Advertisement

Polar Biology

, Volume 31, Issue 10, pp 1291–1294 | Cite as

Krill-feeding behaviour of gentoo penguins as shown by animal-borne camera loggers

  • Akinori Takahashi
  • Nobuo Kokubun
  • Yoshihisa Mori
  • Hyoung-Chul Shin
Short Note

Abstract

Animal-borne camera loggers were used to examine the patterns of prey encounter and feeding behaviour of gentoo penguins at King George Island, Antarctica. The still images from the camera loggers showed that the penguins encountered the swarms of krill for 25.5% (range: 8–38%) of their dives (>5 m) on average, during their foraging trips (mean duration of 5.4 h, n = 7 trips). They encountered krill swarms during the dives to 10–70 m depth, in pelagic as well as benthic habitats. In the benthic habitat, the penguins swam just above the sea floor and headed downward over a krill swarm, probably using the sea floor to assist them to feed on mobile swarms. The shallow coastal waters would be the important foraging habitat of gentoo penguins breeding in King George Island.

Keywords

Antarctica Benthic diving Diving behaviour Foraging strategy Pygoscelis papua Seabirds 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the members of the King Sejong Station, Korea Polar Research Institute (KOPRI), for logistic support in the field, and Dr. Paul Ponganis, Dr. Shinichi Watanabe, and two anonymous referees for useful comments on the manuscript. This work was conducted as a part of an international joint research project, under the auspices of Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition and Korea Antarctic Research Program. This study was partially supported by the research grant PM06010 from Korean Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries (for logistics), and by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) research grant (20310016).

References

  1. Ainley DG (2002) The Adélie penguin: bellwether of climate change. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Deagle BE, Gales NJ, Hindell MA (2008) Variability in foraging behaviour of chick-rearing macaroni penguins Eudyptes chrysolophus and its relation to diet. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 359:295–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Elliot KH, Woo K, Gaston AJ, Benvenuti S, Dall’Antonia L, Davoren GK (2008) Seabird foraging behaviour indicates prey type. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 354:289–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fedak MA, Lovell P, Grant SM (2001) Two approaches to compressing and interpreting time depth information as collected by time-depth recorders and satellite-linked data recorders. Mar Mamm Sci 17:94–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kokubun N, Takahashi A, Mori Y, Watanabe S, Shin HC Comparison of diving behavior and foraging habitat use between chinstrap and gentoo penguins breeding at South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Mar Ecol Prog Ser (submitted)Google Scholar
  6. Lescroël A, Bost CA (2005) Foraging under contrasting oceanographic conditions: the gentoo penguins at Kerguelen Archipelago. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 302:245–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ligowski R (2000) Benthic feeding by krill, Euphausia superba Dana, in coastal waters off West Antarctica and in Admiralty Bay, South Shetland Islands. Polar Biol 23:619–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mattern T, Ellenberg U, Houston DM, Davis LS (2007) Consistent foraging routes and benthic foraging behaviour in yellow-eyed penguins. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 343:295–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ponganis P, Van Dam RP, Marshall G, Knower T, Levenson DH (2000) Sub-ice foraging behavior of emperor penguins. J Exp Biol 203:3275–3278PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  11. Robinson SA, Hindell MA (1996) Foraging ecology of gentoo penguins Pygoscelis papua at Macquarie Island during the period of chick care. Ibis 138:722–731Google Scholar
  12. Rodary D, Bonneau W, Le Maho Y, Bost CA (2000) Benthic diving in male emperor penguins Aptenodytes forsteri foraging in winter. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 307:171–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ropert-Coudert Y, Kato A, Wilson RP, Cannell B (2006) Foraging strategies and prey encounter rate of free-ranging Little Penguins. Mar Biol 149:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shin HC, Kim S (1993) Preliminary study on the breeding of chinstrap and gentoo penguins at Barton Peninsula, King George Island. Korean J Polar Res 4:97–103Google Scholar
  15. Takahashi A, Dunn MJ, Trathan PN, Sato K, Naito Y, Croxall JP (2003) Foraging strategies of chinstrap penguins at Signy Island, Antarctica: importance of benthic feeding on Antarctic krill. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 250:279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Takahashi A, Sato K, Naito Y, Dunn MJ, Trathan PN, Croxall JP (2004) Penguin-mounted cameras glimpse underwater group behaviour. Proc R Soc Lond B: 271:S281–S282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tremblay Y, Cherel Y (2000) Benthic and pelagic dives: a new foraging behaviour in rockhopper penguins. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 204:257–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Watanuki Y, Daunt F, Takahashi A, Newell M, Wanless S, Sato K, Miyazaki N (2008) Microhabitat use and prey capture of a bottom feeding top predator, the European shag, as shown by camera loggers. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 356:283–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Williams TD (1995) The penguins. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Wilson RP (1995) Foraging ecology. In: Williams TD (ed) The penguins. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 81–106Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akinori Takahashi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nobuo Kokubun
    • 2
  • Yoshihisa Mori
    • 3
  • Hyoung-Chul Shin
    • 4
  1. 1.National Institute of Polar ResearchTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Polar ScienceThe Graduate University for Advanced StudiesTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Animal ScienceTeikyo University of Technology and ScienceUenoharaJapan
  4. 4.Korea Polar Research Institute, KORDIIncheonSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations