Polar Biology

, Volume 33, Issue 5, pp 659–672

Description of two new genera, Santelmoa and Bentartia and two new species of Zoarcidae (Teleostei, Perciformes) from the Southern Ocean

Original Paper

Abstract

Two new genera of lycodine zoarcid fish, Santelmoa and Bentartia, and two new species, Santelmoa carmenae and Bentartia cinerea, are described from 13 specimens collected from the Gerlache Strait, Southern Ocean, at 1,056-m depth. Santelmoa can be distinguished from all other lycodine genera by the combination of the following characters: anterior portion of frontals fused; scapular foramen open; ceratohyal–epihyal articulation interdigitating; cranium narrowed; supratemporal commissure and occipital pores absent; intercalar reaching the prootic; parasphenoid wing well developed; palatal arch well developed; posterior hyomandibular ramus short; post-temporal ventral ramus well developed; six branchiostegal rays; vertebrae asymmetrical; pelvic fin rays ensheathed; scales, lateral line, pyloric caeca, palatine and vomerine teeth present. Bentartia differs from the remaining lycodine genera by the following combination of characters: basioccipital and exoccipitals fused; supraoccipital–exoccipital articulation broadly contacting; ceratohyal–epihyal articulation interdigitating; post-temporal ventral ramus weak; two posterior nasal pores; cranium narrowed; supratemporal commissure and occipital pores absent; intercalar set posteriorly; palatal arch well developed; posterior hyomandibular ramus not elongate; parasphenoid wing high; six branchiostegal rays; vertebrae asymmetrical; pelvic fin rays ensheathed; scales, lateral line, pyloric caeca, palatine and vomerine teeth present. The relationships of the two new genera are discussed.

Keywords

Taxonomy Santelmoa Bentartia New genera Eelpouts Antarctic Peninsula 

References

  1. Anderson ME (1982) Revision of the fish genera Gymnelus Reinhardt and Gymnelopsis Soldatov (Zoarcidae), with two new species and comparative osteology of Gymnelus viridis. Natl Mus Nat Sci Publ Zool 17:1–76Google Scholar
  2. Anderson ME (1990) Zoarcidae. Eelpouts. In: Gon O, Heemstra PC (eds) Fishes of the Southern Ocean. JLB Smith Inst Ichthyol, Grahamstown, pp 256–276Google Scholar
  3. Anderson ME (1991) Studies on the Zoarcidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) of the southern hemisphere. V. Two new species from the Weddell Sea, Antarctica. Cybium 15:151–158Google Scholar
  4. Anderson ME (1994) Systematics and osteology of the Zoarcidae (Teleostei: Perciformes). JLB Smith Inst Ichthyol Ichthyol Bull 60:1–120Google Scholar
  5. Anderson ME (2006) Studies on the Zoarcidae of the Southern hemisphere. X. New records from western Antarctica. Zootaxa 1110:1–15Google Scholar
  6. Anderson ME, Fedorov VV (2004) Family Zoarcidae Swainson 1839, eelpouts. Cal Acad Sci Annot Checkl Fish 34:1–58Google Scholar
  7. Anderson ME, Gosztonyi AE (1991) Studies on the Zoarcidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) of the southern hemisphere. IV. New records and a new species from the Magellan Province of South America. JLB Smith Inst Ichthyol Ichthyol Bull 55:1–16Google Scholar
  8. Anderson ME, Hubbs CL (1981) Redescription and osteology of the Northeastern Pacific fish Derepodichthys alepidotus (Zoarcidae). Copeia 2:341–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Devillers C (1958) The crâne des poissons. In: Grassé P-P (dir) Traité de Zoologie XIII. Masson, Paris, pp 551–687Google Scholar
  10. Eastman JT (2005) The nature of the diversity of Antarctic fishes. Polar Biol 28:93–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire E (1807) Considérations sur les pièces de la tête osseuse des animaux vertébrés, et particulièrement sur celles du crâne des oisseaux. Ann Mus Hist Nat 10:342–365Google Scholar
  12. Gosztonyi AE (1977) Results of the research cruises of FRV “Walter Herwig” to South America. XLVIII. Revision of the South American Zoarcidae (Osteichthyes, Blennioidei) with the description of three new genera and five new species. Arch Fisch Wiss 27:191–249Google Scholar
  13. Gosztonyi AE (1988) The intercalar bone in the eelpout Family Zoarcidae (Osteichthyes). Zool Anz 3–4:134–144Google Scholar
  14. Machida Y, Hashimoto J (2001) Pyrolycus manusanus, a new genus and species of deep-sea eelpout from a hydrothermal vent field in the Manus Basin, Papua New Guinea (Zoarcidae, Lycodinae). Ichthyol Res 49:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Makushok VM (1958) The morphology of northern blenniid fishes (Stichaeoidae, Blennioidei, Pisces). Trudy Zool Inst Akad Nauk SSSR 25:3–129 (English translation US Fish Wild Serv, Washington, 1959)Google Scholar
  16. Matallanas J (2008) Description of Gosztonyia antarctica, a new genus and species of Zoarcidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) from the Antarctic Ocean. Polar Biol 32:15–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Matallanas J (2009a) Description of Ophthalmolycus andersoni sp. nov. (Pisces, Zoarcidae) from the Antarctic Ocean. Zootaxa 2027:55–62Google Scholar
  18. Matallanas J (2009b) Description of a new genus and species of zoarcid fish, Bellingshausenia olasoi, from the Bellingshausen Sea (Southern Ocean). Polar Biol 32:873–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Matallanas J, Olaso I (2007) Fishes of the Bellingshausen Sea and Peter I Island. Polar Biol 30:333–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mincarone MM, Anderson ME (2008) A new genus and species of eelpout (Teleostei: Zoarcidae) from Bazil. Zootaxa 1852:65–68Google Scholar
  21. Moeller PR, Stewart AL (2006) Two new species of eelpouts (Teleostei, Zoarcidae) of the genus Seleniolycus from the Ross Dependency, Antarctica. Zootaxa 1376:53–67Google Scholar
  22. Pinochet de la Barra O (1993) El Continente Antártico: ese recién llegado del siglo XX. In: CICYT (ed) Investigación Española en la Antártida. Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, Madrid, 1–16Google Scholar
  23. Shinohara G, Sakurai H (2006) Ericandersonia sagamia, a new genus and species of deep-water eelpouts (Perciformes: Zoarcidae) from Japan. Ichtyol Res 53:172–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shinohara G, Nazarkin MV, Chereshnev IA (2004) Magadania skopetsi, a new genus and species of Zoarcidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) from the Sea of Okhotsk. Ichthyol Res 51:137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*: phylogenetical analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Grupo de Biodiversidad Animal, Unidad de Zoología, Facultad de BiocienciasUniversidad Autónoma de BarcelonaBellaterraSpain

Personalised recommendations