Polar Biology

, Volume 39, Issue 12, pp 2427–2439 | Cite as

Otolith biochronologies reveal latitudinal differences in growth of Bering Sea yellowfin sole Limanda aspera

  • Mary Elizabeth Matta
  • Thomas E. Helser
  • Bryan A. Black
Original Paper


Annual growth patterns in the hard parts of marine organisms are often related to factors in the physical environment; investigators are increasingly borrowing methods from the field of dendrochronology (tree-ring science) to explore these relationships. When applied to otoliths of yellowfin sole Limanda aspera, an abundant and commercially important flatfish, this approach has demonstrated a strong positive correlation between otolith growth and bottom temperature in the southeastern Bering Sea. In the present study, we assess whether the biochronology–growth relationship extends to yellowfin sole collected at higher latitudes. Two new northern Bering Sea biochronologies, one from the Bering Strait region and one near St. Matthew Island, were developed and compared with the southeastern Bering Sea biochronology using mixed effects modeling. Despite large distances (up to 600 km), a high degree of synchrony was observed among all three chronologies. However, subtle differences in growth among the three regions were revealed upon closer examination. The relative amplitude of otolith growth differed among the three chronologies, with stronger negative anomalies in the south and stronger positive anomalies in the north. Differences in average length at age were also detected, with fish growing slower to greater lengths at higher latitudes. Lastly, the Bering Strait biochronology had the weakest and most localized relationships with climate variables, suggesting effects of climate may not be felt uniformly across the regions examined. Biochronologies may thus provide a useful tool in evaluating potential biological responses to projected climate change across a species’ range.


Biochronology Flatfish Fish otoliths Growth Alaska 


  1. Bakkala RG (1981) Population characteristics and ecology of yellowfin sole. In: Hood DW, Calder JA (eds) The eastern Bering Sea shelf: oceanography and resources. US Dept Commer NOAA, Washington, DC, pp 553–574Google Scholar
  2. Black BA (2009) Climate-driven synchrony across tree, bivalve, and rockfish growth-increment chronologies of the northeast Pacific. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 378:37–46. doi:10.3354/meps07854 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Black BA, Boehlert GW, Yoklavich MM (2005) Using tree-ring crossdating techniques to validate annual growth increments in long-lived fishes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 65:2277–2284. doi:10.1139/F05-142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black BA, Schroeder ID, Sydeman WJ, Bograd SJ, Wells BK, Schwing FB (2011) Winter and summer upwelling modes and their biological importance in the California Current ecosystem. Global Change Biol 17:2536–2545. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02422.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Black BA, Matta ME, Helser TE, Wilderbuer TK (2013) Otolith biochronologies as multidecadal indicators of body size anomalies in yellowfin sole (Limanda aspera). Fish Oceanogr 22(6):523–532. doi:10.1111/fog.12036 Google Scholar
  6. Black BA, Sydeman WJ, Frank DC, Griffin D, Stahle DW, García-Reyes M, Rykaczewski RR, Bograd SJ, Peterson WT (2014) Six centuries of variability and extremes in a coupled marine-terrestrial ecosystem. Science 345:1498–1502. doi:10.1126/science.1253209 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Briffa KR, Melvin TM (2011) A closer look at regional curve standardization of tree-ring records: justification of the need, a warning of some pitfalls, and suggested improvements in its application. In: Hughes MK, Diaz HF, Swetnam TW (eds) Dendroclimatology: developments in paleoenvironmental research, vol 11, pp 553–574Google Scholar
  8. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Butler PG, Richardson CA, Scourse JD, Wanamaker AD Jr, Shammon TM, Bennell JD (2010) Marine climate in the Irish Sea: analysis of a 489-year marine master chronology derived from growth increments in the shell of the clam Arctica islandica. Quat Sci Rev 29:1614–1632. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.07.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carilli JE, Norris RD, Black B, Walsh SM, McField M (2010) Century-scale records of coral growth rates indicate that local stressors reduce coral thermal tolerance threshold. Global Change Biol 16:1247–1257. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02043.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cook ER, Briffa KR, Meko DM, Graybill DA, Funkhouser G (1995) The ‘segment length curse’ in long tree-ring chronology development for palaeoclimatic studies. Holocene 5(2):229–237. doi:10.1177/095968369500500211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fritts HC (1976) Tree rings and climate. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Gillanders BM, Black BA, Meekan MG, Morrison MA (2012) Climatic effects on the growth of a temperate reef fish from the Southern Hemisphere: a biochronological approach. Mar Biol 159:1327–1333. doi:10.1007/s00227-012-1913-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grant WS, Bakkala R, Utter FM, Teel DJ, Kobayashi T (1983) Biochemical genetic population structure of yellowfin sole, Limanda aspera, of the North Pacific Ocean and Bering Sea. Fish Bull 81(4):667–677. http://fishbull.noaa.gov/81-4/grant.pdf
  15. Grebmeier JM, Smith Jr WO, Conover RJ (1995) Biological processes on Arctic continental shelves: ice-ocean-biotic interactions. In: Smith WO, Grebmeier JM (eds) Arctic oceanography: marginal ice zones and continental shelves. Coastal and Estuarine Studies 49, Washington DC, American Geophysical Union, pp 231–261Google Scholar
  16. Grissino-Mayer HD (2001) Evaluating crossdating accuracy: a manual and tutorial for the computer program COFECHA. Tree Ring Res 57:205–221Google Scholar
  17. Helama S, Schöne BR, Black BA, Dunca E (2006) Constructing long-term proxy series for aquatic environments with absolute dating control using a sclerochronological approach: introduction and advanced applications. Mar Freshw Res 57:591–599. doi:10.1071/MF05176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Helama S, Nielsen JK, Macias Fauria M, Valovirta I (2009) A fistful of shells: amplifying sclerochronological and palaeoclimate signals from molluscan death assemblages. Geol Mag 146:917–930. doi:10.1017/S0016756809990033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Helser TE, Lai H-L (2004) A Bayesian hierarchical meta-analysis of fish growth: with an example for North American largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides. Ecol Model 178:399–416. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.02.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Helser TE, Lai H-L, Black BA (2012) Bayesian hierarchical modeling of Pacific geoduck growth increment data and climate indices. Ecol Model 247:210–220. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.08.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hollowed AB, Planque B, Loeng H (2013) Potential movement of fish and shellfish stocks from the sub-Arctic to the Arctic Ocean. Fish Oceanogr 22:355–370. doi:10.1111/fog.12027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holmes RL (1983) Computer-assisted quality control in tree-ring dating and measurement. Tree Ring Bull 43:69–78Google Scholar
  23. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Meyers LA (eds)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.ipcc.ch
