Advertisement

Polar Biology

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 255–260 | Cite as

Individual variability of behavioural responses by Wandering Albatrosses (Diomedea exulans) to human disturbance

  • Marienne S. de Villiers
  • John Cooper
  • Peter G. Ryan
Review

Abstract

Sub-Antarctic Marion Island has had a permanent research station for 50 years and the island’s Wandering Albatrosses have been intensively studied for 20 years. The reactions of breeding birds to approaches by a human on foot were recorded. Three response variables were calculated: intensity of vocal reaction (IVR), intensity of non-vocal reaction (INR) and overall response index (ORI). At 5 m from the nest, twice as many birds stood and/or vocalised as at 15 m. Nearest neighbour distance, age and gender did not explain individual variability of responses. Study colony birds had higher IVR scores than non-study colony birds; birds at colonies closest to the station had the highest ORI scores. A better breeding record was associated with lower IVR and ORI scores, but a causative relationship remains to be demonstrated. A minimum viewing distance of 25 m is recommended for breeding Wandering Albatrosses.

Keywords

Human Disturbance Neighbour Distance Nest Density Nest Defence Prince Edward Island 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks are due to all those instrumental in compiling the Marion Island Wandering Albatross database, particularly Robert Crawford and Deon Nel. Permission to conduct research on Marion Island, as well as invaluable logistic support, were received from The Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism through the South African National Antarctic Programme. Valuable comments from Leslie Underhill and Robert Crawford greatly improved this manuscript.

References

  1. Anderson DW, Keith JO (1980) The human influence on seabird nesting success: conservation implications. Biol Conserv 18:65–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berrow SD, Croxall JP (2001) Provisioning rate and attendance patterns of Wandering Albatrosses at Bird Island, South Georgia. Condor 103:230–239Google Scholar
  3. BirdLife International (2000) Threatened birds of the world. Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, Barcelona and Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. Burger J (1981) Effects of human disturbance on colonial species, particularly gulls. Colon Waterbirds 4:28–36Google Scholar
  5. Burger J, Gochfeld M (1999) Role of human disturbance in response behavior of Laysan Albatrosses (Diomedea immutabilis). Bird Behav 13:23–30Google Scholar
  6. Côté SD (2000) Aggressiveness in king penguins in relation to reproductive status and territory location. Anim Behav 59:813–821CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Crawford RJM, Cooper J (2003) Conserving surface-nesting seabirds at the Prince Edward Islands: the roles of research, monitoring and legislation. Afr J Mar Sci 25:415–426Google Scholar
  8. Fowler GS (1999) Behavioral and hormonal responses of Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) to tourism and nest site visitation. Biol Conserv 90:143–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frid A, Dill LM (2002) Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Conserv Ecol 6:11. http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art11Google Scholar
  10. Giese M (1998) Guidelines for people approaching breeding groups of Adèlie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae). Polar Rec 34:287–292Google Scholar
  11. Government of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands (2003) Information for visitors to South Georgia. http://www.sgisland.org/download/South%20Georgia%20Booklet%202003.doc
  12. Grindley JR (1981) Observations of seabirds at Marion and Prince Edward Islands in April and May 1973. In: Cooper J (ed) Proceedings of the symposium on birds of the sea and shore, 1979. African Seabird Group, Cape Town, pp 169–188Google Scholar
  13. Hamer KC, Furness RW (1993) Parental investment and brood defence by male and female great skuas Catharacta skua: the influence of food supply, laying date, body size and body condition. J Zool (Lond) 230:7–18Google Scholar
  14. Heydenrych R, Jackson S (2000) Environmental impact assessment of tourism on Marion Island. Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, South Africa, pp 1–115Google Scholar
  15. Kurey CR, Gochfeld M (1975) Human interference and gull predation in cormorant colonies. Biol Conserv 8:23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. La Grange JJ (1962) Notes on the birds and mammals on Marion Island and Antarctica (S.A.N.A.E.). J S Afr Biol Soc 3:27–84Google Scholar
  17. Lequette B, Weimerskirch H (1990) Influence of parental experience on the growth of Wandering Albatross chicks. Condor 92:726–731Google Scholar
  18. Marchant S, Higgins PJ (1990) Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic birds, vol 1. Ratites to ducks. Oxford University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  19. Montgomerie RD, Weatherhead PJ (1988) Risks and rewards of nest defence by parent birds. Q Rev Biol 63:167–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nel DC, Taylor F, Ryan PG, Cooper J (2003) Population dynamics of the Wandering Albatross Diomedea exulans at Marion Island: long-line fishing and environmental influences. Afr J Mar Sci 25:503–518Google Scholar
  21. Pickering SPC, Berrow SD (2001) Courtship behaviour of the Wandering Albatross Diomeda exulans at Bird Island, South Georgia. Mar Ornithol 29:29–37Google Scholar
  22. Prince PA, Weimerskirch H, Huin N, Rodwell S (1997) Molt, maturation of plumage and ageing in the Wandering Albatross. Condor 99:58–72Google Scholar
  23. Robertson, CR (1998) Factors influencing the breeding performance of the Northern Royal Albatross. In: Robertson G, Gales R (eds) Albatross biology and conservation. Surrey Beatty, Chipping Norton, pp 99–104Google Scholar
  24. Spurr EB (1974) Individual differences in aggressiveness of Adélie penguins. Anim Behav 22:611–616Google Scholar
  25. Tickell WLN (1968) The biology of the great albatrosses Diomdea exulans and Diomedea epomophora. Antarct Res Ser 12:1–55Google Scholar
  26. Tickell WLN (2000) Albatrosses. Pica Press, SussexGoogle Scholar
  27. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136–179Google Scholar
  28. Underhill LG, Petersen SL, Cooper J (2003) Nest densities of the Wandering Albatross Diomedea exulans estimated at the Prince Edward Islands, using GPS. Afr J Mar Sci 25:529–536Google Scholar
  29. Van Zinderen Bakker EM Jr (1971) The genus Diomedea. In: Van Zinderen Bakker EM, Winterbottom JM, Dyer RA (eds) Marion and Prince Edward Islands: report on the South African Biological and Geological Expedition 1965–1966. Balkema, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  30. Vinuela J, Amat JA, Ferrer M (1995) Nest defense of nesting Chinstrap Penguins (Pygoscelis antarctica) against intruders. Ethology 99:323–331Google Scholar
  31. Watkins BP (1987) Population sizes of king, rockhopper and macaroni penguins and wandering albatrosses at the Prince Edward Islands and Gough Island, 1951–1986. S Afr J Antarct Res 17:150–157Google Scholar
  32. Weimerskirch H, Lequette B, Jouventin P (1989) Development and maturation of plumage in the wandering albatross Diomedea exulans. J Zool (Lond) 219:411–421Google Scholar
  33. Weimerskirch H, Shaffer SA, Mabille G, Martin J, Boutard O, Rouanet JL (2002) Heart rate and energy expenditure of incubating wandering albatrosses: basal levels, natural variation, and the effects of human disturbance. J Exp Biol 205:475–483PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marienne S. de Villiers
    • 1
  • John Cooper
    • 1
  • Peter G. Ryan
    • 2
  1. 1.Avian Demography Unit, Department of Statistical SciencesUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa
  2. 2.Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African OrnithologyUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations