Polar Biology

, Volume 27, Issue 9, pp 544–554

Diet and reproductive success of Adélie and chinstrap penguins: linking response of predators to prey population dynamics

Original Paper


The diet and reproductive performance of two sympatric penguin species were studied at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands between 1997 and 2001. Each year, Adélie (Pygoscelis adeliae) and chinstrap (P. antarctica) penguins fed almost exclusively (>99% by mass) on Antarctic krill; however, there was considerable inter-annual variation in reproductive output. In 1998, chinstrap penguins were adversely affected by extensive sea-ice in the vicinity of the colony, whereas Adélie penguins were unaffected by this. However, in 2000, both species suffered reduced reproductive output. Detailed analysis of the population-size structure of krill in the diet indicated a lack of recruitment of small krill into the population since 1996. A simple model of krill growth and mortality indicated that the biomass represented by the last recruiting cohort would decline dramatically between 1999 and 2000. Thus, despite the lack of a change in the proportion of krill in the diet, the population demographics of the krill population suggested that the abundance of krill may have fallen below the level required to support normal breeding success of penguins sometime before or during the 2000 breeding season. The role of marine predators as indicator species is greatly enhanced when studies provide data reflecting not only the consequences of changes in the ecosystem but also those data that elucidate the causes of such changes.


  1. Ainley DG, Wilson PR, Barton KJ, Ballard G, Nur N, Karl B (1998) Diet and foraging effort of Adelie penguins in relation to pack-ice conditions in the southern Ross Sea. Pol Biol 20:311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ainley DG, Ballard G, Barton KJ, Karl BJ, Rau HG, Ribic CA, Wilson PR (2003) Spatial and temporal variation of diet within a presumed metapopulation of Adélie penguins. The Condor 105:95–106Google Scholar
  3. Barlow KE, Boyd IL, Croxall JP, Staniland IJ, Reid K, Brierley AS (2002) Are penguins and seals in competition for Antarctic krill at South Georgia? Mar Biol 140:205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyd IL (2002) Integrated environment–prey–predator interactions off South Georgia: implications for management of fisheries. Aquat Conservation Mar Freshwater Ecosys 12:119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cairns DK (1987) Seabirds as indicators of marine food supplies. Biol Oceanog 5:261–271Google Scholar
  6. CCAMLR (2003) CEMP Standard Methods. CCAMLR, Hobart, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke MR (1986) A handbook for the identification of cephalopod beaks. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke J, Kerry K, Irvine L, Phillips B (2002) Chick provisioning and breeding success of Adélie penguins at Bechervaise Island over eight successive seasons. Pol Biol 25:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Comiso J (2002) DMSP SSM/I daily polar gridded sea-ice concentrations. In: Maslanik J, Stroeve J (eds) Boulber CO. National Snow and Ice Data Centre. Digital mediaGoogle Scholar
  10. Croxall JP (1984) Seabirds. In: Antarctic ecology, vol 2. Academic Press, London, pp 534–618Google Scholar
  11. Croxall JP, Prince PA (1979) Antarctic seabird and seal monitoring studies. Pol Rec 19:573–595Google Scholar
  12. Croxall JP, Prince PA (1980) Food, feeding ecology and ecological segregation of seabirds at South Georgia. Biol J Lin Soc 14:103–131Google Scholar
  13. Croxall JP, Prince PA, Ricketts C (1985) Relationships between prey life-cycles and the extent,nature and timing of seal and seabird predation in the scotia sea. In: Siegfried WR, Condy PR, Laws RM (eds) Antarctic nutrient cycles and food webs. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 517–533Google Scholar
  14. Croxall JP, McCann TS, Prince PA, Rothery P (1988) Reproductive performance of seabirds and seals at South Georgia and Signy Island, South Orkney Islands, 1976–1987: implications for Southern Ocean monitoring studies. In: Sahrhage D (ed) Antarctic ocean and resources variability. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 261–285Google Scholar
  15. Croxall JP, Prince PA, Reid K (1997) Dietary segregation of krill-eating south Georgia seabirds. J Zool 242:531–556Google Scholar
  16. Croxall JP, Reid K, Prince PA (1999) Diet, provisioning and productivity responses of marine predators to differences in availability of Antarctic krill. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 177:115–131Google Scholar
  17. Davoren GK, Montevecchi WA (2003) Signals from seabirds indicate changing biology of capelin stocks. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 258:253–261Google Scholar
  18. Endo Y, Asari H, Watanuki Y, Kato A, Kuroki M, Nishikawa J (2002) Biological characteristics of euphausiids preyed upon by Adelie penguins in relation to sea-ice conditions in Lutzow-Holm Bay, Antarctica. Pol Biol 25:730–738Google Scholar
  19. Everson I, Miller DGM (1994) Krill Mesoscale distribution and abundance: results and implications of research during the BIOMASS Programme. In: El-Sayed SZ (ed) Southern Ocean ecology: the BIOMASS perspective. Cambridge University Press, pp 129–144Google Scholar
  20. Fraser WR, Hofmann EE (2003) A predator’s perspective on causal links between climate change, physical forcing and ecosystem response. Marine ecology-progress series 265:1–15Google Scholar
  21. Furness RW, Tasker ML (2000) Seabird–fishery interactions:quantifying the sensitivity of seabirds to reductions in sandeel abundance, and identification of key areas for sensitive seabirds in the North Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 202:253–264Google Scholar
  22. Gon O, Heemstra PC (1990) Fishes of the Southern Ocean, 1st edn. JLB Smith Institute, Grahamstown, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  23. Hamer KC, Monaghan P, Uttley JD, Walton P, Burns MD (1993) The influence of food supply on the breeding ecology of kittiwakes Rissa tridactyla in Shetland. Ibis 135:255–263Google Scholar
  24. Hecht T (1987) A guide to the otoliths of Southern Ocean fishes. S Afr J Antarc Res 17:1–87Google Scholar
  25. Hill HJ (1990) A new method for the measurement of Antarctic krill Euphausia superba Dana from predator food samples. Pol Biol 10:317–320Google Scholar
  26. Irvine LG, Clarke JR, Kerry KR (2000) Low breeding success of the Adélie penguin at Bechervaise Island in the 1998/99 season. CCAMLR Science 7:151–167Google Scholar
  27. Jansen JK, Boveng PL, Bengtson JL (1998) Foraging modes of chinstrap penguins: contrasts between day and night. Mar Eco Prog Ser 165:161–172Google Scholar
  28. King JC (1994) Recent climate variability in the vicinity of the Antarctic Peninsula. International J Climat 14:357–369Google Scholar
  29. Lishman GS (1985a) The comparative breeding biology of Adélie and chinstrap penguins Pygoscelis adeliae and Pygoscelis antarctica at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands. Ibis 127:84–99Google Scholar
  30. Lishman GS (1985b) The food and feeding ecology of Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) and chinstrap penguins (Pygoscelis antarctica) at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands. J Zool Lond 205:245–263Google Scholar
  31. Loeb V, Siegel V, HolmHansen O, Hewitt R, Fraser W, Trivelpiece W, Trivelpiece S (1997) Effects of sea-ice extent and krill or salp dominance on the Antarctic food web. Nature 387:897–900Google Scholar
  32. Loeb V, Borberg J, Clark K, Force M, Gong N, Harps K, Jenkins A, Lipsky J, Fowley R (2001) Net sampling: krill and zooplankton. NOAA Fisheries AMLR 2000/01 Field Season Report swfsc.ucsd.edu/antarctica.htmGoogle Scholar
  33. Lynnes AS, Reid K, Croxall JP, Trathan PN (2002) Conflict or coexistence? Foraging distribution and competition for prey between Adélie and chinstrap penguins. Mar Biol 141:1165–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Makarov RR, Denys CJ (1981) Stages of sexual maturity of Euphausia superba Dana. SCAR, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Monaghan P, Uttley JD, Burns MD, Thaine C, Blackwood J (1989) The relationship between food supply, reproductive effort and breeding success in Arctic Terns Sterna paradisaea. J Anim Ecol 58:261–274Google Scholar
  36. Montevecchi WA, Birt VL, Cairns DK (1988) Dietary changes of seabirds associated with local fisheries failures. Biol Oceanog 5:153–161Google Scholar
  37. Murphy EJ, Reid K (2001) Biological processes generating fluctuations in large scale ecosystems: modelling Southern Ocean krill population dynamics. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 217:175–189Google Scholar
  38. Murphy EJ, Clarke A, Symon C, Priddle J (1995) Temporal variation in Antarctic sea-ice: analysis of a long-term fast-ice record from the South Orkney Islands. Deep-Sea Res 42:1045–1062Google Scholar
  39. Osman LP, Hucke-Gaete R, Moreno CA, Torres D (2004) Feeding ecology of Antarctic fur seals at Cape Shirreff, South Shetlands, Antarctica. Pol Biol 27:92–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Quetin LB, Ross RM (2003) Episodic recruitment in Antarctic krill Euphausia superba in the Palmer LTER study region. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 259:185–200Google Scholar
  41. Reid K (1996) A guide to the use of otoliths in the study of predators at South Georgia. British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, p 40Google Scholar
  42. Reid K, Croxall JP (2001) Environmental response of upper trophic-level predators reveals a system change in an Antarctic marine ecosystem. Proc Roy Soc Lond Ser B 268:377–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reid K, Trathan PN, Croxall JP, Hill HJ (1996) Krill caught by predators and nets: differences between species and techniques. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 140:13–20Google Scholar
  44. Reid K, Watkins JL, Croxall JP, Murphy EJ (1999) Krill population dynamics at South Georgia 1991–1997, based on data from predators and nets. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 177:103–114Google Scholar
  45. Reid K, Murphy EJ, Loeb V, Hewitt RP (2002) Krill population dynamics in the Scotia Sea: variability in growth and mortality within a single population. J Mar Sys 36:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reid K, Jessopp MJ, Barrett M, Kawaguchi S, Siegel S, Goebel M (2004) Widening the net -spatio-temporal variability in the krill population structure across the Scotia Sea. Deep Sea ResGoogle Scholar
  47. Rindorf A, Wanless S, Harris MP (2000) Effects of changes in sandeel availability on the reproductive output of seabirds. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 202:241–252Google Scholar
  48. Rombola E, Marschoff E, Coria N (2003) Comparative study of the effects of the late pack-ice break-off on chinstrap and Adélie penguins’ diet and reproductive success at Laurie Island, South Orkney Islands, Antarctica. Pol Biol 26:41–48Google Scholar
  49. Sladen WJL (1955) Some aspects of the behaviour of the Adélie and chinstrap penguins. In: Acta XI Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici, Basel 1954, pp 241–247Google Scholar
  50. Takahashi A, Dunn MJ, Trathan PN, Sato K, Naito Y, Croxall JP (2003) Foraging strategies of chinstrap penguins at Signy Island, Antarctica: importance of benthic feeding on Antarctic krill. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 250:279–289Google Scholar
  51. Volkman NJ, Presler P, Trivelpiece W (1980) Diets of pygoscelid penguins at King George Island, Antarctica. Condor 82:373–378Google Scholar
  52. Watanuki Y, Kato A, Mori Y, Naito Y (1993) Diving performance of Adélie penguins in relation to food availability in fast sea-ice areas–comparison between years. J Anim Ecol 62:634–646Google Scholar
  53. Wienecke BC, Lawless R, Rodary D, Bost CA, Thomson R, Pauly T, Robertson G, Kerry KR, Le Maho Y (2000) Adélie penguin foraging behaviour and krill abundance along the Wilkes and Adelie land coasts, Antarctica. Deep Sea Res Part II 47:2573–2587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wilson RP (1984) An improved stomach pump for penguins and other seabirds. J Field Orn 55:109–112Google Scholar
  55. Woehler EJ (1993) The distribution and abundance of Antarctic and sub-Antarctic Penguins SCAR, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.British Antarctic SurveyNatural Environment Research CouncilCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations