Polar Biology

, Volume 35, Issue 12, pp 1879–1888 | Cite as

First direct, site-wide penguin survey at Deception Island, Antarctica, suggests significant declines in breeding chinstrap penguins

  • Ron Naveen
  • Heather J. Lynch
  • Steven Forrest
  • Thomas Mueller
  • Michael Polito
Original Paper

Abstract

Deception Island (62°57′S, 60°38′W) is one of the most frequently visited locations in Antarctica, prompting speculation that tourism may have a negative impact on the island’s breeding chinstrap penguins (Pygoscelis antarctica). Discussions regarding appropriate management of Deception Island and its largest penguin colony at Baily Head have thus far operated in the absence of concrete information regarding the current size of the penguin population at Deception Island or long-term changes in abundance. In the first ever field census of individual penguin nests at Deception Island (December 2–14, 2011), we find 79,849 breeding pairs of chinstrap penguins, including 50,408 breeding pairs at Baily Head and 19,177 breeding pairs at Vapour Col. Our field census, combined with a simulation designed to capture uncertainty in an earlier population estimate by Shuford and Spear (Br Antarct Surv Bull 81:19–30, 1988), suggests a significant (>50 %) decline in the abundance of chinstraps breeding at Baily Head since 1986/1987. A comparative analysis of high-resolution satellite imagery for the 2002/2003 and the 2009/2010 seasons suggests a 39 % (95th percentile CI = 6–71 %) decline (from 85,473 ± 23,352 to 52,372 ± 14,309 breeding pairs) over that 7-year period and provides independent confirmation of population decline in the abundance of breeding chinstrap penguins at Baily Head. The decline in chinstrap penguins at Baily Head is consistent with declines in this species throughout the region, including sites that receive little or no tourism; as a consequence of regional environmental changes that currently represent the dominant influence on penguin dynamics, we cannot ascribe any direct link between chinstrap declines and tourism from this study.

Keywords

Antarctic Peninsula Chinstrap penguin Baily Head Vapour Col Deception Island Remote sensing Tourism 

References

  1. Ainley DG (2002) The Adélie penguin: bellwether of climate change. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties (2005) Resolution on site guidelines for visitors. ATCM XXVIII Final Report, Resolution 5Google Scholar
  3. Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties (2008) Site guidelines for visitors. ATCM XXXI Final Report, Resolution 2Google Scholar
  4. Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties (2009) Site guidelines for visitors. ATCM XXXII Final Report, Resolution 4Google Scholar
  5. Argentina, Chile, Norway, Spain, UK, and USA (2011) Deception Island Specially Managed Area (ASMA) management group report. Information Paper 131, ATCM XXXIVGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbosa A, Banzal J, De León A, Moreno J (2012) Population decline of chinstrap penguins (Pygoscelis antarctica) on Deception Island, South Shetlands, Antarctica. Polar Biol 35(9):1453–1457Google Scholar
  7. Carrascal LM, Moreno J, Amat JA (1995) Nest maintenance and stone theft in the chinstrap penguin. Polar Biol 15:541–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke A, Murphy EJ, Meredith MP, King JC, Peck LS, Barnes DKA, Smith RC (2007) Climate change and the marine ecosystem of the western Antarctic Peninsula. Philos Trans R Soc B 362:149–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Croxall JP, Kirkwood ED (1979) The distribution of penguins on the Antarctic Peninsula and islands of the Scotia Sea. British Antarctic Survey, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Culik BM, Wilson RP (1995) Penguins disturbed by tourists. Nature 376:301–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Downie R, Smellie J (2001) A management strategy for Deception Island. Unpublished reportGoogle Scholar
  12. Forcada J, Trathan PN (2009) Penguin responses to climate change in the Southern Ocean. Glob Chang Biol 15:1618–1630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forcada J, Trathan PN, Reid K, Murphy EJ, Croxall JP (2006) Contrasting population changes in sympatric penguin species in association with climate warming. Glob Chang Biol 12:411–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holmes ND (2007) Comparing king, gentoo, and royal penguin responses to pedestrian visitation. J Wildl Manag 71:2575–2582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holmes ND, Giese M, Achurch H, Robinson S, Kriwoken LK (2006) Behavior and breeding success of gentoo penguins Pygoscelis papua in areas of low and high human activity. Polar Biol 29:399–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IAATO (International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators) Statistics (2011) Antarctica 2010–2011 number of tourists per site/per vessel (Peninsula Sites Only). IAATO website (www.iaato.org)
  17. Lynch HJ, Naveen R, Fagan WF (2008) Censuses of penguins, blue-eyed shags, and southern giant petrel populations in the Antarctic Peninsula, 2001–2007. Mar Ornithol 36:83–97Google Scholar
  18. Lynch HJ, Fagan WF, Naveen R, Trivelpiece SG, Trivelpiece WZ (2009) Timing of clutch initiation in Pygoscelis penguins on the Antarctic Peninsula: towards an improved understanding of off-peak census correction factors. CCAMLR Sci 16:149–165Google Scholar
  19. Lynch HJ, Crosbie K, Fagan WF, Naveen R (2010a) Spatial patterns of tour ship traffic in the Antarctic Peninsula region. Antarct Sci 22:123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lynch HJ, Fagan WF, Naveen RN (2010b) Population trends and reproductive success at a frequently visited penguin colony on the Western Antarctic Peninsula. Polar Biol 33:493–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lynch HJ, Fagan WF, Naveen R, Trivelpiece SG, Trivelpiece WZ (2012a) Differential advancement of breeding phenology in response to climate may alter staggered breeding among sympatric pygoscelid penguins. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 454:135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lynch HJ, Naveen R, Trathan PN, Fagan WF (2012b) Spatially integrated assessment reveals widespread changes in penguin populations on the Antarctic Peninsula. Ecology 93(6):1367–1377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lynch HJ, Ratcliffe N, Passmore J, Foster E, Trathan PN (2012c) Sensitivity analysis identifies high influence sites for estimates of penguin krill consumption on the Antarctic Peninsula. Antarct Sci. doi:10.1017/S0954102012000600
  24. Lynch HJ, White R, Black AD, Naveen R (2012d) Detection, differentiation, and abundance estimation of penguin species by high-resolution satellite imagery. Polar Biol 35:963–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Naveen R, Lynch HJ (2011) Compendium of Antarctica Peninsula visitor sites, 3rd edn. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  26. Naveen R, Forrest SC, Dagit RG, Blight LK, Trivelpiece WZ, Trivelpiece SG (2000) Censuses of penguin, blue-eyed shag, and southern giant petrel populations in the Antarctic Peninsula region, 1994–2000. Polar Record 36:323–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nimon AJ, Schroter RC, Stonehouse B (1995) Heart rate of disturbed penguins. Nature 374:415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Penney RL (1968) Territorial and social behavior in the Adélie penguin. In: Austin OL (ed) Antarctic bird studies. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp 83–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scientific Committee for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (revised) (2004) Commission for the conservation of Antarctic living marine resources ecosystem monitoring program (CEMP) Standard Methods for Monitoring Studies, Hobart, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  30. Shuford WD, Spear LB (1988) Surveys of breeding chinstrap penguins in the South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Br Antarct Surv Bull 81:19–30Google Scholar
  31. Spain (2010) Possible human impact on Deception Island. Information Paper 20, ATCM XXXIIIGoogle Scholar
  32. Stonehouse B (1975) The biology of penguins. University Park Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  33. Taylor JR (1982) An introduction to error analysis. University Science Books, SausalitoGoogle Scholar
  34. Trathan PN, Ratcliffe N, Masden EA (2012) Ecological drivers of change at South Georgia: the krill surplus, or climate variability. Ecography 35:001–011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Trivelpiece WZ, Hinke JT, Miller AK, Reiss CS, Trivelpiece SG, Watters GM (2011) Variability in krill biomass links harvesting and climate warming to penguin population changes in Antarctica. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:7625–7628PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Van Cise AM (Editor) (2011) AMLR 2009/2010 field season report. Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Antarctic Ecosystem Research DivisionGoogle Scholar
  37. Walker BG, Boersma PD, Wingfield JC (2006) Habituation of adult magellanic penguins to human visitation as expressed through behavior and corticosterone secretion. Conserv Biol 20:146–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Williams TD (1995) The penguins: Spheniscidae. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  39. Woehler EJ (1993) The distribution and abundance of Antarctic and subantarctic penguins. Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ron Naveen
    • 1
  • Heather J. Lynch
    • 2
  • Steven Forrest
    • 1
  • Thomas Mueller
    • 3
  • Michael Polito
    • 4
  1. 1.Oceanites, Inc.Chevy ChaseUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and EvolutionStony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA
  3. 3.Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F)Frankfurt am MainGermany
  4. 4.Department of Biology and Marine BiologyUniversity of North Carolina WilmingtonWilmingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations