Advertisement

Polar Biology

, Volume 41, Issue 8, pp 1635–1649 | Cite as

Drivers of inter-annual variation and long-term change in High-Arctic spider species abundances

  • Joseph J. Bowden
  • Oskar L. P. Hansen
  • Kent Olsen
  • Niels M. Schmidt
  • Toke T. Høye
Original Paper

Abstract

Understanding how species abundances vary in space and time is a central theme in ecology, yet there are few long-term field studies of terrestrial invertebrate abundances and the determinants of their dynamics. This is particularly relevant in the context of rapid climate change occurring in the Arctic. Arthropods can serve as strong indicators of ecosystem change due to their sensitivity to increasing temperatures and other environmental variables. We used spider samples collected by pitfall trapping from three different habitats (fen, mesic and arid heath) in High-Arctic Greenland to assess changes in individual species abundances over an 18-year period (1996–2014). We calculated annual abundances of each species using a conventional method and compared this to a technique that corrected for the influence of short-term weather variation on arthropod activity. The latter method used the area under the curve of a fitted generalized additive model to measure annual change in abundance of each species. Abundances calculated using each of the two methods did not differ greatly over time nor in direction of climate effects, suggesting that short-term weather-driven activity does not influence interpretation of long-term trends. We used model selection to determine which climatic variables and/or previous years’ abundance best explained annual variation in species abundances over this period. We identified and used 28 566 adult spiders that comprised eight species. Most notably, the abundances of some species (Collinsia thulensis and Erigone psychrophila) have declined during this 18-year period, in response to rising temperatures and snow depth dynamics, which affected snowmelt timing and moisture availability. No species increased in abundance through the study period. Since some species showed no trend in abundance through time and climatic effects were habitat-specific, continued climate change may also affect local species interactions. Long-term monitoring programmes are an extremely valuable means through which to generate empirical data about changes in populations and communities; this is especially pertinent in the Arctic, where climate change is occurring at a rapid rate.

Keywords

Araneae Assemblage Population Tundra Zackenberg 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Greenland Ecosystem Monitoring Programme, especially BioBasis and ClimateBasis, for access to specimens and climate data, respectively, from Zackenberg, Northeast Greenland. We thank the Natural History Museum Aarhus for access to the Zackenberg collection and use of laboratory facilities. We are also grateful for much helpful feedback from anonymous reviewers and the handling editor.

Author contributions

JJB, OLPH and TTH conceptualized the ideas; JJB identified specimens and generated data; JJB, TTH and OLPH analysed the data; JJB wrote the paper; JJB, OLPH, KO, NMS and TTH contributed to data interpretation, article revision and final approval; NMS was responsible for the collection of specimens under Greenland Ecosystem Monitoring Programme and KO curated all specimens at the Natural History Museum Aarhus.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

300_2018_2351_MOESM1_ESM.docx (851 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 851 kb)

References

  1. Arnold TW (2010) Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike’s Information Criterion. J Wildl Manag 74:1175–1178.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-2817.2010.tb01236.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Böcher J, Kristensen NP, Pape T, Vilhelmsen L (2015) The greenland entomofauna: an identification manual of insects, spiders and their allies. Koninklijke Brill, LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowden JJ, Buddle CM (2010) Determinants of ground-dwelling spider assemblages at a regional scale in the Yukon Territory, Canada. Ecoscience 17:287–297.  https://doi.org/10.2980/17-3-3308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowden JJ, Buddle CM (2012) Life history of tundra-dwelling wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) from the Yukon Territory, Canada. Can J Zool 90:714–721.  https://doi.org/10.1139/z2012-038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowden JJ, Eskildsen A, Hansen RR, Olsen K, Kurle CM, Høye TT (2015a) High-Arctic butterflies become smaller with rising temperatures. Biol Lett 11:20150574.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0574 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowden JJ, Hansen RR, Olsen K, Høye TT (2015b) Habitat-specific effects of climate change on a low-mobility Arctic spider species. Polar Biol 38:559–568.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-014-1622-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CaraDonna PJ, Bain JA (2016) Frost sensitivity of leaves and flowers of subalpine plants is related to tissue type and phenology. J Ecol 104:55–64.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12482 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Culler LE, Ayres MP, Virginia RA (2015) In a warmer Arctic, mosquitoes avoid increased mortality from predators by growing faster. Philos Trans R Soc B 282:20151549.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1549 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DeVito J, Meik JM, Gerson MM, Formanowicz DR Jr (2004) Physiological tolerances of three sympatric riparian wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) correspond with microhabitat distributions. Can J Zool 82:1119–1125.  https://doi.org/10.1139/z04-090 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dornelas M, Gotelli NJ, McGill B, Shimadzu H, Moyes F, Sievers C, Magurran AE (2014) Assemblage time series reveal biodiversity change but not systematic loss. Science 344:296–299.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248484 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ekstrøm CT (2017) MESS: miscellaneous esoteric statistical scripts. R package version 0.4-15. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MESS/index.html
  12. Elberling B, Tamstorf MP, Michelsen A, Arndal MF, Sigsgaard C, Illeris L, Bay C, Hansen BU, Christensen T, Steen Hansen E, Jakobsen BH, Beyens L (2008) Soil and plant community characteristics and dynamics at Zackenberg. Adv Ecol Res 40:223–248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(07)00010-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elmendorf SC, Henry GHR, Hollister RD, Björk RG, Boulager-Lapointe N, Cooper EJ, Cornelissen JHC, Day TA, Dorrepaal E, Elumeeva TG, Gill M, Gould WA, Harte J, Hik DS, Hofgaard A, Johnson DR, Johnstone JF, Jónsdóttir IS, Jorgenson JC, Klanderud K, Klein JA, Koh S, Kudo G, Lara M, Lévesque E, Magnússon B, May JL, Mercado-Díaz JA, Michelsen A, Molau U, Myers-Smith IH, Oberbauer SF, Onipchenko VG, Rixen C, Martin Schmidt N, Shaver GR, Spasojevic MJ, Þórhallsdóttir ÞE, Tolvanen A, Troxler T, Tweedie CE, Villareal S, Wahren C-H, Walker X, Webber PJ, Welker JM, Wipf S (2012) Plot-scale evidence of tundra vegetation change and links to recent summer warming. Nat Clim Change 2:453–457.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1465 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Finke DL, Denno RF (2005) Predator diversity and the functioning of ecosystems: the role of intraguild predation in dampening trophic cascades. Ecol Lett 8:1299–1306.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00832.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Finke DL, Denno RF (2006) Spatial refuge from intraguild predation: implications for prey suppression and trophic cascades. Oecologia 149:265–275.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0443-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hansen RR, Hansen OLP, Bowden JJ, Normand S, Bay C, Sørensen JG, Høye TT (2016) High spatial variation in terrestrial arthropod species diversity and composition near the Greenland ice cap. Polar Biol 39:2263–2272.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-016-1893-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Høye TT, Forchhammer MC (2008a) Phenology of High-Arctic arthropods: effects of climate on spatial, seasonal, and inter-annual variation. Adv Ecol Res 40:299–324.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(07)00013-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Høye TT, Forchhammer MC (2008b) The influence of weather conditions on the activity of high-arctic arthropods inferred from long-term observations. BMC Ecol 8:8.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-8-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Høye TT, Sikes D (2013) Arctic entomology in the 21st century. Can Entomol 145:125–130.  https://doi.org/10.4039/tce.2013.14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Høye TT, Bowden JJ, Hansen OLP, Hansen RR, Henriksen TN, Niebuhr A, Skytte MG (2018) Elevation modulates how Arctic arthropod communities are structured along local environmental gradients. Polar Biol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-017-2204-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. IPCC-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jensen LM, Topp-Jørgensen E, Christensen TR, Schmidt NM (2016) Zackenberg ecological research operations 20th annual report, 2014. Aarhus University, DCE—Danish Centre for Environment and Energy. Aarhus University Press, RoskildeGoogle Scholar
  23. Kapfer J, Grytnes J-A (2016) Large climate change, large effect? Vegetation changes over the past century in the European High Arctic. Appl Veg Sci 20:204–214.  https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12280 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kleiber C, Zeileis A (2008) Applied econometrics with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koltz AM, Schmidt NM, Høye TT (2018) Differential arthropod responses to warming are altering the structure of Arctic communities. R Soc Open Sci 5:171503.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171503 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Lancaster LT (2016) Widespread range expansions shape latitudinal variation in insect thermal limits. Nat Clim Change 6:618–621.  https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE2945 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lawrence KL, Wise DH (2000) Spider predation on forest-floor Collembola and evidence for indirect effects on decomposition. Pedobiologia 44:33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lawrence KL, Wise DH (2004) Unexpected indirect effect of spiders on the rate of litter disappearance in a deciduous forest. Pedobiologia 48:149–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2003.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lensing JR, Todd S, Wise DH (2005) The impact of altered precipitation on spatial stratification and activity-densities of springtails (Collembola) and spiders (Araneae). Ecol Entomol 30:194–200.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-6946.2005.00669.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Loboda S, Savage J, Buddle CM, Schmidt NM, Høye TT (2018) Declining diversity and abundance of High Arctic fly assemblages over two decades of rapid climate warming. Ecography 41:265–277.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02747 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lumley T (2017) Leaps: regression subset selection. R package version 3.0. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/leaps/index.html
  32. Mazerolle MJ (2014) AICcmodavg: model selection and multimodel inference based on (Q)AIC(c). R package version 2.0-1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=AICcmodavgR
  33. McKinnon L, Picotin M, Bolduc E, Juillet C, Bêty J (2012) Timing of breeding, peak food availability, and effects of mismatch on chick growth in birds nesting in the High Arctic. Can J Zool 90:961–971.  https://doi.org/10.1139/Z2012-064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miller-Rushing AJ, Høye TT, Inouye DW, Post E (2010) The effects of phenological mismatches on demography. Philos Trans R Soc B 365:3177–3186.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Myers-Smith IH, Forbes BC, Wilmking M, Hallinger M, Lantz T, Blok D, Tape KD, Macias-Fauria M, Sass-Klaassen U, Lévesque E, Boudreau S, Ropars P, Hermanutz L, Trant A, Collier LS, Weijers S, Rozema J, Rayback SA, Schmidt NM, Schaepman-Strub G, Wipf S, Rixen C, Ménard CB, Venn S, Goetz S, Andreu-Hayles L, Elmendorf S, Ravolainen V, Welker J, Grogan P, Epstein HE, Hik DS (2011) Shrub expansion in tundra ecosystems: dynamics, impacts and research priorities. Environ Res Lett 6:045509.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/045509 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Polis GA, Myers CA, Holt RD (1989) The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:297–330.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.001501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Post E, Høye TT (2013) Advancing the long view of ecological change in tundra systems. Philos Trans R Soc B 368:20120477.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0477 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. R Development Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  39. Roslin T, Wirta H, Hopkins T, Hardwick B, Várkonyi G (2013) Indirect interactions in the high arctic. PLoS ONE 8:e67367.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067367 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Schmidt NM, Hansen LH, Hansen J, Berg TB, Meltofte H (2012a) BioBasis manual-conceptual design and sampling procedures of the biological monitoring programme within Zackenberg Basic. Aarhus University Press, RoskildeGoogle Scholar
  41. Schmidt NM, Kristensen DK, Michelsen A, Bay C (2012b) High Arctic plant community responses to a decade of ambient warming. Biodiversity 13:191–199.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sikes D, Bowser M, Daly K, Høye TT, Meierotto S, Mullen L, Slowik J, Stockbridge J (2017) The value of museums in the production, sharing, and use of entomological data to document hyperdiversity of the changing North. Arctic Sci 3:498–514.  https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2016-0038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith TM, Smith RL (2012) Elements of ecology. Pearson Benjamin Cummings, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Topping CJ, Sunderland KD (1992) Limitations to the use of pitfall traps in ecological studies exemplified by a study of spiders in a field of winter wheat. J Appl Ecol 29:485–491.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2404516 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tulp I, Schekkerman H (2008) Has prey availability for Arctic birds advanced with climate change? hindcasting the abundance of tundra arthropods using weather and seasonal variation. Arctic 61:48–60.  https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tylianakis JM, Didham RK, Bascompte J, Wardle DA (2008) Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 11:1351–1363.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01250.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Vellend M, Baeten L, Myers-Smith IH, Elmendorf SC, Beauséjour R, Brown CD, De Frenne P, Verheyen K, Wipf S (2013) Global meta-analysis reveals no net change in local-scale plant biodiversity over time. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:19456–19459.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312779110 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Walker SE, Rypstra AL, Marshall SD (2003) The relationship between offspring size and performance in the wolf spider Hogna helluo (Araneae: Lycosidae). Ecol Evol Res 5:19–28Google Scholar
  49. Wirta HK, Weingartner E, Hambäck PA, Roslin T (2015) Extensive niche overlap among the dominant arthropod predators of the High Arctic. Basic Appl Ecol 16:86–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2014.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wood SN (2011) Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. J R Stat Soc B 73:3–36.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00749.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhao Z-H, Shi P-J, Hui C, Ouyang F, Ge F, Li B-L (2013) Solving the pitfalls of pitfall trapping: a two-circle method for density estimation of ground-dwelling arthropods. Methods Ecol Evol 4:865–871.  https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph J. Bowden
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  • Oskar L. P. Hansen
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kent Olsen
    • 2
  • Niels M. Schmidt
    • 4
  • Toke T. Høye
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Arctic Research CentreAarhus UniversityAarhus CDenmark
  2. 2.Natural History Museum AarhusAarhus CDenmark
  3. 3.Department of Bioscience, KaløAarhus UniversityRøndeDenmark
  4. 4.Department of Bioscience, Arctic Research CentreAarhus UniversityRoskildeDenmark
  5. 5.Canadian Forest Service - Atlantic Forestry CentreCorner BrookCanada

Personalised recommendations