Polar Biology

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 561–568 | Cite as

Diving patterns of breeding female rockhopper penguins (Eudyptes chrysocome): Noir Island, Chile

  • Andrea Raya ReyEmail author
  • Klemens Pütz
  • Guillermo Luna-Jorquera
  • Benno Lüthi
  • Adrián Schiavini
Original Paper


The diving behaviour of female southern rockhopper penguins (Eudyptes chrysocome) was studied at Noir Island (54°30′S–73°00′W), Chile, in the southeast Pacific Ocean. This isolated island is located at the edge of the continental shelf in an area where the Humboldt Current originates, and holds a population of more than 150,000 breeding pairs. On 13 December 2005, four TDRs were successfully attached to females at the end of the brooding period and recorded diving activity at intervals of 2 s over the next 4 weeks. In total, 40 complete foraging trips were recorded. Trip duration was on average 42.4 ± 40.1 h and the proportion of overnight trips (60%) was the highest value found so far for this species. Mean dive depth and dive duration was 20.6 ± 19.4 m and 63.7 ± 36.4 s, respectively. The diving effort was higher than that of brooding females from the Indian Ocean and comparable with that of conspecifics from colonies in the southwest Atlantic in terms of diving rate (38 ± 14.2 dives h−1), but slightly lower as regards the proportion of time spent underwater (61 ± 10.5%). This study confirms that the diving behaviour of rockhopper penguins varies as a function of the physical and biological characteristics of the foraging areas and of the particular stage of the breeding season.


Rockhopper penguin Eudyptes chrysocome Noir Island Diving behaviour Chile 



This research was made possible through the support of Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) though projects PIP N° 02820 and PEI N° 6045, from the, Wildlife Conservation Society, National Geographic Society and the financial support to the Antarctic Research Trust by the Vontobel-Stiftung, Switzerland. Special thanks are due to Lesley Baxter for language editing.


  1. Banks J, Van Buren A, Cherel Y, Whitfield JB (2006) Genetic evidence for the three species of rockhopper penguins Eudyptes chrysocome. Polar Biol 30:61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BirdLife International (2008) Species factsheet: Eudyptes chrysocome. on 5/2/2008
  3. Chappel MA, Shoemaker VH, Janes DN, Bucher TL (1993) Diving behavior during foraging in breeding Adelie penguin. Ecology 74:1204–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cherel Y, Tremblay Y, Guinard E, Georges JY (1999) Diving behavior of female northern rockhopper penguins, Eudyptes chrysocome moseleyi, during the brooding period at Amsterdam Island (Southern Indian Ocean). Mar Biol 134:375–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiaradia A, Ropert-Coudert Y, Kato A, Mattern T, Yorke J (2007) Diving behaviour of little penguins from four colonies across their whole distribution range: bathymetry affecting diving effort and fledging success. Mar Biol 151:1535–1542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clausen AP, Pütz K (2002) Recent trends in diet composition and productivity of gentoo, Magellanic and rockhopper penguins in the Falkland Island. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 12:51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper W (1992) Rockhopper penguins at the Auckland Islands. Notornis 39:66–67Google Scholar
  8. Cooper J, Wolfaardt A, Crawford RJM (1997) Trends in size and success of breeding colonies of Macaroni and Rockhopper penguins at Marion Island, 1979/80–1995/96. CCAMLR Sci 4:125–147Google Scholar
  9. Crawford RJ, Cooper J, Dyers BM, Greyling MD, Klages NTW, Nel DC, Nel JL, Petersen SL, Wolfaardt AC (2003) Decrease in numbers of the Eastern Rockhopper Penguin Eudyptes chrysocome filholi at Marion Island, 1994/95–2002/03. Afr J Mar Sci 25:487–498Google Scholar
  10. Davoren GK, Montevecchi WA, Anderson JT (2003) Distributional patterns of a marine bird and its prey: habitat selection based on prey and conspecific behaviour. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 256:229–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellis S, Croxall JP, Cooper J (1998) Penguin conservation assessment and management plan. IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist GroupGoogle Scholar
  12. Grémillet D, Argentin G, Schulte B, Culik BM (1998) Flexible foraging techniques in breeding Cormorants Phalacrocorax carbo and shags Phalacrocorax aristotelis: benthic or pelagic feeding? Ibis 140:113–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guinard E, Weimerskirch H, Jouventin P (1998) Population changes of the Northern Rockhopper Penguin on Amsterdam and Saint Paul Islands. Col Waterbirds 21:222–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hilton GM, Thompson DR, Sagar PM, Cuthbert RJ, Cherel Y, Bury SJ (2006) A stable isotope investigation into the causes of decline in a sub-Antarctic predator, the rockhopper penguin Eudyptes chrysocome. Glob Change Biol 12:611–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Horning M, Trillmich F (1997) Ontogeny of diving behaviour in the Galapagos fur seal. Behaviour 134:1211–1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hull CL (1996) Morphometric indices for sexing adult Royal Eudyptes schlegeli and Rockhopper Echrysocome Penguins at Macquarie Island. Mar Ornithol 24:23–27Google Scholar
  17. Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr 54:187–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jouventin P, Cuthbert RJ, Otvall R (2006) Genetic isolation and divergence in sexual traits: evidence for the northen rockhopper penguin Eudyptes moseleyi being a sibling species. Mol Ecol 15:3413–3423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kato A, Watanuki Y, Nishiumi I, Kuroki M, Shaughnessy P, Naito Y (2000) Variation in foraging and parental behavior of King Cormorants. Auk 117(3):718–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kirkwood R, Lawton K, Moreno C, Valencia J, Schlatter R, Robertson G (2007) Estimates of southern rockhopper and macaroni numbers at the Ildefonso and Diego Ramírez Archipelagos, Chile using quadrat and distance-sampling techniques. Waterbirds 30(2):259–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Laidre KL, Heide-Jorgensen MP, Logdson ML, Hobbs RC, Heagerty P, Dietz R, Jorgensen OA, Treble MA (2004) Seasonal narwhal habitat associations in the high. Arctic Mar Biol 145:821–831Google Scholar
  22. Lescroël A, Bost CA (2005) Foraging under contrasting oceanographic conditions: the gentoo penguin at Kerguelen Archipelago. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 302:245–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moors PJ (1986) Decline in numbers of Rockhopper Penguins at Campbell Island. Polar Res 23:69–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oehler DA, Pelikan S, Roger Fry W, Weakley L Jr, Kush A, Marin M (2008) Status of crested penguins Eudyptes spp. on three islands in Southern Chile. Wilson J Ornithol 120(3):575–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pütz K, Ingham RJ, Smith JG, Croxall JP (2001) Population trends, breeding success and diet composition of gentoo Pygoscelis papua, magellanic Spheniscus magellanicus and rockhopper Eudyptes chrysocome penguins in the Falkland Islands. Polar Biol 24:793–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pütz K, Clausen AP, Huin N, Croxall JP (2003) Re-evaluation of historical Rockhopper penguin population data in the Falkland Islands. Waterbirds 26:169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pütz K, Raya Rey A, Clausen A, Schiavini A, Pütz A, Lüthil BH (2006a) Winter dispersion of Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome. Polar Biol 29:735–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pütz K, Raya Rey A, Huin N, Schiavini A, Pütz A, Lüthil BH (2006b) Diving characteristics of Southern Rockhopper Penguins (Eudyptes c. chrysocome) in the Southwest Atlantic. Mar Biol 149:125–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Raya Rey A, Schiavini A (2005) Inter-annual variation in the diet of female southern rockhopper penguin (Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome) at Staten Island and prey relationships of the food web in the study area. Polar Biol 28(2):132–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Raya Rey A, Trathan PN, Pütz K, Schiavini A (2007a) Effect of oceanographic conditions on the winter dispersion of Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 330:285–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Raya Rey A, Trathan PN, Schiavini A (2007b) Inter-annual variation in provisioning behaviour of Rockhopper Penguins Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome at Staten Island. Ibis 149:826–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sanchez RP, Remeslo A, Madirolas A, de Ciechomski JD (1995) Distribution and abundance of post-larvae and juveniles of the Patagonian sprat, Sprattus fuegensis, and related oceanographic conditions. Fish Res 23:47–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schiavini A, Raya Rey A (2004) Long days, long trips: foraging ecology of female rockhopper penguin brooding chicks at Tierra del Fuego. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 275:251–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Takahashi A, Dunn MJ, Trathan PN, Croxall JP, Wilson RP, Sato K, Naito Y (2004) Krill-feeding behaviour in a chinstrap penguin (Pygoscelis antarctica) compared with fish-eating in Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus): a pilot study. Mar Ornithol 32:47–54Google Scholar
  35. Tremblay Y, Cherel Y (2000) Benthic and pelagic dives: a new foraging behavior in rockhopper penguins. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 204:257–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tremblay Y, Cherel Y (2003) Geographic variation in the foraging behavior, diet and chick growth of rockhopper penguins. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 251:279–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tremblay Y, Cherel Y (2005) Spatial and temporal variation in the provisioning behaviour of female Rockhopper Penguins Eudyptes chrysocome filholi. J Avian Biol 36:135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Venegas C (1998) Pingüinos crestados (Eudyptes chrysocome Forster 1781, E. chrysolophus Brandt 1837) y de Magallanes (Spheniscus magellanicus Forster 1781) en Isla Noir, Chile Anales del Instituto de la Patagonia Serie Cs. Nature 26:59–67Google Scholar
  39. Williams TD (1995) The penguins. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 295Google Scholar
  40. Wilson RP, Pütz K, Peters G, Culik B, Scolaro JA, Charrassin J-B, Ropert-Coudert Y (1997) Long-term attachment of transmitting and recording devices to penguins and other seabirds. Wildl Soc Bull 25:101–106Google Scholar
  41. Ydenberg RC, Clark CW (1989) Aerobiosis and anaerobiosis during diving by western grebes: an optimal foraging approach. J Theor Biol 139:437–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Raya Rey
    • 1
    Email author
  • Klemens Pütz
    • 2
  • Guillermo Luna-Jorquera
    • 3
  • Benno Lüthi
    • 4
  • Adrián Schiavini
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.Consejo Nacional De Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, CADICUshuaiaArgentina
  2. 2.Antarctic Research TrustStanleyUK
  3. 3.Departamento de Biología MarinaUniversidad Católica del NorteCoquimboChile
  4. 4.Antarctic Research Trust (Switzerland)Forch, ZurichSwitzerland
  5. 5.Wildlife Conservation SocietyBronxUSA

Personalised recommendations