  24. Kimura DK, Anderl DM, Goetz BJ (2007) Seasonal marginal growth on otoliths of seven Alaska groundfish species support the existence of annual patterns. Alaska Fish Res Bull 12(2):243–251. http://www.sf.adfg.state.ak.us/FedAidPDFs/AFRB.12.2.243-251.pdf
  25. Lauth RR (2011) Results of the 2010 eastern and northern Bering Sea continental shelf bottom trawl survey of groundfish and invertebrate fauna. NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-227. http://www.afsc.noaa.gov/Publications/AFSC-TM/NOAA-TM-AFSC-227.pdf
  26. Matta ME, Goetz BJ (2012) Otolith growth pattern interpretation. In: Matta ME, Kimura DK (eds) Age determination manual of the Alaska Fisheries Science Center Age and Growth Program. NOAA Professional Paper NMFS 13, pp 5–10. http://spo.nwr.noaa.gov/pp13.pdf
  27. Matta ME, Black BA, Wilderbuer TK (2010) Climate-driven synchrony in otolith growth-increment chronologies for three Bering Sea flatfish species. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 413:137–145. doi:10.3354/meps08689 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morrongiello JR, Thresher RE (2015) A statistical framework to explore ontogenetic growth variation among individuals and populations: a marine fish example. Ecol Monogr 85(1):93–115. doi:10.1890/13-2355.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morrongiello JR, Thresher RE, Smith DC (2012) Aquatic biochronologies and climate change. Nat Clim Change 2:849–857. doi:10.1038/nclimate1616 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nichol DG (1997) Effects of geography and bathymetry on growth and maturity of yellowfin sole, Pleuronectes asper, in the eastern Bering Sea. Fish Bull 95:494–503Google Scholar
  31. NOAA (2014) Bering Sea climate. http://www.beringclimate.noaa.gov. Accessed 8 May 2014
  32. Overland JE, Wang M (2013) When will the summer Arctic be nearly sea ice free? Geophys Res Lett 40:1–5. doi:10.1002/grl.50316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rayner NE, Parker DE, Horton EB, Folland CK, Alexander LV, Rowell DP (2003) Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J Geophys Res. doi:10.1029/2002JD002670 Google Scholar
  34. Shockley W, Matta ME (2012) Yellowfin sole (Limanda aspera). In: Matta ME, Kimura DK (eds) Age determination manual of the Alaska Fisheries Science Center Age and Growth Program. NOAA Professional Paper NMFS 13, pp 77–84. http://spo.nwr.noaa.gov/pp13.pdf
  35. Stabeno PJ, Farley Jr Ed, Kachel NB, Moore S, Mordy CW, Napp JM, Overland JE, Pinchuk AI, Sigler MF (2012) A comparison of the physics of the northern and southern shelves of the eastern Bering Sea and some implications for the ecosystem. Deep Sea Res II 65–70:14–30. doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2012.02.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. von Bertalanffy L (1938) A quantitative theory of organic growth (inquiries on growth laws II). Hum Biol 10(2):181–213Google Scholar
  37. von Biela VR, Kruse GH, Mueter FJ, Black BA, Douglas DC, Helser TE, Zimmerman CE (2015) Evidence of bottom-up limitations in nearshore marine systems based on otolith proxies of fish growth. Mar Biol 162:1019–1031. doi:10.1007/s00227-015-2645-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wakabayashi K (1989) Studies on the fishery biology of yellowfin sole in the eastern Bering Sea [in Japanese, English summary]. Bull Far Seas Fish Res Lab 26:21–152Google Scholar
  39. Weisberg S, Spangler G, Richmond LS (2010) Mixed effects models for fish growth. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 67:269–277. doi:10.1139/F09-181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wilderbuer TK, Walters GE, Bakkala RG (1992) Yellowfin sole, Pleuronectes asper, of the eastern Bering Sea: biological characteristics, history of exploitation, and management. Mar Fish Rev 54(4):1–18. http://spo.nmfs.noaa.gov/mfr544/mfr5441.pdf
  41. Wilderbuer TK, Nichol DG, Ianelli J (2015) Assessment of the yellowfin sole stock in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands. In: Stock assessment and fishery evaluation report for the groundfish resources of the Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands regions. Compiled by the Plan Team for the Groundfish Fisheries of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands, North Pacific Fishery Management Council, Anchorage, AK, pp 733–820. http://www.afsc.noaa.gov/REFM/Docs/2015/BSAIyfin.pdf
  42. Woodgate RA, Aagaard K, Weingartner TJ (2005) Monthly temperature, salinity and transport variability of the Bering Strait throughflow. Geophys Res Lett 32(4)Google Scholar
  43. Yang M-S, Yeung C (2013) Habitat-associated diet of some flatfish in the southeastern Bering Sea. US Dep Commer, NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-246. http://www.afsc.noaa.gov/publications/afsc-tm/noaa-tm-afsc-246.pdf
  44. Yeung C, Yang M-S (2014) Habitat and infauna prey availability for flatfishes in the northern Bering Sea. Polar Biol 37:1769–1784. doi:10.1007/s00300-014-1560-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yeung C, Yang M-S, McConnaughey RA (2010) Polychaete assemblages in the south-eastern Bering Sea: linkage with groundfish distribution and diet. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 90(5):903–917. doi:10.1017/S002531541000024X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yeung C, Yang M-S, Jewett SC, Naidu AS (2013) Polychaete assemblage as surrogate for prey availability in assessing southeastern Bering Sea flatfish habitat. J Sea Res 76:211–221. doi:10.1016/j.seares.2012.09.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© US Government 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Resource Ecology and Fisheries Management Division, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries ServiceNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationSeattleUSA
  2. 2.University of Texas at Austin Marine Science InstitutePort AransasUSA

Personalised recommendations