Advertisement

Polar Biology

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 395–405 | Cite as

Physiological life history strategies of photobionts of lichen species from Antarctic and moderate European habitats in response to stressful conditions

  • Nadine Determeyer-Wiedmann
  • Andres Sadowsky
  • Peter Convey
  • Sieglinde OttEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The vegetation of many terrestrial habitats across Antarctica is dominated by poikilohydric symbiotic lichens. Terrestrial habitats generally are characterised by extended exposure to desiccation and high irradiation. Physiological adaptation mechanisms of the algal partner (photobiont) are key factors in the successful colonisation of lichens of locations under severe environmental conditions. This study focused on isolated photobionts of the genus Trebouxia, from the continental Antarctic lichens Buellia frigida, Pleopsidium chlorophanum, the maritime Antarctic lichen Umbilicaria antarctica, and the Swedish lichen Fulgensia bracteata from a moderate temperate ecosystem at sea level. The photosystems PS II and PS I and the ratio of linear to cyclic electron transport were studied to elucidate adaptation mechanisms in the physiology of the photobionts in response to desiccation and light stress. The photobionts of the Antarctic lichens demonstrated striking tolerance to the stress conditions studied. Although the photobionts of U. antarctica and P. chlorophanum were genetically identical based on non-coding internally transcribed spacer (ITS), their physiological responses were clearly different, possibly indicating ecotypic differentiation. The photobiont of F. bracteata showed clearly different responses to those of the Antarctic photobionts. The response differences of the photobionts studied point to fundamental differences in life history strategies.

Keywords

Stress conditions Adaptation Photosystem II and I Electron transport Ratio LET to CET 

Abbreviations

ATP

Adenosine triphosphate

CET

Cyclic electron transport

D1

Dark recovery phase measuring point 1

D2

Dark recovery phase measuring point 2

Fo

Minimum chlorophyll fluorescence yield

Fm

Maximum chlorophyll fluorescence yield, dark adapted

Fm

Maximum chlorophyll fluorescence yield, light adapted

Fv/Fm

Maximum quantum yield of PS II

LET

Linear electron transport

NPQ

Non-photochemical quenching

PAM

Pulse-amplitude modulation

Pm

Maximal P700 change, dark adapted

Pm

Maximal P700 change, light adapted

PS I

Photosystem I

PS II

Photosystem II

P700

Current P700 signal

qL

Coefficient of photochemical quenching

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

TOM

Trebouxia organic medium

Y(I)

Photochemical quantum yield of PS I

Y(II)

Effective quantum yield of PS II

Y(NA)

Non-photochemical quantum yield of PS I-acceptor side limitation

Y(ND)

Non-photochemical quantum yield of PS I-donor side limitation

Y(NO)

Quantum yield of non-regulated energy dissipation in PS II

Y(NPQ)

Quantum yield of regulated energy dissipation in PS II

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Eva Posthoff for her invaluable help with the photobiont cultures. The authors are especially grateful to Ulrike Ruprecht for her invaluable help and support on the molecular identification of the photobionts. Particular thanks for her great effort. Thanks are also due to the organising committee of the XIIth SCAR Biology Symposium 2017, Leuven, Belgium. SO is grateful to the German Research Foundation (DFG) for financing the Research Project Ot 96/15–1 as part of the Antarctic Priority Program (SPP 1158). PC is supported by NERC core funding to the British Antarctic Survey’s ‘Biodiversity, Evolution and Adaptation’ Team. Special thanks are due to the Bundesanstalt für Geologie und Rohstoffe (Andreas Läufer, Detlef Damaske) as well as to the British Antarctic Survey for the opportunity to collect the lichen samples used in this study. Thanks are also due to the staff at Rothera Station and Gondwana Station for logistic support. The authors also thank the reviewers for their invaluable comments.

Funding

There were no sources of funding and potential conflicts.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

To ensure objectivity and transparency in research, we ensure that accepted principles of ethical and professional conduct have been followed.

