Polar Biology

, Volume 36, Issue 11, pp 1587–1599 | Cite as

Seasonal observations and machine-learning-based spatial model predictions for the common raven (Corvus corax) in the urban, sub-arctic environment of Fairbanks, Alaska

  • A. P. Baltensperger
  • T. C. Mullet
  • M. S. Schmid
  • G. R. W. Humphries
  • L. Kövér
  • F. Huettmann
Original Paper

Abstract

The common raven (Corvus corax) is an abundant generalist of the northern hemisphere, known to congregate and roost near human-related food sources. Due to a growing human-footprint and associated anthropogenic food subsidies, raven populations have increased dramatically over the past several years throughout the USA. The sub-arctic region has also witnessed increased urbanization and industrialization, and ravens have taken advantage of these changes. During 2004 and 2006, we surveyed parking lots on a bi-weekly basis in the city of Fairbanks in interior Alaska, showing an influx of ravens in winter. Between 2010 and 2012, we documented the presence and absence of ravens at a permanent set of 30 suspected raven locations and 21 randomized locations within the city limits of Fairbanks. We used machine learning (RandomForests) and 12 spatial GIS datasets from the Fairbanks North Star Borough to accurately model-predict the relative occurrence of ravens during winter and summer in Fairbanks. Our research showed a positive correlation between raven occurrence and commercial and residential zones in both winter and summer, as well as an inverse geographic relationship between ravens and the waste transfer station in the study area in winter, and a direct correlation near restaurants in summer. These results emphasize the link that ravens have with commercial, anthropogenic food sources, and how Fairbanks and its subsidized, urban habitat may be shaping part of the wider sub-arctic biodiversity landscape.

Keywords

Common raven Fairbanks Alaska Distribution model Machine learning Subsidized predator 

Supplementary material

300_2013_1376_MOESM1_ESM.docx (109 kb)
Online Resource 1 Year-round urban raven surveys in Fairbanks, Interior Alaska 2004–2006 (DOCX 109 kb)
300_2013_1376_MOESM2_ESM.docx (107 kb)
Online Resource 2 Spatial survey datasets of ravens in Fairbanks, Alaska 2010–2012 (DOCX 106 kb)
300_2013_1376_MOESM3_ESM.zip (251 kb)
Online Resource 3 ESRI ArcGIS GRID data layer: Spatial prediction of relative index of occurrence (ROI) of ravens in Fairbanks, AK in winter (ZIP 251 kb)
300_2013_1376_MOESM4_ESM.zip (252 kb)
Online Resource 4 ESRI ArcGIS GRID data layer: Spatial prediction of relative index of occurrence (ROI) of ravens in Fairbanks, AK in summer (ZIP 252 kb)

References

  1. Aldridge CL, Boyce MS (2007) Linking occurrence and fitness to persistence: habitat-based approach for endangered greater sage-grouse. Ecol Appl 17:508–526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Backensto S (2010) Common ravens in Alaska’s North Slope oil fields: an integrated study using local knowledge and science. Thesis, University of Alaska Fairbanks, FairbanksGoogle Scholar
  3. Bezzel E (1985) Bird life in intensively used rural and urban environments. Ornis Fennica 62:90–95Google Scholar
  4. Boarman WI (2003) Managing a subsidized predator population: reducing common raven predation on desert tortoises. J Environ Manage 32:205–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boarman WI, Heinrich B (1999) Common raven (Corvus corax), The Birds of North America Online. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/476. Accessed 4 March 2010
  6. Boarman WL, Patten MA, Camp RJ, Collis SJ (2006) Ecology of a population of subsidized predators: common ravens in the central Mojave Desert, California. J Arid Environ 67:248–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Breiman L (1996) Bagging predictors. Mach Learn 24:123–140Google Scholar
  8. Breiman L (2001a) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Breiman L (2001b) Statistical modeling: the two cultures. Stat Sci 16:199–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bui TD, Marzluff JM, Bedrosian B (2010) Common raven activity in relation to land use in western Wyoming: implications for greater sage-grouse reproductive success. Condor 112:65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buler JJ, Hamilton RB (2000) Predation of natural and artificial nests in a southern pine forest. Auk 117:739–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Craig E, Huettmann F (2009) Using “Blackbox” algorithms such as TreeNet and random forests for data-mining and for finding meaningful patterns, relationships, and outliers in complex ecological data: an overview, an example using golden eagle satellite data and an outlook for a promising future. In: Wang HF (ed) Intelligent data analysis: developing new methodologies through pattern discovery and recovery. Idea Group Inc., Hershey, PA, pp 65–83Google Scholar
  13. Cutler DR, Edwards TC et al (2007) Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88:2783–2792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elith J, Graham CH et al (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Engel KA, Young LS (1992) Movements and habitat use by common ravens from roost sites in Southwestern Idaho. J Wildl Manag 56:596–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fairbanks North Star Borough Spatial Data Repository (2010) ftp://co.fairbanks.ak.us/GIS. Accessed 4 March 2010
  17. Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv 24:38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gibson DD, Byrd GV (2007) Birds of the Aleutian Islands, Alaska. Series in Ornithology No. 1. The Nuttall Ornithological Club and The American Ornithologist’s UnionGoogle Scholar
  19. Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model 135:147–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hegel TM, Cushman SA, Evans J, Huettmann F (2010) Current state of the art for statistical modelling of species distributions. In: Drew CA, Wiersma YF, Huettmann F (eds) Predictive species and habitat modeling in landscape ecology. Springer, New York, pp 273–311Google Scholar
  21. Heinrich B (1999) Mind of the raven. Harper Collins Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Hijmans RJ (2012) Cross-validation of species distribution models: removing spatial sorting bias and calibration with a null model. Ecology 93:679–688PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huettmann F, Edwards T, Gottschalk T (2011) Simplicity, complexity and uncertainty in spatial models applied across time. In: Drew CA, Wiersma Y, Huettmann F (eds) Predictive modeling in landscape ecology. Springer, New York, pp 186–208Google Scholar
  24. Jokimäki J, Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M-L, Huhta E, Siikamäki P (2007) Bird species as indicators of environmental changes at tourist destinations. In: Jokimäki J, Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M-L, Tuulentie S, Laine K, Uusitalo M (eds) Environment, local society and sustainable tourism. Arctic Centre Reports 50, University of Lapland, Finland, pp 1–125Google Scholar
  25. Juhász L, Kövér L, Gyüre P (2009) The urbanization of the hooded crow (Corvus cornix L.) in Debrecen (Hungary). II. European Congress of Conservation Biology (ECCB, 2009), Prague, Czech Republic, Book of Abstracts, p 227Google Scholar
  26. Kelly JP, Etienne KL, Roth JE (2002) Abundance and distribution of the common raven and American crow in the San Francisco Bay area, California. West Birds 33:202–217Google Scholar
