Polar Biology

, Volume 27, Issue 7, pp 399–408 | Cite as

Metabolic recovery of continental antarctic cryptogams after winter

  • M. Schlensog
  • S. Pannewitz
  • T. G. A. Green
  • B. Schroeter
Original Paper

Abstract

The activation of metabolism after the winter period was investigated in several mosses and lichens in continental Antarctica. Thalli that were still in their over-wintering inactive state in early spring were sprayed artificially and the time-dependent activation of photosystem II (PSII), carbon fixation and respiration was determined using gas exchange and chlorophyll a fluorescence techniques. The investigated lichens recovered PSII activity almost completely within the first few minutes and gross photosynthesis was fully reactivated within a few hours. In contrast, photosynthesis took much longer to recover in mosses, which could indicate a general difference between the green-algal symbionts in lichens and moss chloroplasts. Only small and quickly reversible increased rates of respiration were observed for the foliose lichen Umbilicaria aprina from a more xeric habitat. In contrast, species occurring near persistent meltwater, such as the moss Bryum subrotundifolium and the lichen Physcia caesia, had highly increased respiration rates that were maintained for several days after activation. Calculation of the carbon balances indicated that the activation pattern strongly dictated the length of time before a carbon gain was achieved. It appears that the differences in recovery reflect the water relations of the main growth period in summer.

References

  1. Bewley JD (1979) Physiological aspects of desiccation tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 30:195–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bewley JD (1995) Physiological aspects of desiccation tolerance: a retrospect. Int J Plant Sci 156:393–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown D, MacFarlane JD, Kershaw KA (1983) Physiological–environmental interactions in lichens XVI: a re-examination of resaturation respiration phenomena. New Phytol 93:237–246Google Scholar
  4. Csintalan Z, Takacs Z, Proctor MCF, Lichtenthaler HK, Tuba Z (1998) Desiccation and rehydration responses of desiccation tolerant moss and lichen species from a temperate semidesert grassland. J Hattori Bot Lab 84:71–80Google Scholar
  5. Csintalan Z, Proctor MCF, Tuba Z (1999) Chlorophyll fluorescence during drying and rehydration in the mosses Rhytidiadelphus loreus (Hedw.) Warnst., Anomodon viticulosus (Hedw.) Hook. & Tayl. and Grimmia pulvinata (Hedw.) Sm. Ann Bot 84:235–244Google Scholar
  6. Davey MC (1997a) Effects of continuous and repeated dehydration on carbon fixation by bryophytes from the maritime Antarctic. Oecologia 110:25–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davey MC (1997b) Effects of short-term dehydration and rehydration on photosynthesis and respiration by antarctic bryophytes. Environ Exp Bot 37:187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davey MC, Rothery P (1996) Seasonal variation in respiratory and photosynthetic parameters in three mosses from the maritime Antarctic. Ann Bot 78:719–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dilks TJK, Proctor MCF (1974) The pattern of recovery of bryophytes after desiccation. J Bryol 8:97–115Google Scholar
  10. Dilks TJK, Proctor MCF (1976a) Effects of intermittent desiccation on bryophytes. J Bryol 9:249–264Google Scholar
  11. Dilks TJK, Proctor MCF (1976b) Seasonal variation in desiccation tolerance in some British bryophytes. J Bryol 9:239–247Google Scholar
  12. Ensgraber A (1954) Über den Einfluß der Antrocknung auf die Assimilation und Atmung von Moosen und Flechten. Flora 141:432–475Google Scholar
  13. Farrar JF, Smith DC (1976) Ecological physiology of the lichen Hypogymnia physodes. III. The importance of the rewetting phase. New Phytol 77:115–125Google Scholar
  14. Gannutz TP (1969) Effects of environmental extremes on lichens. In: Werner RG (ed) Colloque sur les lichéns et la symbiose lichenique. Societé Botanique de France, Paris, pp 169–179Google Scholar
  15. Green TGA, Lange OL (1994) Photosynthesis in poikilohydric plants: a comparison of lichens and bryophytes. In: Schulze E-D, Caldwell MC (eds) Ecophysiology of photosynthesis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 319–341Google Scholar
  16. Green TGA, Kilian E, Lange OL (1991) Pseudocyphellaria dissimilis: a desiccation-sensitive, highly shade-adapted lichen from New Zealand. Oecologia 85:498–503Google Scholar
  17. Green TGA, Schroeter B, Sancho LG (1999) Plant life in Antarctica. In: Pugnaire FI, Valladares F (eds) Handbook of functional plant ecology. Dekker, Basel, pp 495–543Google Scholar
  18. Hartung W, Schiller P, Dietz K-J (1998) Physiology of poikilohydric plants. Prog Bot 59:299–327Google Scholar
  19. Heber U, Bilger W, Bligny R, Lange OL (2000) Phototolerance of lichens, mosses and higher plants in an alpine environment: analysis of photoreactions. Planta 211:770–780CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hicklenton PR, Oechel WC (1976) Physiological aspects of the ecology of Dicranum fuscescens in the subarctic. I. Acclimation and acclimation potential of CO2 exchange in relation to habitat, light, and temperature. Can J Bot 54:1104–1119Google Scholar
  21. Hinshiri HM, Proctor MCF (1971) The effect of desiccation on subsequent assimilation and respiration of the bryophytes Anomodon viticulosus and Porella platyphylla. New Phytol 70:527–538Google Scholar
  22. Ingram J, Bartels D (1996) The molecular basis of dehydration tolerance in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 47:377–403Google Scholar
  23. Kappen L (1988) Ecophysiological relationships in different climatic regions. In: Galun M (ed) CRC handbook of lichenology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 37–100Google Scholar
  24. Kappen L (1993) Lichens in the Antarctic region. In: Friedmann EI (ed) Antarctic microbiology. Wiley, Mannheim, pp 433–490Google Scholar
  25. Kappen L (2000) Some aspects of the great success of lichens in Antarctica. Antarct Sci 12:314–324Google Scholar
  26. Kappen L, Valladares F (1999) Opportunistic growth and desiccation tolerance: the ecological success of poikilohydrous autotrophs. In: Pugnaire FI, Valladares F (eds) Handbook of functional plant ecology. Dekker, Basel, pp 9–80Google Scholar
  27. Kappen L, Smith RIL, Meyer M (1989) Carbon dioxide exchange of two ecodemes of Schistidium antarctici in continental Antarctica. Polar Biol 9:415–422Google Scholar
  28. Lange OL (1965) Der CO2-Gaswechsel von Flechten bei tiefen Temperaturen. Planta 64:1–19Google Scholar
  29. Lange OL (1969) CO2-Gaswechsel von Moosen nach Wasserdampfaufnahme aus dem Luftraum. Planta 89:90–94Google Scholar
  30. Lange OL, Bilger W, Rimke S, Schreiber U (1989) Chlorophyll fluorescence of lichens containing green and blue-green algae during hydration by water vapour uptake and by addition of liquid water. Bot Acta 102:306–313Google Scholar
