Physiological constraints on the life cycle and distribution of the Antarctic fairy shrimp Branchinecta gaini
- 158 Downloads
Maturation to adulthood and successful reproduction in the Antarctic fairy shrimp, Branchinecta gaini, must be completed within a physiologically challenging temporal window of ca. 2.5 months in the southern Antarctic Peninsula. Although adults show considerable metabolic opportunism at positive temperatures, little is known of their tolerance of two physiological insults potentially typical to pool life in the maritime Antarctic: sub-zero temperatures and salinity. B. gaini are freeze-avoiding crustaceans with temperatures of crystallisation (T cs) of −5°C. No antifreeze proteins were detected in the haemolymph. Adults osmoregulate in relation to temperature, but rapid mortality in saline solutions of even low concentration, indicate they cannot osmoregulate in relation to salinity. Survival of ice encasement at temperatures above their T c was found to be pressure but not time dependent: at severe inoculative ice pressures, there was little immediate survival and none survived after 48 h below −2°C; at mild inoculative ice pressures, immediate survival was ca. 100% at −3°C, but <20% after 48 h. There was no significant difference in survival after 1 and 6 h encasement at −3°C. Observations of ventilation suggest that it is not low temperature per se, but ice that represents the primary cryo-stress, with ventilatory appendages physically handcuffed below the freezing point of pool water. Both sub-zero temperatures and salinity represent real physiological constraints on adult fairy shrimp.
KeywordsAnostraca Ice encasement Salinity Osmoregulation Maritime Antarctic
Research was carried out while TCH was an Honorary Research Associate at the University of Birmingham. Fieldwork was funded by a CGS Grant (7/26) from the NERC Antarctic Funding Initiative.
- Block W, Zettel J (2003) Activity and dormancy in relation to body water and cold tolerance in a winter-active springtail (Collembola). Eur J Entomol 100:305–312Google Scholar
- Bohanak AJ, Whiteman HH (1999) Dispersal of the fairy shrimp Branchinecta coloradensis (Anostraca): effects of hydroperiod and salamanders. Limnol Oceanogr 44:487–493Google Scholar
- Brendonck L, Riddoch BJ (2000) Egg bank dynamics in anostracan desert rock pool populations (Crustacea: Branchiopoda). Archiv für Hydrobiol 148:71–84Google Scholar
- Brtek J (1997) Checklist of the valid and invalid names of the ‘Large Branchiopoda’ (Anostraca, Notostraca, Spinicaudata and Laevicaudata), with a survey of the taxonomy of all Branchiopoda. Zbornik Slovenskeho Narodneho Musea Prirodne Vedy 43:1–66Google Scholar
- Brtek J (2002) Taxonomical survey of the Anostraca, Notostraca, Cyclestherida, Spinicaudata, and Laevicaudata. Acta Rerum Naturalium Musei Nationalia Slovaci Bratislava 48:49–60Google Scholar
- Dartnall HJG, Heywood RB (1980) The freshwater fauna of South Georgia. Br Antarct Surv Bull 50:115–118Google Scholar
- Jurasz W, Kittel W, Presler P (1983) Life cycle of Branchinecta gaini Daday, 1910, (Branchiopoda, Anostraca) fom King George Island, South Shetland Islands. Pol Polar Res 4:143–154Google Scholar
- Paggi JC (1996) Feeding ecology of the Branchinecta gainii (Crustacea: Anostraca) in ponds of South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Polar Biol 16:13–18Google Scholar
- Southwood TRE (1977) Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies. J Anim Ecol 46:337–365Google Scholar