Low colonisation on artificial substrata in arctic Spitsbergen
- 113 Downloads
High polar communities tend to be young because of the frequent and intense impact of ice (scour), so colonisation patterns are particularly important. Yet, despite a wealth of studies at temperate and tropical latitudes, we know of no hard substratum settlement/colonisation experiments reported north of 60°N, to date. Here we report on fauna encrusting square panels immersed at 12 m depth in Isforden, Spitsbergen (Svalbard) after 2 and 3 days, a week and a year. Arctic colonisation is slow but is not species poor. We found no colonists present after 2 and 3 days but two panels were colonised by a bryozoan and polychaetes after a week. After a year immersion, three panels were 3, 5 and 11% covered with a mean of ∼247 colonists. This is about an order of magnitude lower than has been described from most studies elsewhere, but not as low as has been recorded at an Antarctic locality. Most individual colonists (80–93%) were polychaetes (Spirorbis tridentatus) but most of the species were bryozoans. The Arctic is widely described as taxon poor compared with elsewhere, but at the local scale we investigated, species richness (20) was as high or higher than in many similar colonisation studies along the north Pacific or Atlantic coasts. In striking contrast, no settlement panel study has yielded fewer higher taxa (2 phyla, 3 classes) than this high arctic study.
KeywordsPolychaete Antarctic Peninsula Hard Substratum Hydroid Hermit Crab
Thanks are due to Dr Maria Wlodarska-Kowalczuk (IO PAS), Dr Marek Zajaczkowski (IO PAS) and Marcin Zajaczkowski for help with panel retrieval. The study has been completed during the Marie Curie Fellowship provided to PK from the European Commission. We thank Prof Lloyd Peck for comments on an early draft of the manuscript and declare that the experiments we performed complied with the current laws of Spitsbergen. We thank three anonymous referees for constructive comments leading to an improved manuscript.
- Barnes DKA (1996) Low levels of colonisation in Antarctica: the role of bryozoans in early community development. In: Gordon DP, Smith AM, Grant-Mackie JA (ed) Bryozoans in space and time. Wellington, New Zealand, pp 19–28Google Scholar
- Bowden D (2005) Seasonality of recruitment in Antarctic sessile marine benthos. Mar Ecol Prog Ser (in press)Google Scholar
- Dayton PK (1990) Polar benthos. In: Smith WO (ed) Polar Oceanography. Academic Press, London, pp 631–685Google Scholar
- Kuklinski P (2001) Bryozoa of the high arctic fjord – a preliminary study. In: Wyse Jackson P, Buttler C, Spencer Jones M (eds) Bryozoan studies 2001. Balkema, Abingdon, pp 175–182Google Scholar
- Pearse VB, Pearse JS (1991) Year-long settling plate study yields no Antarctic placozoans, and surprisingly little else. Antarct J U S 149–150Google Scholar
- Rauschert M (1991) Ergebnisse der faunistischen Arbeiten im Benthal von King George Island (Südshetlandinseln, Antarktis). Ber Polarforsch 76:1–75Google Scholar