  31. Lange OL, Green TGA, Heber U (2001) Hydration-dependent photosynthetic production of lichens: what do laboratory studies tell us about field performance. J Exp Bot 52:2033–2042PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Larson DW (1978) Patterns of lichen photosynthesis and respiration following prolonged frozen storage. Can J Bot 56:2119–2123Google Scholar
  33. Larson DW (1989) The impact of ten years at −20°C on gas exchange in five lichen species. Oecologia 78:87–92Google Scholar
  34. Larson DW, Kershaw KA (1975a) Acclimation of arctic lichens. Nature 254:421–423PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Larson DW, Kershaw KA (1975b) Studies on lichen-dominated systems. XIII. Seasonal and geographical variation of net CO2 exchange of Alectoria ochroleuca. Can J Bot 53:2598–2607Google Scholar
  36. Larson DW, Kershaw KA (1975c) Studies on lichen-dominated systems. XVI. Comparative patterns of net CO2 exchange in Cetraria nivalis and Alectoria sarmentosa collected from a raised-beach ridge. Can J Bot 53:2884–2892Google Scholar
  37. Oechel WC (1976) Seasonal patterns of temperature response of CO2 flux and acclimation in arctic mosses growing in situ. Photosynthetica 10:447–456Google Scholar
  38. Oechel WC, Sveinbjörnsson B (1978) Primary production progresses in the arctic bryophytes at Barrow, Alaska. In: Tieszen LL (ed) Vegetation and production ecology of an alaskan arctic tundra. (Ecological studies 29) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 269-298Google Scholar
  39. Oliver MJ, Bewley JD (1997) Desiccation-tolerance of plant tissues: a mechanistic overview. Hortic Rev 18:171–213Google Scholar
  40. Palmqvist K (2000) Tansley review no. 117: carbon economy in lichens. New Phytol 148:11–36Google Scholar
  41. Pannewitz S, Schlensog M, Green TGA, Sancho LG, Schroeter B (2003) Are lichens active under snow in continental Antarctica? Oecologia 135:30–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Proctor MCF (2000) Physiological ecology. In: Shaw AJ, Goffinet B (eds) Bryophyte biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 225–247Google Scholar
  43. Proctor MCF, Smirnoff N (2000) Rapid recovery of photosystems on rewetting desiccation-tolerant mosses: chlorophyll fluorescence and inhibitor experiments. J Exp Bot 51:1695–1704CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Ried A (1960) Thallusbau und Assimilationshaushalt von Laub- und Krustenflechten. Biol Zentralbl 79:129–151Google Scholar
  45. Scheidegger C, Frey B, Schroeter B (1997) Cellular water uptake, translocation and PSII activation during rehydration of desiccated Lobaria pulmonaria and Nephroma bellum. In: Kappen L (ed) New species and novel aspects in ecology and physiology of lichens. (In honour of O.L. Lange) Bornträger Verlagsbuchhandlung, Berlin, pp 105–117Google Scholar
  46. Schroeter B, Scheidegger C (1995) Water relations in lichens at subzero temperatures: structural changes and carbon dioxide exchange in the lichen Umbilicaria aprina from continental Antarctica. New Phytol 131:273–285Google Scholar
  47. Schroeter B, Kappen L, Moldaenke C (1991) Continuous in situ recording of the photosynthetic activity of Antarctic lichens—established methods and a new approach. Lichenologist 23:253–265Google Scholar
  48. Schroeter B, Green TGA, Kappen L, Seppelt RD (1994) Carbon dioxide exchange at subzero temperatures. Field measurements on Umbilicaria aprina in Antarctica. Cryptogam Bot 4:233–241Google Scholar
  49. Schroeter B, Kappen L, Green TGA, Seppelt RD (1997a) Lichens and the Antarctic environment: effects of temperature and water availability on photosynthesis. In: Lyons WB, Howard-Williams C, Hawes I (eds) Ecosystem processes in Antarctic ice-free landscapes. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 103–117Google Scholar
  50. Schroeter B, Schulz F, Kappen L (1997b) Hydration related spatial and temporal variation of photosynthetic activity in Antarctic lichens. In: Battaglia B, Valencia J, Walton DWH (eds) Antarctic communities. Species, structure and survival. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 221–225Google Scholar
  51. Schroeter B, Sancho LG, Valladares F (1999) In situ comparison of daily photosynthetic activity patterns of saxicolous lichens and mosses in Sierra de Guadarrama, Central Spain. Bryologist 102:623–633Google Scholar
  52. Smith DC, Molesworth S (1973) Lichen physiology. XIII. Effects of rewetting dry lichens. New Phytol 72:525–533Google Scholar
  53. Tuba Z, Csintalan Z, Proctor CF (1996) Photosynthetic responses of a moss, Tortula ruralis ssp. ruralis, and the lichens Cladonia convoluta and C. furcata to water deficit and short periods of desiccation, and their ecophysiological significance: a baseline study at present-day CO2 concentration. New Phytol 133:353–361Google Scholar
  54. Wharton DA (1997) Survival of low temperatures by the Antarctic nematode Panagrolaimus davidi. In: Lyons WB, Howard-Williams C, Hawes I (eds) Ecosystem processes in Antarctic ice-free landscapes. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 57–60Google Scholar
  55. Wharton DA, Block W (1997) Differential scanning calorimetry studies on an Antarctic nematode (Panagrolaimus davidi) which survives intracellular freezing. Cryobiology 34:114–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Schlensog
    • 1
    • 3
  • S. Pannewitz
    • 1
  • T. G. A. Green
    • 2
  • B. Schroeter
    • 1
  1. 1.Botanical InstituteUniversity of KielKielGermany
  2. 2.Biological SciencesWaikato UniversityHamiltonNew Zealand
  3. 3.MünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations