Polar Biology

, Volume 30, Issue 12, pp 1557–1563

First record of sympagic hydroids (Hydrozoa, Cnidaria) in Arctic coastal fast ice

Original Paper


We report on the first record of interstitial cnidarians in sea ice. Ice core samples were collected during eight field periods between February 2003 and June 2006 in the coastal fast ice off Barrow, Alaska (71°N, 156°W) at four locations. A total of 194 solitary, small (0.2–1.1 mm) elongated specimens of a previously unknown interstitial hydroid taxon were found. By cnidome composition and the occurrence of a highly retractable pedal disc formed by epidermal tissue only, the specimens are tentatively assigned to representatives of the family Protohydridae, subclass Anthomedusae. The hydroids were found almost exclusively in the bottom 10 cm-layer (at the ice–water interface) of 118 ice cores, with abundances ranging from 0 to 27 individuals per core section (0–4,244 ind m−2) and a grand mean of 269 ind m−2 in bottom 10 cm-layer sections. Abundances were lower in December and late May than in months in between with considerable site variability. A factor analysis using 12 variables showed that hydroid abundance correlated highest with abundances of copepod nauplii and polychaete juveniles suggesting a trophic relationship.


Arctic Hydroid Cnidaria Sea ice Abundance 


  1. Arar EJ, Collins GB (1992) In vitro determination of chlorophyll a and phaeophytin a in marine and freshwater by fluorescence. EPA Method 445.0Google Scholar
  2. Arlt G (1973) On the importance of biological production of the meiofauna in coastal waters. Wissensch Zeitschrift Univ Rostock 22:1141–1145 (in German)Google Scholar
  3. Bouillon J, Grohmann PA (1990) Pinushydra chiquitita gen. et sp. nov. (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa, Athecata), a solitary marine mesopsammic polyp. Cah Biol Mar 31:291–305Google Scholar
  4. Bozhenova OV, Stepanjants SD, Sheremetevsky AM (1989) The first finding of the meiobenthic cnidaria Boreohydra simplex (Hydrozoa, Athecata) in the White Sea. Zool Zh 68:11–16 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  5. Carey AG (1985) Marine ice fauna: Arctic. In: Horner R (ed) Sea ice biota. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 173–190Google Scholar
  6. Carey AG Jr (1992) The ice fauna in the shallow southwestern Beaufort Sea, Arctic Ocean. J Mar Syst 3:225–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eicken H (2003) From the microscopic, to the macroscopic, to the regional scale: growth, microstructure and properties of sea ice. In: Thomas DN, Dieckmann GS (eds) Sea ice: an introduction to its physics, biology, chemistry, and geology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 22–81Google Scholar
  8. Feder HM, Paul AJ (1980) Seasonal trends in meiofaunal abundance on two beaches in Port Valdez, Alaska. Syesis 13:27–36Google Scholar
  9. van Gaever S, Moodley L, de Beer D, Vanreusel A (2006) Meiobenthos at the Arctic Håkon Mosby Mud Vulcano, with a parental-caring nematode thriving in sulphide-rich sediments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 321:143–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garrison DL, Buck KR (1986) Organism losses during ice melting: a serious bias in sea ice community studies. Polar Biol 6:237–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gayraud S, Philippe M (2003) Influence of bed-sediment features on the interstitial habitat available for macroinvertebrates in 15 French streams. Internat Rev Hydrobiol 88:77–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giere O (1993) Meiobenthology: the microscopic fauna in aquatic sediments. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  13. Gradinger R (1999a) Vertical fine structure of algal biomass and composition in Arctic pack ice. Mar Biol 133:745–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gradinger R (1999b) Integrated abundances and biomass of sympagic meiofauna from Arctic and Antarctic pack ice. Polar Biol 22:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gradinger R (2002) Sea ice microorganisms. In: Bitten G (ed) Encyclopedia of environmental microbiology. Wiley, New York, pp 2833–2844Google Scholar
  16. Gradinger R, Bluhm BA (2005) Susceptibility of sea ice biota to disturbances in the shallow Beaufort Sea. Phase 1: Biological coupling of sea ice with the pelagic and benthic realms. Final report OCS study MMS 2005–062Google Scholar
  17. Gradinger R, Meiners K, Plumley G, Zhang Q, Bluhm BA (2005) Abundance and composition of the sea ice meiofauna in off-shore pack ice of the Beaufort Gyre in summer 2002 and 2003. Polar Biol 28:171–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grainger EH, Hsiao SIC (1990) Trophic relationships of the sea ice meiofauna in Frobisher Bay, Arctic Canada. Polar Biol 10:283–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heip C (1971) The succession of benthic micrometazoans in a brackish water habitat. Biologisch Jaarboek 39:191–196Google Scholar
  20. Heip C, Smol N (1976) On the importance of Protohydra leuckerti as a predator of meiobenthic populations. In: Persoone G, Jaspers E (eds) Proceedings of the 10th european marine biology symposium, 2: population dynamics of marine organisms in relation with nutrient cycling in shallow waters. University Press, Wetteren, Belgium, pp 285–296Google Scholar
  21. Horner R (1985) Sea ice biota. CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  22. Junge K, Eicken H, Deming JW (2003) Bacterial activity at −2 to −20°C in Arctic wintertime sea ice. Appl Env Microbiol 70:550–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karayanni H (2004) Evaluation of double formalin-Lugol’s fixation in assessing number and biomass of ciliates: an example of estimations at mesoscale in NE Atlantic. J Microbiol Methods 56:349–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Karl DM, Winn CD, Hebel DVW, Letelier R (1990) JGOFS Hawaii Ocean Time-series program field and laboratory protocols. http://www.hahana.soest.hawaii.edu/hot/protocols/protocols.html, Hawaii
  25. Krembs C, Gradinger R, Spindler M (2000) Implications of brine channel geometry and surface area for the interaction of sympagic organisms in Arctic sea ice. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 243:55–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lampitt RS, Billett DSM, Rice AL (1986) Biomass of the invertebrate megabenthos from 500–4100 m in the northeast Atlantic Ocean. Mar Biol 93:69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee HJ, Gerdes D, Vanhove S, Vincx M (2001) Meiofauna response to iceberg disturbance on the Antarctic continental shelf at Kapp Norvegia (Weddell Sea). Polar Biol 24:926–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Light B, Maykut GA, Grenfell TC (2003) Effects of temperature on the microstructure of first-year Arctic sea ice. J Geophys Res 108. doi:10.1029/2001JC000887Google Scholar
  29. Melnikov I (1997) The Arctic sea ice ecosystem. Gordon and Breach Science, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  30. Michel C, Nielsen TG, Nozais C, Gosselin M (2002) Significance of sedimentation and grazing by ice micro- and meiofauna for carbon cycling in annual sea ice (northern Baffin Bay). Aquat Microb Ecol 30:57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Norenburg JL, Morse MP (1983) Systematic implications of Euphysa ruthae n. sp. (Athecata: Corymorphidae), a psammophilic solitary hydroid with unusual morphogensis. Trans Am Microsc Soc 102:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nozais C, Gosselin M, Michel C, Tita G (2001) Abundance, biomass, composition and grazing impact of the sea-ice meiofauna in the North Water, northern Baffin Bay. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 217:235–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pati AC, Belmonte G, Ceccherelli VU, Boero F (1999) The inactive temporary component: an unexplored fraction of meiobenthos. Mar Biol 134:410–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pfannkuche O, Thiel H (1987) Meiobenthic stocks and benthic activity on the NE-Svalbard shelf and in the Nansen Basin. Polar Biol 7:253–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Remane A (1927) Halammohydra, ein eigenartiges Hydrozoon der Nord- und Ostsee. Z Morph Oekol Tiere 7:82–92 (in German)Google Scholar
  36. Salvini-Plawen Lv (1987) Mesopsammic cnidaria from plymouth (with systematic notes). J Mar Biol Assoc UK 67:623–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schewe I (2001) Small-sized benthic organisms of the Alpha Ridge, central Arctic Ocean. Internat Rev Hydrobiol 86:317–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schuenemann H, Werner I (2005) Seasonal variations in distribution patterns of sympagic meiofauna in Arctic pack ice. Mar Biol 146:1091–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schultz E (1950a) Psammohydra nanna, ein neues solitäres Hyrozoon der westlichen Beltsee. Kieler Meeresforsch 7:122–127 (in German)Google Scholar
  40. Schultz E (1950b) Zur Ökologie von Protohydra leuckarti Greef. Kieler Meeresforsch 7:128–136 (in German)Google Scholar
  41. Sommer S, Pfannkuche O (2000) Metazoan meiofauna of the deep Arabian Sea: standing stocks, size spectra and regional variability in relation to monsoon induced enhanced sedimentation regimes of particulate organic matter. Deep-Sea Res II 47:2957–2977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thiel H (1988) Chapter 19: Cnidaria. In: Higgins RP, Thiel H (eds) Introduction to the study of meiofauna. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, pp 266–272Google Scholar
  43. Vanaverbeke J, Soetaert K, Heip C, Vanreusel A (1997) The metazoan meiobenthos along the continental slope of the Globan Spur (NE Atlantic). J Sea Res 38:93–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weissenberger J, Dieckmann G, Gradinger R, Spindler M (1992) Sea ice: a cast technique to examine and analyze brine pockets and channel structure. Limnol Oceanogr 37:179–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bodil A. Bluhm
    • 1
  • Rolf Gradinger
    • 1
  • Stefano Piraino
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, Institute of Marine ScienceUniversity of Alaska FairbanksFairbanksUSA
  2. 2.Università degli Studi del SalentoLecceItaly

Personalised recommendations