunizade, IstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological InstituteSt. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical CenterPhoenixUSA
  3. 3.Barrow Neurological InstituteNeuroscience PublicationsPhoenixUSA

Personalised recommendations