References

  1. Ahmadjian V (1960) Some new and interesting species of Trebouxia, a genus of lichenized algae. Am J Bot 47:677–683.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2439519 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmadjian V (1967) A guide to the algae occurring as lichen symbionts: isolation, culture, cultural physiology, and identification. Phycologia 6:127–160.  https://doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-6-2-127.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allakhverdiev SI, Nishiyama Y, Takahashi S, Miyairi S, Suzuki I, Murata N (2005) Systematic analysis of the relation of electron transport and ATP synthesis to the photodamage and repair of photosystem II in Synechocystis. Plant Physiol 137:263–273.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.054478 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Backhaus T, de la Torre R, Lyhme K, De Vera JP, Meeßen J (2014) Desiccation and low temperature attenuate the effect of UVC 254 nm in the photobiont of the astrobiologically relevant lichens Circinaria gyrosa and Buellia frigida. Int J Astrobiol 14:479–488.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1473550414000470 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bendall DS, Manasse RS (1995) Cyclic photophosphorylation and electron transport. BBA-Bioenergetics 1229:23–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2728(94)00195-B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Block W (1996) Cold or drought: the lesser of two evils for terrestrial arthropods? Eur J Entomol 93:325–340Google Scholar
  7. Convey P, Chown SL, Clarke A, Barnes DKA, Cummings V, Ducklow H, Frati F, Green TGA, Gordon S, Griffiths H, Howard-Williams C, Huiskes AHL, Laybourn-Parry J, Lyons B, McMinn A, Peck LS, Quesada A, Schiaparelli S, Wall D (2014) The spatial structure of Antarctic biodiversity. Ecol Monogr 84:203–244.  https://doi.org/10.1890/12-2216.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Vera JP, Horneck G, Rettberg P, Ott S (2003) The potential of the lichen symbiosis to cope with the extreme conditions of outer space I. Influence of UV radiation and space vacuum on the vitality of lichen symbiosis and germination capacity. Int J of Astrobiol 1:285–293.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1473550403001216 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Vera JP, Horneck G, Rettberg P, Ott S (2004) The potential of the lichen symbiosis to cope with the extreme conditions of outer space II: germination capacity of lichen ascospores in response to simulated space conditions. Adv Space Res 33:1236–1243.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2003.10.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. del Hoyo A, Álvarez R, del Campo EM, Gasulla F, Barreno E, Casano LM (2010) Oxidative stress induces distinct physiological responses in the two Trebouxia phycobionts of the lichen Ramalina farinacea. Ann Bot-London 107:109–118.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq206 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Engelen A, Convey P, Popa O, Ott S (2016) Lichen photobiont diversity and selectivity at the southern limit of the maritime Antarctic region (Coal Nunatak, Alexander Island). Polar Biol 39:2403–2410.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-016-1915-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fernández-Marín B, Becerril JM, García-Plazaola JI (2010) Unravelling the roles of desiccation-induced xanthophyll cycle activity in darkness: a case study in Lobaria pulmonaria. Planta 231:1335–1342.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-010-1129-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gasulla F, de Nova PG, Esteban-Carrasco A, Zapata JM, Barreno E, Guéra A (2009) Dehydration rate and time of desiccation affect recovery of the lichenic algae Trebouxia erici: alternative and classical protective mechanisms. Planta 231:195–208.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-009-1019-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Genty B, Briantais JM, Baker NR (1989) The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. BBA Gen Subj 990:87–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4165(89)80016-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Green TGA, Lange OL, Cowan IR (1994) Ecophysiology of lichen photosynthesis: the role of water status and thallus diffusion resistances. Cryptogam Bot 4:166–178Google Scholar
  16. Harańczyk H, Nowak P, Bacior M, Lisowska M, Marzec M, Florek M, Olech MA (2012) Bound water freezing in Antarctic Umbilicaria aprina from Schirmacher Oasis. Antarct Sci 24:342–352.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102012000041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heber U, Walker D (1992) Concerning a dual function of coupled cyclic electron transport in leaves. Plant Physiol 100:1621–1626.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.100.4.1621 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Honegger R (2009) Ökologische Aspekte der Wechselbeziehung zwischen Pilz und Alge. Bayer 36:25–41Google Scholar
  19. Huang W, Zhang SB, Cao KF (2010) Stimulation of cyclic electron flow during recovery after chilling-induced photoinhibition of PSII. Plant Cell Physiol 51:1922–1928.  https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcq144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jahns HM (1988) The lichen thallus. In: Galun M (ed) Handbook of lichenology, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 95–143Google Scholar
  21. Kappen L (2000) Some aspects of the great success of lichens in Antarctica. Antarct Sci 12:314–324.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102000000377 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kappen L, Schroeter B, Scheidegger C, Sommerkorn M, Hestmark G (1996) Cold resistance and metabolic activity of lichens below 0 °C. Adv Space Res 18:119–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(96)00007-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kennedy AD (1993) Water as a limiting factor in the Antarctic terrestrial environment: abiogeographical synthesis. Arctic Alpine Res 25:308–315.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1551914 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kramer DM, Johnson G, Kiirats O, Edwards GE (2004) New fluorescence parameters for the determination of QA redox state and excitation energy fluxes. Photosynth Res 79:209–218.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PRES.0000015391.99477.0d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kranner I, Cram WJ, Zorn M, Wornik S, Yoshimura I, Stabentheiner E, Pfeifhofer HW (2005) Antioxidants and photoprotection in a lichen as compared to its isolated symbiotic partners. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:3141–3146.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0407716102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krause GH, Jahns P (2004) Non-photochemical energy dissipation determined by chlorophyll fluorescence quenching: characterization and function. In: Papageorgiou GC, Govindjee (eds) Chlorophyll a fluorescence, Springer, Dordrecht, pp 463–495.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3218-9_18
  27. Lange OL, Belnap J, Reichenberger H (1998) Photosynthesis of the cyanobacterial soil-crustlichen Collema tenax from arid lands in southern Utah, USA: role of water content on light and temperature responses of CO2 exchange. Funct Ecol 12:195–202.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00192.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Larson DW (1979) Lichen water relations under drying conditions. New Phytol 82:713–731.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1979.tb01666.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leavitt SD, Kraichak E, Nelsen MP, Altermann S, Divakar PK, Alors D, Esslinger TL, Crespo A, Lumbsch T (2015) Fungal specificity and selectivity for algae play a major role in determining lichen partnerships across diverse ecogeographic regions in the lichen-forming family Parmeliaceae (Ascomycota). Mol Ecol 24:3779–3797.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McKersie BD, Lesheim Y (2013) Stress and stress coping in cultivated plants. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Meeßen J, Ott S (2013) Recognition mechanisms during the pre-contact state of lichens: I. Mycobiont-photobiont interactions of the mycobiont of Fulgensia bracteata. Symbiosis 59:121–130.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-013-0232-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meeßen J, Sánchez FJ, Brandt A, Balzer EM, de la Torre R, Sancho LG, de Vera JP, Ott S (2013) Extremotolerance and resistance of lichens: comparative studies on five species used in astrobiological research I. Morphological and anatomical characteristics. Orig Life Evol Biosph 43:283–303.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11084-013-9337-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meeßen J, Sánchez FJ, Sadowsky A, de Vera JP, de la Torre R, Ott S (2014) Extremotolerance and resistance of lichens: comparative studies on five lichen species used in astrobiological research II. Secondary lichen compounds. Orig Life Evol Biosph 43:501–526.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11084-013-9348-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nash TH III (1996) Lichen biology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Øvstedal DO, Lewis Smith RI (2001) Lichens of Antarctica and South Georgia: a guide to their identification and ecology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. Pannewitz S, Schlensog M, Green TGA, Sancho LG, Schroeter B (2003) Are lichens active under snow in continental Antarctica? Oecologia 135:30–38.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-1162-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pfündel E, Klughammer C, Schreiber U (2008) Monitoring the effects of reduced PS II antenna size on quantum yields of photosystems I and II using the Dual-PAM-100 measuring system. PAM Appl Notes 1:21–24Google Scholar
