Polar Biology

, Volume 31, Issue 10, pp 1191–1203 | Cite as

Natural succession of macroalgal-dominated epibenthic assemblages at different water depths and after transplantation from deep to shallow water on Spitsbergen

  • Anna Fricke
  • Markus Molis
  • Christian Wiencke
  • Nelson Valdivia
  • Annelise S. Chapman
Original Paper

Abstract

In the current study, we investigated the primary succession of seaweeds over different time periods at different water depths. Furthermore, we followed the succession of field-grown benthic communities of different successional age, developing on ceramic tiles, prior to and after transplantation from 8 to 0.5 m water depth. The transplantation simulated changes associated with the break up of sea-ice cover, e.g. light regime or wave exposure. For this purpose, we transplanted 12 and 21-month old communities, grown at 8 m water depth, together with a set of sterile tiles, onto rafts, floating in 0.5 m water depth. Our results describe for the first time the succession of macroalgal communities in the Arctic and give important insights into the effect of disturbance of differently aged communities. The primary succession at 0.5 m water depth was mainly driven by Bacillariophyta and filamentous green algae like Urospora sp. and Ulothrix implexa. Twelve-month old communities at 8 m water depth are dominated by members of the Ectocarpales (Phaeophyceae), like Pylaiella littoralis, P. varia, and Ectocarpus siliculosus and the green alga U. implexa, whereas the 21-month old community showed a higher cover of the green algal class Ulvophyceae and sessile invertebrates. After transplantation to near surface conditions, species composition of the communities changed, but this effect was differently strong between communities of different age.

Keywords

Arctic Diversity Macroalgal Recruitment Sublittoral Succession Hard bottom Community Transplantation 

References

  1. Aguilera J, Bischof K, Karsten U, Hanelt D, Wiencke C (2002) Seasonal variation in ecophysiological patterns in macroalga from the Arctic fjord. II. Pigment accumulation and biochemical defense systems against high light stress. Mar Biol 140(6):1087–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albrecht AS (1998) Soft bottom versus hard rock: Community ecology of macroalgae on intertidal mussel beds in the Wadden Sea. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 229(1):85–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes DKA, Conlan KE (2007) Disturbance, colonization and development of Antarctic benthic communities. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362:11–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beuchel F, Gulliksen B, Carroll ML (2006) Long-term patterns of rocky bottom macrobenthic community structure in an Arctic fjord (Kongsfjorden, Svalbard) in relation to climate variability (1980–2003). J Mar Syst 63(1–2):35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bischof K, Hanelt D, Wiencke C (1998) UV-radiation can affect depth-zonation of Antarctic macroalgae. Mar Biol 131:597–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bischof K, Hanelt D, Wiencke C (1999) Acclimation of maximal quantum yield of photosynthesis in the brown alga Alaria esculenta under high light and UV radiation. Plant Biol 1:435–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bischof K, Hanelt D, Aguilera J, Karsten U, Vögele B, Sawall T, Wiencke C (2002) Seasonal variation in ecophysiological patterns in macroalga from the Arctic fjord. I. Sensitivity of photosynthesis to ultraviolet radiation. Mar Biol 140(6):1097–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campana G, Quartino ML, Yousif A, Wulff A (2008) Impacts of UV radiation and grazing on the structure of a subtidal benthic diatom assemblage in Antarctica. In: Wiencke C, Ferreyra G, Abele D, Marenssi S (eds) The Antarctic ecosystem of Potter Cove, King George Island (Isla 25 de Mayo). Synopsis of research performed 1999–2006 at the Dallmann Laboratory and Jubany Station. Rep Polar Mar Res 571, pp 302–310Google Scholar
  9. Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2006) Primer v6: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E Ltd, Plymouth, 190 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2001) A further biodiversity index applicable to species lists: variation in taxonomic distinctness. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 216:265–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coelho SM, Rijstenbil JW, Brown MT (2000) Impacts of anthropogenic stresses on the early development stages of seaweeds. J Aquat Ecosyst Stress Recovery 7(4):317–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Connell JH, Keough MJ (1985) Disturbance and patch dynamics of subtidal marine animals on hard substrata. In: Pickett STA, White PS (eds) The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 125–151Google Scholar
  13. Connell JH, Slatyer RO (1977) Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am Nat 111(982):1119–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dobretsov SV, Qian PY, Wahl M (2005) Effect of solar ultraviolet radiation on the formation of shallow, early successional biofouling communities in Hong Kong. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 290:55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunton KH, Reimnitz E, Schonberg S (1982) An Arctic kelp community in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea. Arctic 35:465–518Google Scholar
  16. Falkowski PG, LaRoche J (1991) Acclimation to spectral irradiance in algae. J Phycol 27:8–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farrell TM (1991) Models and mechanisms of succession: An example from a rocky intertidal community. Ecol Monogr 61(1):95–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hanelt D, Wiencke C, Nultsch W (1997) Influence of UV radiation on the photosynthesis of Arctic macroalgae in the field. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 38:40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hanelt D, Tüg H, Bischof K, Groß C, Lippert H, Sawall T, Wiencke C (2001) Light regime in an Arctic fjord: a study related to stratospheric ozone depletion as a basis for determination of UV efffects on algal growth. Mar Biol 138(3):649–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hassol SJ (2005) ACIA—Der Arktis Klimareport. Convent Verlag GmbH, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  21. Hop H, Pearson T, Hegseth EN, Kovacs KM, Wiencke C, Kwasniewski S, Eiane K, Mehlum F, Gulliksen B, Wlodarska-Kowalczuk M, Lydersen C, Weslawski JM, Cochrane S, Gabrielsen GW, Leakey RJG, Lønne OJ, Zajaczkowski M, Falk-Petersen S, Kendall M, Wängberg S-Å, Bischof K, Voronkov AY, Kovaltchouk NA, Wiktor J, Poltermann M, di Prisco G, Papucci C, Gerland S (2002) The marine ecosystem of Kongsfjorden, Svalbard. Polar Res 21(1):167–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hung OS, Thiyagarajan V, Zhang R, Wu RSS, Qian PY (2007) Attachment of Balanus amphitrite larvae to biofilms originating from contrasting environments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 333:229–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karsten U, Maier J, Garcia-Pichel F (1998) Seasonality in UV-absorbing compounds of cyanobacterial mat communities from an intertidal mangrove flat. Aquat Microb Ecol 16:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Karsten U, Bischof K, Wiencke C (2001) Photosynthetic performance of Arctic macroalgae after transplantation from deep to shallow waters. Oecologia 127:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Karsten U, Schumann R, Rothe S, Jung I, Medlin L (2006) Temperature and light requirements for growth of two diatom species (Bacillariophyceae) isolated from an Arctic macroalga. Polar Biol 29(6):476–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kerr JB, McElroy CT (1993) Evidence for large upward trends of ultraviolet-B radiation linked to ozone depletion. Science 262(5136):1032–1034PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Khandeparker L, Anil AC, Raghukumar S (2006) Relevance of biofilm bacteria in modulating the larval metamorphosis of Balanus amphitrite. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 58(3):425–438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kirk JTO (1994) Light and photosynthesis in aquatic ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 509Google Scholar
  29. Kirst GO, Wiencke C (1995) Ecophysiology of polar algae. J Phycol 31(2):181–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lam C, Harder T, Qian PY (2005) Growth conditions of benthic diatoms affect quality and quantity of extracellular polymeric larval settlement cues. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 294:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lippert H, Iken K, Rachor E, Wiencke C (2001) Macrofauna associated with macroalgae in the Kongsfjord (Spitsbergen). Polar Biol 24(7):512–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Littler MM (1980) Morphological form and photosynthetic performances of marine macroalgae: tests of a functional/form hypothesis. Bot Mar 22:161–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lotze HK, Worm B, Molis M, Wahl M (2002) Effects of UV radiation and consumers on recruitment and succession of a marine macrobenthic community. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 243:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lüder UH, Roleda MY, Wiencke C (2008) Impact of ultraviolet radiation on photosynthesis, DNA, cell structure and germination, and the role of phlorotannins as UV-protecting substances in zoospores of Laminaria digitata (Laminariales, Phaeophyta). Polar Biol (submitted)Google Scholar
  35. McMahon KW, Ambrose WG Jr, Johnson BJ, Sun M-Y, Lopez GR, Clough LM, Carroll ML (2006) Benthic community response to ice algae and phytoplankton in Ny Ålesund, Svalbard. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 310:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Molis M, Wahl M (2004) Transient effects of solar ultraviolet radiation on the diversity and structure of a field-grown eplibenthic community at Luderitz, Namibia. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 302(1):51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Newell RC, Seiderer LJ, Hitchcock DR (1998) The impact of dredging works in coastal waters: a review of the sensitivity to disturbance and subsequent recovery of biological resources on the sea bed. Oceoanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 36:127–178Google Scholar
  38. Pawlik JR (1992) Chemical ecology of the settlement of benthic marine invertebrates. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 30:273–335Google Scholar
  39. Piepenburg D (2005) Recent research on Arctic benthos: common notions need to be revised. Polar Biol 28(10):733–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Raimondi PT (1988) Settlement cues and determination of the vertical limit of an intertidal barnacle. Ecology 69(2):400–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roleda MY (2006) Effects of ultraviolet radiation on early life stages of cold temperate and Arctic macroalgae: implications for recruitment and vertical depth distribution. Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Science, Bremerhaven, p 176Google Scholar
  42. Roleda MY, Hanelt D, Wiencke C (2006a) Exposure to ultraviolet radiation delays photosynthetic recovery in Arctic kelp zoospores. Photosynth Res 88(3):311–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roleda MY, Wiencke C, Lüder UH (2006b) Impact of ultraviolet radiation on cell structure, UV-absorbing compounds, photosynthesis, DNA damage and germination in zoospores of Arctic Saccorhiza dermatodea. J Exp Bot 57(14):3847–3856PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sousa WP (1984) The role of disturbance in natural communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:353–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Svendsen H, Beszczynska-Moeller A, Hagen JO, Lefauconnier B, Tverberg V, Gerland S, Oerbaeck JB, Bischof K, Papucci C, Zajaczkowski M, Attolini R, Bruland O, Wiencke C, Winther JG, Dallmann W (2002) The physical environment of Kongsfjorden-Krossfjorden, an Arctic fjord system in Svalbard. Polar Res 21(1):133–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Underwood AJ (1997) Experiments in ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analyses of variance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  47. Vinebrooke RD, Leavitt PR (1999) Differential Responses of Littoral Communities to Ultraviolet Radiation in an Alpine Lake. Ecology 80(1):223–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vinogradova KL (1995) The checklist of the marine algae from Spitsbergen. Bot Z 80:50–61Google Scholar
  49. Wahl M, Molis M, Davis A, Dobretsov S, Dürr ST, Johansson J, Kinley J, Kirugara D, Langer M, Lotze HK, Thiel M, Thomason J, Worm B, Zeevi Ben-Yosef D (2004) UVR effects that come and go: a global comparison of marine benthic community level impacts. Glob Change Biol 10(12):1962–1972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weslawski JM, Wiktor J, Zajaczkowski M, Swerpel S (1993) Intertidal zone of Svalbard. 1. Macroorganism distribution and biomass. Polar Biol 13(2):73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wethey D (1986) Ranking of settlement cues by barnacle larvae—influence of surface contour. Bull Mar Sci 39(2):393–400Google Scholar
  52. Weykam G, Gomez I, Wiencke C, Iken K, Kloeser H (1996) Photosynthetic characteristics and C:N ratios of macroalgae from King George Island (Antarctica). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 204(1–2):1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weykam G, Thomas DN, Wiencke C (1997) Growth and photosynthesis of the Arctic red algae Palmaria decipiens (Palmariales) and Iridaea cordata (Gigartinales) during and following extended periods of darkness. Phycologia 36(5):395–405Google Scholar
  54. Wiencke C, Vögele B, Kovaltchouk NA, Hop H (2004) Species composition and zonation of marine benthic macroalgae at Hansneset in Kongsfjorden, Svalbard. In: Wiencke C (ed) The coastal ecosystem of Kongsfjorden, Svalbard. Synopsis of biological research performed at the Koldewey Station in the years 1991–2003. Ber Polarforsch Meeresforsch 492, pp 55–62Google Scholar
  55. Wiencke C, Clayton MN, Gómez I, Iken K, Lüder UH, Amsler CD, Karsten U, Hanelt D, Bischof K, Dunton K (2007) Life strategy, ecophysiology and ecology of seaweeds in polar waters. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 6(1–3):95–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wulff A, Zacher K (2008) Short-term UV effects on the photosynthesis of Antarctic benthic diatoms. In: Wiencke C, Ferreyra G, Abele D, Marenssi S (eds) The Antarctic ecosystem of Potter Cove, King George Island (Isla 25 de Mayo). Synopsis of research performed 1999–2006 at the Dallmann Laboratory and Jubany Station. Rep Polar Mar Res 571, pp 263–269Google Scholar
  57. Zacher K, Wulff A, Molis M, Hanelt D, Wiencke C (2007) Ultraviolet radiation and consumer effects on a field-grown intertidal macroalgal assemblage in Antarctica. Global Change Biol 13(6):1201–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Fricke
    • 1
    • 2
  • Markus Molis
    • 3
  • Christian Wiencke
    • 1
  • Nelson Valdivia
    • 3
  • Annelise S. Chapman
    • 4
  1. 1.Section Seaweed BiologyAlfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine ResearchBremerhavenGermany
  2. 2.Centre for Tropical Marine EcologyBremenGermany
  3. 3.Section Seaweed BiologyBiologische Anstalt Helgoland, Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine ResearchHelgolandGermany
  4. 4.Biology DepartmentDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations