Polar Biology

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 317–334 | Cite as

The importance of macroalgae and associated amphipods in the selective benthic feeding of sister rockcod species Notothenia rossii and N. coriiceps (Nototheniidae) in West Antarctica

  • Esteban Barrera-OroEmail author
  • Eugenia Moreira
  • Meike Anna Seefeldt
  • Mariano Valli Francione
  • María Liliana Quartino
Original Paper


Studies on feeding selectivity in Antarctic fish with comparison between diet organisms and those available in the wild are scarce. We explored this issue in Notothenia rossii (NOR) and N. coriiceps (NOC) at Potter Cove in summer 2016 to test: (1) their preference among different benthic groups, primarily species of algae and amphipods and (2) differences between these nototheniids given their distinct morphology but their known similar general ecology in the fjords. The methodology included a comparative analysis of benthic organisms identified in the stomachs and those collected on macroalgal beds (Ivlev Index). Benthic amphipods, mainly Gondogeneia antarctica and Cheirimedon femoratus, followed by macroalgae, mainly Palmaria decipiens and Desmarestia spp., were the most important and frequent dietary items (IRI%) for both nototheniids. However, NOC was more herbivorous and fed more intensively on a wider diversity of benthic organisms such as certain algal-associated groups like gastropods and bivalves, whereas NOR fed on a greater proportion of epibenthic amphipods and other epibenthic prey. Although in the last three decades the physiognomy of the inner cove has been changed due to the retreat of the Fourcade Glacier, at our sampling site in the outer cove the abundance and vertical distribution of macroalgae did not show substantial changes compared with those reported in the literature in 1994–1996. Temporal differences in the feeding selectivity of NOC on amphipod species, between contemporary and historical samples, may be explained by variations in the assemblage of the algal-associated epifauna. We suggest factors that may have produced these changes.


Antarctic fish Diet Potter Cove South Shetland Islands Marine ecology 



We thank C. Bellisio and J. Acosta for their help in field activities and laboratory tasks and Lic. G. Campana for the sampling bags. The divers and boat drivers of Carlini Station provided valuable logistic support. We are very grateful to Prof. J. T. Eastman for his valuable comments on the manuscript. This study was undertaken within the scientific collaboration between Instituto Antártico Argentino and the Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research. It was supported by grants from ANPCyT-DNA (PICTO 0100–2010). M.A.S. was funded by the German Science Foundation (DFG) with the project HE 3391/7–1 within the Priority Programme 1158 on Antarctic Research. This paper presents an outcome of the EU research network IMCONet funded by the Marie Curie Action IRSES (FP7 IRSES, Action No. 319718).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Supplementary material

300_2018_2424_MOESM1_ESM.doc (146 kb)
Electronic supplementary material 1 (DOC 146 kb)


  1. Aghmich A, Taboada S, Toll L, Ballesteros M (2016) First assessment of the rocky intertidal communities of Fildes Bay, King George Island (South Shetland Islands, Antarctica). Polar Biol 39:189–198. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amsler CD, Iken K, McClintock JB, Amsler MO, Peters KJ, Hubbard JM, Furrow FB, Baker BJ (2005) Comprehensive evaluation of the palatability and chemical defenses of subtidal macroalgae from the Antarctic Peninsula. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 294:141–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amsler MO, Amsler CD, von Salm JL, Aumack CF, McClintock JB, Young RM, Baker BJ (2013) Tolerance and sequestration of macroalgal chemical defenses by an Antarctic amphipod: a ‘cheater’ among mutualists. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 490:79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amsler CD, McClintock JB, Baker BJ (2014) Chemical mediation of mutualistic interactions between macroalgae and mesograzers structure unique coastal communities along the western Antarctic Peninsula. J Phycol 50:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkinson A, Siegel V, Pakhomov E, Rothery P (2004) Long-term decline in krill stock and increase in salps within the Southern Ocean. Nature 432:100–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aumack CF, Amsler CD, McClintock JB, Baker BJ (2010) Chemically mediated resistance to mesoherbivory in finely branched macroalgae along the western Antarctic Peninsula. Eur J Phycol 45:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrera-Oro E (2002) The role of fish in the Antarctic marine food web: differences between inshore and offshore waters in the southern Scotia Arc and west Antarctic Peninsula. Antarct Sci 14:293–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barrera-Oro E, Casaux R (1990) Feeding selectivity in Notothenia neglecta, Nybelin, from Potter Cove, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Antarct Sci 2:207–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barrera-Oro E, Marschoff E, Ainley D (2017) Changing status of three notothenioid fish at the South Shetland Islands (1983–2016) after impacts of the 1970–80s commercial fishery. Polar Biol 40:2047–2054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brey T (2001) Population dynamics in benthic invertebrates. A virtual handbook. Version 01.2. Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Germany.
  11. Campana GL, Zacher K, Deregibus D, Momo FR, Wiencke C, Quartino M (2018) Succession of Antarctic benthic algae (Potter Cove, South Shetland Islands): structural patterns and glacial impact over a four-year period. Polar Biol 41:377–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Casaux R, Mazzotta A, Barrera-Oro E (1990) Seasonal aspects of the biology and diet of nearshore nototheniid fish at Potter Cove, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Polar Biol 11:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Casaux R, Barrera-Oro E, Baroni A, Ramón A (2003) Ecology of inshore notothenioid fish from the Danco Coast, Antarctic Peninsula. Polar Biol 26:157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edn. PRIMER-E, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  15. Cortés E (1997) A critical review of methods of studying fish feeding based on analysis of stomach contents: application to elasmobranch fishes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:726–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dauby P, Nyssen F, De Broyer C (2003) Amphipods as food sources for higher trophic levels in the Southern Ocean: a synthesis. In: Huskies AHL, Gieskes WWC, Rozema J, Schorno RML, av der Vries SM, Wolff WJ (eds) Antarctic biology in a global context. Proceedings of the VIIIth SCAR international biology symposium, pp 129–134Google Scholar
  17. De Broyer C, Nyssen F, Dauby P (2004) The crustacean scavenger guild in Antarctic shelf, bathyal and abyssal communities. Deep Sea Res II 51:1733–1752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Broyer C, Lowry JK, Jazdzewski K, Robert H (2007) Catalogue of the Gammaridean and Corophiidean Amphipoda (Crustacea) of the Southern Ocean with distribution and ecological data. Bull Inst R Sci Nat Belg Biol 77:1–135Google Scholar
  19. DeWitt H, Heemstra PC, Gon O (1990) Nototheniidae. In: Gon O, Heemstra PC (eds) Fishes of the Southern Ocean. JLB Smith Institute of Ichthyology, Grahamstown, pp 279–331Google Scholar
