Fledging success of little auks in the high Arctic: do provisioning rates and the quality of foraging grounds matter?
- 287 Downloads
Long-lived birds often face a dilemma between self-maintenance and reproduction. In order to maximize fitness, some seabird parents alternate short trips to collect food for offspring with long trips for self-feeding (bimodal foraging strategy). In this study, we examined whether temporal and spatial variation in the quality of foraging grounds affect provisioning and fledging success of a long-lived, bimodal forager, the little auk (Alle alle), the most abundant seabird species in the Arctic ecosystem. We predicted that an increase in sea surface temperature (SST), with an associated decrease in the preferred Arctic zooplankton prey, would increase foraging trip durations, decrease chick provisioning rates and decrease chick fledging success. Chick provisioning and survival were observed during three consecutive years (2008–2010) at two colonies with variable foraging conditions in Spitsbergen: Isfjorden and Magdalenefjorden. We found that a change in SST (range 1.6–5.4 °C) did not influence trip durations or provisioning rates. SST was, however, negatively correlated with the number of prey items delivered to a chick. Furthermore, provisioning rates did not influence chick’s probability to fledge; instead, SST was also negatively correlated with fledging probability. This was likely related to the prey availability and quality in the little auk’s foraging grounds. Our findings suggest that predicted warmer climate in the Arctic will negatively influence the ability of parents to provide their chicks, and consequently, the fledging prospects of little auk chicks.
KeywordsBimodal foraging Fledging success Alle alle Calanus Svalbard
This work was supported by a grant from Norway through the Norwegian Financial Mechanisms Project No. PNRF-234-AI-1/07(ALKEKONGE) and conducted under the permission of the Governor of Svalbard and Norwegian Animal Research Authority. We thank Rafał Boehnke for analysing chick diet data from Magdalenefjorden and Mateusz Barcikowski, Anika Beiersdorf, Eirik Grønningsæter, Aino Luukkonen, Atle Coward Markussen, Adam Nawrot, Jan Samołyk, Lech Stempniewicz, Tobias Stål and Mikko Vihtakari for their invaluable help in the field.
- Barrett RT, Chapdelaine G, Anker-Nilssen T, Mosbech A, Montevecchi WA, Reid JB, Veit RR (2006) Seabird numbers and prey consumption in the North Atlantic. ICES J Mar Sci 63:1145–1158Google Scholar
- Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Falk-Petersen S, Pavlov V, Timofeev S, Sargent JR (2007) Climate variability and possible effects on arctic food chains: the role of Calanus. In: Ørbæk JB, Kallenborn R, Tombre I, Hegseth EN, Falk-Petersen S, Hoel AH (eds) Arctic-Alpine ecosystems and people in a changing environment. Springer, Berlin, pp 147–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2013) Summary for Policymakers. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
- Karnovsky NJ, Harding AMA, Walkusz W, Kwasniewski S, Goszczko I, Wiktor J Jr, Routti H, Bailey A, McFadden L, Brown ZW, Beaugrand G, Grémillet D (2010) Foraging distributions of little auks Alle alle across the Greenland Sea: implications of present and future Arctic climate change. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 415:283–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kwasniewski S, Gluchowska M, Jakubas D, Wojczulanis-Jakubas K, Walkusz W, Karnovsky N, Blachowiak-Samolyk K, Cisek M (2010) The impact of different hydrographic conditions and zooplankton communities on provisioning little auks along the West coast of Spitsbergen. Prog Oceanogr 87:72–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lack D (1968) Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Motoda S (1985) Devices of simple plankton apparatus—VII. Bull Mar Sci 37:776–777Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Ricklefs RE (1983) Some considerations on the reproductive energetics of pelagic seabirds. Stud Avian Biol 8:84–94Google Scholar
- Stempniewicz L (1981) Breeding biology of the little auk Plautus alle in the Hornsund region, Spitsbergen. Acta Ornithol 18:1–26Google Scholar
- Stempniewicz L (2001) Alle alle little auk. The Journal of the Birds of Western Palearctic, BWP Update, vol 3. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 175–201Google Scholar
- Stempniewicz L, Darecki M, Trudnowska E, Blachowiak-Samolyk K, Boehnke R, Jakubas D, Keslinka-Nawrot L, Kidawa D, Sagan S, Wojczulanis-Jakubas K (2013) Visual prey availability and distribution of foraging little auks (Alle alle) in the shelf waters of West Spitsbergen. Polar Biol 36:949–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Weimerskirch H, Ancel A, Caloin M, Zahariev A, Spagiari J, Kersten M, Chastel O (2003) Foraging efficiency and adjustment of energy expenditure in a pelagic seabird provisioning its chick. Anim Behav 72:500–508Google Scholar
- Weslawski JM, Koszteyn J, Kwasniewski S, Stempniewicz L, Malinga M (1999) Summer food resources of the little auk, Alle alle (L.) in the European Arctic seas. Pol Polar Res 20:387–403Google Scholar