  27. Knight RL, Kawashima JY (2012) Responses of raven and red-tailed hawk populations to linear right-of-ways. J Wildl Manag 57:266–271Google Scholar
  28. Knight RL, Knight HAL, Camp RJ (1993) Populations and land-use patterns in the Mojave Desert, California. Wildlife Soc B 21:469–471Google Scholar
  29. Konstantinov VM (1982) Numbers and some ecological features of synanthropic populations of the Corvidae under the conditions of intensive urbanization (European USSR). Zool ZH 61:1837–1845Google Scholar
  30. Kristan WB III, Boarman WI (2003) Spatial pattern of risk of common raven predation on desert tortoises. Ecology 84:2432–2443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kristan WB III, Boarman WI (2007) Effects of anthropogenic developments on common raven nesting biology in the West Mojave Desert. Ecol Appl 17:1703–1713PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kristan WB III, Boarman WI, Crayon JJ (2004) Diet composition of common ravens across the urban-wildland interface of the West Mojave Desert. Wildlife Soc B 32:244–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Littlefield CD (1995) Demographics of a declining flock of greater sandhill cranes in Oregon. Wilson Bull 107:667–674Google Scholar
  35. Lugenbuhl JM, Marzluff JM, Bradley JE, Raphael MG, Varland DE (2001) Corvid survey techniques and the relationship between Corvid relative abundance and nest predation. J Field Ornithol 72:556–572Google Scholar
  36. Marzluff JM, Neatherlin E (2006) Corvid response to human settlements and campgrounds: causes, consequences, and challenges for conservation. Biol Conserv 130:301–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marzluff JM, Boon RB, Cox GW (1994) Historical changes in populations and perceptions of native pest and bird species in the West. Stud Avian Biol 15:202–220Google Scholar
  38. Nelson SK, Hamer T (1995) Nest success and the effects of predation on marbled murrelets. In: Ralph CJ, Hunt GL, Rafael MG, Piatt JF (eds) The ecology and conservation of the marbled murrelet in North America: an interagency scientific evaluation, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Gen Tech Rep PSW-GTR-152, pp 89–97Google Scholar
  39. Powell AN, Backensto S (2009) Common ravens (Corvus corax) nesting on Alaska’s North Slope Oil Fields. Final Report. OCS Study MMS 2009-007. Minerals Management Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, pp 1–42Google Scholar
  40. Prasad AM, Iverson LR, Liaw A (2006) Newer classification and regression tree techniques: bagging and random forests for ecological prediction. Ecosystems 9:181–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  42. Restani M, Marzluff JM, Yates RE (2001) Effects of anthropogenic food sources on movements, survivorship, and sociality of common ravens in the Arctic. Condor 103:399–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sorace A (2001) Value to wildlife of urban-agricultural parks: a case study from Rome urban area. J Environ Manage 28:547–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Temple SA (1974) Winter food habits of ravens on the Arctic Slope of Alaska. Arctic 27:41–46Google Scholar
  45. Thayer JA, Sydeman J, Fairman NP, Allen SG (1999) Attendance and effects of disturbance on coastal common murre colonies at Point Reyes, California. Waterbirds 22:130–139Google Scholar
  46. US Census Bureau Homepage (2010) http://www.census.gov. Accessed 22 Feb 2010
  47. Vuorisalo T, Andersson H, Lahtinen R, Laaksonen H, Lehikonen E (2003) Urban development from an avian perspective: causes of hooded crow (Corvus corone cornix) urbanisation in two Finnish cities. Landsc Urban Plan 62:69–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Webb WC, Boarman WI, Rotenberry JT (2004) Raven juvenile survival in a human-augmented landscape. Condor 106:517–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. White CM, Cade TJ (1971) Cliff-nesting raptors and ravens along the Colville River in Arctic Alaska. Living Bird 10:107–150Google Scholar
  50. Withey JC, Marzluff JM (2005) Dispersal by juvenile American crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos) influences population dynamics across a gradient of urbanization. Auk 122:205–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zweig MH, Campbell G (1993) Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 39:561–577PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. P. Baltensperger
    • 1
  • T. C. Mullet
    • 1
  • M. S. Schmid
    • 2
  • G. R. W. Humphries
    • 3
  • L. Kövér
    • 4
  • F. Huettmann
    • 1
  1. 1.EWHALE Lab, Department of Biology and WildlifeUniversity of Alaska FairbanksFairbanksUSA
  2. 2.Takuvik Joint International Laboratory, Département de BiologieUniversité LavalQuebec CityCanada
  3. 3.Department of ZoologyUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  4. 4.Department of Nature Conservation Zoology and Game ManagementUniversity of DebrecenDebrecenHungary

Personalised recommendations