Polar Biology

, Volume 29, Issue 12, pp 1077–1083

Ecophysiological strategies of Antarctic intertidal invertebrates faced with freezing stress

  • C. L. Waller
  • M. R. Worland
  • P. Convey
  • D. K. A. Barnes
Original Paper


Recent studies have revealed a previously unanticipated level of biodiversity present in the Antarctic littoral. Here, we report research on the ecophysiological strategies adopted by intertidal species that permit them to survive in this environment, presenting cold-tolerance data for the widest range of invertebrates published to date from the Antarctic intertidal zone. We found significant differences in levels of cold tolerance between species within this zone. However, and contrary to expectations, intraspecific comparisons of subtidal and intertidal groups of eight species found significant differences between groups in only three species. One species, the nemertean Antarctonemertes validum, showed evidence of the presence of antifreeze proteins (thermal hysteresis proteins), with 1.4°C of thermal hysteresis measured in its haemolymph. We found a strong inverse relationship across species between mass and supercooling point, and fitted a power law model to describe the data. The scaling exponent (0.3) in this model suggests a relationship between an animal’s supercooling point and its linear dimensions.


  1. Aarset AV (1982) Freezing tolerance in intertidal invertebrates (a review). Comp Biochem Physiol A 73:571–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansart A, Vernon P (2003) Cold hardiness in molluscs. Acta Oecol 24:95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ansart A, Vernon P (2004) Cold hardiness abilities vary with size of the land snail Cornu aspersum. Comp Biochem Physiol A 139:205–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bale JS (1993) Classes of insect cold hardiness. Funct Ecol 7:751–753Google Scholar
  5. Bigg EK (1953) The supercooling of water. Proc Phys Soc Lond B 66:688–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Block W (1984) A comparative study of invertebrate supercooling at Signy Island, Maritime Antarctic. Br Antarct Surv Bull 64:67–76Google Scholar
  7. Block W (1990) Cold tolerance of insects and other arthropods. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B 326:613–633Google Scholar
  8. Block W, Duman JG (1989) Presence of thermal hysteresis producing antifreeze proteins in the Antarctic mite Alaskozetes antarcticus. J Exp Zool 250:229–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cannon RJC, Block W (1988) Cold tolerance of microarthropods. Biol Rev 63:23–77Google Scholar
  10. Cannon RJC, Schenker R (1985) Cold tolerance of a cryptostigmatid mite at Signy Island, maritime Antarctic. Br Antarct Surv Bull 67:1–5Google Scholar
  11. Clarke A (1991) Cold adaptation. J Zool 255:691–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Convey P (1996) Overwintering strategies of terrestrial invertebrates from Antarctica—the significance of flexibility in extremely seasonal environments. Eur J Entomol 93:489–505Google Scholar
  13. Convey P (2001) Antarctic ecosystems. In: Levin SA (eds) Encyclopedia of biodiversity. Academic, San Diego, vol 1, pp 171–184Google Scholar
  14. Davenport J, MacAlister H (1996) Environmental conditions and physiological tolerances of intertidal fauna in relation to shore zonation at Husvik, South Georgia. J Mar Biol Ass UK 76:985–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duman JG, DeVries AL (1972) Freezing behaviour of aqueous solutions of glycoproteins from the blood of an Antarctic fish. Cryobiology 9:469–472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hansen TN, Baust JG (1988) Differential scanning calorimetric analysis of antifreeze protein activity in the common mealworm, Tenebrio molitor. Biochem Biophys Acta 957:217–221PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hargen AR, Shabica S (1973) Protection against lethal freezing temperatures by mucus in an Antarctic limpet. Cryobiology 10:331–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee RE, Costanzo JP (1998) Biological ice nucleation and ice distribution in cold-hardy ecothermic animals. Annu Rev Physiol 60:55–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Loomis SH (1995) Freezing tolerance of marine invertebrates. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 33:337–350Google Scholar
  20. Murphy DJ (1983) Freezing resistance in intertidal invertebrates. Ann Rev Physiol 45:289–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peck LS, Webb K, Bailey D (2004) Extreme sensitivity of biological function to temperature in Antarctic marine species. Funct Ecol 18:625–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Peck LS, Convey P, Barnes DKA (2006) Environmental constraints on life histories in Antarctic ecosystems: tempos, timings and predictability. Biol Rev 81:75–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pugh PJA (1994) Supercooling points and water content in Acari. Acta Oecol 15:71–77Google Scholar
  24. Pugh PJA, Davenport J (1997) Colonisation vs. disturbance: the effects of sustained ice-scouring on intertidal communities. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 210:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rothery P, Block W (1992) Characterising supercooling point distributions. Cryo Letters 13:193–198Google Scholar
  26. Salt RW (1961) Principles of insect cold hardiness. Annu Rev Entomol 6:55–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sinclair BJ, Vernon P, Klok J, Chown SL (2003) Insects at low temperatures: an ecological perspective. Trends Ecol Evol 18:257–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sinclair BJ, Marshall DJ, Singh S, Chown SL (2004) Cold tolerance of Littorinidae from South Africa: intertidal snails are not constrained to freeze tolerance. J Comp Physiol B 174:617–624PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sømme L (1986) Ecology of Cryptopygus sverdrupi (Insecta: Collembola) from Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica. Polar Biol 6:179–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sømme L, Block W (1982) Cold hardiness of collembola at Signy Island, Maritime Antarctic. Oikos 38:168–176Google Scholar
  31. Sømme L, Block W (1984) Ecophysiology of two intertidal mites at South Georgia. Oikos 42:276–282Google Scholar
  32. Storey KB, Storey JM (1996) Natural freezing survival in animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:365–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Theede H, Schneppenheim R, Beress L (1976) Antifreeze glycoproteins in Mytilus edulis. Mar Biol 36:183–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Waller CL, Barnes DKA, Convey P (2006) Ecological contrasts across an Antarctic land–sea interface. Austral Ecol 31. DOI 10.1111/j.1442-9993.206.01618.xGoogle Scholar
  35. Worland MR, Convey P (2001) Rapid cold hardening in Antarctic microarthropods. Funct Ecol 15:515–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Worland MR, Lukesova A (2001) The application of differential scanning calorimetry and ice nucleation spectrometry to ecophysiological studies of algae. In: Elster J, Seckback J, Vincent WF, Lhotsky O (eds) Algae and extreme environments: ecology and physiology. Proceedings of the international conference, Trebon, September 2000. Nova Hedwigia, Beihefte, pp 571–584Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. L. Waller
    • 1
  • M. R. Worland
    • 1
  • P. Convey
    • 1
  • D. K. A. Barnes
    • 1
  1. 1.British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research CouncilCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations