Advertisement

Polar Biology

, Volume 30, Issue 10, pp 1303–1313 | Cite as

Responses of Emperor Penguins (Aptenodytes forsteri) to encounters with ecotourists while commuting to and from their breeding colony

  • Joanna Burger
  • Michael Gochfeld
Original Paper

Abstract

Emperor penguins (Aptenodytes forsteri) were studied at the Snow Hill breeding colony in November 2006 to determine the effect of people on penguins traveling between the colony and the sea to forage. We tested the null hypothesis that the presence and number of people had no effect on the trajectory of movement or the number and duration of pauses. The distances at which penguins noticed people (mean 35.6 m), changed direction (mean 22.8 m), and the number and duration of pauses increased significantly with increases in the number of tourists in their path, which explained more than 50% of the variance. Undisturbed penguins usually tobogganed on their ventral surface over the ice. When penguins noticed people, they usually stood up and often called. In 10 min observation periods, penguins traveling more than 200 m from people paused an average of <1 min vs. 3.8 min for those passing near people, increasing the energetic cost of commuting. After passing people, penguins rarely stopped. Penguins response to people varied by time of day; later in the day they responded less quickly, changed directions when closer to people, stopped for less time, and passed by people closer than they did earlier in the day. We suggest that the effect of ecotourists on traveling penguins can be partly mitigated by having people walk in small, tight-knit groups, by having people stop moving whenever traveling penguins are within about 25 m to allow the penguins to choose the direction of their passage, and by keeping the visitor pathway separate from the penguin paths insofar as possible.

Keywords

Human disturbance Colony management Antarctica Response distance Parental care Locomotion Marching Toboganning 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Patti and Bert Murray, and the entire staff of the Kapitan Khlebnikov for logistical help during the expedition. Tour ornithologist, Akos Hivekovics and photographer Wayne Lynch provided information about the emperor penguin behavior at other colonies they had visited, and Marc Slattery provided information on emperor penguin responses to visitors at the Cape Crozier and Cape Washington colonies. Tim Griffin and G. Kooyman provided information on penguin locomotion. Our overall protocol for conducting behavioral observations with birds was approved by the Rutgers University Animal Review Committee.

References

  1. AGAD (2003) Antarctic specialty protection areas: Taylor Rookery ASPA No. 101 management plan. Australian Government Antarctic Division, Canberra. http://www.aad.gov.au/default.asp?casid=3365 [accessed 25 Apr 2007]
  2. Agardy MT (1993) Accommdating ecotourism in multiple use planning of coastal and marine protected areas. Ocean Coast Manage 20:219–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beale CM, Monaghan P (2004) Human disturbance: people as predation-free predators? J Appl Ecol 41:335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boersma FD, Clark JA, Hilgarth N (2001) Seabird conservation. In: Schreiber EA, Burger J (eds) Biology of marine birds. CRC, New York, pp 559–580Google Scholar
  5. Burger J (2002) Tourism and ecosystems. In: Douglas I (ed) Encyclopedia of global environmental change. Wiley, Lde, Chichester, UK, pp 587–609Google Scholar
  6. Burger J, Gochfeld M (1981) Discrimination of the threat of direct versus tangential approach to the nest by incubating herring and great black-backed gulls. J Comp Physiol Psychol 95:676–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burger J, Gochfeld M (1991) Human distance and birds: tolerance and response distances of resident and migrant species in India. Environ Conserv 18:158–165Google Scholar
  8. Burger J, Gochfeld M (1993) Tourism and short-term behavioral responses of nesting masked, red-footed, and blue-footed boobies in the Galapagos. Environ Conserv 20:255–259Google Scholar
  9. Burger J, Gochfeld M (1994) Predation and effects of humans on island nesting seabirds. In: Nettleship DN, Burger J, Gochfeld M (eds) Seabirds on islands: threats, case studies and action plans. BirdLife International Conservation Series No. 1, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. Burger J, Gochfeld M (1998) Effects of ecotourists on bird behaviour at Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, Florida. Environ Conserv 25:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burger J, Gochfeld M (1999) Role of human disturbance in response behavior of Laysan albatrosses (Diomedea immutabilis). Bird Behav 13:23–30Google Scholar
  12. Burger J, Gochfeld M (2001) Effect of human presence on foraging behavior of sandhill cranes (Grus Canadensis) in Nebraska. Bird Behav 14:81–87Google Scholar
  13. Burger J, Gochfeld M, Niles LJ (1995) Ecotourism and birds in coastal NewJersey: contrasting responses of birds, tourists, and managers. Environ Conserv 22:56–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burns JM, Kooyman GL (2001) Habitat use by Weddell seals and emperor penguins foraging in the Ross Sea. Antarctica Am Zool 41:90–98Google Scholar
  15. Cobley ND, Shears JR (1999) Breeding performance of gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua) at a colony exposed to high levels of human disturbance. Polar Biol 21:355–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooper J, Oehle EW, Elbin RLE (2000) Guest editorial selecting Antarctic specially protected areas: important bird areas can help. Antarctic Sci 12:129Google Scholar
  17. Croxall JP, Prince PA, Hunter I, McInnes SJ, Copestake PG (1984) The seabirds of the Antarctic peninsula, islands of the Scotia Sea, and Antarctic continent between 80oW and 20oW. In: Croxall JP, Evans PGH, Schreiber RW (eds) Status and conservation of the world’s seabirds. Internatl. Council Bird Preservation. Tech. Publ. No. 2, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  18. Croxall JP, Trathan PN, Murphy EJ (2002) Environmental change and Antarctic seabird populations. Science 297:1510–1514PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ellenberg U, Mattern T, Seddon PJ, Gorquera GL (2006) Physiological and reproductive consequences of human disturbance in Humboldt penguins: the need for species-specific visitor management. Biol Conserv 133:95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fowler SG (1999) Behavioral and hormonal responses of Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) to tourism and nest site visitation. Biol Conserv 90:143–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Giese M (1996) Effects of human activity on Adelie penguin Pygoscelis adeliae breeding success. Biol Conserv 75:157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Giese M, Riddle M (1999) Disturbance of emperor penguin Aptenodytes forsteri chicks by helicopters. Polar Biol 22:366–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gonzalez LM, Arroyo BE, Margalida A, Sanchez R, Oria J (2006) Effect of human activities on the behavior of breeding Spanish imperial eagles (Aquila adalberti): management implications for the conservation of a threatened species. Anim Conserv 9:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Griffin TM, Kram R (2000) Biomechanics: penguin waddling is not wasteful. Nature 408:929PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gutzwiller KJ, Marcum HA, Harvey HB, Roth JD, Anderson SH (1998) Bird tolerance to human intrusion in Wyoming montane forests. Condor 100:519–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harris CM (ed) (2006) Wildlife awareness manual: Antarctic Peninsula, South Shetland Islands, South Orkney Islands. Wildlife Information Publ 1. UK Foreign and Common Wealth Office, Cambridge UK. http://www.era.gs/resources/wam/WAMv3-FINAL-web.pdf [accessed 25 Apr 2007]
  27. Hockey PAR, Hallinan J (1981) Effect of human disturbance on the breeding behavior of jackass penguins Spheniscus demersus. S Afr J Wildl Res 11:59–62Google Scholar
  28. Holmes N, Giese M, Kriwoken LK (2005) Testing the minimum approach distance guidelines for incubating Royal penguins Eudyptes schlegeli. Biol Conserv 126:339–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holmes ND, Giese M, Achurch H, Robinson S, Kriwoken LK (2006) Behaviour and breeding success of gentoo penguins Pygoscelis papua in areas of low and high human activity. Polar Biol 29:399–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. IAATO (International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators) (2004) IAATO overview of Antarctic tourism. Basalt, CO, USAGoogle Scholar
  31. IAATO (2006a) Marine wildlife watching guidelines (whales & dolphins, seals and seabirds). Basalt, CO, USAGoogle Scholar
  32. IAATO (2006b) 1992–2007 Antarctic tourist trends–landed. http://www.polartravel.de/downloads/antarctictouristtrends19922007.pdf [accessed 25 Apr 2007]
  33. Klages N (1989) Food and feeding ecology of emperor penguins in the eastern Weddell Sea. Polar Biol 9:385–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martin J, DeNeve L, Fargallo JA, Polo V, Manuel S (2004) Factors affecting the escape behaviour of juvenile chinstrap penguins, Pygoscelis antarctica, in response to human disturbance. Polar Biol 27:775–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martinez I (1992) Family spheniscidae (penguins). In: del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J (eds) Handbook of birds of the world. Lynx Ediciones, Barcelona, pp 140–161Google Scholar
  36. McClung MR, Seddon PJ, Setiawan AN (2004) Nature-based tourism impacts on yellow-eyed penguins Megadyptes antipodes: does unregulated visitor access affect fledging weight and juvenile survival? Biol Conserv 119:279–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller ML (1993) The rise of coastal and marine tourism. Ocean Coast Manage 20:181–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moser D (2002) Tourism trends: larger ships, more air transport. Australian Antarctic Mag 3:40–42Google Scholar
  39. Murphy RC (1936) Emperor penguin. In: Murphy RC (ed) Oceanic birds of South America. American Museum of Natural History, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Otley HM (2005) Nature-0based tourism: experiences at the volunteer point penguin colony in the Falkland Islands. Mar Ornithol 33:181–187Google Scholar
  41. Pinshow B, Fedak MA, Battles DR, Schmidt-Nielsen K (1976) Energy expenditure for thermoregulation and locomotion in emperor penguins. Am J Physiol 231:903–912PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Pinshow B, Fedak MA, Schmidt-Nielsen K (1977) Terrestrial locomotion in penguins: it costs more to waddle. Science 195:592–594PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Regel J, Putz K (2004) Effect of human disturbance on body temperature and energy expenditure in penguins. Polar Res 40:345–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Robertson G, Williams R, Green K, Robertson L (1994) Diet composition of Emperor penguin chicks Aptenodytes forsteri at two Mawson Coast colonies, Antarctica. Ibis 136:19–31Google Scholar
  45. Rodgers JA Jr, Smith HT (2005) Set-back distances to protect nesting bird colonies from human disturbance in Florida. Conserv Biol 9:89–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. SAS (1995) SAS manual: statistics. Statistical Analysis System Institute, Carey, NCGoogle Scholar
  47. Sekercioglu CH (2002) Impacts of birdwatching on human and avian communities. Environ Conserv 29:282–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schreiber EA, Burger J (2001) Data on life-history characteristics, breeding range, size, and survival of seabird species. In: Schreiber EA, Burger J (eds) Biology of Marine Birds. CRC, New York, pp 665–675Google Scholar
  49. Siegel S (1956) Non-parametric statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  50. Todd FS, Adie S, Splettstoesser JR (2004) First ground visit to the emperor penguin Aptenodytes forsteri colony at Snow Hill Island, Weddell Sea, Antarctica. Mar Ornithol 32:193–194Google Scholar
  51. Villiers Mde, Bause M, Giese M, Fourie A (2006) Hardly hard-hearted: heart rate responses of incubating northern giant petrels (Macronectes halli) to human disturbance on sub-Antarctic Marion Island. Polar Biol 29:717–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Walker BG, Boersma PD, Wingfield JC (2005) Physiological and behavioral differences in Magellanic penguin chicks in undisturbed and tourist-visited locations at a colony. Conserv Biol 19:1571–1577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Walker BG, Boersma D, Wingfield JC (2006) Habituation of adult Magellanic penguins to human visitation as expressed through behavior and corticosterone secretion. Conserv Biol 20:146–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wienecke BC, Robertson G (1997) Foraging space of emperor penguins Aptenodytes forsteri in Antarctic shelf waters in winter. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 159:249–263Google Scholar
  55. Woehler EJ (ed) (1993) The distribution and abundance of Antarctic and sub-Antarctic penguins. Scientific Committee Antarctic Research, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  56. Yorio P, Boersma PD (1992) The effects of human disturbance on Magellanic penguins Spheniscus magellanicus behavior and breeding success. Bird Conserv Int 2:161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yorio P, Frere E, Gandini P, Schiavini A (2001) Tourism and recreation at seabird breeding sites in Patagonia, Argentina: current concerns and future prospects. Bird Conserv Int 11:231–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zimmer I, Plőtz J, Bornemann H, Ancel A, Hagen W (2006) Foraging ecology of enmperor penguins. Polar Systems POL 4. Alfred-Wegener-Institut fur Polar und Meeresforshung, Bremerhaven, Germany, http://web.awi-bremerhaven.de/Publications/Zim2006a.pdf [accessed 25 Apr 2007]

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Life SciencesRutgers UniversityPiscatawayUSA
  2. 2.Environmental and Occupational MedicineUMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical SchoolPiscatawayUSA

Personalised recommendations