Polar Biology

, Volume 36, Issue 9, pp 1373–1379 | Cite as

Terrestrial predation by polar bears: not just a wild goose chase

  • D. T. IlesEmail author
  • S. L. Peterson
  • L. J. Gormezano
  • D. N. Koons
  • R. F. Rockwell
Short Note


Behavioral predictions based on optimal foraging models that assume an energy-maximizing strategy have been challenged on both theoretical and empirical grounds. Although polar bears (Ursus maritimus) are specialist predators of seal pups on the Arctic ice pack, the use of terrestrial food sources during the ice-free period has received increased attention in recent years in light of climate predictions. Across a 10-day period of observation, we documented between four and six individual polar bears successfully capture at least nine flightless lesser snow geese (Chen caerulescens caerulescens) and engage in at least eight high-speed pursuits of geese. The observed predatory behaviors of polar bears do not support predictions made by energy-optimizing foraging models and suggest that polar bears may frequently engage in energy inefficient pursuits of terrestrial prey. Further study of the nutritional needs and foraging behaviors of polar bears during the ice-free period is warranted, given that polar bears are predicted to spend more time on land as climate change advances.


Optimal foraging Diet choice Predation Energy budget Chen caerulescens Ursus maritimus 



We graciously thank Ryan Choi for his superior assistance with video and image editing. Christa Mulder provided comments on an earlier draft. DTI received support for this project from the S. J. and Jesse E. Quinney Foundation and Delta Waterfowl.

Supplementary material

300_2013_1341_MOESM1_ESM.doc (34 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 34 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MPG 19114 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (MPG 17672 kb)


  1. Ankney CD (1979) Does the wing molt cause nutritional stress in lesser snow geese? Auk 96:68–72Google Scholar
  2. Ankney CD, MacInnes CD (1978) Nutrient reserves and reproductive performance of female lesser snow geese. Auk 95:459–471Google Scholar
  3. Belovsky GE (1978) Diet optimization in a generalist herbivore: the moose. Theor Popul Biol 14:105–134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bevelhimer MS, Adams SM (1993) A bioenergetics analysis of diel vertical migration by kokanee salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:2336–2349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brose U (2010) Body-mass constraints on foraging behaviour determine population and food-web dynamics. Funct Ecol 24:28–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark DA (1980) Age-and sex-dependent foraging strategies of a small mammalian omnivore. J Anim Ecol 49:549–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Donnelly RE, Sullivan KA (1998) Foraging proficiency and body condition of juvenile American dippers. Condor 100:385–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dyck M, Romberg S (2007) Observations of a wild polar bear (Ursus maritimus) successfully fishing Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) and Fourhorn sculpin (Myoxocephalus quadricornis). Polar Biol 30:1625–1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Estes JA, Riedman ML, Staedler MM, Tinker MT, Lyon BE (2003) Individual variation in prey selection by sea otters: patterns, causes and implications. J Anim Ecol 72:144–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Galbraith PS, Larouche P (2011) Sea-surface temperature in Hudson Bay and Hudson Strait in relation to air temperature and ice cover breakup, 1985–2009. J Mar Syst 87:66–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hailey A, Chidavaenzi RL, Loveridge JP (1998) Diet mixing in the omnivorous tortoise Kinixys spekii. Funct Ecol 12:373–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hobson KA, Stirling I, Andriashek DS (2009) Isotopic homogeneity of breath CO2 from fasting and berry-eating polar bears: implications for tracing reliance on terrestrial foods in a changing Arctic. Can J Zool 87:50–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hurst RJ, Leonard ML, Watts PD, Beckerton P, Øritsland NA (1982a) Polar bear locomotion: body temperature and energetic cost. Can J Zool 60:40–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hurst RJ, Ørtisland NA, Watts PD (1982b) Body mass, temperature and cost of walking in polar bears. Acta Physiol Scand 115:391–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lunn NJ, Stirling I (1985) The significance of supplemental food to polar bears during the ice-free period of Hudson Bay. Can J Zool 63:2291–2294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pulliam HR (1975) Diet optimization with nutrient constraints. Am Nat 109:765–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pyke GH (1984) Optimal foraging theory: a critical review. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 15:523–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Regehr EV, Lunn NJ, Amstrup SC, Stirling I (2007) Effects of earlier sea ice breakup on survival and population size of polar bears in western Hudson Bay. J Wildl Manag 71:2673–2683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rockwell RF, Gormezano LJ (2009) The early bear gets the goose: climate change, polar bears and lesser snow geese in western Hudson Bay. Polar Biol 32:539–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rockwell RF, Gormezano LJ, Koons DN (2011) Trophic matches and mismatches: can polar bears reduce the abundance of nesting snow geese in western Hudson Bay? Oikos 120:696–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Russell RH (1975) The food habits of polar bears of James Bay and southwest Hudson Bay in summer and autumn. Arctic 28:117–129Google Scholar
  22. Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11:369–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sih A, Christensen B (2001) Optimal diet theory: when does it work, and when and why does it fail? Anim Behav 61:379–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Simpson SJ, Sibly RM, Lee KP, Behmer ST, Raubenheimer D (2004) Optimal foraging when regulating intake of multiple nutrients. Anim Behav 68:1299–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Singer MS, Bernays EA (2003) Understanding omnivory needs a behavioral perspective. Ecology 84:2532–2537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith PA, Elliott KH, Gaston AJ, Gilchrist HG (2010) Has early ice clearance increased predation on breeding birds by polar bears? Polar Biol 33:1149–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stempniewicz L (1993) The polar bear Ursus maritimus feeding in a seabird colony in Frans Josef Land. Polar Res 12:33–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stempniewicz L (2006) Polar bear predatory behaviour toward molting barnacle geese and nesting glaucous gulls on Spitsbergen. Arctic 59:247–251Google Scholar
  29. Stirling I (1974) Midsummer observations on the behavior of wild polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Can J Zool 52:1191–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stirling I, McEwan EH (1975) The caloric value of whole ringed seals (Phoca hispida) in relation to polar bear (Ursus maritimus) ecology and hunting behavior. Can J Zool 53:1021–1027PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stirling I, Parkinson CL (2006) Possible effects of climate warming on selected populations of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in the Canadian Arctic. Arctic 59:261–275Google Scholar
  32. Stirling I, Lunn NJ, Iacozza J (1999) Long-term trends in the population ecology of polar bears in western Hudson Bay in relation to climatic change. Arctic 52:294–306Google Scholar
  33. Westoby M (1978) What are the biological bases of varied diets? Am Nat 112:627–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. T. Iles
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. L. Peterson
    • 2
  • L. J. Gormezano
    • 3
  • D. N. Koons
    • 1
  • R. F. Rockwell
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Wildland Resources and the Ecology CenterUtah State UniversityLoganUSA
  2. 2.Department of Wildland ResourcesUtah State UniversityLoganUSA
  3. 3.Division of Vertebrate ZoologyThe American Museum of Natural HistoryNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations