Polar Biology

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 511–521 | Cite as

Usnea antarctica, an important Antarctic lichen, is vulnerable to aspects of regional environmental change

  • Stef BokhorstEmail author
  • Peter Convey
  • Ad Huiskes
  • Rien Aerts
Original Paper


Studies of cryptogam responses to climate change in the polar regions are scarce because these slow-growing organisms require long-term monitoring studies. Here, we analyse the response of a lichen and moss community to 10 years of passive environmental manipulation using open-top chambers (OTCs) in the maritime Antarctic region. Cover of the dominant lichen Usnea antarctica declined by 71 % in the OTCs. However, less dominant lichen species showed no significant responses except for an increase in Ochrolechia frigida, which typically covered dying lichen and moss vegetation. There were no detectable responses in the moss or associated micro-arthropod communities to the influence of the OTCs. Based on calculated respiration rates, we hypothesise that the decline of U. antarctica was most likely caused by increased net winter respiration rates (11 %), driven by the higher temperatures and lower light levels experienced inside the OTCs as a result of greater snow accumulation. During summer, U. antarctica appears unable to compensate for this increased carbon loss, leading to a negative carbon balance on an annual basis, and the lichen therefore appears to be vulnerable to such climate change simulations. These findings indicate that U. antarctica dominated fell-fields may change dramatically if current environmental change trends continue in the maritime Antarctic, especially if associated with increases in winter snow depth or duration.


CO2 Gas fluxes Micro-arthropods Snow Usnea antarctica Winter 



We are very grateful for the logistical support provided by the British Antarctic Survey. We thank Mark van de Wouw and Simon Hernimon for their help in establishing this experiment in the field. Special thanks to Roger Worland for managing the micro-climate logging system for many years in our absence. This study was initiated through financial support by the Netherlands Polar Programme (NPP-NWO 851.20.016), and SB was supported by an Antarctic Science Bursary for the 2013/2014 field season. PC is supported by NERC funding to the BAS core ‘Biodiversity, Evolution and Adaptation programme’. This work also forms an output of the SCAR programme ‘State of the Antarctic Ecosystem’.

Supplementary material

300_2015_1803_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (343 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 343 kb)
300_2015_1803_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (94 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 94 kb)


  1. Benedict JB (1990) Experiments on lichen growth 1. Seasonal patterns and environmental controls. Arctic Alp Res 22:244–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benedict JB (1991) Experiments on lichen growth 2. Effects of a seasonal snow cover. Arctic Alp Res 23:189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berg A, Gunnarsson B, Ostlund L (2011) ‘At this point, the lichens in the trees are their only means of survival’: a history of tree cutting for winter reindeer fodder by Sami people in Northern Sweden. Environ Hist 17:265–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bjerke JW, Bokhorst S, Zielke M, Callaghan TV, Bowles FW, Phoenix GK (2011) Contrasting sensitivity to extreme winter warming events of dominant sub-Arctic heathland bryophyte and lichen species. J Ecol 99:1481–1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bokhorst S, Huiskes A, Convey P, Aerts R (2007a) The effect of environmental change on vascular plant and cryptogam communities from the Falkland Islands and the Maritime Antarctic. BMC Ecol. doi: 10.1186/1472-6785-7-15 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bokhorst S, Ronfort C, Huiskes A, Convey P, Aerts R (2007b) Food choice of Antarctic soil arthropods clarified by stable isotope signatures. Polar Biol 30:983–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bokhorst S, Huiskes AHL, Convey P, Bodegom PMv, Aerts R (2008) Climate change effects on soil arthropod communities from the Falkland Islands and the Maritime Antarctic. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1547–1556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bokhorst S, Huiskes AHL, Convey P, Sinclair BJ, Lebouvier M, van de Vijver B, Wall DH (2011) Microclimate impacts of passive warming methods in Antarctica: implications for climate change studies. Polar Biol 34:1421–1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bokhorst S, Bjerke JW, Tømmervik H, Preece C, Phoenix GK (2012) Ecosystem response to climatic change: the importance of the cold season. Ambio 41:246–255CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Bokhorst S, Huiskes AHL, Aerts R, Convey P, Cooper EJ, Dalen L, Erschbamer B, Gudmundsson J, Hofgaard A, Hollister RD, Johnstone JF, Jonsdottir IS, Lebouvier M, Van de Vijver B, Wahren C-H, Dorrepaal E (2013) Variable temperature effects of Open Top Chambers at polar and alpine sites explained by irradiance and snow depth. Glob Change Biol 19:64–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bokhorst S, Wardle DA, Nilsson M-C, Gundale MJ (2014) Impact of understory mosses and dwarf shrubs on soil micro-arthropods in a boreal forest chronosequence. Plant Soil 379:121–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bokhorst S, Asplund J, Kardol P, Wardle AD (2015) Lichen physiological traits and growth forms affect communities of associated invertebrates. Ecology 96:2394–2407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Collins NJ (1976) Growth and population dynamics of the moss Polytrichum alpestre in the maritime Antarctic. Oikos 27:389–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Convey P (2013) Antarctic ecosystems. In: Levin SA (ed) Encyclopedia of biodiversity, vol 1. Elsevier, Waltham, pp 179–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Convey P, Pugh PJA, Jackson C, Murray AW, Ruhland CT, Xiong FS, Day TA (2002) Response of Antarctic terrestrial microarthropods to long-term climate manipulations. Ecology 83:3130–3140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Convey P, Chown SL, Clarke A, Barnes DKA, Bokhorst S, Cummings V, Ducklow HW, Frati F, Green TGA, Gordon S, Griffiths HJ, Howard-Williams C, Huiskes AHL, Laybourn-Parry J, Lyons WB, McMinn A, Morley SA, Peck LS, Quesada A, Robinson SA, Schiaparelli S, Wall DH (2014) The spatial structure of Antarctic biodiversity. Ecol Monogr 84:203–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cornelissen JHC, Callaghan TV, Alatalo JM, Michelsen A, Graglia E, Hartley AE, Hik DS, Hobbie SE, Press MC, Robinson CH, Henry GHR, Shaver GR, Phoenix GK, Jones DG, Jonasson S, Chapin FS, Molau U, Neill C, Lee JA, Melillo JM, Sveinbjornsson B, Aerts R (2001) Global change and arctic ecosystems: is lichen decline a function of increases in vascular plant biomass? J Ecol 89:984–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cornelissen JHC, Lang SI, Soudzilovskaia NA, During HJ (2007) Comparative cryptogam ecology: a review of bryophyte and lichen traits that drive biogeochemistry. Ann Bot 99:987–1001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Davis RC (1981) Structure and function of two Antarctic terrestrial moss communities. Ecol Monogr 51:125–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Day TA, Ruhland CT, Strauss SL, Park JH, Krieg ML, Krna MA, Bryant DM (2009) Response of plants and the dominant microarthropod, Cryptopygus antarcticus, to warming and contrasting precipitation regimes in Antarctic tundra. Glob Change Biol 15:1640–1651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fowbert JA, Smith RIL (1994) Rapid population increases in native vascular plants in the Argentine Islands, Antarctic Peninsula. Arctic Alp Res 26:290–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gannutz TP (1970) Photosynthesis and respiration of plants in the Antarctic Peninsula area. Antarct J 5:49–52Google Scholar
  23. Gerson U, Seaward MRD (1977) Lichen-invertebrate associations. In: Seaward MRD (ed) Lichen ecology. Academic Press, London, pp 69–119Google Scholar
  24. Grobe CW, Ruhland CT, Day TA (1997) A new population of Colobanthus quitensis near Arthur Harbor, Antarctica: correlating recruitment with warmer summer temperatures. Arctic Alp Res 29:217–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hill PW, Farrar J, Roberts P, Farrell M, Grant H, Newsham KK, Hopkins DW, Bardgett RD, Jones DL (2011) Vascular plant success in a warming Antarctic may be due to efficient nitrogen acquisition. Nat Clim Change 1:50–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kappen L (1993) Plant activity under snow and ice, with particular reference to lichens. Arctic 46:297–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kappen L (2000) Some aspects of the great success of lichens in Antarctica. Antarct Sci 12:314–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kappen L, Sommerkorn M, Schroeter B (1995) Carbon acquisition and water relations of lichens in polar regions—potentials and limitations. Lichenologist 27:531–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kennedy AD (1993) Water as a limiting factor in the Antarctic terrestrial environment—a biogeographical synthesis. Arctic Alp Res 25:308–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kennedy AD (1995) Simulated climate-change—are passive greenhouses a valid microcosm for testing biological effects of environmental perturbations. Glob Change Biol 1:29–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lang SI, Cornelissen JHC, Shaver GR, Ahrens M, Callaghan TV, Molau U, Ter Braak CJF, Hölzer A, Aerts R (2012) Arctic warming on two continents has consistent negative effects on lichen diversity and mixed effects on bryophyte diversity. Glob Change Biol 18:1096–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lindo Z, Nilsson M-C, Gundale MJ (2013) Bryophyte-cyanobacteria associations as regulators of the northern latitude carbon balance in response to global change. Glob Change Biol 19:2022–2035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindsay DC (1973) Estimates of lichen growth rates in the Maritime Antarctic. Arctic Alp Res 5:341–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marion GM, Henry GHR, Freckman DW, Johnstone J, Jones G, Jones MH, Levesque E, Molau U, Molgaard P, Parsons AN, Svoboda J, Virginia RA (1997) Open-top designs for manipulating field temperature in high-latitude ecosystems. Glob Change Biol 3:20–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Øvstedal DO, Smith RIL (2001) Lichens of Antarctica and South Georgia. University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. Parnikoza I, Convey P, Dykyyz I, Trokhymets V, Milinevsky G, Tyschenko O, Inozemtseva D, Kozeretska I (2009) Current status of the Antarctic herb tundra formation in the Central Argentine Islands. Glob Change Biol 15:1685–1693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Royles J, Ogée J, Wingate L, Hodgson DA, Convey P, Griffiths H (2012) Carbon isotope evidence for recent climate-related enhancement of CO2 assimilation and peat accumulation rates in Antarctica. Glob Change Biol 18:3112–3124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Royles J, Amesbury MJ, Convey P, Griffiths H, Hodgson DA, Leng MJ, Charman DJ (2013) Plants and soil microbes respond to recent warming on the Antarctic Peninsula. Curr Biol 23:1702–1706CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Salmane I, Brumelis G (2008) The importance of the moss layer in sustaining biological diversity of Gamasina mites in coniferous forest soil. Pedobiologia 52:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schroeter B, Scheidegger C (1995) Water relations in lichens at subzero temperatures—structural changes and carbon dioxide exchange in the lichen Umbilicaria aprina from continental Antarctica. New Phytol 131:273–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schroeter B, Olech M, Kappen L, Heitland W (1995) Ecophysiological investigations of Usnea antarctica in the Maritime Antarctic. 1. Annual microclimatic conditions and potential primary production. Antarct Sci 7:251–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schroeter B, Kappen L, Green TGA, Seppelt RD (1997) Lichens and the Antarctic environment: effects of temperature and water availability on photosynthesis. In: Lyons WB, Howard-Williams C, Hawes I (eds) Ecosystem processes in Antarctic ice-free landscapes. Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam, A.A, pp 103–117Google Scholar
  43. Schroeter B, Green TGA, Pannewitz S, Schlensog M, Sancho LG (2010) Fourteen degrees of latitude and a continent apart: comparison of lichen activity over two years at continental and maritime Antarctic sites. Antarct Sci 22:681–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thomas ER, Marshall GJ, Mcconnell JR (2008) A doubling in snow accumulation in the western Antarctic Peninsula since 1850. Geophys Res Lett. doi: 10.1029/2007GLO32529 Google Scholar
  45. Torres-Mellado GA, Casanova-Katny MA (2011) Antarctic hairgrass expansion in the South Shetland archipelago and Antarctic Peninsula revisited. Polar Biol 34:1679–1688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Turner J, Bindschadler R, Convey P, di Prisco G, Fahrbach E, Gutt J, Hodgson D, Mayewski P, Summerhayes C (2009) Antarctic climate change and the environment. Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research. Victoire Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  47. Turner J, Barrand NE, Bracegirdle TJ, Convey P, Hodgson DA, Jarvis M, Jenkins A, Marshall GJ, Meredith MP, Roscoe H, Shanklin J (2013) Antarctic climate change and the environment: an update. Polar Rec 50:237–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wahren CHA, Walker MD, Bret-Harte MS (2005) Vegetation responses in Alaskan arctic tundra after 8 years of a summer warming and a winter snow manipulation experiment. Glob Change Biol 11:537–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Walton DWH (1982) The Signy Island terrestrial reference sites: XV. Micro-climate monitoring, 1972–1974. Br Antarct Surv B 55:111–126Google Scholar
  50. Webb NR, Coulson SJ, Hodkinson ID, Block W, Bale JS, Strathdee AT (1998) The effects of experimental temperature elevation on populations of cryptostigmatic mites in high Arctic soils. Pedobiologia 42:298–308Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stef Bokhorst
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  • Peter Convey
    • 2
  • Ad Huiskes
    • 3
  • Rien Aerts
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Arctic EcologyNorwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA)TromsøNorway
  2. 2.British Antarctic SurveyNatural Environment Research CouncilCambridgeUK
  3. 3.Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea ResearchYersekeThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of Systems Ecology, Institute of Ecological ScienceVU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations