Polar Biology

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 391–395 | Cite as

Kleptoparasitism in foraging gentoo penguins Pygoscelis papua

Short Note

Abstract

An ongoing challenge in marine top predator research is understanding processes that are responsible for patterns that are often derived from land-based access to individuals. The use of animal-borne camera loggers, however, is proving useful in this regard as researchers can directly observe species and habitat-associated interactions. During an ongoing study investigating the foraging ecology of gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua) at the Falkland Islands, we observed the first attempted underwater intraspecific kleptoparasitism event for a penguin. This was revealed through a bird deployed with an animal-borne camera logger. Although unsuccessful in its attempt, the new reported behaviour highlights a novel interaction and further demonstrates the value of cameras in better understanding the ecology of marine vertebrates.

Keywords

Pygoscelis Penguin Camera Kleptoparasitism 

Supplementary material

300_2015_1772_MOESM1_ESM.jpg (63 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (JPEG 62 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MP4 100710 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (MP4 27187 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (MP4 12837 kb)

Supplementary material 5 (MP4 22894 kb)

Supplementary material 6 (MP4 24818 kb)

Supplementary material 7 (MP4 10798 kb)

Supplementary material 8 (MP4 4066 kb)

References

  1. Ashbrook K, Wanless S, Heubeck M et al (2011) Kleptoparasitism in common guillemots at two colonies during a period of poor food availability. Seabird 24:83–89Google Scholar
  2. Baylis AMM, Crofts S, Wolfaardt AC (2013) Population trends of gentoo penguins Pygoscelis papua breeding at the Falkland Islands. Mar Ornithol 41:1–5Google Scholar
  3. Brockmann HJ, Barnard CJ (1979) Kleptoparasitism in birds. Anim Behav 27:487–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carrascal LM, Moreno J, Amat J (1995) Nest maintenance and stone theft in the Chinstrap penguin (Pygoscelis antarctica). Polar Biol 15:541–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clausen AP, Putz K (2002) Recent trends in diet composition and productivity of gentoo, Magellanic and rockhopper penguins in the Falkland Islands. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 12:51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clausen AP, Arkhipkin AI, Laptikhovsky V, Huin N (2005) What is out there: diversity in feeding of gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua) around the Falkland Islands (Southwest Atlantic). Polar Biol 28:653–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coria N, Libertelli M, Casaux R, Darrieu C (2000) Inter-annual variation in the autumn diet of the gentoo penguin at Laurie Island, Antarctica. Waterbirds 23:511–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Croxall AJP, Davis RW, Connell MJO (1988) Diving patterns in relation to diet of gentoo and macaroni penguins at South Georgia. Condor 90:157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fulton GR (2010) Attempted kleptoparasitism by a Crested Tern on a Pied Cormorant at Warnbro Sound, South-western Australia. Aust Field Ornithol 27:81–84Google Scholar
  10. Giraldeau L-A, Caraco T (2000) Social foraging theory. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  11. Hatch JJ (1970) Predation and piracy by gulls at a ternery in Maine. Auk 87:244–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Iyengar EV (2008) Kleptoparasitic interactions throughout the animal kingdom and a re-evaluation, based on participant mobility, of the conditions promoting the evolution of kleptoparasitism. Biol J Linn Soc 93:745–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kokubun N, Kim JH, Takahashi A (2013) Proximity of krill and salps in an Antarctic coastal ecosystem: evidence from penguin-mounted cameras. Polar Biol 36:1857–1864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Krause J, Ruxton GD (2005) Living in groups. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Lavers JL, Jones IL (2007) Impacts of intra-specific kleptoparasitism and diet shifts on Razorbill Alca torda productivity at the Gannet Islands, Labrador. Mar Ornithol 35:1–7Google Scholar
  16. Lescroël A, Ridoux V, Bost CA (2004) Spatial and temporal variation in the diet of the gentoo penguin (Pygoscelis papua) at Kerguelen Islands. Polar Biol 27:206–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Luque SP (2007) Diving behaviour analysis in R. R News 7:8–14Google Scholar
  18. Masello JF, Mundry R, Poisbleau M et al (2010) Diving seabirds share foraging space and time within and among species. Ecosphere 1:art19. doi:10.1890/ES10-00103.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Miller AK, Karnovsky NJ, Trivelpiece WZ (2009) Flexible foraging strategies of gentoo penguins Pygoscelis papua over 5 years in the South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Mar Biol 156:2527–2537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Morand-Ferron J, Sol D, Lefebvre L (2007) Food stealing in birds: brain or brawn? Anim Behav 74:1725–1734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ponganis PJ, Van Dam RP, Marshall G et al (2000) Sub-ice foraging behavior of emperor penguins. J Exp Biol 203:3275–3278PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
  23. Ratcliffe N, Richardson D, Scott RL et al (1997) Host selection, attack rates and success rates for Black-headed Gull kleptoparasitism of terns. Colon Waterbirds 20:227–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Senzaki M, Suzuki Y, Watanuki Y (2014) Foraging tactics and success of inter- and intra-specific kleptoparasites on Rhinoceros Auklets Cerorhinca monocerata. Ornithol Sci 13:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Steele WK, Hockey PR (1995) Factors influencing rate and success of intraspecific kleptoparasitism among Kelp Gulls (Larus dominicanus). Auk 112:847–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Takahashi A, Sato K, Naito Y et al (2004) Penguin-mounted cameras glimpse underwater group behaviour. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 271:S281–S282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Takahashi A, Kokubun N, Mori Y, Shin H (2008) Krill-feeding behaviour of gentoo penguins as shown by animal-borne camera loggers. Polar Biol 31:1291–1294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tremblay Y, Thiebault A, Mullers R, Pistorius P (2014) Bird-borne video-cameras show that seabird movement patterns relate to previously unrevealed proximate environment, not prey. PLoS One 9:e88424. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088424 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Trivelpiece WZ, Bengtson JL, Trivelpiece SG et al (1986) Foraging behavior of Gentoo and Chinstrap penguins as determined by new radiotelemetry techniques. Auk 103:777–781Google Scholar
  30. Watanabe YY, Ito M, Takahashi A (2014) Testing optimal foraging theory in a penguin–krill system. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 281:20132376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Williams TD, Rothery P (1990) Factors affecting variation in foraging and activity patterns of gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua) during the breeding season at Bird Island, South Georgia. J Appl Ecol 27:1042–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wilson RP, Alvarrez B, Latorre L et al (1998) The movements of gentoo penguins Pygoscelis papua from Ardley Island, Antarctica. Polar Biol 19:407–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DST/NRF Centre of Excellence at the Percy FitzPatrick Institute, Department of ZoologyNelson Mandela Metropolitan UniversitySummerstrandSouth Africa
  2. 2.Falklands ConservationStanleyFalkland Islands

Personalised recommendations