  20. Deregibus D, Quartino ML, Campana GL, Momo FR, Wiencke C, Zacher K (2016) Photosynthetic light requirements and vertical distribution of macroalgae in newly ice-free areas in Potter Cove, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Polar Biol 39:153–166. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duarte W, Moreno C (1981) The specialized diet of Harpagifer bispinis. Hydrobiología 80:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duffy JE, Hay ME (1991) Food and shelter as determinants of food choice by an herbivorous marine amphipod. Ecology 72:1286–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eastman J, Barrera-Oro E, Moreira E (2011) Adaptive radiation at a low taxonomic level: divergence in buoyancy of the ecologically similar Antarctic fish Notothenia coriiceps and N. rossii. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 438:195–206. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Falk U, Sala H (2015) Winter melt conditions of the inland ice cap on King George Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Erdkunde 69:341–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fanta E (1999) Laboratory tests on feeding interactions and food preferences of some Antarctic fish from Admiralty Bay, King George Island, South Shetland Islands. Pol Polar Res 20:335–346Google Scholar
  26. Horn MH (1989) Biology of marine herbivorous fishes. Oceanogr Mar Biol 27:167–272Google Scholar
  27. Huang Y, Amsler MO, McClintock J, Amsler CD, Baker BJ (2007) Patterns of gammaridean amphipod abundance and species composition associated with dominant subtidal macroalgae from the western Antarctic Peninsula. Polar Biol 30:1417–1430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Iken K, Barrera-Oro E, Quartino ML, Casaux R, Brey T (1997) Grazing by the Antarctic fish Notothenia coriiceps: evidence for selective feeding on macroalgae. Antarct Sci 9:386–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Iken K, Quartino ML, Barrera-Oro E, Palermo J, Wiencke C, Brey T (1998) Trophic relations between macroalgae and herbivores. Ber Polarforsch 299:258–262Google Scholar
  30. Ivlev VS (1961) Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, p 302Google Scholar
  31. Jazdzewski K., De Broyer C., Pudlarz M., Zielinski D. (2002) Seasonal fluctuations of vagile benthos in the uppermost sublittoral of a maritime Antarctic fjord. In: Arntz WE, Clarke A (eds) Ecological Studies in the Antarctic Sea Ice Zone: results of EASIZ Midterm Symposium, pp 89-96Google Scholar
  32. Jażdżewska A (2011) Soft bottom sublittoral amphipod fauna of Admiralty Bay, King George Island, Antarctic. Oceanol Hydrobiol Stud 40:1–10Google Scholar
  33. Jażdżewski K, Konopacka A (1999) Necrophagous lysianassoid Amphipoda in the diet of Antarctic tern at King George Island, Antarctica. Antarct Sci 11:316–321Google Scholar
  34. Kamler E (2002) Inter-individual and seasonal variability of biological indices in notothenioid fishes from admiralty, Antarctica. Pol Polar Res 23:265–278Google Scholar
  35. Kellermann A (1987) Food and feeding ecology of postlarval and juvenile Pleuragramma antarcticum (Pisces: Notothenioidei) in the seasonal pack ice zone off the Antarctic Peninsula. Polar Biol 7:307–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kim JH, Jażdżewska A, Choi HG, Kim W (2014) The first report on Amphipoda from Marian Cove, King George Island, Antarctic. Oceanol Hydrobiol Stud 43:106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Klöser H, Quartino ML, Wiencke C (1996) Distribution of macroalgae and macroalgal communities in gradients of physical conditions in Potter Cove, King George Island, Antarctica. Hydrobiol 333:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kock K-H, Kellermann A (1991) Reproduction in Antarctic notothenioid fish (review). Antarct Sci 3:125–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Linkowski T, Presler P, Zukowski C (1983) Food habits of nototheniid fishes (Nototheniidae) in Admiralty Bay (King George Island, South Shetland Islands). Pol Polar Res 4:79–95Google Scholar
  40. Loeb VJ, Siegel V, Holm-Hansen O, Hewitt R, Fraser W, Trivelpiece W, Trivelpiece S (1997) Effects of sea-ice extent and krill or salp dominance on the Antarctic food web. Nature 387:897–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Loeb VJ, Hofmann EE, Klinck JM, Holm-Hansen O, White WB (2009) ENSO and variability of the Antarctic Peninsula pelagic marine ecosystem. Antarct Sci 21:135–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moline MA, Claustre H, Frazer TK, Schofield O, Vernet M (2004) Alteration of the food web along the Antarctic Peninsula in response to a regional warming trend. Glob Change Biol 10:1973–1980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Momo F, Bogazzi E, Duttweiler F (1998) Amphipods of Potter Cove: community composition, biology and growth. Ber Polarforsch 299:144–149Google Scholar
  44. Montgomery WL, Gerking SD (1980) Marine macroalgae as food for fishes: an evaluation of potential food quality. Environ Biol Fish 5:143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moreira E, Juáres M, Barrera-Oro E (2014) Dietary overlap among early juvenile stages in an Antarctic notothenioid fish assemblage at Potter Cove, South Shetland Islands. Polar Biol 37:1507–1515. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moreno C, Zamorano J (1980) Selección de los alimentos en Notothenia coriiceps neglecta del cinturón de macroalgas de Bahía South, Antártica. Ser Cient Inst Antárt Chil 25(26):33–44Google Scholar
  47. North A (1996) Locomotory activity and behaviour of the Antarctic teleost Notothenia coriiceps. Mar Biol 126:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pinkas LM, Oliphant S, Iverson ILK (1971) Food habits of albacore, bluefin tuna and bonito in Californian waters. Calif Fish Game 152:1–105Google Scholar
  49. Presler P (1986) Necrophagous invertebrates of the Admiralty Bay of King George Island (South Shetland Islands, Antarctica). Pol Polar Res 7:25–61Google Scholar
  50. Quartino ML, Boraso de Zaixso AL (2008) Summer macroalgal biomass in Potter Cove, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica: its production and flux to the ecosystem. Polar Biol 31:281–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Quartino ML, Klöser H, Schloss IR, Wiencke C (2001) Biomass and associations of benthic marine macroalgae from the inner Potter Cove (King George Island, Antarctica) related to depth and substrate. Polar Biol 24:349–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Quartino ML, Zaixso HE, Boraso de Zaixso AL (2005) Biological and environmental characterization of marine macroalgal assemblages in Potter Cove, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Bot Mar 48:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Quartino ML, Deregibus D, Campana G, Latorre G, Momo F (2013) Evidence of macroalgal colonization on newly ice-free areas following glacial retreat in Potter Cove (South Shetland Islands) Antarctica. PLoS ONE 8:e58223. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. R Development Core Team (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Accessed 20 June 2010
  55. Rückamp M, Braun M, Suckro S, Blindow N (2011) Observed glacial changes on the King George Island ice cap, Antarctica, in the last decade. Glob Planet Change 79:99–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sahade R, Tatián M, Kowalke J, Kühne S, Esnal G (1998) Benthic faunal associations on soft substrates at Potter Cove, King George Island, Antarctica. Polar Biol 19:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sahade R, Lagger C, Torre L, Momo F, Monien P, Schloss I, Barnes D, Servetto N, Tarantelli S, Tatián M, Zamboni N, Abele D (2015) Climate change and glacier retreat drive shifts in an Antarctic benthic ecosystem. Sci Adv 1:e1500050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schloss I, Abele D, Moreau S, Demers S, Bers V, González O, Ferreyra G (2012) Response of phytoplankton dynamics to 19-year (1991–2009) climate trends in Potter Cove (Antarctica). J Marine Syst 92:53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schram J, Schoenrock K, McClintock J, Amsler C, Angus R (2016) Seawater acidification more than warming presents a challenge for two Antarctic macroalgal-associated amphipods. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 554:81–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Seefeldt MA, Weigand AM, Havermans C, Moreira E, Held C (2017a) Fishing for scavengers: an integrated study to amphipod (Crustacea: Lysianassoidea) diversity of Potter Cove (South Shetland Islands Antarctica). Mar Biodiv. Google Scholar
  61. Seefeldt MA, Campana GL, Deregibus D, Quartino ML, Abele D, Held C (2017b) Different feeding strategies in Antarctic scavenging amphipods and their implication for colonization success in times of retreating glaciers. Front Zool 14:59. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Siciński J, Jażdżewski K, De Broyer C, Presler P, Ligowski R, Nonato EF, Corbisier TN, Petti MAV, Brito TAS, Lavrado HP, Błażewicz-Paszkowycz M, Pabis K, Jażdżewska A, Campos LS (2011) Admiralty Bay benthos diversity—a census of a complex polar ecosystem. Deep Sea Res Part II Top Stud Oceanogr 58:30–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tiedtke JE, Kock K-H (1989) Structure and composition of the demersal fish fauna around Elephant Island. Arch Fisch Wiss 39:143–169Google Scholar
  64. Zamzow JP, Amsler CD, McClintock JB, Baker BJ (2010) Habitat choice and predator avoidance by Antarctic amphipods: the roles of algal chemistry and morphology. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 400:155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto Antártico ArgentinoSan MartínArgentina
  2. 2.Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)Buenos AiresArgentina
  3. 3.Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino RivadaviaBuenos AiresArgentina
  4. 4.Functional Ecology SectionAlfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine ResearchBremerhavenGermany
  5. 5.Department of Animal Ecology, Evolution and Biodiversity, Faculty of Biology and BiotechnologyRuhr University BochumBochumGermany
  6. 6.Universidad Nacional de General SarmientoLos PolvorinesArgentina

Personalised recommendations