Analysis of trophic interactions reveals highly plastic response to climate change in a tri-trophic High-Arctic ecosystem
- 580 Downloads
As a response to current climate changes, individual species have changed various biological traits, illustrating an inherent phenotypic plasticity. However, as species are embedded in an ecological network characterised by multiple consumer–resource interactions, ecological mismatches are likely to arise when interacting species do not respond homogeneously. The approach of biological networks analysis calls for the use of structural equation modelling (SEM), a multidimensional analytical setup that has proven particularly useful for analysing multiple interactions across trophic levels. Here we apply SEM to a long-term dataset from a High-Arctic ecosystem to analyse how phenological responses across three trophic levels are coupled to snowmelt patterns and how changes may cascade through consumer–resource interactions. Specifically, the model included the effect of snowmelt on a High-Arctic tri-trophic system of flowers, insects and waders (Charadriiformes), with latent factors representing phenology (timing of life history events) and performance (abundance or reproduction success) for each trophic level. The effects derived from the model demonstrated that the time of snowmelt directly affected plant and arthropod phenology as well as the performance of all included trophic levels. Additionally, timing of snowmelt appeared to indirectly influence wader phenology as well as plant, arthropod and wader performance through effects on adjacent trophic levels and lagged effects. The results from the tri-trophic community presented here emphasise that effects of climate on species in consumer–resource systems may propagate through trophic levels.
KeywordsArctic ecosystem Trophic interactions Greenland Phenology Performance Trophic mismatch Plants Arthropods Waders Structural equation modelling
This study has been financed by the ECOGLOBE initiative. Data were obtained from the Greenland Ecosystem Monitoring program. A big “Thanks” goes to Lars Holst Hansen and Jannik Hansen for great field assistance and data help. Additionally, Nicholas Tyler and Ditte Hendrichsen supplied comments and challenging views, which were greatly appreciated.
Compliance with ethical standards
All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted.
- Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Applications of SEM. Multivariate data analysis. Pearson, Upper Saddle River, pp 687–783Google Scholar
- Holling CS (1996) Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In: Schulze P (ed) Engineering within ecological constraints. The National Academies Press (NAP), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Kattsov VM, Källén E (2005) Future climate change: modeling and scenarios for the Arctic. In: Arris L (ed) Arctic climate impact assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 99–150Google Scholar
- Kline RB (2011) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 3rd edn. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Kline RB (2012) Assumptions in structural equation modeling. In: Hoyle R (ed) Handbook of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Express, New York, pp 111–125Google Scholar
- Macwhiter B, Austin-Smith P, Kroodsma D (2002) Sanderling (Caldris alba). Birds North America http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/653
- McBean G (2005) Arctic climate: past and present. In: ACIA, Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. ACIA Overview report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 21–60Google Scholar
- Nettleship DN (2000) Ruddy turnstone (Arenaria interpres). Birds North Am. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/537
- Overland JE, Wang M, Walsh JE et al (2011) Climate model projections for the Arctic. Snow. Water, Ice and Permafrost in the Arcic. AMAP, pp 1–18Google Scholar
- Rosseel Y (2012) lavaan: An R package for structural equation modelingGoogle Scholar
- Schmidt NM, Hansen LH, Hansen J et al (2012) BioBasis: Conceptual design and sampling procedures of the biological monitoring programme within Zackenberg Basic. Department of BioScience, Aarhus University, RoskildeGoogle Scholar
- Terborgh J, Estes JA (eds) (2010) Trophic cascades : predators, prey, and the changing dynamics of nature. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Warnock ND, Gill RE (1996) Dunling (Caldris alpina). In: Birds North Am.Google Scholar