Advertisement

Polar Biology

, Volume 35, Issue 9, pp 1395–1405 | Cite as

Description of two new species of Santelmoa (Teleostei, Zoarcidae) from the Southern Ocean

  • Jesús Matallanas
  • Cecília Corbella
  • Peter R. Møller
Original Paper

Abstract

Detailed examination of eelpouts in collected material from the Gerlache Strait and the Bellingshausen Sea, during the Spanish Antarctic Expeditions Bentart 03 and Bentart 06, and from the Bransfield Strait, during the Danish Galathea 3 Expedition, at depths between 1,056 and 1,837 m, revealed two undescribed species of Santelmoa Matallanas 2010. Herein, Santelmoa fusca sp. nov. and Santelmoa antarctica sp. nov. are described on the basis of twelve specimens. Santelmoa fusca can be separated from all other Santelmoa species by the following characters: mouth terminal; two posterior nasal pores; lateral line double; two irregular rows of palatine teeth; dorsal fin rays 109–113; anal fin rays 88–94; vertebrae 27–29 + 87–91 = 114–118; two pyloric caeca well developed; scales reduced to tail; pelvic fins and vomerine teeth present. Santelmoa antarctica can be separated from all other Santelmoa species by the following characters: mouth subterminal; two posterior nasal pores; suborbital pores seven (6 + 1); lateral line double; single row of palatine teeth; supraoccipital dividing the posterior end of frontals; central radials notched; dorsal fin rays 109–112; anal fin rays 89–93; vertebrae 27 + 89–92 = 116–119; two pyloric caeca well developed; scales, ventral fins and vomerine teeth present. Santelmoa fusca and S. antarctica can readily be separated from each other by squamation (reduced to tail vs. on the tail and on the posterior part of body); suborbital pore pattern (6 + 0 vs. 6 + 1), as well as several morphometric characters. The relationships of the two new species with congeners are discussed.

Keywords

Eelpouts Santelmoa fusca Santelmoa antarctica 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the scientific team, the captain, crew and UTM technicians of the R/V Hespérides for their help during the Bentart 03 and Bentart 06 cruises, on which many specimens were captured. Special thanks to José Castro “Córdoba” for his expertise in fishing with the traps and to Dr. Ignacio Olaso for helping onboard with the collection of type specimens. We are also grateful to Carmen Benito for the X-rays, Jordi Corbera for the illustrations, and Muriel, daughter of the first author, for the English correction of the draft manuscript. This manuscript also benefited from the constructive criticism by reviewers (Gento Shinohara and Mario la Mesa). The Bentart cruises were supported by the Spanish Antarctic Programme (CICYT), and the Galathea 3 Expedition was conducted under the auspices of the Danish Expedition Foundation. This study was supported by a grant from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spain: “Culminación del estudio taxonómico integrado de Zoárcidos (Teleostei, Perciformes) antárticos (CTM2011-1585-E)”, and a grant from the Danish National Research Foundation, “Evolution of Polar fishes”.

References

  1. Anderson ME (1982) Revision of the fish genera Gymnelus Reinhardt and Gymnelopsis Soldatov (Zoarcidae), with two new species and comparative osteology of Gymnelus viridis. Natl Mus Nat Sci Publ Zool 17:1–76Google Scholar
  2. Anderson ME (1988) Studies on the Zoarcidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) of the southern hemisphere. I. The Antarctic and subantarctic regions. Antarct Res Ser 47:59–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson ME (1990) Studies on the Zoarcidae, (Teleostei: Perciformes) of the southern hemisphere. III. The southwestern Pacific. JLB Smith Inst Ichthyol Spec Publ 50:1–17Google Scholar
  4. Anderson ME (1994) Systematics and osteology of the Zoarcidae (Teleostei: Perciformes). JLB Smith Inst Ichthyol Ichthyol Bull 60:1–120Google Scholar
  5. Anderson ME (2006) Studies on the Zoarcidae of the Southern hemisphere. X. New records from western Antarctica. Zootaxa 1110:1–15Google Scholar
  6. Andriashev AP (1965) A general review of Antarctic fish fauna. In: van Oye P, van Mieghen J (eds) Biogeography and ecology in Antarctica. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 491–550Google Scholar
  7. Clarke A, Johnston IA (1996) Evolution and adaptative radiation of Antarctic fishes. Trends Ecol Evol 11:212–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eastman JT (2005) The nature of the diversity of Antarctic fishes. Polar Biol 28:93–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gosztonyi AE (1977) Results of the research cruises of FRV “Walter Herwig” to South America. XLVIII. Revision of the South American Zoarcidae (Osteichthyes, Blennioidei) with the description of three new genera and five new species. Arch Fisch Wiss 27:191–249Google Scholar
  10. Gosztonyi AE (1988) The intercalar bone in the eelpout Family Zoarcidae (Osteichthyes). Zool Anz 3–4:134–144Google Scholar
  11. Iglésias SP, Dettai A, Ozouf-Costaz C (2012) Barbapellis pterygalces, new genus and new species of a singular eelpout (Zoarcidae: Teleostei) from the Antarctic deep waters. Polar Biol 35:215–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Matallanas J (2008) Description of Gosztonyia antarctica, a new genus and species of Zoarcidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) from the Antarctic Ocean. Polar Biol 32:15–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Matallanas J (2009a) Description of a new genus and species of zoarcid fish, Bellingshausenia olasoi, from the Antarctic Ocean. Polar Biol 32:873–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Matallanas J (2009b) Description of Ophthalmolycus andersoni sp. nov. (Pisces, Zoarcidae) from the Antarctic Ocean. Zootaxa 2027:55–62Google Scholar
  15. Matallanas J (2010) Description of two new genera, Santelmoa and Bentartia and two new species of Zoarcidae (Teleostei, Perciformes) from the Southern Ocean. Polar Biol 33:659–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Matallanas J (2011a) Description of two new species of Ophthalmolycus (Teleostei: Zoarcidae) from the Southern Ocean and key to species of the genus. J Mar Biol Ass UK 91:561–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Matallanas J (2011b) Description of Santelmoa elvirae sp. nov. (Teleostei: Zoarcidae) from the Southern Ocean. J Mar Biol Ass UK 91:1231–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Matallanas J, Olaso I (2007) Fishes of the Bellingshausen Sea and Peter I Island. Polar Biol 30:333–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Møller PR, Stewart AL (2006) Two new species of eelpouts (Teleostei, Zoarcidae) of the genus Seleniolycus from the Ross Dependency, Antarctica. Zootaxa 1376:53–67Google Scholar
  20. Regan CT (1914) Fishes. British Antarctic Terranova Nova Expedition 1910. Nat Hist Rep Zool 1:1–54Google Scholar
  21. Voskoboinikova OS, Laius DL (2003) Osteological development of European eelpout Zoarces viviparus (Zoarcidae). J Ichthyol 43:646–659Google Scholar
  22. Voskoboinikova OS, Chegadaeva EA, Nazarkin MV (2010) Comparative osteology, relationships, and systematic of fish of the genus Zoarces (Zoarcidae: Perciformes). J Ichthyol 50:704–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jesús Matallanas
    • 1
  • Cecília Corbella
    • 1
  • Peter R. Møller
    • 2
  1. 1.Grupo de Biodiversidad Animal, Zoología, Facultad de BiocienciasUniversidad Autónoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Zoological Museum, Natural History MuseumUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen ØDenmark

Personalised recommendations