Advertisement

Polar Biology

, Volume 40, Issue 12, pp 2457–2468 | Cite as

Abundance, richness, and succession of microfungi in relation to chemical changes in Antarctic moss profiles

  • Dai Hirose
  • Satoru Hobara
  • Yukiko Tanabe
  • Masaki Uchida
  • Sakae Kudoh
  • Takashi Osono
Original Paper

Abstract

Little is known in continental Antarctic about patterns of abundance, diversity, and succession of microfungi within moss profiles consisting of live, senescent, and dead tissues in different stages of decomposition. In the present study, vertical patterns of the abundance and diversity of microfungi and their relationship with chemical compositions were examined within moss colonies collected from coastal outcrops in the Lützow–Holm Bay area (Queen Maud Land), East continental Antarctica. Total and darkly pigmented hyphal length, the richness of molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) of microfungi, and the occurrence of Phoma herbarum and Pseudogymnoascus pannorum increased with the depth of moss profiles. The content of organic chemical components and nitrogen in moss tissues decreased, whereas ash content increased with the depth of moss profiles. Relative amount of recalcitrant compounds and total carbohydrates did not significantly differ among the vertical layers. The downward increase of the microfungal richness and occurrence in the Antarctic moss profiles without MOTU replacement was consistent with the directional-nonreplacement model of succession, indicative of the high environmental resistance, which represents the sum of the adverse factors hindering the success of species establishment. This contrasted with the fungal succession in arctic moss profiles, which accorded with the directional-replacement model, in which species replacement took place due to modification of habitat and competition. More hostile environmental conditions than those in the Arctic characterized the fungal succession and limited the fungal decomposition of moss in continental Antarctica.

Keywords

Continental Antarctica Bryophyte Bryum pseudotriquetrum Decomposition Hyphal length Phoma herbarum 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Y. Motoyoshi and members of JARE-51 for their assistance during the expedition; Dr. H. Kanda and Dr. A.S. Mori for useful discussions; Dr. K. Kato for helpful identification of moss species; and Dr. Elizabeth Nakajima for critical reading of the manuscript. This study was partially supported by the National Institute of Polar Research through General Collaboration Projects No. 26-28 to T.O. and by a Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI Grant (No. 70370096 to M.U.).

References

  1. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang JH, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Arenz BE, Blanchette RA, Farrell RL (2014) Fungal diversity in Antarctic soils. In: Cowan DA (ed) Antarctic terrestrial microbiology. Springer, Berlin, pp 35–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey AD, Wynn-Williams DD (1982) Soil microbiological studies at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands. Br Antarct Surv Bull 51:167–191Google Scholar
  4. Baker JH (1972) The rate of production and decomposition of Chorisodontium aciphyllum (Hook. f. & Wils.) Broth. Br Antarct Surv Bull 27:123–129Google Scholar
  5. Berg B (1986) Nutrient release from litter and humus in coniferous forest soils—a mini review. Scand J For Res 1:359–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berg B, Söderström B (1979) Fungal biomass and nitrogen in decomposing Scots pine needle litter. Soil Biol Biochem 11:339–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bridge PD, Newsham KK (2009) Soil fungal community composition at Mars Oasis, a southern maritime Antarctic site, assessed by PCR amplification and cloning. Fungal Ecol 2:66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butler MJ, Day AW (1998) Fungal melanins: a review. Can J Microbiol 44:1115–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cannone N, Convey P, Guglielmin M (2013) Diversity trends of bryophytes in continental Antarctica. Polar Biol 36:259–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davey ML, Currah RS (2006) Interactions between mosses (Bryophyta) and fungi. Can J Bot 84:1509–1519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis RC (1981) Structure and function of two Antarctic terrestrial moss communities. Ecol Monogr 51:125–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Domsch KH, Gams W, Anderson TH (2007) Compendium of soil fungi, 2nd edn. IHW-Verlag, EchingGoogle Scholar
  13. Dowding P, Widden P (1974) Some relationships between fungi and their environment in tundra regions. In: Holding AJ, Heal OW, MacLean SF Jr, Flangan PW (eds) Soil organisms and decomposition in tundra. University of Alaska, Tundra Biome Steering Committee, Fairbanks, pp 123–150Google Scholar
  14. Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith E (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28:350–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Erickson M, Miksche GE (1974) On the occurrence of lignin or polyphenols in some mosses and liverworts. Phytochemistry 13:2295–2299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fenton JHC (1980) The rate of peat accumulation in Antarctic moss banks. J Ecol 68:211–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernandez CW, Koide RT (2014) Initial melanin and nitrogen concentrations control the decomposition of ectomycorrhizal fungal litter. Soil Biol Biochem 77:150–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fukasawa Y, Osono T, Takeda H (2009) Effects of attack of saprobic fungi on twig litter decomposition by endophytic fungi. Ecol Res 24:1067–1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993) ITS primer with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes: application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rust. Mol Ecol 21:113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hirose D, Tanabe Y, Uchida M, Kudoh S, Osono T (2013) Microfungi associated with withering willow wood in ground contact near Syowa Station, East Antarctica for 40 years. Polar Biol 36:919–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hirose D, Hobara S, Matsuoka S, Kato K, Tanabe Y, Uchida M, Kudoh S, Osono T (2016) Diversity and community assembly of moss-associated fungi in ice-free coastal outcrops of continental Antarctica. Fungal Ecol 24:94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones PCT, Mollison JE (1948) A technique for the quantitative estimation of soil microorganisms. J Gen Microbiol 2:54–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kanda H, Inoue M (1994) Ecological Monitoring of moss and lichen vegetation in the Syowa station area, Antarctica. Proc NIPR Symp Polar Biol 7:221–231Google Scholar
  24. King HGC, Heath GW (1967) The chemical analysis of small samples of leaf material and the relationship between the disappearance and composition of leaves. Pedobiologia 7:192–197Google Scholar
  25. Lehtonen MT, Akita M, Kalkkinen N, Ahola-Iivarinen E, Rönnholm G, Somervuo P, Thelander M, Valkonen JPT (2009) Quickly-released peroxidase of moss in defense against fungal invaders. New Phytol 183:432–443CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Leung GL, Robson GD, Robinson CH (2011) Characterisation of cold-tolerant fungi from a decomposing High Arctic moss. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1975–1979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lindo Z, Gonzalez A (2010) The Bryosphere: an integral and influential component of the Earth’s biosphere. Ecosystems 13:612–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Malosso E, Waite IS, English L, Hopkins DW, O’Donnell AG (2006) Fungal diversity in maritime Antarctic soils determined using a combination of culture isolation, molecular fingerprinting and cloning techniques. Polar Biol 29:552–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McRae CF, Seppelt RD (1999) Filamentous fungi of the Windmill Islands, continental Antarctica. Effect of water content in moss turves on fungal diversity. Polar Biol 22:389–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller OK Jr, Laursen GA (1974) Belowground fungal biomass on US tundra biome sites at Barrow, Alaska. In: Holding AJ, Heal OW, MacLean SF Jr, Flangan PW (eds) Soil organisms and decomposition in tundra. University of Alaska, Tundra Biome Steering Committee, Fairbanks, pp 151–158Google Scholar
  31. Ochyra R, Lewis-Smith RI, Bednarek-Ochyra H (2008) The illustrated moss flora of Antarctica. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Osono T, Takeda H (2001) Organic chemical and nutrient dynamics in decomposing beech leaf litter in relation to fungal ingrowth and succession during three year decomposition processes in a cool temperate deciduous forest in Japan. Ecol Res 16:649–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Osono T, Takeda H (2004) Accumulation and release of nitrogen and phosphorus in relation to lignin decomposition in leaf litter of 14 tree species in a cool temperate forest. Ecol Res 19:593–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Osono T, Takeda H (2005) Limit values for decomposition and convergence process of lignocellulose fraction in decomposing leaf litter of 14 tree species in a cool temperate forest. Ecol Res 20:51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Osono T, Trofymow JA (2012) Microfungal diversity associated with Kindbergia oregana in successional forests of British Columbia. Ecol Res 27:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Osono T, Hobara S, Koba K, Kameda K (2006a) Reduction of fungal growth and lignin decomposition in needle litter by avian excreta. Soil Biol Biochem 38:1623–1630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Osono T, Hirose D, Fujimaki R (2006b) Fungal colonization as affected by litter depth and decomposition stage of needle litter. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2743–2752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Osono T, Ishii Y, Hirose D (2008) Fungal colonization and decomposition of Castanopsis sieboldii leaf litter in a subtropical forest. Ecol Res 23:909–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Osono T, Hobara S, Hishinuma T, Azuma JI (2011) Selective lignin decomposition and nitrogen mineralization in forest litter colonized by Clitocybe sp. Eur J Soil Biol 47:114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Osono T, Ueno T, Uchida M, Kanda H (2012) Abundance and diversity of fungi in relation to chemical changes in arctic moss profiles. Polar Sci 6:121–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Osono T, Matsuoka S, Hirose D, Uchida M, Kanda H (2014) Fungal colonization and decomposition of leaves and stems of Salix arctica on deglaciated moraines in high-Arctic Canada. Polar Sci 8:207–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Preston CM, Trofymow JA, Sayer BG, Niu J (1997) 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with cross-polarization and magic-angle spinning investigation of the proximate-analysis fractions used to assess litter quality in decomposition studies. Can J Bot 75:1601–1613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rao S, Chan Y, Lacap DC, Hyde KD, Pointing SB, Farrell RL (2012) Low-diversity fungal assemblage in an Antarctic Dry Valleys soil. Polar Biol 35:567–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Robinson CH (2001) Cold adaptation in Arctic and Antarctic fungi. New Phytol 151:341–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Robinson CH, Borisova OB, Callaghan TV, Lee JA (1996) Fungal hyphal length in litter of Dryas octopetala in a high-Arctic polar semi-desert, Svalbard. Polar Biol 16:71–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ruisi S, Barreca D, Selbmann L, Zucconi L, Onofri S (2007) Fungi in Antarctica. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 6:127–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Selbmann L, Onofri S, Fenice M, Federici F, Petruccioli M (2002) Production and structural characterization of the exopolysaccharide of the Antarctic fungus Phoma herbarum CCFEE 5080. Res Microbiol 153:585–592CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Stevens MI, Hunger SA, Hills SFK, Gemmill CEC (2007) Phantom hitch-hikers mislead estimates of genetic variation in Antarctic mosses. Plant Syst Evol 263:191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Svoboda J, Henry GHR (1987) Succession in marginal arctic environments. Arc Alp Res 19:373–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tanabe Y, Yasui S, Osono T, Uchida M, Kudoh S, Yamamuro M (2017) Abundant deposits of nutrients inside lakebeds of Antarctic oligotrophic lakes. Polar Biol 40:603–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tateno O, Hirose D, Osono T, Takeda H (2015) Beech cupules share endophytic fungi with leaves and twigs. Mycoscience 56:252–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thormann MN, Currah RS, Bayley SE (2004) Patterns of distribution of microfungi in decomposing bog and fen plants. Can J Bot 82:710–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tosi S, Casado B, Gerdol R, Caretta G (2002) Fungi isolated from Antarctic mosses. Polar Biol 25:262–268Google Scholar
  54. Tosi S, Onofri S, Brusoni M, Zucconi L, Vishniac H (2005) Response of Antarctic soil fungal assemblages to experimental warming and reduction of UV radiation. Polar Biol 28:470–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vilgalys R, Hester M (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriol 172:4238–4246CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Yu NH, Kim JA, Jeong MH, Cheong YH, Hong SG, Jung JS, Koh YJ, Hur JS (2014) Diversity of endophytic fungi associated with bryophyte in the maritime Antarctic (King George Island). Polar Biol 37:27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang T, Zhang YQ, Liu HY, Wei YZ, Li HL, Su J, Zhao LX, Yu LY (2013) Diversity and cold adaptation of culturable endophytic fungi from bryophytes in the Fildes Region, King George Island, maritime Antarctica. FEMS Microb Ecol 341:52–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dai Hirose
    • 1
  • Satoru Hobara
    • 2
  • Yukiko Tanabe
    • 3
  • Masaki Uchida
    • 3
  • Sakae Kudoh
    • 3
  • Takashi Osono
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculty of PharmacyNihon UniversityFunabashiJapan
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Symbiotic SciencesRakuno Gakuen UniversityEbetsuJapan
  3. 3.National Institute of Polar ResearchTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Department of Environmental Systems Science, Faculty of Science and EngineeringDoshisha UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations