Polar Biology

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 345–354 | Cite as

Growth line deposition and variability in growth of two circumpolar bivalves (Serripes groenlandicus, and Clinocardium ciliatum)

  • William G. AmbroseJr.
  • Paul E. Renaud
  • William L. LockeV
  • Finlo R. Cottier
  • Jørgen Berge
  • Michael L. Carroll
  • Benjamin Levin
  • Stuart Ryan
Original Paper

Abstract

Growth patterns of two common circumpolar bivalves, the Greenland cockle (Serripes groenlandicus), and the hairy cockle (Clinocardium ciliatum) have been used in previous studies to reconstruct environmental conditions in the arctic. To date, there has been no direct determination that growth lines in either species are deposited periodically, and there has been no examination of factors affecting growth. We placed calcein-marked individuals of both species on oceanographic moorings in two fjords (Rijpfjord and Kongsfjord) in the Svalbard archipelago for one and two (Kongsfjord only) years. Growth patterns were compared with concurrent in situ temperature and fluorescence data in order to assess environmental controls on growth. Dark growth lines are evident on the outer shell surface and internally in shell cross section in both S. groenlandicus and C. ciliatum, and both species deposited only one line per year, unequivocally confirming that internal lines are deposited annually. Growth line deposition in both species began in late summer to early fall, before the seasonal decline in temperature. There was no difference in growth of S. groenlandicus between the two fjords despite differences in water temperature (3°C), fluorescence (nearly threefold) and the onset and duration of the winter season. C. ciliatum, however, grew approximately 2.8 times faster in the warmer, more food-rich Kongsfjord than in Rijpfjord. Subannual lines were counted in two individuals of each species from each fjord, but deposition of these lines was not clearly related to number of growing days estimated by temperature and fluorescence.

Keywords

Arctic Sclerochronology Serripes groenlandicus Clinocardium ciliatum Subannual Svalbard 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the work of the officers and crew of R/V Jan Mayen. Technical assistance was provided by M. Duvall and W. Ash from the Bates College Imaging Center, C. Griffiths from SAMS and H. Nygård from UNIS. The research leading to these results has received funding from the Research Council of Norway (IPY-NESSAR), the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement nr. 226248—ATP, ConocoPhilips through the ArcWin grant at UNIS, and a Phillips Faculty Fellowship from Bates College to WGA and funding for mooring operations was received from the Research Council of Norway (MariClim 165112/S30) and the UK Natural Environment Research Council (Oceans 2025 Theme 10). Additional funding was provided by Akvaplan-niva. Comments by Thomas Brey and an anonymous reviewer improved an earlier version of our manuscript.

References

  1. Ambrose WG Jr, Carroll ML, Greenacre M, Thorrold S, McMahon K (2006) Variation in Serripes groenlandicus (Bivalvia) growth in a Norwegian high-Arctic fjord: evidence for local- and large-scale climate forcing. Glob Change Biol 12:1595–1607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews JT (1972) Recent and fossil growth rates of marine bivalves, Canadian Arctic, and Late-Quaternary arctic Marine environments. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 11:157–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker RM (1964) Microtextural variation in pelecypod shells. Malacologia 2:69–86Google Scholar
  4. Black BA (2009) Climate-driven synchrony across tree, bivalve, and rockfish growth increment chronologies of the northeast Pacific. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 378:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blicher ME, Rysgaard S, Sejr MK (2010) Seasonal growth variation in Chlamys islandica (Bivalvia) from sub-Arctic Greenland is linked to food availability and temperature. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 407:71–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Butler PG, Richardson CA, Scourse JD, Wanamaker AD Jr, Shammon TM, Bennell JD (2010) Marine climate in the Irish Sea: analysis of a 489-year marine master chronology derived from growth increments in the shell of the clam Arctica islandica. Quat Sci Rev 29:1614–1632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carroll ML, Johnson B, Henkes G, McMahon KW, Voronkov A, Ambrose WG Jr, Denisenko SG (2009) Bivalves as indicators of environmental variation and potential anthropogenic impacts in the southern Barents Sea. Mar Pollut Bull 59:193–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll ML, Ambrose WG Jr, Levin B, Ratner A, Ryan S, Henkes GA (2011a) Climatic regulation of Clinocardium ciliatum (Bivalvia) growth in the northwestern Barents Sea. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 302:10–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carroll ML, Ambrose WG Jr, Levin BS, Locke WL V, Henkes GA, Hop H, Renaud PE (2011b) Pan-Svalbard growth rate variability and environmental regulation in the Arctic bivalve Serripes groenlandicus. J Mar Syst 88:239–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark GR (1968) Mollusk shell: daily growth lines. Science 161:800–802PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark GR (1974) Growth lines in invertebrate skeletons. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 2:77–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cottier F, Tverberg V, Inall M, Svendsen H, Nilsen F, Griffiths C (2005) Water mass modification in an Arctic fjord through cross shelf exchange: the seasonal hydrography of Kongsfjorden, Svalbard. J Geophys Res Ocean 110:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cottier FR, Nilsen F, Inall ME, Gerland S, Tverberg V, Svendsen H (2007) Wintertime warming of an Arctic shelf in response to large-scale atmospheric circulation. Geophys Res Lett 34. doi: 10.1029/2007GL029948
  14. Dunca E (1999) Bivalve shells as archives for changes in water environment. Vatten 55:279–290Google Scholar
  15. Evans JW (1972) Tidal growth increments in the cockle Clinocardium nuttallii. Science 176:416–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farrow GE (1971) Periodicity structures in the bivalve shell: experiments to establish growth controls in Cerastoderma edule from the Thames Estuary. Paleontol 14:571–588Google Scholar
  17. Goshima S, Noda T (1992) Shell growth of the North Pacific cockle Clinocardium californiense in Hakodatae Bay, Hokkaido. Hokkaido Benthos Res 42:39–48Google Scholar
  18. Gröke DR, Gilliken DP (2008) Advances in mollusc sclerochronology and sclerochemistry tools for understanding climate and environment. Geo-Mar Lett 28:265–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hernaman V, Munday PL, Schläppy ML (2000) Validation of otolith growth-increment periodicity in tropical gobies. Mar Biol 137:715–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones DS (1981) Repeating layers in the molluscan shell and not always periodic. Paleontol 55:1076–1082Google Scholar
  21. Jones DS, Williams DF, Arthur MA (1983) Growth history and ecology of the surf clam, Spisula solidissima (Dillwyn), as revealed by stable isotopes and annual shell increments. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 73:225–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaehler S, McQuaid CD (1999) Use of the fluorochrome calcein as an in situ growth marker in the brown mussel Perna perna. Mar Biol 133:455–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Khim BK, Krant DE, Cooper LW, Grebmeier JM (2003) Seasonal discharge of estuarine freshwater to the western Chukchi Sea shelf identified in stable isotope profiles of mollusk shells. J Geophys Res 108:16-1–16-10. doi: 10.1029/2003JC001816 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kilada RW, Roddick D, Mombourquette K (2007) Age determination, validation, growth and minimum size of sexual maturity of the Greenland Smooth cockle (Serripes groenlandicus, Bruguiere, 1789) in Eastern Canada. J Shellfish Res 26:443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moreau J, Bambino C, Pauly D (1986) Indices of overall growth performance of 100 Tilapia (Cichlidae) populations. In: Maclean JL, Dizon LB, Hosillos LV (eds) The first asian fisheries forum. Asian Fisheries Society, Manila, pp 201–206Google Scholar
  26. Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH (1990) Applied linear models, 3rd edn. Irwin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  27. Pannella G, MacClintock C (1968) Biological and environmental rhythms reflected in molluscan shell growth. Paleontol Soc Mem 2:64–92Google Scholar
  28. Poulain C, Lorrain A, Flye-Sainte-Marie J, Amice E, Morize E, Paulet Y-M (2011) An environmentally induced tidal periodicity of microgrowth increment formation in subtidal populations of the clam Ruditapes philippinarum. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 397:58–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rhoads DC, Lutz RA (1980) Skeletal growth of aquatic organisms: biological records of environmental change. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Riascos J, Guzman N, Laudien J, Heilmayer O, Oliva M (2007) Suitability of three stains to mark shells of Concholepas (Gastropoda) and Mesodesma donacium (Bivalvia). J Shellfish Res 26:43–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Richardson CA (2001) Molluscs as archives of environmental change. Ocean Mar Biol Ann Rev 39:103–164Google Scholar
  32. Schöne BR, Lega J, Flessa KW, Goodwin DH, Dettman DL (2002) Reconstructing daily temperatures from growth rates of the intertidal bivalve mollusk Chione cortezi (northern Gulf of California, Mexico). Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 184:131–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schöne BR, Oschmann W, Rössler J, Freyre Castro AD, Houk SD, Kröncke I, Dreyer W, Janssen R, Rumohr H, Dunca E (2003) North Atlantic Oscillation dynamics recorded in shells of a long-lived bivalve mollusk. Geology 31:1037–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schöne BR, Fiebig J, Pfeiffer M, Gleb R, Hickson J, Johnson A, Dreyer W, Oschmann W (2005) Climate records from a bivalved Methuselah (Arctica islandica, Molluska; Iceland). Holocene 228:130–148Google Scholar
  35. Sejr MK, Jensen T, Rysgaard S (2002) Annual growth bands in the bivalve Hiatella arctica validated by a mark-recapture study in NE Greenland. Polar Biol 25:794–796Google Scholar
  36. Sejr MK, Blicher ME, Rysgaard S (2009) Sea ice cover affects inter-annual and geographic variation in growth of the Arctic cockle Clinocardium ciliatium (Bivalvia) in Greenland. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 389:149–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sokal RR, Rolf FJ (1969) Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Company, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  38. Søreide JE, Leu E, Berge J, Graeve M, Falk-Petersen S (2010) Timing of blooms, algal food quality and Calanus glacialis reproduction and growth in a changing Arctic. Glob Change Biol. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02175.x
  39. Tallqvist M, Sundet J (2000) Annual growth of the cockle Clinocardium ciliatum in the Norwegian Arctic (Svalbard area). Hydrobiologia 440:331–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wallace MI, Cottier FR, Berge J, Tarling GA, Griffiths C, Brierley AS (2010) Comparison of zooplankton vertical migration in an ice-free and seasonally ice-covered Arctic fjord: an insight into the influence of sea ice cover on zooplankton behavior. Limnol Oceanogr 55:831–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wanamaker AD Jr, Hetzinger S, Halfar J (2011) Reconstructing mid- to high-latitude marine climate and ocean variability using bivalves, coralline-algae, and marine sediment cores from the Northern hemisphere. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 302:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Witbaard R, Duineveld GC, Amaro T, Bergman MJ (2005) Growth trends in three bivalve species indicate climate forcing on the benthic ecosystem in the southeastern North Sea. Clim Res 30:29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • William G. AmbroseJr.
    • 1
    • 2
  • Paul E. Renaud
    • 2
    • 3
  • William L. LockeV
    • 1
  • Finlo R. Cottier
    • 4
  • Jørgen Berge
    • 3
    • 5
  • Michael L. Carroll
    • 2
  • Benjamin Levin
    • 1
  • Stuart Ryan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyBates CollegeLewistonUSA
  2. 2.Akvaplan-niva, Fram Centre for Climate and EnvironmentTromsøNorway
  3. 3.University Centre in SvalbardLongyearbyenNorway
  4. 4.Scottish Association for Marine ScienceScottish Marine InstituteOban, ArgyllUK
  5. 5.Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and EconomicsUniversity of TromsøTromsøNorway

Personalised recommendations