  38. Richter M, Rühle W, Wild A (1990) Studies on the mechanism of photosystem II photoinhibition I. A two step degradation of D1-protein. Photosynth Res 24:229–235.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Romeike J, Friedl T, Helms G, Ott S (2002) Genetic diversity of algal and fungal partners in four species of Umbilicaria (lichenized ascomycetes) along a transect of the Antarctic Peninsula. Mol Biol Evol 19:1209–1217.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ruprecht U, Brunauer G, Türk R (2014) High photobiont diversity in the common European soil crust lichen Psora decipiens. Biodivers Conserv 23:1771–1785.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0662-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sadowsky A (2015) Anpassungsmechanismen an extreme Umweltbedingungen in physiologischem und genetischem Kontext antarktischer Flechten und ihrer Photobionten. Dissertation, HHU DüsseldorfGoogle Scholar
  42. Sadowsky A, Ott S (2012) Photosynthetic symbionts in Antarctic terrestrial ecosystems: the physiological response of lichen photobionts to drought and cold. Symbiosis 58:81–90.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-012-0198-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sadowsky A, Ott S (2015) Symbiosis as a successful strategy in continental Antarctica: performance and protection of Trebouxia photosystem II in relation to lichen pigmentation. Polar Biol 39:139–151.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-015-1677-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sadowsky A, Mettler-Altmann T, Ott S (2016) Metabolic response to desiccation stress in strains of green algal photobionts (Trebouxia) from two Antarctic lichens of southern habitats. Phycol. 55:703–714.  https://doi.org/10.2216/15-127.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sánchez FJ, Meeßen J, del Carmen Ruiz M, Leopoldo G, Ott S, Vílchez C, Horneck G, Sadowsky A, de la Torre R (2014) UV-C tolerance of symbiotic Trebouxia sp. in the space-tested lichen species Rhizocarpon geographicum and Circinaria gyrosa: role of the hydration state and cortex/screening substances. Int J Astrobiol 13:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S147355041300027X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schaper T, Ott S (2003) Photobiont selectivity and interspecific interactions in lichen communities. I. Culture experiments with the mycobiont Fulgensia bracteata. Plant Biol 5:441–450.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-42711 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schlensog M, Schroeter B (2000) Poikilohydry in Antarctic cryptogams and its influence on photosynthetic performance in mesic and xeric habitats. Antarct ecosyst: models for wider ecological understanding. The Caxton Press, Christchurch, pp 175–182Google Scholar
  48. Schreiber U, Klughammer C (2008) Non-photochemical fluorescence quenching and quantum yield in PS I And PS II: analysis of heat-induced limitations using Maxi-Imaging-PAM and Dual-PAM-100. PAM Appl Notes 1:15–18Google Scholar
  49. Schroeter B, Green TGA, Pannewitz S, Schlensog M, Sancho LG (2011) Summer variability, winter dormancy: lichen activity over 3 years at Botany Bay, 77 S latitude, continental Antarctica. Polar Biol 34:13–22.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-010-0851-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schroeter B, Green TGA, Pintado A, Türk R, Sancho LG (2017) Summer activity patterns for mosses and lichens in Maritime Antarctica. Antarct Sci 29:517–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stocker-Wörgötter E (2001) Experimental lichenology and microbiology of lichens: culture experiments, secondary chemistry of cultured mycobionts, resynthesis, and thallus morphogenesis. Bryologist 104:576–581.  https://doi.org/10.1639/0007-2745(2001)104[0576:ELAMOL]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wornik S, Grube M (2010) Joint dispersal does not imply maintenance of partnerships in lichen symbioses. Microb Ecol 59:150–157.  https://doi.org/10.1007//s00248-009-9584-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yoshimura I, Yamamoto Y, Nakano T, Finnie J (2002) Isolation and culture of lichen photobionts and mycobionts. In: Protocols in lichenology. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–33.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56359-1_1

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of BotanyHeinrich Heine UniversityDuesseldorfGermany
  2. 2.Cluster of Excellence in Plant Sciences (CEPLAS) and Institute of Plant BiochemistryHeinrich Heine UniversityDuesseldorfGermany
  3. 3.British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High CrossCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations