Advertisement

Polar Biology

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 499–508 | Cite as

Polar bear (Ursus maritimus) maternity den distribution in Svalbard, Norway

  • Magnus Andersen
  • Andrew E. Derocher
  • Øystein Wiig
  • Jon Aars
Original Paper

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to identify maternity denning areas and to describe aspects of denning behaviour in polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in Svalbard, Norway. Den observations made during aerial and ground surveys (n = 553), observations of recently emerged family groups made during capture and tagging of bears (n = 206), and dens recorded by satellite telemetry (n = 76 dens) were used to describe the distribution of dens in the Barents Sea region. Data were collected during March, April, and May from 1972 to 2010, and while most dens were abandoned during the first 2 weeks of April, there was substantial variation. The highest number of dens was recorded on the islands in the eastern and northern parts of Svalbard with fewer dens found further west on the island Spitsbergen. Females with cubs-of-the-year or their tracks indicated some denning in southern, eastern, and northern parts of Spitsbergen. Telemetry also revealed that females captured in Svalbard and the Barents Sea den in Franz Josef Land, Russia. The majority of dens (62%) in Svalbard were located on land within ca. 1 km of the shore with the most inland den 19 km from shore. Heavy exploitation of polar bears before 1973, when a hunting moratorium was implemented, likely led to reduced denning in some areas. Our observations of den distribution indicate that denning is now more widespread in the archipelago than 50 years ago and reflects a reestablishment of denning areas following years of protection.

Keywords

Denning ecology Ursus maritimus Svalbard Barents Sea 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Norwegian Polar Institute (NPI) provided funding for the study. We would like to thank Anders Skoglund at the Mapping Section, Norwegian Polar Institute, for help with maps and GIS analyses. We also thank the World Wildlife Fund for supporting the research programme.

References

  1. Aars J, Marques TA, Buckland ST, Andersen M, Belikov S, Boltunov A, Wiig Ø (2009) Estimating the Barents Sea polar bear subpopulation size. Mar Mamm Sci 25:35–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amstrup SC (1993) Human disturbance of denning polar bears in Alaska. Arctic 46:246–250Google Scholar
  3. Amstrup SC, Gardner C (1994) Polar bear maternity denning in the Beaufort Sea. J Wildl Manage 58:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belikov SE (1980) Distribution and structure of dens of female polar bears in Wrangel Island. In: Martinka CJ, McArthur KL (eds) Bears—their biology and management. US Gov Print Off, Washington DC, pp 117Google Scholar
  5. Derocher AE (2005) Population ecology of polar bears at Svalbard, Norway. Popul Ecol 47:267–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Derocher AE, Stirling I (1998) Maternal investment and factors affecting offspring size in polar bears (Ursus maritimus). J Zool 245:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Derocher AE, Andriashek D, Arnould JPY (1993) Aspects of milk composition and lactation in polar bears. Can J Zool 71:561–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Derocher AE, Wiig Ø, Andersen M (2002) Diet composition of polar bears in Svalbard and the western Barents Sea. Polar Biol 25:448–452Google Scholar
  9. Derocher AE, Andersen M, Wiig Ø, Aars J, Hansen E, Biuw M (2010) Sea ice and polar bear den ecology at Hopen Island, Svalbard. Mar Ecol Prog Ser (in press)Google Scholar
  10. Durner GM, Amstrup SC, Fischbach AS (2003) Habitat characteristics of polar bear terrestrial maternal den sites in northern Alaska. Arctic 56:55–62Google Scholar
  11. Durner GM, Douglas DC, Nielson RM, Amstrup SC, McDonald TL, Stirling I, Mauritzen M, Born EW, Wiig Ø, DeWeaver E, Serreze MC, Belikov SE, Holland MM, Maslanik J, Aars J, Bailey DA, Derocher AE (2009) Predicting 21st-century polar bear habitat distribution from global climate models. Ecol Monogr 79:25–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferguson S, Taylor M, Rosing-Asvid A, Born E, Messier F (2000) Relationships between denning of polar bears and conditions of sea ice. J Mamm 81:1118–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fischbach AS, Amstrup SC, Douglas DC (2007) Landward and eastward shift of Alaskan polar bear denning associated with recent sea ice changes. Polar Biol 30:1395–1405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hansson R, Thomassen J (1983) Behavior of polar bears with cubs in the denning area. Int Conf Bear Res and Manage 5:246–254Google Scholar
  15. Harington CR (1968) Denning habits of the polar bear (Ursus maritimus Phipps). Can Wildl Serv Rep 5:1–30Google Scholar
  16. Jonkel CJ, Kolenosky GB, Robertson R, Russell RH (1972) Further notes on polar bear denning habits. Int Conf Bear Res and Manage 2:142–158Google Scholar
  17. Keating KA, Brewster WG, Key CH (1991) Satellite telemetry: performance of animal-tracking systems. J Wildl Manage 55:160–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Larsen T (1985) Polar bear denning and cub production in Svalbard, Norway. J Wildl Manage 49:320–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Larsen T (1986) Population biology in Svalbard polar bears (Ursus maritimus). PhD Thesis, University of Oslo, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  20. Lentfer JW (1975) Polar bear denning on drifting sea ice. J Mamm 56:716–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lentfer JW, Hensel RJ (1980) Alaskan polar bear denning. In: Martinka CJ, McArthur KL (eds) Bears—their biology and management. US Gov Print Off, Washington DC, pp 101–108Google Scholar
  22. Lønø O (1970) The polar bear (Ursus maritimus Phipps) in the Svalbard area. Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter 149:1–115Google Scholar
  23. Lydersen C, Gjertz I (1986) Studies of the ringed seal (Phoca hispida Schreber 1775) in its breeding habitat in Kongsfjorden, Svalbard. Polar Res 4:57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mauritzen M, Derocher AE, Wiig Ø (2001) Space-use strategies of female polar bears in a dynamic sea ice habitat. Can J Zool 79:1704–1713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Messier F, Taylor MK, Ramsay MA (1992) Seasonal activity patterns of female polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in the Canadian Arctic as revealed by satellite telemetry. J Zool 226:219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Messier F, Taylor MK, Ramsay MA (1994) Denning ecology of polar bears in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. J Mamm 75:420–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ovsyanikov N (1998) Den use and social interactions of polar bears during spring in a dense denning area on Herald Island, Russia. Ursus 10:251–258Google Scholar
  28. Parovshchikov VJ (1964) A study on the population of the polar bear, Ursus (Thalarctos) maritimus Phipps, of Franz Josef Land. Acta Soc Zool Bohem 2:167–177Google Scholar
  29. Prestrud P, Stirling I (1994) The International Polar Bear Agreement and the current status of polar bear conservation. Aquat Mamm 20:113–124Google Scholar
  30. Ramsay MA, Dunbrack RL (1986) Physiological constraints on life-history phenomena: the example of small bear cubs at birth. Am Nat 127:735–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ramsay M, Stirling I (1986) On the mating system of polar bears. Can J Zool 64:2142–2151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramsay M, Stirling I (1990) Fidelity of female polar bears to winter den sites. J Mamm 71:233–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Richardson E, Stirling I, Hik DS (2005) Polar bear (Ursus maritimus) maternity denning habitat in western Hudson Bay: a bottom-up approach to resource selection functions. Can J Zool 83:860–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scott PA, Stirling I (2002) Chronology of terrestrial den use by polar bears in western Hudson Bay as indicated by tree growth anomalies. Arctic 55:151–166Google Scholar
  35. Smith TG (1980) Polar bear predation of ringed and bearded seals in the land-fast sea ice habitat. Can J Zool 58:2201–2209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith TG, Lydersen C (1991) Availability of suitable land-fast ice and predation as factors limiting ringed seal populations, Phoca hispida, in Svalbard. Polar Res 10:585–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stirling I, Andriashek D (1992) Terrestrial maternity denning of polar bears in the eastern Beaufort Sea area. Arctic 45:363–366Google Scholar
  38. Stirling I, Archibald WR (1977) Aspects of predation of seals by polar bears. J Fish Res Board Can 34:1126–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stirling I, Spencer C, Andriashek D (1989) Immobilization of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) with Telazol® in the Canadian Arctic. J Wildl Dis 25:159–168PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Stroeve J, Holland MM, Meier W, Scambos T, Serreze M (2007) Arctic sea ice decline: faster than forecast. Geophys Res Lett 34:L09501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tchernova J (2010) Denning characteristics and movement patterns of female polar bears with cubs in Svalbard during the first month after emergence: implication for detecting denning locations. Masters Thesis, University of Tromsø, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  42. Van de Velde F, Stirling I, Richardson E (2003) Polar bear (Ursus maritimus) denning in the area of the Simpson Peninsula, Nunavut. Arctic 56:191–197Google Scholar
  43. Vinnikov KY, Robock A, Stouffer RJ, Walsh JE, Parkinson CL, Cavalieri DJ, Mitchell JFB, Garrett D, Zakharov VF (1999) Global warming and Northern Hemisphere Sea ice extent. Science 286:1934–1937PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Watts PD, Hansen SE (1987) Cyclic starvation as a reproductive strategy in the polar bear. Symp Zool Soc Lond 57:305–318Google Scholar
  45. Wiig Ø (1995) Distribution of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in the Svalbard area. J Zool 237:515–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wiig Ø (1998) Survival and reproductive rates for the polar bears at Svalbard. Ursus 10:25–32Google Scholar
  47. Zeyl E, Ehrich D, Aars J, Bachmann L, Wiig Ø (2010) Denning area fidelity and mitochondrial DNA diversity of female polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in the Barents Sea. Can J Zool 88:1139–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Magnus Andersen
    • 1
  • Andrew E. Derocher
    • 2
  • Øystein Wiig
    • 3
  • Jon Aars
    • 1
  1. 1.Norwegian Polar InstituteTromsøNorway
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  3. 3.National Centre for Biosystematics, Natural History Museum, University of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations